Blog

Frontend vs Backend

On the Web: Frontend vs Backend

It’s time for another technical discussion. This is a rather pleasant subject called the frontend. In small steps, I’ll try to explain what you might know from estimation. For starters, basic concepts.

 

What is it about?

Creating web applications, in simple words – websites. After typing in a specific web address, the site you are looking for appears and all you see and all you can click on is the frontend. Some websites can be breathtaking: containing beautiful fonts, colours, graphics, animations, drop-down menus, transparency, and other wonders.

However, it’s not all about the looks but above all about making it useful and user-friendly.

Maybe some of you, get annoyed that you can’t find something on the site or one of the buttons doesn’t work. You click and… no effect… almost makes you throw the PC out the window…No? Okay, maybe I’m the only one who gets carried away sometimes.

 

Let’s move on…

You could say that the pages are saved in HTML format and stored on web servers. Sounds a bit archaic. Those times are behind us, so it sounds better when I say that pages are dynamically generated by web servers. To read them correctly, we use browsers: Google Chrome, FireFox, Opera, Safari etc.

There is also a kind of a “back” of a website, called the backend.

We can’t see that but it’s actually here where all the data is stored. It works with the database and other applications to download the requested information to the frontend. So, if a particular page freezes, is slow or is not efficient, I don’t know… we can’t log in and so on, so there was an error, in that case the appropriate specialist must check what went wrong, what “broke” in the code.

Real-life situation.

Imagine we’re planning on buying plane tickets. We type in the address in the browser, go to the website that interests us. Next, we search for the flight and fill in the following: departure date, arrival date, time, destination, etc.

By clicking “search”, something happens that we are not able to see. The frontend connects to the backend, which pulls out specific information stored there.

When I first tried to understand the subject, the association with the restaurant came to mind. As a frontend I imagined the part where we sit comfortably at the table, choose a dish from the menu, and admire the design of the interior. When we are ready to place an order, the waiter comes up to us, writes everything down in his little notepad, and goes quickly, where our eye can no longer reach, to the back.

What is going on there on the backend, you can only imagine based on Ramsey’s Kitchen Nightmares. Or maybe it is better if we don’t. The order comes back to us in the form of a delicious meal, which looks almost perfect, as in the menu. Yummy.

Well, that’s my fantasy, although searching for real comparisons to some extent allows me to find a starting point for deeper analysis.

 

In Recruiting

Various specialists take part in creating the frontend of the websites. Some of them are responsible for the design, others take care of the graphics, usability, others for logical aspects of the application. They use various tools to a greater or lesser extent and it is worthwhile to analyze which they use before sending out an offer.

This will avoid finding later from the candidate that the proposed project deviates from their experience. And I know it from my personal experience. Onc time, I tried very hard to convince a UI Developer from desktop applications to cooperate on the position of JavaScript Developer. It did not go well!

 

Will a Larger Salary Make Your Candidates Happier?

Will a Larger Salary Make Your Candidates Happier?

When times are tough, we often believe the answer to all our problems is gaining more money. Recruiting often sees candidates bypass job descriptions with an eagerness to discover their potential new salary.

As humans, it is hard to not constantly be thinking about being better off and believing in the notion that wealth equates to happiness. To strengthen their skillset and CV, prospective job candidates may opt to take CPD accredited training courses. This allows candidates to ensure they maintain the professional standards of their qualifications since the course quality is independently verified. Furthermore, this will enable candidates to build their confidence and credibility. They are paving the way for future career progression. 

The CPD Standards Office collated data from the ONS to discover what and if industries show any correlation between average weekly earnings and employee happiness.

While money is, of course, important, we all need to earn enough to make ends meet, provide for our families, and occasionally splurge on a summer holiday or new frivolous treat. Does it really bring happiness?

When placing candidates within roles, they may have voiced their want to leave their current job due to unhappiness within the industry. Quite often, the first question on any job seekers’ lips is ‘what is the salary?’ Mistakenly believing they will automatically be happier if they are earning more, disregarding other factors that make up the job specification.

 

Are retail workers the happiest?

In this study, the industry with the highest correlation between their salaries and happiness work in retail, trade, and repairs. This correlation was a high of 92.01%. Although this does not necessarily mean retail workers are the most cheerful, however, it does show happiness increase through a higher wage.

Food services and accommodation, such as hotels, came second in the findings at 88.91%. Education comes in a close third at 88.59%. These industries are commonly lower-paid roles, so despite team members not being the most affluent, happiness can still increase with wages.

While these sectors can relish in pay rises and bonuses, others feel a little positive effect from their earning. Despite how much this may be.

Mining and quarrying displayed a minute correlation of just 22.15%. The obvious assumption from this can be the strenuous work these employees undertake that have both long and short-term implications on their physical health.

Although these roles often pay a higher than average salary, it appears this is no compensation for the ramifications on workers’ health. One could argue that no amount of money could increase the happiness levels in these roles.

It isn’t just diminished physical health that can cause low levels of happiness. Industries that are infamous for high levels of mental strain, such as the financial industry, also reported a very low correlation. Showing high wages is not compensation for what their minds could have to endure daily. 

 

Mental health and higher wages

General happiness could increase with a higher salary but with a negative mental health impact at the same time. Respondents in the survey ranked their level of anxiety, and the data cross-referenced to their average weekly earnings.

Retail, trade, and repairs came on top yet again, with a correlation of 74.52%. High happiness does not always equate to low levels of anxiety. In fact, one can possess the two emotions at the same time.

The higher we climb in our careers, the higher our responsibilities. This can often lead to heightened stress levels and bring more anxiety.

An interesting factor, the lowest reported correlation between anxiety and higher wages, was in the health and social work sector. This industry is known for high levels of stress, but it appears as wages increase, anxiety does not.

We could hypothesize that with experience comes better handling of the role, and as these stress levels were already present, to begin with, the individual sees little change in their attitude. 

 

Will bonuses bring happiness?

Regardless of the sector, employees are often awarded bonuses for the same reasons. This could be a reward for meeting targets, exceptionally good work, or as compensation for a particularly difficult working period that employees handled.

In return, management teams hope this will boost productivity and improve staff morale. However, this appears not to be giving the results for which many employers may be hoping.

The highest correlation between happiness and bonuses was within the construction industry. This was still a meagre 41%.

We can speculate as to why this is. Perhaps the sum of these bonuses is not enough to change the attitude or happiness level of the employees. 

When there is an offer for performance-based bonuses, the strenuous work to achieve these targets could be high. Additionally, with mounting pressure to meet these targets, it may not justify the award.

 

Wage satisfaction

Here we look into the real question. Are those who are completely satisfied with their earnings able to lead a stress-free life thanks to their income? Those surveyed were not asked how much they earned, but rather whether they are happy with the income.

Those who stated they were completely satisfied with their income also report the highest correlation with anxiety levels at 65.68%. This doesn’t necessarily lead to these respondents earning highly, rather, they are satisfied with what they are paid.

When asked how they were managing financially, those who replied they were ‘living comfortably’ showed the highest correlation with anxiety at 89.97%. This reflects that higher earnings can equate to increased anxiety levels.

Once again, mining and quarrying scored the lowest of wage satisfaction at 9.28% alongside happiness levels. This reiterates that more money does not bring happiness in that sector.

When a candidate seems increasingly concerned about the offered wage, it is important to let them know that this is not the most crucial element of their job hunt especially if they are applying for a career that doesn’t correlate with their previous experience.

Are they just trying to seek happiness in their earnings? On the other hand, are they applying for a similar position to what they are in and simply looking for a higher wage in a new company? It is important to query them on their current role satisfaction, regardless of their wage.

Their current qualms with their career may not be eradicated simply due to higher earnings. Present these findings to them and make them aware that money can equal happiness, but only in certain industries, and they may have to sacrifice their mental health to achieve this by taking on more anxiety.

Candidate Segmentation and the CRM

Candidate Segmentation and the CRM

There are countless reasons to love your CRM as a talent acquisition professional.  There is an obsessive beauty in gathering leads for a specific industry or skill. As with any new toy however, you must use the system correctly to receive optimal results.  For those new to using a CRM, allow me to save you some time by sharing my own post-mortem.

 

Is it Too Late to Bring Back Manila File Folders?

Visualize a CRM like an old school manila file folder, there is something to be said for doing a task the old-fashioned way.  Prior to an ATS or CRM, a Recruiter would file resumes away by location, job, or skill set – all manually.  Offices housed giant walls of file drawers, each labeled and filed haphazardly. You could spend all day laboriously searching for the right person, usually alphabetically, sorting thru resumes one-by-one.  The benefit was you could leave no stone unturned; the bad news was it literally would take you all day to do it.  Fortunately, the modern CRM of today allows us to create virtual file folders that make finding the right candidate a snap.

 

What is a Segment?

In order to take advantage of the automation a CRM brings; we must segment our passive candidates.  Segmenting just means “divide”.  Candidates are in inventory that need to be divided into smaller parts to leverage recruitment marketing campaigns and communication. The art of being organized in a CRM starts with these virtual folder divisions.  There are CRM’s that work entirely with talent network pools.  Those pools serve as folders.  But segmenting candidates by talent network pools isn’t enough. Imagine filling 1500 jobs a year and a CRM only offering you eight folders to store them in.  That’s a big fat – no sale.  If your CRM works this way, you will need to push your vendor to provide you sub folders or additional ways to segment your prospects.

Segmenting your candidates by location or license/certification makes sense, you may even be doing that now.  But how else can you divide and store a candidate for quick retrieval later?

 

Some Segmenting Considerations:

Candidates by Relocation

Create a folder for those who will relocate, and those who won’t. You can further segment candidates out by noting which locations a person would relocate to, but I find that tedious.  Keep good notes and track the where and when of relocation in each candidates file. Relocation is all about timing, being able to communicate with those candidates till the time is right is a competitive advantage.

Candidates by Rejection Reason

I have targeted email campaigns for candidates, by rejection reason.  If a candidate tells me they are on a contract till December, then slamming them with jobs right now will just frustrate them.  I note if the candidate is interested, and I set up a multi-channel cadence to stay in touch till their contract is complete.  You can have separate segments for a myriad of rejection reasons – “just started a new job”, “happy in current role”, “can’t meet salary requirements”, etc.…  Setting up candidates by rejection helps align future recruitment marketing campaign messaging. It is more than just a time saver, it helps create personal conversations with your leads.

Candidates by Event

If you have been Recruiting for a while, you have attended events.  You meet a candidate at a job fair, they pique your interest, but the timing isn’t right.  Three months later an opportunity arises, and you think, “ughhh, what’s the name of that lady I met three months ago? She had red hair, about five feet five inches, had glasses….”  I am sure I’ve had a few missed connections in the past, before the CRM existed.  If you keep a folder for the specific event and date (depending on how you recall events), the candidate will be much easier to find.

 

Final Thoughts

As Recruiters and Sourcers, we are only as good as our inventory.  And our inventory is only as good as it is organized. How do you think Amazon keeps track of every single item it sells?  They do it with strong inventory software.  The CRM will manage our inventory of candidates by every imaginable differentiator, we just need to know how to set up the organizational system.  Creating segments is personal. However, it works for you, is best, but test yourself.  Have a mini hackathon.  Set out to search for a specific candidate in your CRM.  If it takes you more than five minutes to find the right person, your segmenting process need work.  Best of luck and happy hunting.

Recruiting Automation Technology Poised to Grow Post-Covid

Recruiting Automation Technology Poised to Grow Post-COVID

As employers in the country start to shift their thoughts to a return to work, a new way of recruiting is poised to gain momentum. I am speaking about the adoption of more recruiting automation technology into the recruiting and hiring process.

Thousands of recruiters were laid off. Which, will likely lead companies to implement more automation strategies throughout their business including the talent suite. Many internal recruiters will need a more efficient way to sort through a potential avalanche of applications. In order to maintain a positive candidate experience.

 

Improve Efficiency

Brendan Cruickshank, an executive with text recruiting platform Emissary. Says his team is seeing a number of employers looking to improve their department’s efficiency.

“I just had a Director of Talent call me this morning saying that their team was cut in half from 20 to 10 recruiters and they were looking for automated technology tools to bridge the gap”, he told me over a Slack exchange.

“We are seeing a lot of companies look at automated screening tools to help augment their recruitment efforts when they have seen a boost in business from Covid-19 as well as when they are seeing a negative impact.

Those companies in industries like grocery are looking at chatbots to handle the increased volume of applicants, while those companies whose teams are impacted need automation to do more with less.”

Having downtime is also spurring its adoption. Jessica Miller-Merrell from the Workology blog says TA teams finally have the time to explore more technology options.

“Right now TA teams are looking more at automation while they are experiencing less hiring reqs. I just talked to someone this morning about this very thing. Who works in talent acquisition at a 30,000 person company in aerospace”, she told me.

 

Do More With Less

Joss Leufrancois from the sourcing platform Visage, is even more bullish. As the economy reopens he told me by chat, “employers will need to hire at a faster pace in higher volume than before COVID for several months. They will need to do so with fewer resources.

Retail, hospitality, travel, and most industries have taken extreme measures to preserve cash. They no longer have enough TA headcounts and won’t be able to bring everybody back.”

He told me it’s a numbers game at this point. As an example, a retailer hiring 1,000/month pre-COVID needs to hire 6,000/month between Sept and Dec with 1/3rd of TA headcounts. How will they do it? Automation of Sourcing, screening, video interviewing, etc.

Recruiting automation technology used to be a choice, and is now a requirement. 

Theresa Nordstrom, a Candidate Attraction Consultant, thinks companies will need to become more efficient. “If they don’t they’ll have a more difficult time hiring. Because they won’t be able to sort through the applicants. Companies might say things like…oh we have lots more applicants so we don’t need as many recruiters. If the recruiting processes are locked down, the speed of hire is going to be an issue.”

 

The Good News

The good news for post-COVID hiring is there are enough tools in the market to help employers make the transition to a more automated recruiting funnel. I’ve heard that companies like Amazon have become masters at high volume hiring. One anecdotal story I heard about said the entire process took 18 minutes from start to finish. 

At the end, the candidate obtains a QR code and instructions on where to go for processing as a new hire. This is the new normal. 

Make no mistake, we are well on our way to a fully automated hiring process for many types of jobs. To most employers recruiting is still viewed as a cost center.  It’s going to be an interesting story to follow.

Recruitment Marketing: What is it and why should you care?

A company’s unique environment can allow them to be internally successful. Employee satisfaction is high and productivity follows suit. On the other hand, a company that does not offer an appealing “package” leads to employee dissatisfaction. And oftentimes can make the company fall behind their competitors. An employer brand, therefore, can make or break a company. So, what is an employer brand?

Employer brand is a combination of culture, compensation, benefits, work environment, and career that makes your company uniquely your company. For example, my employer has an employer brand of a small shop, data-driven talent acquisition company that strives to shape thought leaders of the industry. We are data nerds and proud of it.

I literally squealed the other day when I created formulas to aggregate our data in Google Sheets, it was the highlight of my day. We have the added bonus of receiving an honorary superhero name. Sourcers by day, Wonder Woman and Nightwing by night. Our schedules are pretty packed.

 

What we do

What we do is unique in the industry. We provide companies with market data that gives them transparency into our strategy and allows them to recreate our work themselves in the future. It’s pretty powerful stuff (get it?).

The data we provide gives clients insight into how many people appear in our searches (along with the boolean strings we run for each search). How different sourcing platforms compare against one another, how many candidates per search are a fit for the role. And updated contact and professional information on each candidate. 

From there, we offer a unique experience of DISC personality assessment focused messaging. Our messaging reflects our employer brand. Filled with memes, jokes, and data-driven insights. Wayne Tech’s employer brand is consistent through each stage of our process and fosters a healthy work environment.

In order for a company to be successful, they need to have an appealing and strong employer brand. But, what does employer brand matter if nobody knows about it? 

You guessed it. This is where recruitment marketing becomes important! Recruitment marketing is showing your employer brand through social media posts, company websites, blogs (wink, wink), podcasts, webinars, and more. Recruitment marketing gives your company a unique voice that drives home many initiatives. Like employee appreciation.

For example, companies can share content that resonates with their brand and promote current employees through showing support for their content, initiatives, and work. When potential candidates and clients see your recruitment marketing on their feeds and enjoy or relate to the content, they will remember your employer brand. 

 

Inbound Recruiting

The more content you post that resonates. The more likely you will be to drive business through attracting candidates and clients to you. Aka Inbound Recruiting.  Furthermore, your employees will appreciate the recognition and will be proud of the employer brand that they consider themselves a part of. When writing posts for Wayne Tech, I tend to imagine what phrasing would catch my interest in the content that I am posting. Because I am part of my company’s employer brand, the posts will attract folks who resonate with what we are doing and who we are as a company.

On the other hand, recruitment marketing can use the same voice to write job postings. Nobody likes to read the generic job description that contains only the bare necessities of what requirements a candidate needs to be successful at a job. Companies that show personality in job descriptions will attract the type of talent that fits the employer brand.

For example, some companies will include “perks” of the job, like pet of the month contests or monthly ping pong brackets to draw in candidates that align with their employer brand. Companies can continue to display their employer brand throughout the recruitment process, getting candidates excited about the potential of working with them.

Wayne Tech has an unconventional recruitment process. In fact, my first interview question was to say 3 fun things about myself over Facebook chat. I’m pretty sure Batman knew I was worth a longer conversation with when I told him my wingspan is nearly 6 feet, despite only being 5’6” tall.

Weird, I know. But very useful for reaching my k-cup pods in the very back of my pantry.

 

Messaging

Companies can even continue their recruitment marketing strategies with their messaging. As I mentioned earlier, we write our messaging for the different DISC personalities and fill them with memes, jokes, and data. That’s because as a company, we nerd out on all of those things. 

In my first week at Wayne Tech, we all took the DISC personality test and compared against one another’s tests to see how we could best work as one united team. We each value understanding one another’s work styles in order to be as efficient and supportive as possible. We also like to laugh, but who doesn’t?

 

Summary

In order to show candidates and clients who we are and what we do, we need to understand what our employer brand is. Creating a strong recruitment marketing strategy not only draws candidates and potential business to you but also builds a united front internally.

Employees will have a sense of passion for the company they represent and be driven to contribute in ways that they may not have if they did not feel that they were part of a unique employer brand. That being said, I’ve got to go grab my belt and boots, we just received a bat signal!

 

 

5 Ways to Decrease Hiring Costs When the Economy Reopens

5 Ways to Decrease Hiring Costs When the Economy Reopens

One of the critical challenges that businesses will face as the 2020 economy reopens will be recruiting and hiring new talent on tightened budgets. While the cost of hiring can be high, the price of bad employees, inadequate training, and low retention rates are higher. Here are five ways you can decrease hiring costs while improving your recruitment efforts. Use this to discover budget-friendly hiring techniques that don’t compromise the quality of your hiring process.

 

1. Promote from Within

The average cost of hiring a new employee is $3,000 – $5,000, according to a report from SHRM. When you promote from within, though, you can reduce overall hiring costs significantly by cutting expenses such as:

  • Posting job listings
  • Vetting potential candidates
  • Preliminary interviews
  • Background checks
  • Orientation and onboarding

Employees hired from within the company are typically already a fit with company culture and familiar with company policies, which saves time and money in the training process.

Additionally, employees promoted from within are 39 percent less likely to be fired from their jobs than external new hires.

 

2. Launch Employee Referral Programs

Hiring people referred by employees can reduce the time it takes to find and hire qualified candidates. For example, when someone vouches for a candidate, you can spend less time calling references, reduce the early stages of interviews, and simplify the background check process.

Employee referrals reduce the need for outside recruitment firms and lower employee turnover and reduce hiring costs.

To encourage employee referrals, companies can offer employees something as simple as social praise, which can help boost morale.

 

3. Utilize Hiring Software

Recruiting software helps cut hiring costs by expediting and automating several HR tasks, such as:

  • Posting and publishing to job boards
  • Spotting qualified applicants
  • Communicating with candidates
  • Scheduling interviews
  • Getting approvals

Some platforms, like Workable, provide remote hiring features such as video interviews and screening features.

Hiring software helps streamline the hiring process and decrease the costs of hiring new employees.

 

4. Automate Employee Onboarding

Hiring expenses don’t end with “you’re hired!” The process of orientation and training is challenging, so finding ways to cut onboarding expenses without compromising quality is essential for companies working on smaller budgets.

Onboarding software such as Bamboo, WorkBright, and GoCo help streamline processes to save time and money on orientation and training. For example, GoCo software provides robust HR features such as benefits enrollment and payroll deductions with employee self-service options.

Onboarding software can reduce the manpower needed to enroll and train new hires, creating significant savings for businesses looking to cut hiring costs.

 

5. Consider Implementing Mentorship Programs

When you’re working with a reduced budget, as many businesses will be for the rest of 2020, it’s critical to consider how you’ll retain the new employees that you hire. Losing one worker costs an average of $15,000.

U.S. employers lost $617 to employee turnover in 2018, and more than three-quarters of turnovers were preventable, according to the Work Institute.

Starting a workplace mentoring program is an excellent way to improve your workers’ job satisfaction, boost their job performance, and increase your employee retention rates

Setting up a mentoring program for your business doesn’t take a lot of time or expense, but can result in substantial savings for your company.

 

Employee Resources and HR Automation Decrease Hiring Costs

Unquestionably, most businesses will be looking to do more with less as the economy reopens.

By promoting from within, launching employee referral programs, and utilizing recruiting and onboarding software, these companies can cut costs without compromising on the quality of its hiring procedures.

HCM Talent Technology Roundup – June 5, 2020

Virtual Technology and Candidate Experience Aren’t the Same Things

How employers treat the workforce matters, even when the labor market’s crowded. Business conditions always change, after all, so today’s flood of job seekers could be next year’s drought. 

“Experience matters all of the time,” said Chad Sowash, co-host of Chad & Cheese: HR’s Most Dangerous Podcast. “The people who don’t understand that are the ones who don’t care about tomorrow. They just care about filling the requisition in front of them.” 

To offer a personal experience in the era of travel restrictions and social distancing, many employers have turned to virtual recruiting platforms. Providers such as Beamery, GR8 People, Paradox and Eightfold have expanded or enhanced their platforms to offer more virtual recruiting options. Meanwhile newcomers like Turazo have reported a noticeable uptick in interest since the pandemic began.

Adopting virtual solutions makes perfect sense. Digital conversations may not be the same as face-to-face interviews. But at least recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates can look each other in the eye.

But “solutions” aren’t “replacements.” Videoconferencing may have taken off, but webcams can accomplish only so much. For example, workers say their corporate culture has taken a beating over the last several months. Digital meetings, or not.

Research by the business ratings and review firm Clutch found that nearly two-thirds of employees—63%—spend less time socializing with colleagues either in-person or online since businesses moved them to remote work. And while employers have provided greater access to communications tools since March, they’ve failed to maintain the level of comradery and cohesion they had before the virus appeared.

 

Where’s the creativity?

It’s telling that 35% of companies haven’t hosted any kind of virtual social event since the pandemic began. And barely 20% have staged professional development events mixing social and business activities. All this indicates that organizations aren’t being particularly creative with their use of virtual communications.

Meetings? Sure. Happy hours to keep the team cohesive? Not so much.

Granted, Clutch’s research examined the impact of virtual solutions on culture, not the getting-to-know-you aspects of recruiting. But it does demonstrate that facilitating an effective culture—including a positive digital candidate experience—is about more than videoconferencing or collaboration technology.

Companies need proactive plans to build trust and accountability among both employees and candidates, executives say. As well as a strong digital infrastructure to support them. 

Those plans should consider the long term. The millions of people now on unemployment “are human beings and need to be treated like human beings,” Sowash said. Providing them with “the great experience they deserve as human beings” and keeping them out of a black hole isn’t only the right thing to do. It also aids the brand.

When candidates return to dominance in the labor market, and most recruiters agree that they will, the employers they favor will be the ones who treated them well. Even when they were the runner-up for a job.

“Focus on technologies that are going to provide a great experience and help candidates up-front from an expectation standpoint,” Sowash said. “Whether it’s matching or using conversational AI to do early screening, don’t waste their time.”

 

Doing Business

The pandemic is still driving activity throughout the recruiting space. Some of this week’s moves on the ground:  

iHire unveiled a service to help laid-off employees find new jobs. Virtual Outplacement Services combines personalized job-seeker support with iHire’s career-management platform. The company positions the outplacement services as being affordable and “compassionate.”  

Salary.com launched a tool to help employers organize and manage their job descriptions. Called Job Architect, it can be used as a standalone product or an integrated component of the company’s CompAnalyst platform.  

GR8 People extended its offer to new users for 60 days of free access to its virtual event solution. The feature connects an employer’s existing videoconferencing platform to GR8 People’s recruiting tools, allowing customers to avoid investing in capabilities they already have.

Snagajob released On Demand, a platform that allows employers to adjust their staffing needs in real-time. The product allows for “push-button” hiring and facilitates virtual interviews.

The new HackerRank Remote Hiring Solution enables remote end-to-end, skills-based hiring. It includes a virtual whiteboard capability, interview guidelines, an industry skills rubric, and interviewer scorecards.

Recruiting platform BountyJobs announced a partnership with employment screening company provider Crimcheck. BountyJobs said it has the largest partner network of any recruiting marketplace.

Remote Employees: A Study on Productivity, Perceptions, and Perks

Remote Employees: Productivity, Perceptions, and Perks

In an ever-changing digital workplace, the office itself may become the latest to go obsolete. Recent research suggests more than 40 percent of workers have worked remotely to some extent, and this telecommuting trend is only likely to intensify.

A growing number of corporations have embraced work-from-home options. Finding participating employees at least as productive as their in-office peers. Moreover, many professionals view working remotely as an important enticement when considering job prospects.

In the elusive search for a work-life balance, it helps to cut out the commute. Yet the realities of working from home remain largely unknown. What do employees actually do when liberated from the office environment? Do distractions crop up incessantly? Or are we actually more productive in the comfort of our own homes?

Let’s explore what working from home is really like. The data in the following study takes the experiences of over 1,000 workers in three categories. These are full-time remote employees, those who split work time between their home and the office, and professionals who work in the office exclusively. The data reveals the perks and problems remote workers encounter and compares their experience to that of their office counterparts.

Whether you already work remotely or simply envy those who do, you won’t want to miss this true view of working from home.

 

satisfaction by employee type

 

Balance beyond the office?

In many different areas, professionals who worked from home or split time between the home and office reported greater satisfaction than their in-office counterparts.

This trend was especially evident in matters relating to individual performance. Remote or split-time workers reported more satisfaction than in-office employees, with regard to pay, growth opportunities, and their jobs in general.

Results like these form the basis of the business case for offering work-from-home options. Multiple studies have found remote employees to be happier and more engaged after leaving the office setting.

Interestingly, however, a hybrid approach may be even more beneficial to workers than working exclusively at home. Work-life balance and family life satisfaction were best among the split-time cohort, for example. They were also most likely to feel employer appreciation.

Moreover, spending part of the week in the office may pay great dividends with colleagues. Split-timers felt most satisfied with their co-worker relationships. And, they were less likely than in-office workers to feel disconnected from fellow employees.

 

remote work perks

 

Remote work perks

Of the potential perks of going remote, work-from-home professionals were most grateful to forego the daily commute.

Time spent in traffic can add up quickly. The average American spends over 200 hours a year getting to work and back. So the emphasis on this benefit is understandable. Schedule flexibility proved nearly as important. More than half of remote workers identified this advantage as one of their favorite parts of working from home. This perk is often especially important to parents. For whom a rigid 9-to-5 schedule can impact child care.

Similarly, more than a quarter of remote workers appreciated the ability to stay home with kids or pets. Other favorite work-from-home perks included freedom from office frustrations. Many preferred less supervision and fewer interruptions. And others appreciated greater autonomy and an improved ability to focus on their work.

Other commonly cited benefits had very little to do with productivity. More than 10 percent said they loved sleeping longer and not getting dressed for work. A significant percentage also appreciated the chance to do other things while working. So what kind of unsanctioned multitasking are work-from-home professionals most tempted to try?

 

on the clock distractions

 

Time-wasting temptations

The data suggests it’s tough to resist the allure of entertainment. More than three-quarters of work-from-home employees watched TV on the clock at least once, and nearly 17 percent reported always doing so. To be fair, some workers may simply use the TV as a source of white noise. And, offices are often full of counterproductive background sounds as well.

A more concerning drain on productivity might be personal tasks. Nearly two-thirds of workers admitted checking items off their personal to-do lists while getting paid.

In a similar vein, over 35 percent left home to run errands during working hours. And another 20 percent left the house without telling a supervisor. Respondents also reported various forms of self-care during working hours. Roughly a third exercised on the clock, and almost 45 percent took a shower.

Perhaps work-from-home professionals felt compelled to shower midday because they skipped cleaning up in the morning. Where the majority of office and split-time workers regularly showered before starting work, just 43 percent of remote workers did so. Remote workers were significantly less likely to brush their teeth before getting to work as well.

 

perceptions of remote employees

 

Out-of-the-office envy?

Working from home may be increasingly commonplace, but professionals who do so can still arouse strong feelings. When asked about remote workers’ happiness, in comparison to their in-office counterparts, over 78 percent say that professionals who work from home are happier.

The work ethics of remote workers were also highly regarded. Only about a quarter of respondents feel that work-from-home professionals are less driven or hardworking than their in-office peers.

The question of productivity raised more division, however. Thirty-seven percent felt remote workers were less productive, nearly 36 percent said they were more productive, and almost 28 percent deemed them equal to in-office employees on this count.

Recent studies suggest working from home may actually boost productivity in some cases, but given the data about unsanctioned activities on the clock, it’s easy to see why opinions to the contrary continue.

Interestingly, a third of respondents said remote workers were more necessary than in-office employees. This finding could reflect who gets to go remote. Perhaps highly valued professionals have more power to negotiate work-from-home arrangements.

 

 

Productivity parallels

Although office, split-time, and work-from-home professionals spent similar amounts of time on the clock each day, remote workers reported being slightly more productive on average.

Experts have suggested many reasons that professionals who work from home may actually be more industrious. Including the theory that remote workers have more concern for the perception of unproductivity and overcompensate accordingly.

Employees who split their weeks between home and the office offered an interesting case study in contrasting opinions. Thirty-seven percent felt more productive when at home, whereas nearly as many said they got more done at the office.

Of course, a hybrid schedule also raises the question of where to work on each day of the week. Some suggest “work-from-home Wednesdays,” for example, explaining a mid-week change of pace works wonders for morale.

 

top work locations

 

Where they work

However you feel about traditional office environments, they’re built with work in mind. That’s not always the case at home. Remote employees may not have access to a proper work area and will resort to surfaces designed for other purposes. The kitchen counter was a popular desk alternative for professionals at home. Although many adopted a more casual approach, relaxing with their laptops on the couch or in bed instead.

Thankfully, 59 percent of at-home workers did not need these options, using a desk specifically devoted to their work. Or even creating a small home office.

Additionally, roughly 7 percent reported going to co-working spaces. A rapidly growing industry catering to remote workers in search of a sense of community. In fact, co-working’s rise suggests things can get a little lonely once workers go remote.

What do people miss most about the office once they leave it behind?

 

missing out

 

Office upsides

However liberating it may seem, remote work often takes an emotional toll according to respondents. Thirty-eight percent of at-home workers reporting missing being around other professionals and roughly 35 percent felt they were missing team camaraderie. Perhaps a lack of human contact explains why most remote workers reported feelings of loneliness during the workday. 

Moreover, 48 percent said they planned to return to an office environment at some time in the future. As more workers confront feelings of isolation related to working at home, many companies are struggling to maintain morale and engagement within their remote workforce.

Of course, some remote workers had more practical concerns, such as coffee at no cost or the ability to communicate effectively in conversation with co-workers. Nearly a quarter felt their opportunities for growth had been curtailed by working from home as well.

Still, a sizeable contingent of remote workers felt no regrets. More than 19 percent said they missed nothing about the office at all.

 

Making home “work”

These findings suggest that professionals who work from home are often as productive as their in-office peers and frequently more satisfied in many aspects of their professional lives. But the remote lifestyle’s pleasures can quickly become its pitfalls. When distractions beckon throughout the house, productivity can prove difficult.

Additionally, for all the frustrations of commuting and a rigid work schedule, the office entails real chances for human connection and colleague camaraderie.

While working from home is an opportunity valued by some, others may find it isolating. If remote work does sound appealing, however, your home will need to meet a new set of requirements. While the couch or kitchen table may suffice temporarily, you’ll probably yearn for more suitable working conditions over time.

Sourcing vs Artificial Intelligence – Who Will Prevail?

Sourcing vs AI – Who Will Prevail?

Artificial intelligence will replace Sourcers within five years. The battle will be sourcing vs AI, and AI will win. Unless Sourcers do something about it, that is.

I know the arguments. That a human being will always be necessary to plug and vet applicants when using Candidate Matching Artificial Intelligence software.  I know humans are a vital link to building candidate relationships.

The problem is Sourcers don’t have a voice when it comes to making purchasing decisions. Sourcers may end up as collateral damage to those executives unfamiliar within the space.

There are all sorts of Talent Acquisition artificial intelligence software products today. Most of us know about chatbots.  We use chatbots to help answer candidates’ simple everyday questions about the company and role. But there is also candidate matching software and candidate behavior software available right now.

This is not a thing of the future. It is here today. The validity of these technological advancements for talent acquisition is spot on, but not without some outliers. In review of one candidate matching behavior software, my results dubbed me as a person that doesn’t like conflict.

I double-dog-dare you to a fight to prove that AI wrong.

While another AI behavioral software picked out that I am a “sometimes friendly” type of person, which is so true. Sometimes.

Leaders will not be able to defend the return on investment for sourcing if metrics are not measured and socialized. Sure, we know anecdotally that Sourcers have intangible benefits for pipelining, but are we measuring it? Think about it from the perspective of a leader.

If a leader knows that artificial intelligence technology exists, that will scour the internet for talent and eliminate the need for a team of ten Sourcers, who wouldn’t be enticed?

So, what is to be done about it?

 

How to Avoid Being an AI Statistic

Celebrate Sourcing Wins

Even one hire in sourcing is a win.  Have a plan in place to celebrate every hire. Yes, I know it is a Sourcers job to fill positions, but it is not like I am asking to give out a participation trophy.

Have you seen the market lately?  It is superbly challenging to hire a person today. Unemployment is high, but skilled roles remain open.

And people are standing still. Who would take a move during this financial crisis and pandemic? Not me. So, celebrate the wins right now if you have them.

 

Track Each Source

There are many sourcing metrics to measure. Submit to recruiter, new candidates contacted, hires, response rates, etc. However, one of the most valuable measurements is the code “Sourced By.”  It is the single most persuasive piece of data to show the candidate wasn’t hired via a live person that provided the impetus for a candidate to apply online.

  • Your ATS should have a “Referred by Sourcer” source tracking code. This is the most vital action that can be done to give Sourcers credit for their work.
  • Sourcers should have the ability in the CRM to tag passive candidates by where they found the prospect.
  • Communicating that the source for a candidate was via Indeed isn’t enough. You should be able to differentiate if the person applied via Indeed or if they were uncovered by the Sourcer after a compelling text campaign. Be specific.
  • Did the Sourcer use a great Boolean string or some other deep dive tactic? Have a way to identify those situations.

 

Visualize Sourcing Data

Talent acquisition leaders rely on performance data that is downloaded from an ATS or CRM and converted to an Excel spreadsheet. And that is great. Excel is a TA Leaders friend.

But it doesn’t always tell the story you want to convey. Our eyes are trained when we look at regular reports to go right to the bottom figures – percent loss, percent gain – fills – time to fill, etc. Avoid the “bottom line” trap and create a monthly or quarterly business review document with visualization for executives.

This executive summary is not a dashboard, rather, a one-page brief. It should be split into four or five parts with the most significant data that tells of your sourcing success. Perhaps your Sourcing team had a strong agency avoidance number this quarter. I’d represent that with an info-graphic and dollar amount.

If your Sourcers had a great quarter filling aged positions, or have superb customer surveys, represent that with an infographic percent of change.

Make it visual, show the strengths, and make it easy for leaders to see your worth.

In conclusion, with Sourcing vs AI, it is up to Sourcers and Sourcing leaders. They will need to solidify their position of masters over artificial intelligence.

Skip the anecdotal.  Know and share your successes. Your industry and fellow human beings are depending upon you to be heard.

Neurodiversity: Why You Should Recruit Autistic Employees

Most people don’t understand autism. The word itself is an umbrella term, referring to a complex spectrum of developmental disorders. Some forms are more severe than others, but there is a common thread that runs among the spectrum.

A typical person with autism might find it harder to socially interact and communicate with ‘neurotypical’ people. (People who do not have autism.)

Unfortunately, in the general confusion around what autism is, stigmas and negative stereotypes have influenced how society views it. The result is that, of the approximately 700,000 people living in Britain diagnosed with some form of autism, a scant 16% of them have full-time employment.

 

Why are autistic workers undervalued?

The negativity surrounding autism probably stems from the general tendency for autistic persons to be extra-sensitive to their surroundings. Such sensitivities can make office environments or work commutes stressful and difficult.

Even the brightness of typical office lights and background noise can add to the discomfort. Therefore, with all this information, hiring managers and employers might regard autistic workers as unreliable, inconvenient, and maybe even a costly and unnecessary expense.

The trouble with these conceptions is they are just not true.

In most cases, autistic people make for brilliant employees who regularly outperform their neuro-typical peers. In addition, as there are literally hundreds of thousands of autistic men and women not working, they currently represent a huge resource of untapped talent.

 

The unique advantages of autistic ‘neurodiversity’

Autistic people have no shortage of valuable traits and most businesses would jump at the chance to recruit them. If only they knew about them. One trait is that autistic people tend to have very large IQs, and they often have skills in areas where there are already marketplace skills shortages.

Obviously, every autistic person is individual and different, like the whole of society. But together the autistic community generally tends to think in ways that are different from the rest of the population. This is the essence of neurodiversity.

Autistic people process more information and faster than neuro-typical people. This allows them to demonstrate incredible attention to detail, excellent pattern-recognition, and excelled error detection skills, along with a very good logical analysis.

Autistic people also demonstrate what is known as “hyperfocus” or “hyper-systemizing.” Meaning, they can work and concentrate closely on complex projects for lengthy time periods without losing concentration or easily distracted.

There is no denying that hyperfocus is a highly sought after and valuable skill. Particularly within the tech, engineering, and construction industries.

Another big difference is that autistic people tend to consider problems from the bottom up, whereas neuro-typical people tend to start from the top down. While the top-down approach is considered standard, it is often corrupted by confirmation bias and ambiguous conclusions.

The bottom-up approach involves considering all of the information first, before coming to a conclusion. Yes, the bottom-up approach takes more time. But the results are often much better and less biased.

Having a mix of autistic and neuro-typical employees gives managers more options. It allows them to choose whether they want an exact, detailed approach to a problem. Or conversely, a faster and more creative one.

 

Working with autistic employees

A popular theory in academia is that people with autism have heavier and more interconnected brains. This can greatly enhance cognitive power. The trade-off is that some autistic people can struggle with social interaction.

But with a little training, this does not have to be a problem. Autistic people often require extremely precise communication, with unambiguous and detailed instructions. For example, if you were to show a spreadsheet to a person with autism and ask their opinion on it, they are likely to say something akin to “that is a spreadsheet”.

But if you detail very clearly and specifically what it is you want them to look at and interpret, you will likely be rewarded with a great logical analysis.

This may require some minor training in communication and awareness. But this is an expense that is only likely to benefit all other employees in the business as well. Improved communications between employees is only ever a positive and never an impediment.

 

Hiring autistic workers, and making your business more neurodiverse

Given the brilliance that autistic people often demonstrate when it comes to cognitive and problem-solving, who wouldn’t want to hire more of them? That being said, it takes a slightly different approach to determine to successfully hire autistic individuals.

Firstly, write your job description in a very clear, precise, and unambiguous way. Remember, autistic candidates need to know exactly what is needed of them to know if they are right for the role.

Second, the standard high-stress job interview process needs to change. They are extra uncomfortable for autistic people because job interviews mostly assess social skills.

To test an autistic individual, it is better to have them non-verbally demonstrate their technical and cognitive skills. You can still ask questions of course. But try to do so informally.

Finally, you may need to make some environmental adjustments to your office or workplace. As a lot of autistic candidates prefer to work in quieter and less bright environments. But most importantly, people with autism need acceptance and some flexibility. Particularly, if the commute at rush hour can make them uncomfortable.

In the greater picture, however, these are all very minor and inexpensive changes to make.

An autistic employee on the team could make a tremendous difference to your business’s problem-solving capabilities, general output, and project deliverance.

Sourcing Data Scientists

Sourcing Data scientists

The world is awash with a lot of data. Much of this data is unstructured. Some of it has structure, but to analyze the data would require the development and implementation of an appropriate model, and to come up with meaningful insights out of the data is where the challenge lies. This is where the data scientist’s role comes in handy.

Recruiters in general will navigate Linkedin as the first port of call to find data scientists, but there are sources where they can find relevant prospects to explore further.

The following are a few platforms worth further explorations.

 

Kaggle

Kaggle, owned by Google, is a large online community of 1M+ data scientists, statisticians, and machine learning practitioners. Additionally, they are novices through more experienced levels. Companies run competitions on this platform, offering big prizes of up to $100,000. And, maybe hire the winners from time to time.

Kaggle has a ranking system described here and an illustration of it is as follows. Notice Gold, silver and Bronze medals and the total points is what makes an individual stand out from the rest.

 

 

Since the ranking information is quite structured, utilize DataMiner or similar scraping software to select the required information to be exported to Excel for outreach marketing.

A Kaggle profile generally will list the following:

  • Name
  • Brief information on the individual
  • Location
  • A link to a personal website or Linkedin etc (sometimes)
  • Competitions Ranking (if applicable)
  • Contribution to datasets
  • Notebooks expertise
  • Discussion expertise
  • Followers
  • Sometimes a bio if you are lucky

 

 

Example search strings you can employ:

 

AICrowd

Another worthwhile data science competition platform includes AICrowd.  Their motto is to enable data science experts and enthusiasts to solve real-world problems, through collaborative challenges.

 

 

They have a leaderboard with the top 100 users ranked. Some of the user profiles have names, location, and sometimes a bio as illustrated below:

 

 

Zindi

If you have Africa based hiring requirements, then Zindi could be the hunting ground for your pursuits. Zindi hosts an entire data science ecosystem of scientists, engineers, academics, companies, NGOs, governments, and institutions focused on solving Africa’s most pressing problems.

They work with companies, non-profit organizations, and government institutions to develop, curate, and prepare data-driven challenges. Solutions are automatically ranked by the accuracy achieved. Zindi also has a leaderboard points-based ranking system of its users in terms of top challenges.

A typical Zindi profile lists the following as illustrated below:

  • Photograph
  • Spoken Languages (an unusual category)
  • Tech language
  • Location
  • Bio (sometimes)
  • The competitions that the individual participated in
  • Discussion forum contributions

 

 

An example search string to find data scientists in Nigeria one could employ is:

 

Innocentive

Innocentive is a US-based platform that focuses primarily on real problems dealing with life sciences as well as other industries.

They have 390,000+ Solvers from 190+ countries.  With 60% educated to Master’s level or above in their network, and have run 2,000+ Challenges, received 162,000+ Proposed Solutions and awarded $20M worth prizes so far.

Innocentive has a Top Solvers list going back up to the year 2015. However, the public profiles display very little information apart from the occasional photo and location. You cannot view the full profile without registration.

There is a section of profiles listed under “winning solvers” going back to 2015 but very little information is accessible.

 

 

CrowdAnalytix

CrowdAnalytix is an end-to-end platform for developing and deploying AI and Data Science solutions and while building solutions. Basically, they leverage a network of 24,000 data scientists.

An X-ray search of the website site:crowdanalytix.com inurl:contests leaderboard gives a list of the contests. And, upon clicking a contest, information about the winners and leaderboard are available. From time to time you will luck out, and a bio of the individual is visible.

CrowdAnalytix additionally has a Twitter handle using which one can find the followers of this platform.

 

Conclusion

To sum it up, the sky is the limit to search for data science professionals. Recruiters would be well advised to look out for upcoming platforms where the relevant professionals congregate, contribute, and are making a name for themselves.

Understanding Hiring Funnel Metrics Can Land You Your Next Hire

Understanding Hiring Funnel Metrics Can Land You Your Next Hire

We thought recruiting was tough just a few months ago when unemployment was at a record low. Recruiters can now expect an influx of applications as offices reopen and the economy moves into recovery mode. Before relationship-building with candidates begins, you’ll need to understand hiring funnel metrics and why your ATS can be your greatest sidekick during this time.

 

Impressions

Gathering impressions and being aware of your job position comes first. You can promote it on social media, through emails, or on job boards such as Indeed or LinkedIn. It’s said that you need 500 impressions to make one hire. That means you’ll have to rely on your ATS connecting to outside sources.

Before technology, word-of-mouth hiring or an ad in the newspaper worked just fine. The digital age brought unique challenges and benefits to gathering job impressions. With powerful search engines and job sites, it is easier than ever to find jobs around the world. It’s the recruiter’s job to attract the right people to a position so they move on to the application process.

 

Applications

For most job seekers, the application process is the most exhausting part of the job hunt, so they can be very selective of which positions they apply for. In 2017, there was a 12% conversion rate from viewer to applicant, and 60% of applicants quit in the middle of a job application because it was too tedious.

Adjust the length of the application process based on the position you’re recruiting for. If you’re hiring for multiple cashier positions at a retail store, make the applications short and sweet. Leave lengthier applications for upper-level management and leadership roles.

 

Screening

There are a variety of ways screening can be conducted. This could mean skills assessments, submitting work samples, or even having a phone interview. About 20% of all applicants are screened. If you’re manually screening applicants, that could take as long as 12-24 hours (1-2 hours per applicant for 12 applicants). This means, if you have other HR duties, the process could take as long as one week.

Not to mention the price of developing screening methods, conducting them, having phone interviews, and more. If you have a pool of likely candidates, this process could take even longer. With an ATS, you can create and send screening questions or assessments, and then receive an easy-to-understand report, saving you valuable time and resources.

 

Interviews

Interviews can be the lengthiest and most time-consuming part of the hiring funnel for recruiters due to the number of people participating in the interviews. On average, it takes five interviews to make one hire, which is about 42% of those screened.

For interviews, collect questions from the position’s team to ensure the candidate is a good fit for a job you may be unfamiliar with. You can use your ATS to schedule interviews and keep notes of your interviewees.

 

HIRE!

Generally, it takes three offers to make one hire. This means candidates decline the offer one-third of the time.

This last step is the most simple to define but often one of the most tedious! You can use information previously received from the applicant during the application and screening processes to develop a personnel file. You can also use an ATS, such as BrightMove, to create Internal Career Portals. This helps promote succession planning and upward mobility for your current employees.

All in all, there are many numbers and figures involved in the hiring funnel, but by understanding them, you’re able to understand and predict candidate behavior. With so many duties and responsibilities during the recruiting process, you can make your potential and current employee information work for you.

HCM Talent Technology Roundup – May 27, 2020

U.S. Workers Stay Put… And Seek Second Incomes

The COVID-19 pandemic has made American workers conservative. Most of them plan to stay where they are since they don’t believe new jobs are waiting for them.

That doesn’t mean they’re content. Nearly half of them plan to look for a second source of income. In fact, two new surveys—one from outsourcing firm Yoh and the other from recruiting technology provider Jobvite—paint a sobering picture of the U.S. workforce. Which now includes more than 38 million unemployed people.

Jobvite’s 2020 Job Seeker Nation Report found that 46% of workers need additional income to supplement their main job’s pay. Evidence of the financial toll imposed by the pandemic. But worse than that, 19% of the workers surveyed say they, or an immediate family member, have gone without food for 24 hours because they didn’t have the money to buy any.

It’s not surprising, then, that 78% of Americans plan to sit tight, as Yoh found. Especially when more than 69% don’t believe they could find a new position if they looked.

That doesn’t mean workers will stay where they are under any and all circumstances, however. More than two-thirds of those 44 and younger (69%) and 55% of their older colleagues would change jobs if they thought their employer wasn’t doing enough to keep them safe.

 

What Candidates are Looking For

If they do look for a new job, expect candidates to still ask questions about how a position will fit with their overall goals. Jobvite said career growth is still the most important consideration in their decision-making process, cited by 56% of workers. That’s followed by compensation (54%), healthcare and retirement benefits (49%), and the ability to work remotely (33%).  

What’s not clear is whether workplace safety is as important to talent acquisition as it is to retention. But it’s worth noting that a full 50% of workers told PwC that they’d stay away from their employer’s facilities because of COVID-19 fears. At the same time, 24 percent won’t use public transportation for their commute.

Employers seem to understand the workforce’s nervousness. According to Gartner, 64% of HR executives are giving the employee experience a higher priority than they did before the pandemic. 

Making reality match their aspirations may be difficult. As Gartner HR Practice Vice President Elisabeth Joyce said, “The return to the workplace is not just an operational challenge, it’s a human challenge.” 

Employers need to be transparent about their decision-making, Joyce said. And for reasons that go beyond keeping current workers on board. How employees react to a company’s reopening will become known outside of the organization. So the decisions leadership makes now will “define their employment brand for the next several years.”  

 

Doing Business

On the ground, the pandemic continues to drive activity throughout the recruiting space. Some of this week’s moves:  

JazzHR released a white-label platform that allows partners to incorporate its ATS into their own solutions. The company hopes the move will help its customers and partners “strengthen client and candidate relationships, while also creating a new recurring revenue stream,” said CEO Pete Lamson.

Jobvite rolled out an integration with Ultimate Software that allows employers to better connect talent acquisition data to post-hire performance. Jobvite already had an integration with Ultimate Software’s UltiPro, but describes the new link as a “standard, repeatable and cost-effective” connection with UltiPro Onboarding.  

DaXtra Technologies announced an integration with Medworking’s medical job boards Radworking.com, Hospitalistworking.com, and Cardioworking.com. The companies said combining DaXtra’s medical skills taxonomies and search capabilities will help employers find medical candidates more quickly.  

Hourly and shift-job board Snagajob released On Demand, a new platform that allows employers to adjust their staffing needs in real-time. The product allows for “push-button” hiring and can virtual interviews.

HackerRank launched the HackerRank Remote Hiring Solution, which enables end-to-end skills-based hiring remotely. The product includes a virtual whiteboard capability, interview guidelines, an industry skills rubric, and interviewer scorecards.

What’s Next for AI Recruiting? In Conversation with Benjamin Gillman of myInterview

What’s Next for AI Recruiting?

Over the last few years, the growing presence of AI in recruiting has been hotly debated. Almost everyone in the talent acquisition space has an opinion on the technology, its seemingly rapid development, and what AI might do for candidates and employers alike.

Then, COVID-19 showed up. The hiring landscape changed overnight. Now, as businesses begin to reopen, many are wondering how recruiting will function on the other side of the pandemic – and where AI will factor into the process.

 

In Conversation with Benjamin Gillman of myInterview

AI recruiting benjamin gillmanBenjamin Gillman, co-founder of myInterview, is taking a pragmatic stance. Explaining the technology’s use thus far, “We typically see AI used at the top of the recruitment funnel, because this is the point when the quantity of data can be overwhelming. The role of the tools is to gather and distill candidate information against the job description to surface the most appropriate talent.” 

Here, Gillman’s thinking echoes much of what was said and written about pre-COVID-19. The application of AI near the top of the funnel leads to increased efficiency and time savings for recruiters. Able to spend less energy on administrative tasks and more on building relationships with candidates. A logical rationale based on where the world was coming into 2020. But what about now? 

 

AI In the Short Term

Gillman continues, “I think that AI, at least in the next few years, is going to be assisting us more than it’s going to be disrupting us. The tasks that we were going to be doing are going to look similar, except that we will get a lot more information, a lot more data than we had previously. We’re also going to be doing this work in a different format than we’re used to. Instead of picking up the phone, we’re going to have virtual calls, which will be automated. Instead of face-to-face interviews, it’s going to be video. Then instead of us analyzing what we’re hearing, we’re going to receive a transcript of what the candidate said.”

Even so, Gillman doesn’t believe that final selection can be replaced entirely by AI, especially in this new job market, noting that “this is a people business and it’s run by people-people.” Instead, he stays firm that the next few years will be spent refining AI more than anything else. 

 

Candidate Heavy Market

He shares, “We’re moving towards a very candidates-heavy market. Unfortunately, we have high unemployment. That means that employers need to find a way to find talent. And candidates need a way to be able to get in front of employers efficiently. We’re going to be seeing technology coming through in this regard to assist both parties on both sides of the table to bring the process forward. Video is the obvious move here because it’s so accessible now with mobile technology. This is a very simple way that people are comfortable with, and it also brings that human element into the process instead of it just being fully data-centric.”

That’s not to say that Gillman doesn’t see the value in the data. He certainly does, particularly for companies operating with limited staff in place. In these instances, Gillman points to candidate engagement and time to hire as key metrics to measure. Especially given the number of qualified candidates on the market. Who might otherwise still be employed if not for COVID-19.

In fact, he feels this is the time to be investing more in long-term strategic adoptions to ensure companies are enticing the best candidates. 

 

The Future of AI Recruiting

As for the future. Gillman seems sure that AI will continue to play a critical role in the recruiting process. Albeit one that might remain top of the funnel for the time being. In that capacity, AI will support the needs of talent acquisition teams, managing an influx of candidates during recovery.

Doing so might even help improve technology’s reputation. One that Gillman says remains misunderstood, “This isn’t some magic that is going to be matching candidates with jobs. Our approach is to take as much information as possible from video and display it in the right way.”  

He concludes, “No algorithm is currently mature enough to replace the human mind. It can only learn from data that’s been collected along the way. It’s very important that we take AI for what it is, and position it for what it is, and embrace it, because it can create efficiencies and help us to be making better hiring decisions. With the correct AI tools, the impact will be positive and we will see steady growth, especially in the near term.” 

Opening the Kimono on Natural Language

Opening the Kimono on Natural Language 

The working world is rife with clichés, repeated ad nauseam in meetings, thought leadership, and the like. You hear things about peeling back the layers and thinking outside the box. You get advice about why you should always be closing even when you don’t work in sales, why you should run things up the flagpole before you circle back and avoid boiling the ocean in favor of going for the low-hanging fruit.

Because if all else fails, you can always do more with less because, well, it is what it is. Raising the bar that frequently is downright exhausting. Not to mention, people don’t actually talk like that IRL (cough, in real life). 

For sourcing and recruiting, this is an important distinction, given the rise of natural language processing. For anyone unfamiliar, NLP is the computer’s ability to understand human language as it’s spoken or written. It’s commonly associated with artificial intelligence, though the concept behind natural language relates to several other disciplines.

In recruiting specifically, natural language dates back years and years to include discussions around semantic search. For as long as sourcers and recruiters have used computers to try and find candidates has the way humans that talk and think played a role in the process. It’s only recently that became tied into automation.

Here’s how it all works: 

 

Natural Language

For starters, let’s spend another moment or two on the idea of natural language. What this really means is the ordinary language that people use. Unlike controlled or constructed languages, natural language is ever-evolving and shifting, influenced by individual factors as well as regional and global ones.

It is what makes a candidate born and raised in one locale that much different from one who moves frequently. It is also subject to change based on one’s immediate surroundings like the everyday clichés mentioned earlier. Few of us talk to our friends about breaking down the silos while out at the bar. 

 

Natural Language Processing

NLP attempts to take the wild, unwieldy words and phrases that people use and examine the information provided. Because computers are machines, the “process” means encoding natural language into a form that the computer understands.

Along the way, it looks at multiple factors like speech and discourse, as well as syntax and semantics. It’s looking at word choice and part of speech and running sentiment analysis to figure out if what a candidate said is what they meant. Do you remember trying to diagram a sentence in school? That’s what it’s doing.

As a result, the technology is able to process large amounts of data efficiently, while picking up on patterns in a way that humans might not.  

 

Voice Assistants

Reverse engineer NLP and you start to get new applications like Siri and Alexa. A few years back, the whole space got flustered by the idea that someday they might source candidates using a voice assistant. But as Tim Sackett of HRU Technical Resources put it, “Anything is viable to recruit, but is it realistic? People keep telling me they recruit off Twitter, but realistically what percentage of hires do we really hire off Twitter? Almost none. ‘Siri, can you find me a Java Developer in Kalamazoo, MI?’ Maybe she’ll be able to, but I’m doubting it will ever be a serious source.” He’s not wrong. 

 

Chatbots

Where NLP does provide a serious source is chatbots. Those tiny little computer-powered popup windows that think they talk like a human. Maybe you can tell the difference. Maybe you can’t. Some have cute names, while others come with shiny, happy faces.

What you don’t see are the algorithms, sifting through the data collected, growing smarter and more sophisticated as a result. Leveraging another NLP method known as knowledge resources, chatbots can store information in an ontology. That’s a fancy way of saying they know how things relate. So, if a candidate tells the chatbot that they have X degree and Y skill, it determines that they might be a good fit for Z job.

This is just scratching the surface of NLP and its many uses. Like a lengthy Boolean search, it’s possible to write rules and redefine what natural language means before it even reaches the computer. For sourcing and recruiting, NLP is still in its infancy. Maybe one of these days, someone will develop a fantastic voice assistant app that can garner more than a few two-star reviews.

Until then, it’s important just to know what natural language is and where it sits in the recruiting landscape, both for manual sourcing and automated initiatives. Par for the course.