Blog

Procrastination Nation: The Most Creative Ways To Kill Time At Work.

killing-timeBack when I was about 10 years old (or so), I used to tell my brother he was a superhero. Now, I’d like the record to show that this was in no way intended to be a compliment, but rather, a pun. Because his superhuman alter ego, the one he’d pretty much default to – when he got around to it, that is – was Procrastinator Man. Which, of course, I tried calling him in that weird 1930s newsreel announcer voice – “It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s…” I would then pause for effect and then finish way too late to be anything but annoying, just to get the point across.

A lot of people have these tales of their amazing family members who did stuff like graduate from Harvard after becoming a single mom at 15, or drove themselves to the ice rink at 5 AM every morning on their way to playing hockey in the Olympics.

Well, my brother probably could be one of those Chicken Soup for the Soul stories, but to say he was a procrastinator would be something of an understatement.

He was a talented kid, but the one talent that really stood out was his innate ability to avoid any type of work until it was actually over, and my having to bust my butt to make sure that ever happened, because I knew early on that if I expected any sort of help from that guy, I was kind of up shit creek.

Now, I’ve always been a pretty ambitious and driven person, an “overachiever” who never misses a deadline or passes up an opportunity. This has served me well; sadly, in the weird world of work I find myself in, actually being the one person who’s always on time has always proved to be a competitive advantage in an industry that’s inevitably, uh, fashionably late. I don’t know what it is, I’ve just always been that way.

Which is why, as you can imagine, I found my brother’s amazing ability to avoid doing any work whatsoever so incredibly frustrating. I would be there sweating my ass off hauling out garbage or up to my elbows in dish soap, and watch him “piddle” (as my oh so Southern mother would say) as he pretended to straighten out his video game collection or dust that one spot on the TV over and over as he watched whatever show happened to be on. Really, he’d resort to pretty desperate measures to avoid having anything to do with anything even remotely resembling that whole “work” thing.

Obviously, my brother was neither the first nor the last of my friends who could contend for the title of “World’s Worst Procrastinator,” particularly when I was in college and the only person who wouldn’t wait until the absolute last possible minute to get that paper or project done.

I was the one who could sleep before midterms and finals instead of having to pull an all nighter, because I was the one who chose to work instead of spending the semester smoking pot all day while polishing off cans of Natty Light until they dove out of that night’s dive bar du jour. The inevitable hangover the next day, of course, meant that doing anything but sleeping it off was out of the question, creating an insurmountable amount of work that would pile up until the last possible moment.

This personal preference for procrastination, unsurprisingly, has plagued me even as I’ve become experienced enough in the workforce to know better than to expect anyone else to get ahead of the work instead of apologizing for letting it pile up. The scary part is, and I know I’m aging myself a little bit here, is that I’m part of the generation that didn’t grow up as digital natives, and spent my formative years without unlimited text messaging or fast, reliable mobile internet access.

I know, I’m ancient, but you’d think that if anything my cohort would have been a little more reliable considering the fact that we didn’t have to deal with all the digital distractions that have made the procrastination problem infinitely worse, but I digress.

The Business of Avoiding Work.

150611-productivity_survey-mt-1118_7874412e9659768a1d387d182739dda6.nbcnews-ux-600-700My point is this: if you’ve ever worked in Corporate America, you know that you’ve got to get shit done on time, but most people don’t do a particularly good job with forward planning or the marathon approach to what often becomes an unnecessary sprint to crank out deliverables before the drop dead deadline date that they’ve known about for weeks or months ahead of time.

A new survey by CareerBuilder shows that as work cultures go, we truly are Procrastination Nation, and most of us put more work into avoiding work than the actual work itself probably entails, anyway. So if you think there’s nothing like the last minute, you’re far from alone – and that the most common productivity killers are so endemic that it’s easy to forget exactly how big a deal this trend is for the bigger business and bottom line picture.

As any HR lady will tell you, the rise of smartphones, endless access to memes, Buzzfeed quizzes and the frenetic pace of the half dozen social streams we’re constantly keeping up with has made it hard to keep up with work.

As CareerBuilder’s survey shows, the most common time killers among workers aren’t really that surprising – if you guessed texting, surfing the Internet or gossiping, good guess, and go you.

Now, since you’re reading this blog, you’re probably avoiding work by justifying this as “professional development” or “staying on top of industry trends,” which are fancy ways of saying reading this kind of stuff (God bless you all, by the way), and can appreciate the fact that pretty much everyone else in the office is, in fact, putting off work at this exact moment, too. Statistically speaking, that is.

Of course, while it’s so commonplace it’s become more or less a fact of working life, the fact is that distracted employees cost companies a ton of money and lost productivity – there’s even a creepy buzzword, “time theft,” which accurately reflects the actual costs to organizations everywhere. But there’s not a whole lot companies can do about it, since we need things like smartphones and internet access to do our jobs, which creates something of a corporate conundrum.

Since it’s called work for a reason, and it’s not nearly as much fun as Buzzfeed, frankly, so I don’t know of anyone who hasn’t fallen down some rat hole of disposable online content and burned precious hours perusing worthless crap. You know how you promise yourself you’re just going to read one more article, click one more link, and what starts as something to do right after lunch becomes looking up and realizing it’s time to go home. Oops.

The fact is that everyone is guilty of doing this at least a couple times, and most of us have figured out that it’s a bad habit – and also how to make up for the work we missed and get done what we’re supposed to do. Even if it means having to rush to beat a deadline and maybe spending some time away from those Reddit threads and Pinterest boards.

But there are some people whose propensity for procrastination leads to some pretty creative strategies for dodging deadlines and ducking deliverables. Seriously, this Careerbuilder survey shows that sometimes, the work done to miss work just isn’t worth the work, but your coworkers and colleagues are capable of doing some pretty weird shit for the sake of not doing shit.

The 6 Strangest Ways To Kill Time At Work.

Here are some of the strangest activities the CareerBuilder survey uncovered (along with a few of my personal favorites). And because you probably also have a tab opened to Buzzfeed, I threw on some .gifs to fuel your fix for content crack capable of cracking you up. These stories sure did:

1. An Employee Used The Bathroom Sink in the Office To Treat Himself To A Nice Sponge Bath.

tumblr_inline_np1n6sBr3c1tryws0_500

2. During one particularly entertaining video conference call, one employee shared his screen to reveal that he had been browsing for a mail order bride from the Ukraine instead of that Powerpoint presentation. 

tumblr_lwq30i2HEG1r8l2z6o1_r1_500

 

3. One employee admitted that he only watches Netflix at the office when he drinks vodka, so he only binge watches during working hours a couple days a week. Max.

crying-under-desk

 

4. One employee wanted to avoid having to spend an afternoon off site at a company meeting, so he did the only natural thing to do and slashed the tires on the cars of his coworkers, so they had no way of making the meeting, either.

funny-gif-tire-crab-running-away

 

5. An employee was out a little late the night before, so was relieved that he had found such a comfy couch to pass out on before having to go back to his desk. Unfortunately for him, he was rudely awakened by his CEO entering his office. Surprise!

 

 

200_s (1)

6. An employee decided to write some really, really disparaging posts about his company and its bullshit mandatory training on social media – right in the middle of his organization’s mandatory employee social media training. 

tumblr_moh0w5MPkw1s5fb0ko1_500

7. An employee sent some very explicit and inappropriate pictures of his, uh, total rewards package to a coworker with whom he was having a fling – only accidentally pressed that pesky ‘reply all’ button. 

c7j95oz

 

So if you’re feeling guilty for playing Candy Crush, just know that you’ve got some catching up to do if you want to truly rise to the procrastination occasion. Which, of course, defeats the purpose entirely. All I can say is, keep on keeping it weird, Corporate America.

What’s the weirdest thing you’ve ever seen a coworker doing at the office that’s completely idiotic, NSFW or just flat out hilarious? Let us know by leaving a comment below – c’mon, it’s a great way to kill time.

5 Steps for Using Geocoding for Social Recruiting on Twitter

Map Pin Showing location on Map. A Manual Version of geocoding

Twitter is a candidate sourcing resource that recruiters should not ignore. The complaint when using the Twitter search field is getting too much information or irrelevant data. Searching on Twitter takes a few extra steps to get quality results. A geocode search is an often underutilized tool that can help you recruit like a boss.

Wikipedia describes geocoding this way:

“Geocoding (sometimes called forward geocoding) is the process of enriching a description of a location, most typically a postal address or place name, with geographic coordinates from spatial reference data such as building polygons, land parcels, street addresses, postal codes (e.g. ZIP codes, CEDEX) and so on.”

Three steps to using geocoding for Twitter searches are:

  1. Find the Geocode
  2. Gather the average Boolean search information
  3. Create a Search String
  4. Enter your search string into the search area in Twitter
  5. Enjoy the fruit of your labor!

Let me show you geocoding in action. Let’s find a Recruiter in Dallas, Texas.

  1. Find the GeocodeScreenshot from MyGeoPositon.com

Every place on earth identifies to two simple numbers, the Longitude, and Latitude. There are a plethora of websites that will show you geocodes.   Texas A&M (gig ‘em) Geoservices has a complete list of where to go to find this information. By personal preference, I use “MyGeoPosition.com.” On MyGeoPosition.com, all you have to do is enter identifying information. You do not need to enter a complete physical address. Just enter as much information as you have. Odds are, you will not find someone in this exact location, so you will need to enter a mileage around the address you want to search. You can do this in kilometers or miles.

Dallas, TX = 32.7766640,-96.7969880

  1. Gather the average Boolean search information

For this example, we will be looking for a recruiter within 30 miles of Dallas. I don’t want to see tweets or accounts that have “jobs” in them.

  1. Create a Search String

For today’s purposes, the search string looks like this:

#Recruiter -jobs Geocode:32.7766640,-96.7969880,30mi

  1. Enter your search string into the search area in Twitter

Results:

screenshot1twitter

 

  1. Enjoy the fruit of your labor!

The default results will be “Top”, but you can look at search results for the most recent tweets within the “Live” section. You can also find “Accounts, photos, videos and more! Play around in the results area, you may find things you did not know you needed that are nearby such as conferences or meetups that can create even more leads.

Let’s dig even deeper. Dallas is a big place so searching within what longitude/latitude for “Dallas” still may find candidates that live in a non-commutable area. The best geocoding search method is using the complete address. Thanksgiving Square is a massive office building in Dallas. Let’s find potential candidates that live within 10 miles of the office of 1601 Elm St Dallas, TX 75201

Follow instructions in step one above however enter the particular address.

1601 Elm St Dallas, TX 75201 = 32.7819570,-96.7980960 . The search string will now look like this:

#Recruiter –jobs Geocode:32.7819570,-96.7980960,10mi

 Results:

Screenshotpic2

Don’t about using this for networking. For example, you are going to the SHRM conference in Las Vegas in 2015. I dare say that ALL meetings offer a customized hashtag. For the SHRM conference, it is #SHRM15. If you want to see if anyone from your area is going, the an example search string could be #SHRM Geocode:32.7819570,-96.7980960,50mi

Results:

Now I know some folks that are going to SHRM that I can connect with when I get there that are close to me is that I can continue the relationship when I come home.

It takes a few extra steps but with geocoding, you can narrow down twitters search results and make them more relevant to you.

 A few caveats:

While this is a great social recruiting and networking tool, there are quite a few limitations. Remember the search only works if the Twitter user has opted in to sharing location OR has added a precise location in their Twitter bio.

The other thing to remember is that if a person is tweeting from their cell phone or while at a conference, the tweet ties to their current location. So if they are in Las Vegas but live in Dallas, this search methodology will not work because the geocode will have to be in Vegas. You can use this to your advantage. For example, this particular week, the Talent42 conference is going on. If I am in Seattle attending this conference and want to see who is using the conference hashtag, in this case, #talent42, and are actually in Seattle with location on their cellphones here are the steps:

  • Search for the conference site. Ex: Bell Harbor Conference Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Enter conference address into geocode finder (I am using MyGeoposition.com.) (51.5033630,-0.1276250)
  • And search for Twitter users tweeting in this location. (#Talent42 Geocode:51.5033630,-0.1276250,50mi)

I know I am overstating this a bit but remember; this only works if they have the location enabled on their cell phone. I did not find any using the string above until I widened the search to 2000 miles. Even then, I only found one person. If the Twitter user entered location is Waco, TX and location services is off on my phone, my tweets will show as coming from Waco, TX. This feature is great for the privacy of users but not for sourcers.

Another point to consider is that information in a user’s profile may not be entirely accurate. Gahlord Dewald, of in the thoughtfaucet.com explains this beautifully.

“…if someone in Manchester UK fills out their profile info with “Manchester” their tweets can show up in a geocode Twitter search around the coordinates of Manchester NH USA. This can introduce noise into the data.”

I have written a great deal of information, but drastic talent shortage calls for drastic measures. Become the best recruiter you can be by educating yourself on recruiting tools you may not have thought of previously.

About the Author:

Jackye Clayton is recognized as a people expert who puts the Human in HJackye Clayton Contributing Editor Recruiting Toolsuman Resources. An international trainer, she has traveled worldwide sharing her unique gifts in sourcing, recruiting and coaching. She offers various dynamic presentations on numerous topics related to leadership development, inclusionary culture development, team building and more.Her in-depth experience in working with top Fortune and Inc 500 clients and their employees has allowed her to create customized programs to coach, train and recruit top talent and inspire others to greatness.

Follow Jackye on Twitter @JackyeClayton or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Recruiters: Stop Talking And Learn How To Listen.

be quiet“Chasing a person doesn’t give you value or build values in you. You earn your value by chasing morality and practicing dignity.” – Shannon L. Alder

If we’ve met for longer than say, 30 seconds, you probably already know I like to talk and tell stories; after all, recruiting is all about creating the right narrative, and the gift of gab is truly one that keeps on giving in this crazy business of ours.

Now, while I tend to be a bit, well, self-deprecating, I will give myself a little credit. I’m a hell of a recruiter – and have a career’s worth of results to back me up.

And looking back at it all, I realize that when we talk about being an “experienced” recruiter, we’re really just talking about the crazy stories of dealing with insane candidates, masochistic hiring managers and crappy clients – these are the stories that aren’t only worth sharing, but the ones that really provide the opportunities for learning and developing new skills, talent acquisition approaches and staffing strategies.

That’s why I like sharing them with you – I’ve dealt with enough crazy over the course of my career (and made enough mistakes, Lord knows) to at least provide a laugh, and hopefully, a learning opportunity.

Either way, it provides me a platform to pontificate and make a point, and if there’s one thing I’ve learned you need in this industry, it’s an outlet.

Once Upon A Time…

images (8)Some of the best stories I have started back during the nascent days of my recruiting career, back when I was working the desk at a small staffing agency in Phoenix. Which, as you can imagine, provided more than its pure share of craziness.

I still had a lot to figure out, but knew just enough about recruiting to be dangerous, which led me to my second job, after a rival agency got tired of losing candidates to me and decided to make me an offer I can’t refuse.

Which was pretty flattering for a rookie recruiter, if nothing else – and I decided it might be worth checking out, even though I was perfectly happy where I was, beating the crap out of the guys currently courting me. I wasn’t really too excited about sleeping with the enemy, but if they wanted to buy me a steak dinner and some wine before I shot them down, I figured it was worth at least a first date.

It’s Not You. Actually, It Is.

its-not-you-its-meOf course, when the owner and my ostensible future recruiting manager called me in for one of those infamous “opportunity” conversations, I came in cocky, overly arrogant and forgetting, for a second, that in fact I was just another green third party recruiter making it all up as I went along.

They wanted me, after all, and I went into this conversation not realizing that talking shop with a direct competitor isn’t exactly kosher in this industry.

Particularly since I had one of those pesky non-competes in place, but that dense legal language was more easily annoyed than my ego. But this, uh, “learning opportunity” is a story for another day.

I ended up having my sense of self sufficiently stoked, and their sweet talk sufficiently compelling, to end up accepting the offer – and accepting a fairly fat signing bonus, to boot – and just like that, I found myself across town on the second stop in my recruiting journey. It was more or less same shit, different desk, but this time, the desk at least had a window, so I was happy. It doesn’t take much.

I would learn a lot at this particular agency, and the experiences there, and the friends I made, continue to stay with me, even after all these years. And I realized, like a lot of rookie recruiters, that no matter how much I thought I knew, I really knew nothing – something that became readily apparent my very first ever meeting my very first ever Monday morning at my new gig.

This being a bigger agency, I hadn’t had any experience with this type of meeting, which I found out at my new firm was the way they kicked off every week: an all hands gathering for all the recruiters in the company to go over all requisitions we were working on, the relative priority of each respective search (as defined by sales) and where each of our submittals or slates stood in the process. This meeting was unusual, since the only accountability I had at the boutique firm I had come from was really to myself and my own wallet.

So, I did something I don’t usually do – being the new guy, and realizing I had only 6 months under my belt, which obviously paled in comparison to most of the recruiters in the room – I decided to just shut up and listen. Besides, I knew enough to know it wasn’t a good idea to get called out or make enemies my very first day. I laid low, and watched how everything played out. Needless to say, it was quite a scene.

Don’t Judge.

At this point, I think it’s apropos to put a little disclaimer here to make sure I’m making my M.O. clear. In fact, right now I know you’re probably snickering or wondering why I’m not watching Matlock or going out to Luby’s for the early bird special, like most cranky old dudes out there. So I’m not going to go too deep into the typically dry account manager updates, or the recruiters bragging about how much bank they’d rolled up on their most recent req. If you’ve been there (and most of us have), you’ve done that. It didn’t get interesting until we started talking about candidates – and I started hearing real recruiters giving real feedback for the first time.

It was then I learned that you can never really gauge anything about a company’s talent acquisition function until you see it through the filter of how they treat candidates, first. Back in the day, that wasn’t called “candidate experience,” it was just the stuff you did to make sure you kept new business and new referrals coming in. It wasn’t a theoretical discussion, it was a business necessity.

I know, I’m old school like that.

Candidate Development.

maxresdefault (4)After I had been on the job for a few weeks, I came to one of these meetings not to crow about my accomplishments, but rather, to try to get some help from my colleagues – the purported purpose of these meetings, after all, was getting help.

And even though I still thought I was a hot shot, I knew that in this case, it was desperately needed, because I had been banging my head against the wall for a few weeks on one of my open reqs and couldn’t figure out what the hell, exactly, I was doing wrong.

The role was for a developer ‘opportunity’ (used liberally) for a startup in town that wasn’t really well known enough to justify its obscene list of minimum basic requirements and annoying “preferred” experience (e.g. the type no one actually has).

It was not exactly the best developer role in the world, to be blunt – even calling it a “developer” was something of a misnomer, considering the position was mostly maintenance of shitty software and shittier systems. Now, it did have a few good things going for it – as even the worst positions do, as these are often the only salient selling points a recruiter has for positioning opportunities that are anything but.

For starters, their Class A office space occupied a prime location next to the nicest malls in town, and they were unique in offering some semblance of a 9-5 existence, meaning only a few short steps separated the office from the many happy hour choices at an office where there actually was the possibility of a happy hour. I’ll drink to that, and most candidates seemed to be OK with the possibility, too.

Take Carl. I had come across him and instantly thought he’d be a pretty great candidate for the role – as an added bonus, he was available, having just come off of his last contract. Score, right?

Carl and I already had a relationship developed as he explored opportunities, which made it easy to present him with this opportunity and overcome his objections about the position and the company. In other words, Carl was all but closed. I had done my job as a recruiter, right?

The rest was really just details, and rare is the recruiter who sweats those things.

Keeping It Real.

Carl wasn’t only sold on the company, I hadn’t sold him a bill of goods – he was fully aware of the fact that it was a six month gig cleaning up code, which is decidedly unsexy to most programmers with his background and experience. When he went in for the interview, I didn’t even think twice about it – at that point, I was on a hot streak, closing pretty much every deal I was involved in to date. Hell, my celebratory steak dinners I treated myself to when I made a placement had become a regular part of my diet.

This is why it seemed like a slap in the face when, after the interview, Carl turned down the offer outright after he nailed the interview. Didn’t even give me a chance to close him – he closed me down, first. This was my first rejection, so I wasn’t only hurt, but completely confused, too.

Now don’t get me wrong, I got shot down by candidates all day – I was an agency recruiter, after all – but when you actually get one to an offer, they become far more than a candidate. They’re a comrade in arms, someone who you’ve sunk as much time, effort and thought into their job search as they have – and here was the first one who betrayed what I had assumed, to then, was all recruiting really required.

What made this worse is that he didn’t even let me know why, exactly, he was no longer under consideration for the role, ignoring my many phone calls and increasingly desperate voicemails. Nothing. Just some generic e-mail telling me that he had “decided against taking the role.” That’s it? That’s all he had for me? How, I thought, could someone I’d put so much time into repay it like this – wasting not only my time, but my hiring managers, too.

Revenge is a dish, as they say, best served cold. And I guess whatever I’d done wrong in terms of candidate experience was catching up with me. I was a closer, and the pain of this particular rejection stung badly enough where I felt I needed to find out what the hell was wrong with me. What I learned has stayed with me to this day.

A Little Humility Goes A Long Ways.

get-over-yourselfThe recruiter who had originally presented Carl had worked with him previously, too – and this agency recruiter was sharp, with that well deserved swagger that you only get when you sell. When we started deconstructing what had gone wrong in that Monday morning meeting, I decided to deflect the blame, conveniently, on the candidate instead of owning that maybe I did something wrong.

This is the natural defense mechanism for most recruiters, after all.

So after I had finished lambasting his low character and poor communication style, I was expecting a pat on the back, not a slap on the face. But this other recruiter – Jason – looked at me like I was an idiot and told me precisely why Carl had turned me down cold. It was because he told Carl to do so.

I had spent so much time communicating with the candidate I failed to communicate with the very same people I was supposed to support, and he had two roles he was coaching Carl through, too – never realizing, of course, that the other guy the candidate was talking to was actually working at the same agency. These roles were full time, long term career opportunities – not a short term contract, like my role – and was dedicated to building new things, not just maintaining what others had already built.

He knew that these were the biggest drivers for Carl, even though, as Carl told me, he truly was open to considering my role – but only because he needed a gig, not because these were things he wanted or needed. I failed to understand not just the fact he was interested and available, but that didn’t necessarily make him a fit. I had fallen into a trap that too many recruiters get snared in – the cardinal sin of talent acquisition.

I had become complacent. I had forgotten who’s really in control during the recruiting process – it’s always the candidate, no matter what the circumstances might look like on the surface. Never judge a book by its cover, and never judge a candidate by their cover letter, as it were.

The Debrief.

a6445f43ba8a66430047a957b11a61e5Unlike my very first placement, Johnny, who I discussed in my last article, I had turned into some sort of machine, and my efficiency had become a bigger driver for me – the outcome – than the means that were the reason I had, to date, been so successful at hiring.

I had the hubris to believe I had become a good enough recruiter to stop sweating the small stuff, and that cost me big. The more experienced recruiter had been through this before, been burned, and learned the painful lesson I was just now coming to terms with: the cost of complacency.

He closed precisely because he never assumed he’d close, and this determined everything about his approach.

To his credit, the other recruiter didn’t hold my hubris against me, but he did show me that when I saw Carl as a bonus and a paycheck, the fact that he saw the candidate as more than a placement, but as a person who knew other people and could help him make other placements down the line meant that he would beat me – and most every other recruiter – every single time.

The recruiter who realizes they need the candidate worse than the candidate needs them realizes what it really takes to be a TOP RECRUITER, the kind who close, not the type who pose in front of Ferraris in Miami Beach and use #TheMovement as a hashtag instead of a silent motivation for moving the industry forward. It’s recruiters like my colleague, who thought enough of me to at least let me know why he won.

He won because he had enough experience to know enough to know contract developers were contract developers because they liked to get in and out of their projects; they went in, did the job, built the app and moved on. They were always looking for the next project, which meant they were always working with at least a couple recruiters.

They never had to look on job boards, because there were always recruiters out there who they could rely on for their next gig. So there was always going to be competition – and the other recruiter, knowing how arrogant I was, used my inexperience against me. He never forgot that he didn’t ever have a hire, and that the relationship was more important than the transaction.

Carl got the gig he wanted, and I got the lesson I deserved.

The Past is Prologue.

6a00e008d9a3f98834017ee8609979970dThe funny thing about recruiting is how easy it is to learn from, and make up for, your mistakes. They really are learning opportunities, you just have to treat them as such instead of blaming everyone but yourself for a candidate or offer not working out.

Remember: it’s a marathon, not a sprint. Approach it as such.

You see, after about a year, the other recruiter, as recruiters are wont to do, moved onto another role, this time as an internal recruiter – meaning that since Carl was under contract with us and this agency actually enforced its non-competes, he more or less had to work with me (or at least, the other recruiter wasn’t allowed to touch him).

And since, after a year, I knew Carl’s contract was winding down, I was determined to make good this time around. So, a little older and a whole lot wiser, I reached out to Carl again to see if he would mind meeting up and talking through his options for his next step. To my relief, he readily agreed.

This time, I didn’t present him with an opportunity. We talked about his needs, and his aspirations, and from there, formed a game plan. We stuck to it, and I found a formula that’s worked for me over literally thousands of subsequent searches. The candidate drives, and it’s your job to steer. No recruiter should ever forget this fact.

I got it right this time with Carl. I learned he had a baby on the way, and decided that he needed a little bit more stability than being a contract developer would afford him. He revealed he was finally ready to hang up his consulting spurs and find a role as a full time employee.

Of course, I was able to know him well enough to know when the right role came across my desk, and having listened, getting him through a process and to an offer was far easier knowing the opportunity was right, and right for him (not just for me and my placement fee). I’m not going to go into a whole lot more details than I already have, but what mattered most was, the next year, when I checked in on him after he had gotten the gig, he was happy.

He said thank you. He reinforced that he made the right decision, which is the ultimate validation that any recruiter can get, really.

I wanted to tell this true story not to be didactic, but because the only way to learn is by screwing up – and because I did, hopefully you don’t really have to.

I don’t think recruiting is actually about building that perfect Boolean string, or building a product that will somehow magically unearth that perfect JAVA developer for that role you’re so damn desperate to place. It’s about the scars you get in the battles that make all the difference when it comes to winning that whole “war for talent.”

Although I don’t really like that phrase. It’s never a war when you’re doing it for the right reasons, because you never have to fight when you’re doing recruiting right. #TrueStory

Derek ZellerAbout the Author: Derek Zeller draws from over 16 years in the recruiting industry. The last 11 years he has been involved with federal government recruiting specializing within the cleared Intel space under OFCCP compliance. Currently, he is a Senior Sourcing Recruiter at Microsoft via Search Wizards.

He has experience with both third party agency and in-house recruiting for multiple disciplines and technologies. Using out-of-the-box tactics and strategies to identify and engage talent, he has had significant experience in building referral and social media programs, the implementation of Applicant Tracking Systems, technology evaluation, and the development of sourcing, employment branding, military and college recruiting strategies.

You can read his thoughts on RecruitingDaily.com or Recruitingblogs.com or his own site Derdiver.com.  Derek currently lives in the DC area.

Yatedo: Profile Aggregation Meets Semantic Search: Updates

Yatedo made it’s debut on RecruitingTools last year in April 2014 when we shared a posting on a tool that has yet to gain significant popularity among the recruiting world, specifically in the US market. Yatedo is a profile aggregation tool which allows you to find and contact anyone on the web searching any keyword in a structured environment. Yatedo browses, reads, understands and extracts all existing public information on the entire web.

It structures the information in an easy to read and understand interface.

Yatedo_Talent

At the time we reviewed Yatedo last year we gave the tool a strong recommendation. There were some challenges so we’ve gone back to test their growth and this is what we’ve found.

We can start by saying that they’ve made significant enhancements to their platform. Last year we found the tool to provide accurate results but perform sluggish during peak search times. From 2014: [quote]The only major issue with the site’s capabilities seem to be its tendency to go over capacity during times of peak demands, and the site is often impossible to access due to too many users trying to access Yatedo simultaneously.[/quote].

Here are the enhancements we’ve seen and why we are calling this a winner for you to look at:

The returned results are far more accurate then we can remember. Previously you had the option to search keywords and location, but were often return results based on keywords. The location was often lost in the returned set of results. This has changed. The search results we’ve seen have been strong, and closely, not perfectly matched our query.Yatefo SEarch

The speed at which we can search (options, search interface and UX) the second time around has vastly improved. The interface has improved and the filtering options has been enhanced.

Yatedo, still loves to think. Only by way of our trusty stop watch app, we’ve seen a real time average of 4 to 6 seconds per filter update for each additional filter we added. This was not awful but it did kill the buzz of a greatly improved tool. Watching the circle twirl around is annoying when you have options that require no wait time.

Our recommendation:

Last year we told you [quote]Once Yatedo can figure out a similar fix, it should emerge as a major player within the people search and sourcing arena[/quote]

This year we are bullish on the fact that Yatedo has successful emerged into a viable application that may very well one day become part of your companies tool box. They still need to make a run at faster load times, but that should not deter you from taking a walk through demo.

Try Yatedo Talent Search here or simply run a regular search here

[youtube url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb-nLVNQ9rQ” width=”500″ height=”300″]

 

Summer Brand Camp: When Consumer And Employer Brands Collide.

2015-06-08_09-04-26I’m a conference skeptic, but in the first 15 minutes of Summer Brand Camp, they had me convinced this was going to be different — and it definitely delivered.

The event is focused on the intersection of consumer and employer brands — which is already unique — but the main focus of the content is purpose.

Most people already know the days of the “company men” are over and that employee loyalty is hard to come by. Consumer loyalty is just as tricky to earn.

Identifying and bottling purpose is more important than ever for attracting and keeping both customers and talent.

Summer Brand Camp: Top 6 Takeaways.

With the majority attendees representing the hospitality and foodservice industries, the conference focused on providing rich experiences to what has historically been considered a transactional space for both hires and buyers.

The content of the conference was really different than any I have seen before, so if you weren’t able to attend, have no fear — we’ll share some highlights from sessions that stood out for you here. You can also check the hashtag #SBrandCamp on Twitter to take a peek at what other attendees found valuable.

1. Help Employees Discover Their Purpose.

chilisAt the very least, with 24/7 connection to technology, we can say that the lines between our work and personal lives have blurred.

Chili’s Grill & Bar ambassadors Chris Ebbeler and Dom Perry shared some of the ways they focus on helping employees discover their purpose with a focus on celebrating health and wellness, sharing “love notes” with employees, and offering them unforgettable experiences like driving racecars.

Takeaway #1:

“Customers will never love a company until the employees love it first.” — Simon Sinek

2. Moments Matter.

CGn5Q7PUkAAG0kFWhether you work on the customer or candidate experience (or both), you’re likely noticing some trends that are highlighting the importance of moments.

Kyle Lacy brought focus to mobility, the collaborative economy, data at scale (big data), cloud computing, machine learning, and humanizing automation and the impact they are having on the marketplace bringing the focus back to experience and memorability.

Lacy asked the audience to remember the focus of their work is not the minutia, but that if you work in employment branding, you are an experience maker and manager.

Takeaway #2:

Companies like Google, Uber, and AirBnB are disrupting the marketplace by owning audiences and delivering them experiences that change the game.

3. Substance Beats Style.

CGqpyYaUYAA4qE5How many times have you heard, “People do business with people they like?” But today, it’s not just about being likeable, it’s about being useful.

Content marketing author Jay Baer calls marketing so useful people will pay for it being a “Youtility.”

He reminded that “trust is the filter through which all business success must pass.”

And in an attempt to discover trustworthy recommendations online, customers have found that the guest experience and employee experience have converged with marketing — you can search reviews, social media updates, and ranty blog posts online.

And with 92% of Americans trusting recommendations from friends and family members (Nielsen), while only 47% trust companies, creating memorable experiences for customers and employees is the most effective way to build trust within their communities.

Takeaway #3:

Smart businesses create trust with help, not hype.

4. Dare to Serve.

cherylIn 2007, Cheryl Bachelder took over as CEO of Popeyes (Louisiana Kitchen). Visits, sales, and profit were down — and Bachelder and her team made what she called “a daring declaration” to turn things around and become one of the hottest concept quick service restaurants. Since then, they focused on creating a workplace where people are motivated with respect and dignity.

She talked about how in the “nice guys finish last” world, we may be glorifying the wrong type of leadership — what she calls “Leader First Leaders,” who use power to advance their own agenda.

Instead, she made a call for Serve First Leaders who use their power to lift up those they lead, but maintain a rigorous focus on results.

Takeaway #4:

There are no great leaders without great results.

5. Changing the Workplace, Marketplace, and the World.

unnamed (7)Amanda Hite is changing the world for the better with her social media agency BTC Revolutions. By understanding that people are the medium — be it community managers (or community igniters, as she calls them), advocates, influencers, Vine stars, YouTubers, and social media personalities — she works to bring people together over causes they can get behind.

If you’re already working with a community or in the process of building one — Hite reminds to “out-love everyone” and keep your community positive by letting them win together.

Takeaway #5:

Bond your community over wins they can share together.

6. Your Culture Is Your Brand.

unnamed (8)If you work in marketing or HR in any industry — chances are you’ve had a brand crush on Chipotle at some point. They’ve built a tribe of loyalists by being different and disrupting the quick service market.

Chipotle Recruitment Strategy Manager JD Cummings and Brand Voice Lead William Espey talked about how the Chipotle culture is the brand — and that the best recruiting tool they have is a culture that effectively engages employees.

In a market where every candidate is a customer, a positive candidate experience not only protects their employment brand, but also their customer experience.

They’re proud to give employees a total sense of ownership over the restaurant. Their focus on culture and the employee experience has inspired them to offer a wide variety of benefits including tuition reimbursement and, soon, paid vacation time and sick pay for all employees at all levels of the organization.

Takeaway #6:

When employees are engaged, the customer experience inspires loyalty that brings a measurable lift in return.

Bottom line: Wherever you touch the candidate or customer experience, the inspiration you’ll get from this event is well worth your time.

Put Summer Brand Camp on your list of events to attend next year — you won’t regret it.

lizzieLizzie Maldonado is a strategic social and content marketing professional with significant experience developing and leading B2B and social business functions, having served as Sr. Manager of Social Media for Radio Shack and the Starr Conspiracy, in addition to a long list of consulting clients.

Lizzie is a digital storyteller who uses social media and digital marketing to make B2B brands stand out with B2C panache. She writes about the truth in B2B social media at Resnarkable and is a contributor to Social Media Today and The Glass Heel. She was also suspended 32 times in high school. So she means business.

Follow Lizzie @Lizonomics or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

Closing the Gap: A Look at Gender Bias in Fortune 500 Job Listings.

101In 2007, Catalyst published research showing that corporate boards that include three or more women significantly outperform others; these companies show 53% greater return on equity, 42% greater return on sales, and 66% greater return on invested capital.

Since that study, the proportion of Fortune 500 companies including women on their boards has increased. A recent report by Fortune reveals that there are only 23 Fortune 500 companies remaining that have all-male boards.

In 2010, Helena Morrissey founded the 30% Club with the goal of getting the boards of FTSE-100 companies to include at least 30% women by the end of 2015 (currently 23.5% up from 12.6%). In April of last year, Peter Grauer launched the U.S. chapter of the 30% Club.

Participating CEOs and board chairs commit to building gender-balanced boards at their own companies and advocating for gender fairness within their industries.

Recruitment Advertising and Gender Bias

So this week we looked at a key question: When leaders commit to gender balance in the executive ranks, does it change the way people recruit and hire at other levels of their organization?

To find out, we looked at three groups of US companies and ran their public job listings through Textio:

Companies in the 30% Club. We wanted to see whether their job listings are less gender-biased than average.

Companies with all-male boards. We wanted to see whether their job listings are more male-biased than average.

Comparison group. This a sampling of Fortune 500 companies that have not made a strong executive statement about gender balance but do have one or two women on their boards.

Here’s what we found (skip to the bottom for our list of companies that are getting gender bias in job listings right).

30% Club job listings show less gender-biased job listings overall, but they are still male-biased.

All groups average at least moderate male bias across their companies’ job listings. This is in line with what we see at most large US corporations, with some variation by role.

On average the 30% Club companies show less gender bias than companies in the other groups (though there are a few notable exceptions on both sides).

The chart below shows how companies in the different groups stack up.

% jobs with male bias % jobs that are neutral % jobs with female bias
Companies in the 30% Club 47% 29% 24%
Companies with all-male boards 69% 22% 9%
Comparison group 59% 24% 17%

…except for jobs in tech, finance, and other STEM fields, where jobs are strongly male-biased in every kind of company.

Regardless of the number of women on the company’s board, jobs in tech, finance, and other STEM fields show significant male bias. The table below shows no meaningful difference between categories.

% jobs with male bias % jobs that are neutral % jobs with female bias
Companies in the 30% Club 81% 13% 6%
Companies with all-male boards 83% 11% 6%
Comparison group 79% 14% 7%

 

A few companies stand out from the pack.

Large companies are like cities; most include some great, diverse organizations and some that aren’t as great. But eight companies emerged in our analysis as having inclusive, strong job listings across the board, and we are happy to highlight them. These are companies with a range of jobs across the gender spectrum.

No companies with all-male boards made this list.

% jobs with male bias % jobs that are neutral % jobs with female bias
The Walt Disney Company 39% 38% 23%
Kellogg 39% 39% 22%
Aetna 42% 31% 27%
Macy’s 46% 29% 25%
Apple 48% 33% 19%
Gap 48% 28% 24%
Weyerhaeuser 49% 34% 17%
Prudential 51% 29% 20%

 

For comparison, here are the bias ranges for tech/finance/STEM jobs at the same set of companies:

% jobs with male bias % jobs that are neutral % jobs with female bias
The Walt Disney Company 76% 12% 12%
Kellogg 71% 15% 14%
Aetna 77% 10% 13%
Macy’s 68% 28% 4%
Apple 62% 18% 20%
Gap 67% 17% 16%
Weyerhaeuser 58% 30% 12%
Prudential 65% 18% 17%

Even at companies that show strong support for including women in the executive ranks, there is still a lot of work to do. It’s a great start to see gender balance in job listings across a company’s entire catalog of jobs, but STEM job listings everywhere still lag behind.

Read more at the Textio Word Nerd Blog.

KieranSnyder-MediumKieran Snyder is the co-founder and CEO of Textio, a recruiting technology startup based in Seattle. Kieran holds a PhD in linguistics and has held product and design leadership roles at Microsoft and Amazon. She has authored several studies on language, technology, and document bias.

Kieran earned her doctorate in linguistics and cognitive science from the University of Pennsylvania and has published original research on gender bias in performance reviews and conversational interruptions in the workplace over the last year. She participates actively in Seattle-based STEM education initiatives and women in technology advocacy groups.

Follow Kieran on Twitter @KieranSnyder or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

Notorious: Why Recruiters Who Ignore Big Data Are Ready To Die.

6247__biggie-smalls-notorious-big-daughter-tattooIf you’re like most recruiting and talent pros out there, you’re probably sick and tired of hearing about “big data,” a concept so seemingly complex that neither pundits nor practitioners can come to any sort of consensus on what the hell, exactly, “big data” even means to begin with, much less how to use it to actually improve the recruiting processes.

Many perceive having to confront the growing dilemma of what to do with big data as something that requires a ton of additional work or bandwidth, like social media or CRM, or the ever growing pile of additional tasks being added to an already overwhelming recruiting workload.

But the cool thing about big data is that it’s already being generated, and if you’ve got any sort of ATS or HCM in place (which is to say, the overwhelming majority of employers), then you’ve already been generating terabytes of recruiting related data through your system.

Of course, the growing deluge of data pouring in through the recruiting flood gates isn’t limited simply to a single system. If you’ve ever posted a job to an external job board, purchased a license to a resume database or have invested in any sort of point solution for sourcing or screening that sits outside your system, there’s tons more potentially actionable analytics being automatically generated.

The problem with this, of course, is that these sources of data sit siloed, with widely differing benchmarks, reporting capabilities and data sets. This means that while these solutions are generating the same sorts of statistics and measuring more or less the same sort of stuff, like source of or cost per hire, their lack of integration and automated aggregation preempt being able to actually use big data to improve the recruiting process and ultimately make better hires faster.

As more and more employers invest in adopting a data driven approach to recruiting, the inherent lack of integration capabilities coupled with an explosion of systems generating both structured and unstructured information presents a pretty significant inhibitor to maximizing the potential recruiting ROI “big data” represents, particularly as it relates to predictive analytics.

When it comes to informing and optimizing you’re recruiting strategy internally while executing successful recruiting outcomes externally, tying together all your insights all in one place just makes sense. And, naturally, we’ve got the numbers to back up our big data business case.

2015-06-04_09-24-16

Big Data: Gotta Keep ‘Em Integrated

As employers increasingly adopt analytics as an inexorably intertwined element of their talent attraction strategy, more organizations are seeing real value in the information and insights inherent to data driven recruiting.

A recent survey found that 92% of talent leaders who had implemented big data solutions were “satisfied” or “extremely satisfied” with the results, while 82% said big data “provided significant value to their organization” and their ability to recruit and retain top talent.

According to a 2014 Accenture study, one of the most common ways that employers are utilizing new data is to find new sources of candidates while optimizing and enhancing the candidate experience. The survey suggested this was also the area where recruiters were deriving the most tangible benefits from big data.

94% of talent executives report that they’ve successfully used big data to “moderately or extensively” identify new candidate sources; 90% say that big data has helped them retain current employees and more effectively acquire new ones, and 89% reported using big data to “moderately or extensively” enhance candidate experience, with 51% reporting “extensive, measurable benefits” to achieve measurable gains in using big data to build better relationships with better candidates.

2015-06-04_09-25-20

As with any emerging technology, though, one of the biggest challenges preempting adoption are concerns related to not being able to integrate big data solutions with existing systems, or having the in-house talent or capabilities necessary to implement or manage big data programs.

The good news is, there are many systems on the market which offer seamless, simple integrations that are already built into their software, streamlining all of the aggregated information from multiple platforms into a consolidated view that offers a better view, competitive intelligence and actionable insights on what the available talent pool looks like for each respective position.

This can then easily inform a much more effective approach to sourcing and developing hard-to-find candidates who have the prerequisite skills you’re looking for in a candidate, along with the personality and culture fit requirements that your stakeholders are looking for in a new hire.

If these candidates can be proactively identified through data driven recruitment marketing and sourcing initiatives, then it’s obviously incumbent on individual recruiters to segue from high tech to high touch.

Big data can help uncover which candidates are worth investing the time in building and maintaining a relationship with, not to mention when and how to best communicate with those candidates to capture their interest and ultimately, convert them into hires.

Jumping Into the Talent Pool: Look Before You Leap

While big data is becoming increasingly complex, the right tools enable recruiters to more effectively manage hiring manager and candidate expectations by providing insights into the relative availability of talent, the best places to target that talent, and a better understanding into the background, experience and expertise most likely to translate into a successful new hire irrespective of the industry, job function or market for which you’re recruiting.

With employers generating more data – which, naturally, often resides in HCM systems dedicated exclusively to capturing existing employee information without feeding that information back into a front end recruiting solution.

If your core HCM system doesn’t integrate or interface with your talent acquisition systems, you’re missing out on one of big data’s biggest opportunities.

2015-06-04_09-26-25

Being able to utilize employee performance data as part of a data driven recruiting strategy allows companies to go beyond simply collecting a pool of qualified candidates, but also the ability to measure and analyze those candidates against current and projected gaps in your existing workforce. Integrating these two core HR systems also allows recruiters to develop a “success profile” based on a better understanding of what a top performer or high potential employee looks like.

This profile can be used not only as a mechanism for more effective candidate screening and selection, but also as a way to better understand the key drivers and most effective messaging for candidates with similar traits, making engagement and conversion much easier throughout every stage of the hiring process.

The Future of Big Data Starts Now.

As any recruiter can tell you, having a million different tabs each opened to a different candidate database or recruiting tool is the norm, and that the dozens of different systems necessary for executing and tracking all recruiting related activity is one of the most pervasive pet professional pet peeves in talent acquisition today.

Having to switch between stand-alone systems and disparate point solutions, each with different log-on credentials, inconsistent UI/UX and drastically diffuse dash boarding, benchmarking reporting capabilities, coupled with the inability to integrate with the other overpriced systems you’ve patched together as part of your process, just plain sucks – and inhibits actually being able to apply big data to better outcomes.

Instead of being able to go to a single source of data and investing energy in interpreting and acting on aggregate analytics, already overloaded, overwhelmed recruiters must manually track and compile all this information, which means doing the bare minimum with big data is already too big of an ask to begin with.

If this sounds like the recruiting hell you live in, you’re not alone; having to manually compensate for the inability of these systems and sources of hire to automatically interact is one of the most common challenges facing talent practitioners and leaders today.

65% of recruiters reported the lack of automated systems integrations as their biggest technology headache in a recent survey, and 72% reported that this lack of consolidated data and aggregate analytics represents one of their biggest hurdles in adopting data driven recruiting processes and procedures.

Get With the System: Solutions for Streamlining

There are a variety of different products out there on the market that automate and consolidate all recruiting related data into a standard, centralized source that lets recruiters more easily interpret, understand and tell a much more complete story – and what you could be doing better – to build the best possible relationships with the candidates, clients and colleagues who represent the key stakeholders in the hiring process.

One such tool, CareerBuilder’s BDAS (which is a badass acronym for ‘Big Data Analytic Solution’), offers a great example of how integrating disparate data sources into a single system can help generate some actual meaningful methodology into the metrics madness. This analytic solution can help companies visualize, measure and optimize their recruiting strategies and see what’s working (and what’s not). You don’t have to be a data scientist to do it.

I mention the CareerBuilder product not because this post was sponsored through their largesse, but because, as I wrote in a recent post, the repositioning of CareerBuilder from their traditional job board model into a fully integrated, enterprise grade recruitment platform has succeeded primarily due to their industry leading analytics solutions, which were greatly enhanced by their acquisition of Broadbean just over a year ago.

While most knew Broadbean as simply a job distribution tool, the fact is that as a middleware provider between the manifold ATS/HCM systems and recruitment advertising sites and job boards with which they integrated ultimately generated a firehose of data and performance benchmarks across external sources of hire and internal systems. Their already robust reporting product, mixed with the reach and broader product offerings in the CareerBuilder suite now allow users to bring together data sets from many different sources on one screen with fully configurable, clean dashboards that can help any recruiter tell the narrative of their entire recruiting program.

The data visualizations of their BDAS tool, which I demoed at this year’s HR Technology conference, were among the most impressive – and easy to interpret, configure and customize – of any recruiting technology available on the market (including companies whose entire products are point solutions dedicated exclusively to “big data.” I don’t normally pimp products, but seriously, this is one that’s worth checking out if you’re looking for a way to leverage the science of data without having to hire a data scientist to do it.  See the above screenshot for a simple look at how simple, yet powerful, this tool truly is. And I’m really not just saying that.

2015-06-04_09-27-26

A recent poll showed that only about 15% of enterprise recruiting organizations feel like they’re making the most out of big data and “fully utilizing” the full capabilities of talent analytics available to them.

This fact makes a strong business case for bucking the trend of systems proliferation and focusing on consolidating solutions so that they can better utilize analytics for decision making while not making significant additional investments in buying even more solutions to help handle the fact that you’ve likely got too many tools and too much technology as it is.

The formula for big data success means keeping systems as simple as possible. You don’t have to do the math to see why integration is common sense. Unlike, say, figuring out what to do with this whole analytics and big data thing. At least it’s pretty obvious where you need to start.

To learn more about how CareerBuilder’s Big Data Analytics Solution can help solve your biggest recruiting headaches, click here

 

 

Disclaimer: Recruiting Daily was compensated by CareerBuilder for this post. But their data and action items are actually pretty priceless, so in this case, the facts and opinions contained herein do, in fact, represent those of the publisher. Because we’re all about making candidate experience better, too.

Zen and the Art of Candidate Maintenance.

zenRecently, thanks to the remarkable and inimitable Amy Ala, I was lucky enough to score ringside seats for a fascinating follow up conversation to a seemingly simple question a candidate had posted to Quora, asking for advice on which of two outstanding job offers they should accept.

The resulting firestorm of impassioned opinions and inflammatory commentary about which option the candidate should choose served as a fascinating real time case study into the world of online recruiting and talent acquisition today.

It should come as no news that even the most innocuous question about the simplest of issues would ignite such a complex and contentious conversation, since, after all, Quora’s entire raison d’etre is to serve as a forum for allowing users to pose questions to the community about a variety of topics, including requests for job search and recruiting related advice.

As you can imagine, there are no shortage of “experts” out there waiting to weigh in with uninformed or asinine insights, or vendors waiting to present whatever product they’re selling as the solution to whatever problem a user might have. Welcome to the wonderful world of social media – if you’ve been there, the Quora brouhaha I witnessed was pretty much par for the course, of course.

What made this particular conversation particularly interesting was a complete shocker: turns out, the CEO of one of the companies in question publically responded to the post to inform the candidate that they would no longer be moving forward and were effectively rescinding their outstanding offer.

As you might expect, the Internet had a field day with this story when it broke, then promptly moved on to the next dispensable human interest story or the next cautionary tale of life in the online age, and for the most part, this incident disappeared just as quickly as it went viral.

Friends With Zenefits: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

39466-the-good-the-bad-and-the-uglyBut even after our collective attention has shifted to the next weird news item or internet-induced debacle, there are no shortage of outstanding issues raised for all parties involved – and potential repercussions that should prove far less fleeting than the ensuing 15 minutes of internet fame.

Now that the buzz has died down and the blowback has largely blown over, it’s a perfect time to dissect this discussion and what the recruiting issues this story raised really mean for talent acquisition today.

The Good

The candidate, who reported receiving offers from both Uber and Zenefits (not a terrible choice, all things considered), decided to leverage the collective experience and expertise of the Quora community to solicit information or insights on which company would be the better employer for someone just kicking off a career.

The candidate weighed out the respective pros and cons of each of the offers, and his SWOT analysis, so to speak, personally really impressed me. As a seasoned recruiter, I know that this sort of due diligence and analytical approach to a job offer is something of an anomaly, even though one should reasonably expect that anyone in a similar scenario would utilize a similar strategy for successfully assessing any job opportunity, particularly when there’s an actual offer involved.

What impressed me even more was the fact that even though the candidate is a new grad, he (we’ll use the masculine tense for the sake of simplicity) put a commendable level of thoughtfulness into his evaluation, focusing his pros and cons of the offer beyond simply looking at the associated salaries; many recent grads make the rookie mistake of chasing money, often to the exclusion  of more important or meaningful long term career considerations.

This willingness to not automatically take the highest offer and realization that the value of a job isn’t always completely based in cash compensation is a scenario that’s increasingly rare in today’s cutthroat and competitive job market, particularly in Silicon Valley, where the ability of high growth, high tech companies to attract top talent lies largely in their ability to pay more than the competition. So I’ve got nothing but respect for someone who is looking for more out of an offer than money, particularly for someone just starting out.

The Bad

Now, that said, the candidate’s approach was admirable in theory, but poorly executed in practice, with more than a few key missteps along the way ultimately leading to unanticipated (and unwelcome) consequences. For starters, the candidate committed the cardinal sin of naming names, identifying which companies the competing offers were actually from.

Since he was looking for advice on which offer to accept rather than, say, company specific career information, there was absolutely no reason or justifiable rationale for explicitly stating the names of the companies he was considering, although I suspect that this mistake, like the road to hell, was paved with good intentions. I don’t believe the inclusion of the companies’ identities was done out of some type of malice or to manipulate one against the other for his own selfish ends. Instead, he simply forgot that during the hiring process, there’s an expectation for discretion that’s even more acute given the current state of Internet affairs and the preponderance of online oversharing created by an entire generation for whom there’s no such thing as TMI. Which, of course, couldn’t be further from the fruth.

What’s more, though, is that in while the carefully considered pros were well thought out and more or less objective, the candidate also took a few shots at each of the companies while discussing the offers’ respective ‘cons’ that would have been ill advised in any situation, but were particularly idiotic inclusions by a candidate given the context. For example, here is an example of the kind of ‘cons’ that should probably have never seen the light of day:

uber-logoUber

“The biggest con for Uber is that their attitude towards me so far has been: “we don’t really need you. but here is your offer”. They really don’t seem to care as much, and I can understand why. Uber attracts top talent and they can easily find someone to replace me.”

This sense that Uber has expressed an attitude that ‘they don’t really need you’ is anything but an objective observation, and the candidate seems to be expressing a personal feeling rather than universal fact.

Add to this the additional blurb about the ease by which Uber could find someone to replace him, and you’ve got a statement that truly irks me, particularly the last part of the statement.

I would hope that his complete lack of self-confidence or intrinsic belief in his personal abilities would somehow have gotten flagged at some point during the interview process; that the candidate feels that he’s dispensable before even accepting an offer is the definition of a recruiting red flag, and as much an indictment of Uber’s hiring process as the candidate’s decision making process.

That the candidate feels the company doesn’t really need him, even though they’re moving forward with an offer, speaks to the fact that Uber’s candidate experience likely leaves a lot to be desired. If candidates don’t feel like they’re in the driver’s seat, companies like Uber will find that candidates will quickly realize they’re being taken for a ride.

Zenefits_1414602Zenefits

“My biggest problem with Zenefits is that it isn’t a buzzword like Uber. Most people won’t know what Zenefits is (or so I think). I think that this isn’t as exciting a brand name to have on your resume when applying to the likes of Google.”

When the candidate was inevitably asked some variation of the question, “why do you want to work here?” while interviewing, this issue should probably have come to light, considering this question, for me and many recruiters, is one of the simple starter questions we lead off most of our interviews by asking.

Generally, my phone interviews are scheduled a day or two in advance, and I expect candidates to use that time to do at least a little research and come up with a rationale for why they want to work at my company, in addition to what they know about us, assuming of course they weren’t direct sourced. And this is almost always one of the questions I lead off with in an interview, since if they can’t answer those, they’re unlikely to get much too much further along anyway.

Unfortunately, this candidate’s apparent concern with ensuring the right professional pedigree and keeping up appearances so that he can ultimately land a job at a company like Apple or Google instead of focusing on the job at hand gives the appearance of a candidate who already has one foot out the door – a perpetual flight risk who sees this opportunity as a means to an entirely different end game.

I would have also cautioned the candidate against sharing specific immigration and salary information. However, once again, oversharing on the internet is one of those realities of the world we live in, and even though it’s omnipresent, it almost never ends well for anyone involved.

My point is, that many of these missteps made by the candidate can be chalked up to naivete, but the fact that they actually went out and solicited advice and critically examined an outstanding offer should be commended – this is something smart candidates should do, but almost always overlook. A little discretion would have gone a long way in preventing this whole situation from becoming the next sensational internet recruiting debacle.

At the end of the day, I’d offer any job seeker the same advice I’m suggesting to this candidate, and you should always apply the same rules of the recruiting road that could have kept this incident from turning ugly: don’t ever publically post anything that you wouldn’t want your employer, current or future, to see associated next to your name for all of eternity.

The internet never forgets, and these small mistakes could be a big issue throughout your career, no matter how long or illustrious that career may subsequently be.

parker-conradThe Ugly.

The hero of this sordid little tale, and the sole gold medalist who gives us the moral to the story is clearly Zenefits CEO Parker Conrad (pictured).

For starters, how the hell does the CEO of one of the fastest growing technology companies in the world have the time to troll candidates on Quora, anyway?

I’ll grant that his responding to the candidate wasn’t the best use of his time, at least that’s the way it came across to me, and likely, to many of his investors, too.

But while, as we’ve discussed, a little discretion on the candidate’s part would have gone a long way, the fact that they publically named the company gave the CEO of said company more than enough justification to reciprocate by publically pulling the offer. His exact quote to the candidate query about who he should choose?

“Definitely not Zenefits,” cautioned Mr. Conrad, before going on to  retract the job offer entirely, just in case the candidate missed the hint. So, let me get this straight.

A candidate who’s survived your company’s screening and selection process and made it through to actually getting an offer (after presumably being deemed a “good fit” for your company) goes online and solicits some advice on multiple offers, and that act alone is enough to negate the entire hiring process that preceded it?

Get over yourself, Parker Conrad. If you think that your company is the only one candidates are considering, you, sir, have another thing coming.

News flash: in today’s job market, candidates are the ones in control, and virtually every candidate I’ve talked to so far in 2015 is weighing multiple options or are considering different opportunities, often with several offers already in hand. Chalk that one up as a win for Uber, I guess.

But if we segment the action the candidate took in soliciting advice without penalizing them for subsequently over sharing, the real loser here is Zenefits. This company arguably lost a detail oriented candidate with a propensity for making calculated, well informed decisions – characteristics that definitely sound like a candidate I’d want to hire for my company. Instead of trying to sell him on opportunities at Zenefits, Mr. Conrad simply withdrew the offer, ostensibly searching for that special someone who could love him, and only him.

The part of this whole sad saga, though, that really ruffles my feathers is that the CEO had the audacity to publicly pull an employment offer, but then, after going to this extreme, went back into the site and edited his initial response, deleting the entire portion of the thread where he formally pulled the offer from the site (but fortunately not from the immortal cache of the web).

I want to make sure I’m clear on this. The CEO steps up and single handedly pulls an offer, then realizing the flames have already been fanned, rushes to cover up his very public mistake once the PR team tells him what a bad idea his previous move really was in retrospect? Why in the world would he do this?

You, the CEO, and a well educated, experienced one at that, didn’t think that this was a bad idea until after the fact; if you believe what you wrote, and one would hope that there was some conviction driving this impulsive decision, then own it and stand behind your actions and what you wrote.

By the very nature of his response, Mr. Conrad missed an opportunity to show exactly how approachable and engaged the executives at Zenefits can be to this and all other candidates out there. The perception that the senior leaders at the organization was one that the candidate specifically cited in his list of ‘pros,’ and it’s one that remains ever elusive for almost every other organization out there to instill as part of their employer value proposition. The candidate wrote of Zenefits:

“Upper management is accessible. I can speak to top people (CEO, CTO) which is really nice.” 

Sure, you can speak to them, just as long as you limit yourself to unilateral praise and avoid any hint of dissention or suggest that you’re not walking the company line, it seems. Instead of engaging in an “accessible” manner, the CEO instead just threw a tantrum – which I’ll file somewhere other than ‘accessible’ or ‘approachable’ on the laundry list of leadership characteristics.

For all the big bucks Zenefits spends at building brand awareness and goodwill within the recruiting ecosystem, this seems like a really low hanging fruit that’s a perfect set up to reinforce the company’s accessibility, and Zenefits’ commitment to this value. Instead, they showed an utter disregard for taking this common sense approach to addressing this situation, and proved, yet again, that common sense in the world of work actually isn’t very common at all.

One can only imagine the kind of impact this cautionary tale will likely have on Zenefits employer brand or how much it will influence the company’s ongoing talent attraction strategies, but one thing is clear: there’s nothing zen about having to clean up after this mess, and no one benefits from such epic recruiting fails. No one wants to be friends with Zenefits. Don’t make the same mistake.

unnamed (11)

About the Author: Pete Radloff has 15 years of recruiting experience in both agency and corporate environments, and has worked with such companies as Comscore, exaqueo, National Public Radio and Living Social.

With experience and expertise in using technology and social media to enhance the candidate experience and promote strong employer brands, Pete also serves as lead consultant for exaqueo, a workforce consulting firm.

An active member of the Washington area recruiting community, Pete is currently a VP and sits on the Board of Directors of RecruitDC.

Follow Pete on Twitter @PJRadloff or connect with him on LinkedIn, or at his blog,RecruitingIn3D.


 

Put up or Shut up – Why you Need to Offer a Free Trial

Please offer a free trialDear Good Intentioned Recruiting Software Company,

I saw your software. It looked really interesting. It even looked like it was the ideal product for me. Unfortunately, you do not offer a free trial so I can see it in action. I went to your demo link, but it was a 5-minute youtube video and didn’t show me what I wanted to see. I went to your competitors website who did offer a trial. I did not have to give a credit card or anything! Even though it didn’t do everything I wanted, it did 90% so I bought it after one day.

When a company, selling a product, does not offer a free trial, it seems….well shady. Internet user Nort, from Australia, said, “I can now understand why there is no Trial Version of the Program. If there were, no one would buy it. I realize that I have wasted my well-earned money on trash, but I was warned never buy without a trial version. I didn’t listen, so that’s my fault. Never again.” This seems to be the sentiment of all those I have asked.

As a reviewer of recruiting tools, I get asked to look at a ton of new products. I sit on demos almost daily. I love new tools but, if I can not try it, I am not writing a review on it.

18ixbyyc7qx7ljpgThe point of offering a trial is to gain trust of my friends, the potential buyers and me. It is also the time for me to see how much I need your product. By trying out the product, I have fallen in love with some tools I did not even know I needed. This is a win-win for both of us.

Even if I do not buy the product, I could give you more market share. I will tell people what I liked about the product. You may even get a more diversified customer base.

Before dropping money, whether the amount is $6 or $6,000, I want to test it. “Not having a free trial would be a non-starter”, says SaaS Growth Strategies, a consulting firm specializing in customer acquisition.

A number of years ago, Lisa LaMotta of Forbes magazine wrote, “…don’t just see free trials as an opportunity to win new customers–see them as a way to improve your product. Even if trial participants don’t turn into paying customers, their feedback on your product is more than worth your efforts.

So what kind of trial should you offer? This really depends on the product you are trying to sell. If your product will create greater value you the more you use it, maybe offering a time-limited trial.hcksr

Craig Peterson, from Beyond Compare, offers a very generous 30-day full trial. When asked about it he said, “If someone installs two programs to evaluate, and then doesn’t have a chance to really try them out until a month later, the one that works is more likely to get the sale.  It also makes it more likely that potential customers will learn the application and start relying on it, so when it does come time to pay they are less likely to throw out that investment and switch to another tool.”

The bottom line is, if your product sucks and you do not want people to find out, do not offer a trial. You will not get conversions to paying customers for selling a product that doesn’t work. But if you have a great product, do not be afraid so let me see for myself. Just remember, if you have a great product, I will tell my friends about it. If you have a terrible product, and the only way for me to really find out was buy it, I am telling EVERYONE about it…

I cannot wait to try your software,

 

JC

Jackye Clayton Contributing Editor Recruiting ToolsAbout the Author: Jackye Clayton is recognized as a people expert who puts the Human in Human Resources. An international trainer, she has travelled worldwide sharing her unique gifts in sourcing, recruiting and coaching. She offers various dynamic presentations on numerous topics related to leadership development, inclusionary culture development, team building and more.Her in-depth experience in working with top Fortune and Inc 500 clients and their employees has allowed her to create customized programs to coach, train and recruit top talent and inspire others to greatness.

Follow Jackye on Twitter @JackyeClayton or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Building A Global Recruiting Association: Why It’s Time To Fix What’s Broken.

“The best time to make changes is when you have a pretty good thing going on, and you just want to make it better. The most difficult time is when you’ve lost your edge and hit rock bottom, and you are panicking. Then, you start to make panic moves.”  – Geno Auriemma

Unlike the UConn Huskies, who Auriemma coached to yet another NCAA Women’s Basketball championship in 2015 (his tenth), recruiting doesn’t have a good thing going, nor is it getting any better, either.

Oh, sure – we’ve got all of these cool tools and killer tech all of the sudden, which purport to help recruiters reach uncharted waters and go where no recruiter has ever gone before. The thing is, our industry is a lot like the Titanic, the cutting edge moving talent professionals irrevocably closer to the inevitable iceberg.

Recruiting Has Hit Rock Bottom.

For an industry desperately in need of change, it seems that any change we do make only exacerbates an already bad situation. Recruiters are sinking their own ship, and meaningful advances seem effectively blockaded by general animosity and disdain for those of us who find ourselves at work in the business of finding work.

We’re lambasted by job seekers, internally ridiculed by hiring managers, and seen as a convenient scapegoat for the many frustrations and aggravations inherent to finding or filling a job – a broken process that’s falling apart largely because recruiters are failing to fix what’s broken.

Instead, we seem too busy taking each other to task for a litany of Crimes Against Best Practices or sweating the small stuff (from employer branding to Boolean String basics) to the exclusion of realizing just how bleak the bigger picture for recruiting has really become.

Recruiters have, in a way, become even worse than our professional predecessors; our profession has hit the lowest nadir, it seems, of its relatively short but increasingly sordid history as a specialized business function. Recruiters, by and large, have never exactly been the most driven or diligent of professionals, particularly since most of us fell into this line of work not by careful design but by existential accident.

But in the halcyon days before the internet, believe it or not, recruiters still had to do some sort of work – they were measured by outgoing calls, or interviews scheduled, or some other metric that wasn’t “big data” but was still a big deal in terms of defining and determining individual recruiter performance.

Sure, these metrics were imperfect, but in the days before automation, every hire required at least some manual work that required recruiters to actually, well, work. Now, instead, we rely on technology as a crutch, and rather than make us more effective and efficient, these systems and software are somehow making us more lazy and less accountable than ever before.

The Problem With Removing People From the Recruiting Process.

rosie-jetsonsTechnology doesn’t enable recruiters, largely, to do a better job doing their jobs. Instead, it enables recruiters to do stuff like send out form letters, blast “talent networks” with spammy e-mails and update every social network with annoying, automated “job alerts” without doing anything at all.

Technology helps us cast a wider net for candidates than ever before, but paradoxically, does nothing to solve for the fact that recruiters no longer feel the need to actually pick up the phone and make calls, or take the time to engage or build relationships with candidates beyond some superficial connection on social media. 

Recruiters have, largely, removed ourselves from what’s become a point-and-click process, and somehow automated away any human element of recruiting so that what used to be called ‘personnel’ has become the most dehumanized of all business functions.

This is a shame – but no matter how much we try to do to call out, expose or chastise these RINOs (recruiters in name only), it doesn’t seem to make much difference. Recruiters, largely, know that they’re part of the problem, but would rather respond by shrugging their shoulders than helping actually be a part of the solution. Since every attempt at inducing change has, until now, only somehow exacerbated a recruiting profession already at rock bottom, maybe it’s time we tried to do something different. Something new. Something better.

Part of the Solution.

There are no shortage of suspect certification options out there today, nor are there a shortage of recruiters willing to pay for the chance to proudly append some worthless acronym (think: CIR, CSP, etc.) after their names. But for all the professional certification options available, and the millions of recruiters touting these credentials, the question remains: does any of this make the recruiting profession any more professional?  

Does licensing truly impact performance and incentivize improvement, or is it, like that annual trek to the DMV, just another necessary evil to endure and yearly fee to pay? This is a comparison many people like to turn to when justifying certification, but it’s an erroneous analogy.

Sure, one could argue, requiring a knowledge and skills test that’s periodically administered to keep your driver’s license current prevents any idiot out there from being on the road, but like recruiting, that doesn’t stop every idiot from going out and getting a license.

They’ll still drink and drive or text and drive or do a bunch of other stupid stuff, and while these might cause them to lose their licenses, their propensity for these behaviors in no way pre-empted their ability to obtain that license in the first place. And unlike driver’s licenses, recruiters don’t even need certifications to recruit – most hit the road for the first time without ever having been behind a wheel, and generally have no one teaching them the right way to steer, signal or stop. Certifications rarely do this, either. 

Recruiting Deserves Better.

do betterRecruiting has never had a barrier to entry, but for some reason, the baseline for recruiters has fallen to an all time low, and the cut rate quality of our professional product has plunged to an unprecedented low point in an industry that hasn’t exactly ever set the bar all that high. It’s hard to underperform the expectations most people have for recruiters, but somehow, we’re succeeding in that dubious achievement, even if we’re failing in pretty much every other conceivable area.

Folks, we not can do better, but we desperately have to ensure that something changes, soon – or else risk the fact that without barriers for entry, there might not be a profession left to enter after long, anyway. Anyone can set up a shingle or a social profile and call themselves a recruiter. And today, simply saying you’re a recruiter makes it so. Which is a big part of the problem.

Those who actually tough it out and last more than a few months in an agency beat the odds; most burn out in the first 6 months, but those who somehow manage to make a few placements suddenly start to think that they not only are a recruiter, but are an “expert,” and go about positioning themselves as a “Guru” or “Thought Leader” who will impact the world of recruiting, even if it’s a world they themselves hardly know or understand.

On the corporate side, those who can’t do anything else often become a “recruiting coordinator,” and somehow this glorified coordinator position becomes a way stop on a short path to run talent acquisition for some company so desperate for a recruiter with experience they’re willing to overlook the fact they don’t actually have any recruiting experience before slapping them with some fancy Manager or Director of Talent Acquisition Title. If you can’t make it from scheduling interviews to setting strategy in like 18 months, you’re doing something wrong, these days.

Bullshit.

Building A National Recruiting Association.

stop-collaborateCertifications are, at the core, a piece of paper that really is nothing more than kindling fueling the fire of frauds and fakes whose deceptive behavior, despicable business and dubious morality threatening to burn our entire industry to the ground.

What we need instead of another worthless paper doing nothing more than condoning the problem is to come up with a solution that actually serves to objectively educate recruiters and independently inform the direction of our industry in a way that advances our best interests, not just the bottom line of proprietary certification providers.

We need like minded recruiters who can come together and drive real change, to share best practices and benchmarks and hopefully, helping restore some sense of honor to our profession and finally stop suffering the shame in silence.

We’ve put up and shut up, and now we need to do something to combat the public perception that recruiters are basically no different than people who club baby seals, burn down acres of rainforest or test drugs on cute puppies or kittens. We’re not evil, but we’re not doing a whole hell of a lot to provide any evidence to the contrary.

A professional recruiting association made up of practitioners, trainers and leaders would serve to codify best practices, reinforce professional ethics and enforce repercussions for violating them, and, most importantly, develop and deliver practical, relevant training through delivering coursework built around a curriculum of best practices that are actually practiced throughout the recruiting profession.

Such an association would offer value to anyone involved in the talent acquisition process (sourcers, vendors, recruiters, HR generalists, etc.) and provide skills development, professional training and learning opportunities to all recruiting professionals at all career levels.

Recruiting believes in inclusion, and we believe that no association should represent any interests besides what’s best for our industry, or advancing any agenda beyond advancing our profession. Third party or in house, sourcer or workforce strategist, if you’re a recruiter, we’re all in this together.

A big component of any professional association is often to develop and maintain certification programs, but for a recruiting association, this function is functionally not on the roadmap, nor is licensing – these are two sides of the same specious and suspect coin, and neither would help with the stated goal of making recruiting better.

For example, what is the point of having a “licenced professional recruiter” if that doesn’t preclude them from behaving like amateurish assholes, nor does having some acronym after recruiters’ names on their LinkedIn profiles if they’re still blasting out mass InMail sends without checking to see if their recipients are even remotely relevant or on-target?

This is no different than when a licenced driver chooses to drink and drive – with calamitous results. We’d prefer not to condone or provide justification to bad recruiting behaviors, and a license or certification could end up indemnifying the very same recruiting worst practices it’s effectively trying to end.

A Recruiting Call To Action.

ohitsonIf you’re still dubious about the need for identifying best practices in our profession or creating a way to consequently educate and reinforce these best practices to recruiting practitioners, consider the ramifications of continuing with recruiting business as usual.

If we keep with the status quo, even the best recruiters and recruiting organizations could find themselves the victims of collateral damage caused by too many bad candidate experiences, too many angry hiring managers, too many poorly targeted send outs – and the more these behaviors become just another part of the job for recruiters, the less likely it will be that recruiters will have a job for very much longer at all.

Consider the fact that you’re put in the same professional bucket as those people who send inane email after mistargeted InMail after galactically stupid business development or networking calls, that any “recruiter” out there is, in fact, a reflection (and indictment) of all of us, even those of us who care enough about our jobs to realize that we’re not working with passive candidates or active applicants or any of that – we’re dealing with people. Without those people, we wouldn’t have jobs – and might not, if we continue to do our jobs the way we’re doing them.

Now, don’t get us wrong – no one would be required to join this organization. It’s not a union, nor is it going to be some sort of vertically integrated cash grab like SHRM or CIPD. Rather, we’d like this ‘association’ to really be more like a collective of like-minded individuals who can look out for each other, and for the profession that, for better or for worse, we’re all invested in together.

There are a lot of crappy recruiters out there, but the few, the proud, the passionate and the professional recruiters in our ranks can rise up and show that recruiting, done the right way, can actually help advance your career and act as your advocate when looking for a new role. We need to show recruiters are actually not adversaries preempting people from getting jobs, but instead, allies and advocates who sincerely want to help improve their quality of life by improving the quality of their careers. It’s as simple as that.

There will, of course, be skeptics and cynics out there. Many recruiters, the agencies that employ them and the vendors who service them are making millions off the status quo, and have no real need to improve anything other than their bottom line. There are those who need the chaos to compensate for their incompetence, lack of process or recruiting ineptitude, and will continue to choose complete madness as their preferred recruiting methodology.

We don’t. We believe that recruiters – not to mention the clients and candidates they serve – deserve better. It’s time for a change, and we’re writing this manifesto to ask that you join us in maybe, for once, helping move this profession forward. We’re not asking for much. Just for your help in helping all of us become better by training the new kids on the block the right way from the start or, more likely, teaching the old dogs some new tricks. Lord knows we could use it.

How You Can Help.

DZmJ0We’re asking for your support not just on blogs like this, not by answering some dumb call to action on a landing page or joining some group on Facebook or LinkedIn, but instead, to help form the core of a larger community of recruiters working together, with no ulterior motives other than recruiting a little bit better for everyone, and restoring professionalism and pride to an industry so sorely lacking both, it seems.

We know that for as many bad recruiters as there are out there, there are more of you out there who want and deserve better for our profession and sincerely believe in helping make the future of recruiting far brighter than the bleak, sad state of talent today. It doesn’t have to be this way – and with your help, it won’t be for long. 

This isn’t some pipe dream or utopian fantasy. In fact, we’ve already started making some progress. We recently convened a Founder’s Meeting made up of some of the most committed and concerned recruiters in the business, many of whom had long been clamoring for a solution similar to what we’re proposing.

We’ve begun to collaborate and define things like principles, processes and passion, that will inform the rest of the work that we do. And that outstanding work looks a little daunting, considering the size, scope and scale of such a massive undertaking. But we understand that changing an industry is no easy task, which is why over the next few weeks we’ll be holding more meetings, including expanded sessions, with representatives of the entire recruiting community.

Sourcers, recruiters, vendors, HR generalists, employment branding specialists and anyone who works in recruitment, no matter whether in-house or agency, domestic or global, at an SMB or multinational, can help be a part of driving real change in recruiting and play a part at moving our profession forward. If you’re interested, please let us know by dropping a note in the comment section below. We’re not focusing on the US market alone, so we strongly urge those in other global regions to become part of this movement to “recruiting excellence.”

If you just want to let us know you’re interested, cool – we’ll be in touch. But it’d help a lot if you could also let us know a little bit about the specific areas and behaviors recruiters need to focus on for improving our profession, or where you think we need to focus first for building a better future for recruiting.

This is about you. It’s about them. It’s about us. And like it or not, we’re all in this together.

This post was co-authored by Steve Levy and Derek Zeller.

About the Authors:

steve levySteve Levy is well respected as one of the best sourcers in the business, combining old school and new cool technologies to identify and engage exceptional talent – and actually knows those mythical “purple squirrels.”

Levy, a member of the RecruitingBlogs Editorial Advisory Committee who has been referred to as “the recruiting industry’s answer to Tom Peters” has been recognized as one of the Top 100 Most Social Human Resources Experts on Twitter;

The 10 to Follow in Social Media RecruitingTop 25 Twitter Accounts for Job Seekers to FollowTop 100 Twitter Accounts Job Seekers MUST Follow: 2012Top 50 Twitter Accounts Job Seekers MUST Follow: 2011101 Career Experts all Job Hunters Should Follow on Twitter; and Top 100 HR & Recruiting Pros to Follow on Twitter.

Follow Steve On Twitter @LevyRecruits or connect with him on LinkedIn.

Derek ZellerDerek Zeller draws from over 16 years in the recruiting industry. The last 11 years he has been involved with federal government recruiting specializing within the cleared Intel space under OFCCP compliance. Currently, he is a Senior Sourcing Recruiter at Microsoft via Search Wizards.

He has experience with both third party agency and in-house recruiting for multiple disciplines and technologies. Using out-of-the-box tactics and strategies to identify and engage talent, he has had significant experience in building referral and social media programs, the implementation of Applicant Tracking Systems, technology evaluation, and the development of sourcing, employment branding, military and college recruiting strategies.

You can read his thoughts on RecruitingDaily.com or Recruitingblogs.com or his own site Derdiver.com.  Derek currently lives in the DC area.

Follow Derek on Twitter @Derdiver or connect with him on LinkedIn.

 

 

Gild turns Big Data into Understandable Data with new Business Intelligence Capabilities

BBusiness Intelligenceig Data has gotten so much hype the last few years that people have been spun into a panic. It seemed everyone wanted their “Big Data,” only to find that they only have “small data” or they do not know how to manage the data that they have. Gild users will be happy to discover that Gild has released a new business intelligence platform to keep their fears at bay. I was honored to speak to Luca Bonmassar, Co-founder of Gild and Chief Product and Technology Officer last week who showed me their new Business Intelligence (BI) capabilities. Let me tell you, the product is legit.

 

“We designed our Business Intelligence for Hiring solution to be automated, easy-to-use, and individually relevant for multiple roles,” said Luca Bonmassar, CTO of Gild. “We started with a library of drag-and-drop custom reports, but savvy users like developers can also write their own queries and use our IDE for easy integration with things like a third-party onboarding application. By making the solution both personalized and agile, it’s easy to tailor it to each customer’s specific needs.”Dashboard

It is not enough for a recruiting department to obtain their data without being able to manage it. Without BI tools, recruiting departments have lost control of their data, releasing it to IT or Accounting departments to create reports or hire a data analyst and report writer to find out what the data reveals.

In my former life, I was an IT Business Analyst. From what I saw, Gild’s “Business Intelligence for Hiring” uses easy wizard technology to produce very professional, easy to read and easy to create reports. Here is the kicker – with Gild, you can compare your results with what your competitors are doing. (Booya!) I have not seen another tool that has allowed you to do that.

“There’s a sea change coming to talent acquisition that’s similar to the transformation marketing automation tools created in how companies go to market,” said Sheeroy Desai, CEO of Gild. “By arming each person involved in the hiring process with the real-time information to become more effective, Business Intelligence for Hiring eliminates the need for a dedicated business analyst or costly, separate BI application. As an integral part of The Gild Platform, our new BI solution lets everyone see the data that matters most as well as data they never had access to before—whether it’s understanding which sources produce the best candidates, where recruiting campaigns are most successful, how employees are performing or where resources are being spent. And because we offer data in a form that’s both meaningful and easy to understand, companies can now get a truly accurate overview of their entire business ecosystem.”

Business Intelligence for Hiring Makes Anyone a Business Analyst

Gild’s recent press release breaks down how different staff and business strategists can optimize the

  • ReportsCEOs: With a new single source of truth for the entire company, CEOs can immediately assess the return on investment (ROI) of each hiring expense, benchmark performance against that of similar businesses and make educated decisions about where to focus resources and what strategies to pursue over time.
  • CFOs and Finance Professionals: With a graphical comparison of aggregated hiring expenditures and returns from across the company, financial experts can quickly understand the fiscal impact of hiring on budgets and the bottom line, identify pricey missteps and optimize the hiring process for the most cost-effective return.
  • Talent Leaders:With new access to data on everything from the state of the pipeline to recruitment cost per employee, talent leaders can become analytical pros by tracking effectiveness by department, hiring team and even individual managers to improve the speed and effectiveness of hiring across the board.
  • Recruiters: With the ability to track performance against colleagues as well as recruiters at similar companies, recruiters can boost personal productivity, make better hiring decisions based on behavioral metrics and become more valuable and strategic by mastering BI and its impact on the business.
  • Hiring Managers: With new data about how hiring and firing rates impact each team, which factors affect productivity the most and which areas require improvement and optimization, hiring managers can now become instant analytical experts and help grow the entire business.
  • BI Analysts: With auto-refreshed data and easily customizable reports, BI analysts can stop fielding time-consuming, expensive ad-hoc report requests from across the company and focus on building unique, sophisticated reports relevant to the business using Gild’s IDE.

Now you have no more excuses as to why you don’t know what your recruiting team is doing. It is literally just one click away.

About Gild (Vendor Description)219615LOGO

Gild is transforming the talent acquisition industry and fundamentally changing how the world hires. Fueled by data science, consumer-friendly technologies, and predictive analytics, Gild’s smart hiring platform powers the way companies find, nurture, and hire talent across all industries and functions. Gild is used by growing companies to hire the talent they need to innovate and succeed—smarter and faster. Founded in 2011, Gild is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices in Salt Lake City and Milan.

 

 

Jackye Clayton Contributing Editor Recruiting ToolsAbout the Author: Jackye Clayton is recognized as a people expert who puts the Human in Human Resources. An international trainer, she has travelled worldwide sharing her unique gifts in sourcing, recruiting and coaching. She offers various dynamic presentations on numerous topics related to leadership development, inclusionary culture development, team building and more.Her in-depth experience in working with top Fortune and Inc 500 clients and their employees has allowed her to create customized programs to coach, train and recruit top talent and inspire others to greatness.

Follow Jackye on Twitter @JackyeClayton or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

The 5 Best Employee Engagement Tips You’ll Read This Year.

As the global economy continues to expand, more and more companies are aggressively hiring for top talent and mission critical roles, effectively leveraging boom times for building the infrastructure required for sustainable, scalable growth.

As a result of low unemployment and heavy hiring demand, the labor market has tightened significantly, putting the onus on employers to figure out the best way not only to recruit employers, but also to ensure they’re sufficiently motivated and engaged to make sure they stick around, too.

In the increasingly cutthroat competition for skilled workers, the dynamics of the world of work seem to have shifted inexorably towards workers themselves. Winning the proverbial ‘war for talent’ now means not only hiring the right people for the right jobs, but making sure those people are competent, happy and dedicated to the larger business mission, vision and values.

Engaged employees are pretty easy to spot; they’re the ones for whom work isn’t just a place to go or a thing to do, but can channel their professional passions and fulfill some sort of greater purpose. Engaged workers don’t simply show up from 9-5 and slog enthusiastically through their duties until it’s time to go home; instead, they’re the ones whose ownership mentality and dedication drive forward both overall business and bottom line.

Even the most engaged employees, however, are aware that there are other options out there, and that they, not their employers, are now the ultimate arbiters of their own careers. That’s why it’s absolutely imperative for organizations to drive retention by finding a way to tap into top performers’ psyches and find the necessary solutions to effectively reap the most obvious benefits of employee engagement: improved satisfaction, productivity and ultimately, improved business performance. Of course, this isn’t always easy.

In a world where cliched quotes, Successories accoutrements and superficial self-help books seem synonymous with “motivation,” smart companies know that employee engagement takes more than a perfunctory pat on the back or a pithy poster on the break room wall. They know there’s no silver bullet for driving engagement or motivating employees, no one-size-fits all plan or program that’s going to work for every organization, business unit or company.

The 5 Best Employee Engagement Tips You’ll Read This Year.

That’s why it’s essential employers build personalized, targeted engagement tactics that motivate individual employees to do the best work for themselves, as well as for their organizations, every day. But while what works might be far from universal, there are some underlying principles every company can use to get started building employee engagement strategies for recruiting and retention success.

1. Clarity is Key.

clarityOne obvious disconnect between organizations and employees that often impacts motivation is the inability for companies to clearly articulate performance goals or responsibilities for individual workers, instead relying on amorphous “STAR” statements, ambiguous soft skills or subjective outcomes which fail to specify what they’re actually expected to achieve.

Employees must have a crystal clear understanding of how their role reinforces bigger business objectives, and also how their decision making process and personal performance tie into those of the organization.

Make an effort to understand the disparity that often exists in internal talent pools, as well as the differing needs and drivers that will have the biggest retention ROI for current workers; what motivates one employee might not resonate with every employee, even someone else in their exact same role, level or business unit. Tailoring goals and engagement strategies might require a concerted effort or relatively resource intensive strategy to yield optimal results, but the payoff in performance should be worth it.

In fact, engaged employees tend to be about 20% more productive than their disengaged counterparts, and generally have a performance score on formal reviews that’s a full fifth higher, on average, than workers with even neutral engagement scores.

Remember to maintain a clear barrier between segments, levels and functions and build strategies that are the most likely to challenge and motivate these smaller work groups and teams; what might work in one group could be perceived as too demanding, or even threatening, for another.

Before getting started, ask employees what they want, and constantly be open to feedback and iterative changes to policies and programs to make sure that there’s always alignment between what the employer expects and what employees actually deliver. Often, many of the most pressing problems can be easily solved by simply providing more clarity and removing ambiguity from employee communications, particularly during the performance planning process.

2, Make Performance More Than An Annual Process.

rypple_funny_friday_aug_20_2010Many employers, traditionally, reserve providing employees with performance related feedback and goal setting part of a process that’s frequently a formal, annual HR initiative (and one that most employees and managers disdain).

These formal performance reviews are important, but equally important is for employers to balance these initiatives with informal, ongoing conversations that can provide the timely, regular and constructive feedback that’s inherently impossible when these discussions are limited to an annual exercise.

Feedback is fundamental for an employee to truly understand developmental opportunities, personal strengths or areas for improvement. This means making feedback an integral and dynamic aspect of your corporate culture instead of simply another workforce management process or HR-directed policy.

It’s common for managers to provide feedback only in situations where an employee has made a mistake or somehow screwed up, and these tend to be more disciplinary than didactic; it’s important that leaders use learning opportunities to provide constructive criticism so workers know not only what went wrong, but what they specifically need to do to fix an issue and make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Employees need to feel like they’re not being penalized for making mistakes, but instead are offered a learning opportunity and given the guidance required to resolve these. Often, an employee’s mistake is caused by a lack of understanding of specific accountabilities or responsibilities, so it’s important to reinforce these while balancing critiques with constructive feedback and positive encouragement. Employees who know that they can make a mistake without having to fear for their jobs tend to not only do much better jobs, but studies show that they’re much more likely to stick around in that job longer, too.

Which is the entire point, really.

 

3. Accentuate the Positive

34664245Performance reviews and employee feedback shouldn’t be reserved simply for fixing issues or improving performance, but also for celebrating and recognizing the outstanding contributions of individuals and groups on an ongoing basis. Creating a culture of recognition shows that an employer not only supports their employees but appreciates, rather than expects, workers’ wins and celebrates their successes instead of focusing on fixing failures.

Even though many workers join employers – or leave them – because of salary and compensation considerations, a lucrative paycheck is only one element of an effective total rewards program; supporting and appreciating workers, even when there’s no compensation considerations involved, can considerably improve employees’ perceived sense of value and worth, which is always worth it when you’re trying to retain top talent.

While we’re on the subject of salary, remember that it’s almost always not just about the money, and employees who are only driven by direct compensation aren’t the ones worth trying to retain, anyway. Instead, employers need to focus on ensuring that money isn’t a motivating factor for disengagement (since it’s the easiest fix), and making sure that their salaries are not only competitive with the market, but that the overall package motivates employees in ways a paycheck alone can’t.

Consider rewarding employees with spot bonuses or performance-related incentives that reward competencies and recognize performance, instead; this way, you’re not only making your staff feel respected and valued, you’re paying them what they’re really worth at work. Salary is a baseline, but companies whose compensation actually pays for performance almost always see better performance – and outcomes – than those who offer no incentive for workers other than a paycheck for simply showing up.

4. Transparency Is Key.

giphy (3)While a little performance related compensation can go a long way, employee engagement can’t be bought with money alone.

Engagement, rather, is a set of intrinsic feelings where a worker feels valued and respected by their employer and fully reciprocate through their omnipresent passion and on-the-job productivity.

Employee engagement all comes down to a set of feelings that can’t always be articulated, but can only be attained when workers feel comfortable enough at the workplace to do their best work. As we discussed above, workers should be compensated beyond direct compensation, but even when paying a premium for performance, companies need to make sure that any remuneration decisions are made as consistently and transparently as possible.

If employees know the type of work required to be compensated accordingly, they’ll have a much more clear idea of what work they need to do to get there.

5, Experimentation Is Key To Experience.

failingWhile you hire and promote your workers due largely to direct experience or specific expertise required by their actual roles, getting more out of top talent means encouraging career planning to emphasize breadth, not just depth, of experience.

Today’s workers don’t want to be pigeonholed or feel like they’ve got to get out of your company to move up – instead, they’re looking for roles that will provide diverse experiences and exposure to new challenges so that they’re not just doing a job, but instead, building the competencies they need to advance in their careers.

If your organization doesn’t give employees the chance to develop internally, or if your culture fails to embrace internal mobility, training or advancement opportunities as core competencies, than chances are your workers are more likely to look for a new job than focus on delivering in their current one.

When it comes to retention, it’s essential to work closely with individual employees and understand their career ambitions and professional objectives so that you can offer them opportunities or align responsibilities with these long term goals so that their short term work has a long term purpose, and they feel like the work they do today will pay off tomorrow – and provide the career trajectory they want without having to leave your company to get it.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that top talent is motivated by new challenges and constant learning experiences; no one wants a work culture that’s boring, monotonous or overly bureaucratic. Most employees can’t stay engaged if they’re doing the exact same thing every single day, and employers have to recognize it’s their responsibility to constantly seek new ways to appeal to the intellectual aspirations and professional objectives that current staff couldn’t replace simply by moving to a new employer.

Top talent has options, and if you want to make sure they stick around, you’ve got to make sure you’ve got an engagement strategy and company culture that’s worth sticking around for. Fight flight, or lose the war for talent. It’s really that simple.

About the Author: Steve Brown is a regular contributor and author on a variety of business related topics. His work can be seen on many high traffic, high visibility sites such as PeopleInsight, a UK based consulting firm providing employee engagement and staff survey expertise across the public, private and not-for-profit sectors.

How Talent Analytics Can Help You Develop a Recruitment Strategy

How Talent Analytics Can Help You Develop a Recruitment Strategy

There’s an evolution cycle for Data and Talent Analytics in HR.  Most organizations are currently in a reactive reporting cycle. They are tracking a lot of metrics, but not able to proactively predict results.  We’re finding the ability to measure, analyze, and optimize talent practices is now critical to business success. This separates the Best-in-class players from the rest. What is your strategy?

While many HR organizations recognize the need. They are starting to invest more strategically in measurement and stats. A lot of us need a road map and a bit of guidance to get started. With the right tools and capabilities, data is your competitive advantage.

So the next time someone tries to sell you on artificial intelligence, use some real smarts for once. Realize that no technology on earth can fix what’s really broken in your HR organization. And real people are what HR should really be focusing on.

Attendees will learn:

  • Where to start when analyzing recruitment data
  • How analytics can help you monitor supply & demand
  • How analytics can help you stay ahead of the competition
  • 3 ways to ensure that your company message and branding resonates with job seekers

Why Employee Generated Content Matters for Recruitment Marketing.

talent shortageChances are you think you’re a pretty interesting person. Why else would you Instagram that photo of your award-winning holiday-themed desk at work? Or share your company blog post – the one where you talk about how to engage employees?

If that sounds familiar, you’re not alone.It turns out everyone on social media likes to talk about themselves. Researchers have found that up to 80% of social media posts are announcements about people’s own immediate experiences.

So we all have a healthy ego, and that’s great, but how can employers use this knowledge to create greater engagement among employees?

Talk Amongst Yourselves.

That doesn’t mean throwing together a survey and mass emailing your employees with the subject line, “TELL ME ABOUT YOU.” To attract successful employee-generated content (EGC), you need a clear set of goals.
By the end of the competition, over 2,000 employees participated, and 75 percent of respondents shared the project with friends, family and colleagues. For example, when Deloitte set out to create employee generated content, they had two goals: 1) show potential hires how great it is to work there, and 2) engage current employees through participation.
To do this, they created the Deloitte Film Festival competition.Employees were asked to create videos answering the question, “What’s your Deloitte?” By the end of the competition, over 2,000 employees participated, and 75 percent of respondents shared the project with friends, family and colleagues outside of Deloitte. 

4 Keys To Creating Killer Employee Generated Content

Once you have a goal, you need a plan of attack. While you brainstorm, keep in mind the attributes that all successful EGC has in common, and ask yourself: Is my campaign…

tumblr_m76uk4kzXo1rqfhi2o1_5001. Be Authentic.

“With employee-generated content, authenticity is a dominant value in the content. It needs to tell a story which enables the audience to associate a positive understanding about the company with an underpinning of career endeavors. The relevancy and accuracy of the content, including from whom the content was created, is authenticated to the company and employee that works there.” –Russell Miyaki 

Target does a great job of giving their employees a voice. This is an effective strategy for not only engaging employees but also giving your clients a window into who they’re working with. Whether you choose to do a one-time employee engagement page, or you offer your employees a more permanent blogger position, just make sure you are allowing the employee to express themselves in their own words. This, along with on-the-job photos, will help you build an authentic brand image.

2. Accentuate the Positive.

everything-is-awesome-6Employee generated content can act as an organic recruitment tool to attract new hires. Consider all the reasons your employees love where they work. Fast food chain In-N-Out Burger was recently listed by Entrepreneur as a top company to work for in 2015.

Their employees cite “great pay rates, fantastic hours, calm and comfortable atmosphere, and plenty of benefits” among the reasons for working there.

Talk to your employees and find out what they are most excited about. Then harness their excitement by putting it on a platform where others can see it. Internally, it will serve to inspire current employees, and externally, it can appeal to potential job candidates.

3. Employee Generated Content Is For Everyone.

To make the Deloitte Film Festival inclusive, the company relied heavily on early-stage employee input.

“Feedback here was key; it helped us flesh out the project voice/tone, structure the project for maximum two-way communication and decide to invest in filmmaker support tools.” – Janet C. DeNunzio, Deloitte Services U.S. Communications team.

Ensure that the greatest number of employees will participate and contribute to the campaign by polling them ahead of time. This will give you a good idea of what level of participation they are most comfortable with and what would motivate them to contribute.

4. Be on Brand.

T-Mobile uses the branded hashtag #BeMagenta to aggregate all their employee generated content on social media. Search “#BeMagenta” on Twitter or Facebook and you’ll find posts like this one:

T-Mobile-be-magenta-tweet

More importantly, Be Magenta is more than a hashtag. “Magenta” is a lifestyle T-Mobile has crafted and promotes across all communication platforms. To be magenta means you are bold, fearless, and brilliant. T-Mobile EGC tagged with #BeMagenta lets employees align themselves with those positive attributes and all others on the team who share their beliefs.

For all your employee generated content campaigns, but especially when they live on social media, you need to be the one leading the conversation. To do this, you need to create guidelines for not only the account handler, but the users. Facebook’s About tab is a good place to put your page expectations.

Tell your users what will and will not be accepted. Of course, even with a set of rules, you may get the occasional negative post. Decide ahead of time how you and your team will deal with potential issues and establish a protocol for addressing the problem post.

Letting your employees tell their story is imperative if you want to create an engaged and unified team. In addition, EGC can act as an organic recruitment tool to attract new hires. Just remember that in the world of EGC, your campaign is nothing unless it’s authentic, positive, inclusive and branded.

Read more on employe generated content at Meshworking from TMP.

alison kelleyAllison Kelley is an Inbound Marketing Specialist at TMP Worldwide Chicago. Originally from Connecticut, she moved to Chicago after Googling “Tina Fey” and finding out about The Second City. Allison has written for a variety of industries including nonprofit, HR, digital marketing, entrepreneurship, and travel.

When not creating engaging content for clients, Allison reviews comedy and live lit events for Chicagoist and performs her stories at reading series around town.

You can contact Allison at [email protected] or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Buyer Beware: Don’t Let A Bad Hire Happen To You.

tumblr_llzytzzG4r1qhlpf0In my last Recruiting Daily post, “Why Bad Hires Happen To Good Recruiters,” I tried to explain why even the best talent acquisition pros in the business make misinformed, misdirected hiring decisions every day.

Bad hires happen. And it’s because of  four primary and pervasive causes, or at least my first hand observations over the course of my career in this business would lead me to believe.

These, in turn, can really all be distilled in a single, simple statement: employers make bad hires because of bad recruiting, specifically a lack of proper due diligence or digging into a candidate’s real story.

This might not always be a ton of fun on the front end and might seem like it can slow an already painfully slow process, but the time required to backfill a bad hire and reinvent the req-related wheel are far more costly (and frustrating) than simply getting it right the first time. Which, let’s face it, is kind of what companies expect from recruiters anyway.

No pressure.

Guilt Free Recruiting: 4 Tips For Never Regretting Another Hire.

mockupNow that we’ve gotten the sources of bad hires out of the way, I’d like to discuss a few more ways that recruiters can specifically avoid making the most common hiring mistakes. Here are a few solutions for specific prehire problem areas you can actually use to make sure bad hires don’t happen to you.

While I know many of these tips and tricks might seem like no brainers, many of the world’s most sophisticated talent organizations still rely on a completely unstructured, entirely subjective prescreening process that’s really nothing more than hiring managers’ personal preferences or broken business processes.

Given the fact that so few employers actually employ these really straightforward, but really obvious action items, forgive me if these come across as patronizing or polarizing.

It’s just that they’re problems that are, in fact, really easy to fix (unlike bad hires, which represent one mess you never want to have to clean up).

de5864b7499faf47357e8c1bd3888172x1. Try Before You Buy.

Problem: The candidate lacks technical or functional expertise and doesn’t have the skills they need to actually deliver in the job for which they were hired.

Solution: Anyone can claim to be an expert in something – and, judging from social media profiles or professional services RFPs, there are far too many “experts” out there for this to really mean anything, anyway.

But expertise is more than just sticking the right set of keywords on your resume or LinkedIn profile.

Any recruiter who even remotely knows their requisition should never get fooled by buzzword bingo or making a choice based off a candidate’s presentation style instead of professional substance. But as we all know, deep screening for technical skills and job specific expertise is not a strong suit for most recruiters out there.

That’s why I’d recommend taking candidates who look good online for an offline test drive – the only way to see if a candidate is going to work out is by well, working. Ideally, this task involves giving the candidate an actual problem or challenge simulating actual job experiences or requiring real work samples that this position was created to overcome (and if there isn’t one that’s obvious, it might be time to reevaluate the role).

Alternatively, it can be an issue that your company has recently solved, a precedent that makes it easy to see whether or not the candidate is going to cut it since you already know the answer (and they should, too – or at least come up with something that’s more than superficially similar).

It’s uncanny how quickly this litmus test screens out candidates from candidont’s, if you will. If they’re really an “expert” at anything more than using the word expert to describe whatever keyword happens to be in question, you’ll know. It’s the people who push back on really basic situational simulations or simple skills testing you should be wary of when administering these assessments.

Sure, there’s some time and money involved in these trials but even if you simply pay people for their time, you’re going to only compensate them for the work they deliver. And if they don’t deliver, then you know they’re not going to work. That’s OK – it doesn’t have to cost you thousands to figure it out.

one-size-fits-all 4502. One Size Never Fits All.

Problem: The candidate has all of the technical or functional expertise and they’ve even worked at a competitor. Let’s hire them!

Solution: While many positions and hiring stakeholders want candidates with deep domain expertise, industry experience or skills specific to your market, customer segment or vertical, you’re also running a risk.

That risk is you’re likely find a hammer who thinks everything else is a nail – and they already have your company nailed just because they’re coming from a competitor.

Someone who’s done it before will do it again, even if what they did isn’t what’s going to work this time.

This is why pattern recognition is so important for figuring out whether or not a candidate’s skills are truly transferrable, or, conversely, determining whether or not a potential new hire with a less traditional profile or limited industry experience has enough expertise to make a move make sense for either of you.

One example of a company who does a great job with pattern recognition testing, particularly for campus recruiting and emerging workforce positions is the prescreening process in place at Procter & Gamble. They require less experienced workers to apply the requisite business acumen required to anticipate (or at least appreciate) new or nuanced situations.

To start pattern recognition testing at your company, just start out by simply trying to discover exactly how much, if any, research the candidate has done into your specific market, customers, company and job – or if they already know enough to know how to articulate the often subtle similarities or slight differences between their current or past roles and the one you’re considering for their future.

Other baselines include determining whether a candidate has the intellectual curiosity required to dive in and ask the right questions needed to develop the right solutions and strategies. That’s why “no” is never the right answer to the inevitable “any other questions?” at the end of every interview.

A candidate without the ability to appreciate or articulate the small but significant contrasts in both strategy and operations is a candidate who is unlikely to be able to adapt well to these new situations when they arise on the job. And they always will.

you-sir-3. Go For The Gold STAR.

Problem: You’re too busy to read every resume and the candidate talks a good game about past performance. But… they’re making it up.

Solution: Past performance is the original predictive analytic involved in forecasting future success.

While past roles might have a slightly different set of responsibilities or reporting structure than the role you’re considering, seeing that someone has succeeded in overcoming even remotely similar challenges (and have the numbers to prove it) is essential.

Good thing that talent management has a pretty tried and true performance management process already in place.

And while the infamous STAR model  (that’s situation, task, action and results, if you’re just joining us) is so overused it’s used for buzzword bingo in talent management circles, it’s another story entirely when it’s used when attracting and acquiring that talent.

Recruiters often forget that this same model works equally well within the context of a behavioral based interview as it does a formal performance review, and every bit as effective for measuring individual performance. The key to this approach is to ask as many open ended questions as possible to focus their responses on specific results that are directly related to their personal efforts.

Don’t let candidates use team or company accomplishments during their job tenure as a crutch. Instead, tease out what outcomes a candidate drove through their individual performance and what impact those results had on bottom line results.

There might be no “I” in team, but you have to keep an eye on the unique contributions each candidate drove themselves. If they can’t do that, chances are you’re recruiting the wrong person in that team, business unit or function (and you should probably call those references yourself, as an aside).

Standardizing and implementing the STAR method in any meaningful way requires investing precious recruiting resources – like finite time or budget – before candidates even come in the door.

That’s why recruiting organizations that are getting it right know that investing in preparation preempts perspiration, and know that it’s ideal to spend as much time as possible with the entire interview team to holistically discuss what success looks like for the role, how it’s going to be measured and what competencies are required for achieving these results.

I know, this sounds painful, but it’s uncanny how much this investment up front in the recruiting process will pay off further along in the process.

When everyone’s evaluation and competency models are aligned on an interview team, candidates not only move through process faster, but the risk of making a bad hire are more or less minimized. One of my favorite words of recruiting advice I’ve ever received is that you can ensure someone can deliver results only when they know what results you expect them to deliver.

Start the interview by defining or reiterating your expectations and make sure before moving onto discussing strategies and tactics for delivering results, the candidate is able to align these with only those outcomes you or your hiring manager truly care about.

Then, give them a baseline and benchmarks and you will both quickly know what they’re signing up for and what’s expected if they decide to move on with next steps. Even if they get an offer, this is the far better place to let them opt out than after they’re already onboard.

And yes, recruiters can – and should – take no for an answer. The right candidate will always give you the right answer when they know what the question is. The STAR method just helps recruiters hear it a bit better.

5171593+_1f479b654a12cd4e44bc540d67ac55be4. Ignorance Isn’t Bliss.

The Problem: The candidates never understood that they were actually in that category, unaware of their own inherent ineffectiveness. Simply put, the candidate has a great sense of self, but no self-awareness.

The Solution: You probably can’t help the fact that the candidates who leave the best impressions are also the ones who actually believe the lines they’re feeding you about your company being such a great place to grow a career.

Style can easily distract any hiring stakeholder away from substance, a subconscious tendency every recruiter must consciously resist.

So how do you not only identify something as amorphous as “self awareness” but also measure it in any sort of meaningful way? The answer isn’t asking them about their greatest strengths or weaknesses, meaningless questions unless the recruiter goes the extra step of asking the ones that will give them this information without getting some sort of canned response or well rehearsed white lie. That is, if you think you can handle the truth.

Getting a candidate to volunteer meaningful insights into intrinsic motivation by removing the inherent artifice of job interviews is really hard for any recruiter. But it’s not impossible.

I recommend using a combination of techniques to create what’s essentially a triangulation of structured feedback from the candidate, hiring team and references alike throughout the screening and selection process. For example, asking candidates probing questions designed to assess their self-awareness in the context of specific projects can be really revealing.

Here are a few of my favorites, and what answer you should be looking for (even if it’s not what you actually ask):

“Looking back, what could you have done differently for this project?”  If they don’t temper their long list of success stories with at least a couple learning experiences, they’ll probably never learn anything.

“If you could leave out one preferred qualification or job duty from this requisition, which one would you take out?” The right candidates don’t want to take anything off – they want to add even more on.

“How would your boss react if I called him right now and made you a verbal offer on speaker phone?” If they already know the answer to that question or don’t give the matter at least a little pause, this isn’t their first recent recruiting rodeo. Don’t let them take you for a ride.

“If we extended your probationary period because we still weren’t sure whether we’d made the right choice after 90 days, how would you respond?” The ones who’d walk will balk. The really good ones will keep it real. Really.

Balance these responses by posing these same questions (obviously reframe as needed) to a candidate’s references to see whether  their self-perception is on point or if they’re completely clueless (or in denial) about what their coworkers really think.

Then ask the hiring team the exact same questions. At the intersection of that triangulation lies the truth you should look for when interviewing candidates. Top talent knows how to play to the middle.

These are just a few good tips to help you avoid bad hires – or at least, they’ve always worked for me. That’s not saying you’ll never make another recruiting decision you’ll soon regret, but they should help prevent making bad hires by providing a good method to the recruiting madness.

rayRay Tenenbaum is the founder of Great Hires, a recruiting technology startup offering a mobile-first Candidate Experience platform for both candidates and hiring teams. Ray has previously spent half of his career building Silicon Valley startups such as Red Answers and Adify (later sold to Cox Media); the other half of his career was spent in marketing and leadership roles at enterprise organizations including Procter & Gamble, Kraft, Booz & Co. and Intuit. Ray holds an MBA from the University of Michigan as well as a bachelor’s in chemical engineering from McGill University.

Follow Ray on Twitter @rayten or connect with him on LinkedIn.