Blog

Without Bias: Pride and Prejudice and Recruiting.

keira“Someone has said that it requires less mental effort to condemn than to think.” 

― Emma Goldman

We all have stories. And if you’ve been reading this blog at all, you already know many of mine – I hope you have as much fun hearing them as I do telling them. See, after surviving all these years in the talent trenches, I’ve come to realize just how much amazing material and interesting anecdotes seem to come out of such a seemingly mundane profession.

Yes, recruiters are known to stretch the truth, but if there’s one rule I’ve learned, it’s that the more ridiculous, far-fetched and unbelievable a recruiter’s story might be, the more likely it is to be true. And every one of us has at least one or two real doozies, as my grandmother used to call them.

This story is really no different than the other experiences I’ve put into writing, really; it’s just that actually doing so has taken me a little while, not least because I’ve had to personally come to terms with what happened, and to reconcile myself with such institutional issues as workplace bias, professional discrimination and personal phobia. Hell, no one is perfect, and I can say frankly the best part about screwing up is learning what you did wrong so you never have to experience that failure again.

I’m comfortable with my imperfections, because they’re really what makes me, well, me. They’ve shaped my life and taught me manifold lessons, and sure, they’ve caused me some pain in the past. But I figure by finally opening up and sharing this particular story, and by admitting the errors of my ways, I can gain some kind of absolution.

Or at least, provide the rest of you recruiters out there with a cautionary tale of what not to do when working a recruiting desk.

Now, for some reason, I seem to write a lot about my halcyon days back as a third party recruiter, days that are long gone – but the lessons I learned in that agency are the ones that were the most formative on my development, both personally and professionally. When you’re first starting out, the magnitude of every decision, positive or negative, is magnified, which is why, in my mind, I learned more in my relatively brief tenure in search than I probably have in my extensive in-house career. Time is accelerated when you don’t know what you’re doing, and things come at you faster than you can handle sometimes. Pressure builds, tensions soar, and even the best of us is bound to screw up in the staffing pressure cooker.

Particularly because it’s in those agency and contingency workforce kinds of environments where you run into the most colorful cast of characters. Talk about diversity, when you’re filling high volume, high turnover and low skilled sort of reqs, there’s no such thing as a “traditional candidate” – and while each placement I made on that desk was unique in their own weird way, there’s always been one that’s stood out in my mind – and who’s become even more prominent in the past few months as I watch what’s happening now, in real life, these many years later.

It seems I can’t watch the news or even read headlines these days without thinking of one very special, very different candidate named Carl.

giphy (86)

A Biographical Note.

In the past, I’ve been hired to work on some pretty complex profiles and hard to fill roles for a variety of companies; finding those needles in the proverbial haystack is my job as a sourcer and recruiter, after all; it’s what I’m good at, and, lucky for me, it’s what I love to do, too. Hell, to me, there’s nothing more rewarding than locating that next hire and closing down that impossible req after everyone tells you it can’t be done – proving people wrong and beating the odds (and the competition) is one of the best parts of the people business. I hear, “impossible to fill,” and I think, “challenge accepted.”

If I can’t do it, it probably can’t be done. Not to sound like a dick or anything, but I’ve been doing this a while and have gotten to be damn good at this whole recruiting thing. For example, I was once tasked with finding a CCIE (that’s a Cisco Certified Internet Engineer for all you Luddites out there) for a large client in the financial services sector.

This skill set was so in demand the client made it clear that money was no object – and they’d pay whatever price it took to land someone with this experience and expertise. I know, it’s not often that anyone hands an agency recruiter a blank check, but these were the early days of what’s now become codified as “cybersecurity” and morphed from a specialty skillset within IT into a global industry generating hundreds of thousands of new tech jobs (and billions in terms of turnover) each and every year.

While cybersecurity has evolved, back in the day, anyone with a CCIE designation was worth their friggin’ weight in gold; these were the networking professionals sitting unquestionably at the upper echelon of the tech recruiting hierarchy at the time.

They were nearly impossible to find and even harder to lure away from their current employers given the short talent supply, fierce demand and staggering compensation packages CCIEs commanded. Everyone wanted them, and everyone knew the price – and was willing to pay it. Those were the best sort of searches you could ever get working at an agency, and I relished the chance to throw myself into a search that was notoriously difficult, highly complex and extremely targeted.

Even if I had no idea what in the hell I was doing. Somehow, I was going to do it.

I realized quickly that I’d signed up for more than I’d bargained for; while I’d run all the job ads on all the familiar sites and ran a ton of database searches, both internal and external for this skillset, I couldn’t find a single passive candidate or active applicant, period. Crickets. That’s not happened to me before or since. So I did what any rookie recruiter would do – I panicked and started pressing my luck with some resumes that badly missed the mark and arguing about the need for this qualification with my hiring managers wondering when they’d have some candidates to look at. Things were starting to fall apart, and I was starting to get desperate.

That’s when I first met Carl. Well, actually, he first appeared to me magically, showing up in my inbox as a resume that looked like a slam dunk at any employer. Dude even had a CCIE – and somehow, someway, I’d landed a unicorn who actually responded to an online ad and reached out to me proactively, which, like, pretty much never happens for roles with requirements like this one. I mean, he was so perfect, my first reaction was that his applying must be a red flag, since there must be something wrong with him if he was the one reaching out to me. But nope.

Turns out Carl wasn’t just interested in connecting over the phone. Nope. He actually showed up in my office – in person – later in the day, which even then was kind of a weird thing to do. But I wasn’t going to look a gift horse or a CCIE in the mouth, so of course, I instantly dropped what I was doing to meet him.

Apparently he wanted the position so much he thought a face-to-face meeting and the chance to plead his case in person would help his cause – which was highly unnecessary, since his resume alone was enough to get him hired pretty much anywhere.

Good on him, I thought. At least the guy’s got cajones and isn’t afraid to put himself out there.” I admired the hell out of that sort of tenacity – too many candidates could give two shits about you, but here was one who was actually doing the hard sell for once. And I kind of liked it – and him – immediately.

Carl was quite a character, a seasoned Network Engineer who knew the ins and outs of cybersecurity, data breaches and network threats. I mean, we’re talking all-star hacker sorts of shit. He had held his CCIE designation for a number of years now, as he constructed several server firms and built secure data networks for a variety of cutting edge companies, finding his skillset so in demand that he could pretty much write his own ticket at that time. Even during that first conversation, and even though he tried to pitch himself for the role, Carl was so perfect I couldn’t help but go into full on recruiter mode.

You know, when you stop sounding like a human and start sounding like a mouth-breathing idiot, asking asinine questions about what interested them in the role, why they were motivated to make a change, what he needed out of an offer if my client was (inevitably) interested in moving forward, that sort of stuff. He gave me the information I needed, and when he walked out of my office, I started working on what I thought would be a slam dunk placement (and big money, no whammies as far as my commision was concerned).

I composed my write up, appended it on top of Carl’s resume, and submitted it immediately to my hiring manager, pretty damn sure I’d finally cracked the code and found the CCIE we’d spent so long looking for. I was already counting my placement fee in my head (and making it rain, considering where comp would come in at).

giphy (88)

Persuasion.

While he’d already dropped by, I asked Carl to come to the office as a formality – also, these intake meetings were company policy, even if we had met before.

Carl was a tall, lanky guy, looked kind of like he used to be a pretty good basketball player in his day. He had sharp features and a quick smile, an  easy laugh, and an amazing intellect – in fact, the tech guys Carl met with during the hiring process almost all agreed he was, in fact, “brilliant.” The kind of mind that doesn’t happen along every day – particularly when they’ve also got a CCIE to boot. He had the looks, the skills, and a one of a kind mind – and yet, there was something a little, well, off about Carl.

He was shy and timid, even for a techie, avoiding eye contact and speaking in a voice so quiet I had to strain to hear his carefully worded answers to my commonplace questions. The answers were routine, but my staffing sixth sense told me that not everything with Carl was exactly as it seems. Call it a hunch. But the truth was, he was terribly shy and insecure, and it showed.

This naturally made me concerned about how he’d come across when meeting and interviewing with the client. After all, they were that kind of Wolf of Wall Street kind of financial firm dripping with machismo and materialism, where the car you drove and the watch you wore said all they needed to know about you as a person. Yeah, they were pretty much pricks.

I tried coaching Carl, telling him what I knew about the client, their button up and competitive culture and how they valued not only the experience and knowledge potential hires could bring to the firm, but also their upside – they were looking for what my hiring manager referred to as “the total package.”

They only took A players, making them mediocre under their own hubris and high standards – and I told Carl if he wanted the job, he had to come across as an A player all around, even if his technical acumen and hard skills were more or less beyond reproach. I walked him through interview etiquette, coached him on what to wear and how he needed to present himself to seem like he had the confidence and charisma my client considered so critical in every new hire.

He proved a willing pupil, and even though he showed up looking a bit ragged and acting a bit nebbish, I’d soon gotten him to the point where he could at least pretend to be enough of a badass to impress my clients into making him an offer. He assured me that hard driving culture wasn’t a non-starter; he craved the competition and the chance to work with some of the best in the business. He felt confident his skills would speak for themselves, a sentiment I shared as he finally met with my client in person a few days later.

Of course, just to make sure he was feeling OK about everything and troubleshoot any last minute issues (or issue any last minute edicts or advice), I asked him to stop by the office on his way over to what I was sure was going to be a successful interview. This hire, I was sure, was going to be one hell of a feather in my hat as a recruiter, not to mention one hell of a payday, too. I wasn’t leaving anything to chance, so I put on my white gloves and sent him on his way, holding my breath until the hiring manager immediately called me to start putting together an offer for Carl as soon as possible.

Carl was ecstatic about the opportunity and receiving an offer, and it took minimal negotiation about stuff like start dates and sign on bonuses to get him to sign on the dotted line and start this new chapter in his career – one with tremendous upside, infinite earnings potential and the prestige of working in a key role for one of the best known brands on Wall Street. It was the type of role that any network engineer dreams of, the sort of job and company worth someone like Carl actually going through a recruiter like me to try to land. And we did it.

Still, even as I saw him off into his new role, I just felt something was a little off about Carl, that there was something – I couldn’t describe what – somehow missing from him, if that makes sense. Like even in his biggest triumph, he still wasn’t completely whole – and that while professionally he was on top of the world, for some reason he remained insecure, shy and reserved. I couldn’t figure it out – that is, until I met Carl again about two years later.

That’s the moment everything clicked. Even if nothing made sense.

giphy (84)

Love and Friendship.

When you’re a lifelong recruiter, you see so many resumes at some point, finding the ones that are going to work becomes somewhat second nature. There are few feelings better (professionally speaking, at least) than that pit of excitement that you inevitably get in your stomach that moment you finally find that profile you’ve been hunting for – the Chupacabra candidate, the one whose very existence is probably a myth, although it’s the hunt that makes this business so damned fun.

But as much fun as the chase might be, there’s pretty much nothing more rewarding than when luck and circumstance collide and that golden resume somehow shows up seemingly out of nowhere, a placement waiting to happen – whether or not you have an actual job order or not. You know the type I’m talking about. There are certain candidates you can place anywhere, and most of the time, you know it more or less immediately. Those are every recruiter’s favorite kind of candidate, which is why a couple years after the fact, Carl still stood out in my mind as one of my better sourcing success stories.

Even if it really was just dumb luck that our paths happened to cross on the way to a successful placement.

Of course, most resumes are downright forgettable, and I was up to my neck in mediocre, minimally qualified candidates who I’d never dream of trying to submit to one of my clients. They’d do if there were no other options, but our clients don’t hire us to find B or C players. This is why I’ve always been in the habit of setting up an alert after every successful placement so that I’m automatically notified if any of those slam dunk candidates happens, for whatever reason, to submit their resume to one of the manifold paid job board databases or they update their professional profile or experience online (a sure sign they’re probably on the market again).

I almost never got results – these sorts of candidates aren’t the kind of job seekers who generally posted their resumes up on Monster or applied to job ads, really. But if they did, I didn’t want to miss out on making another potential placement – because some candidates, with a recruiting relationship that spans the course of their career, are truly the gift that keeps on giving.

I’ve built a bench of a few of those A-players over the years, but since I do my job, most of the time, my best placements stick around, developing their careers within a company instead of by moving between them (as a rule).

giphy (87)

Collected Poems & Prayers.

Retention is every recruiter’s enemy, if you think about it. But finding a candidate a career destination is rewarding enough to make up for the potential loss in recurring placement fees, I suppose.

That’s why I was so surprised one day to actually have one of my many alerts actually return a result one random morning; when I went to look at which candidate had been posting their resume, I figured that it must have been a mistake, since I’d never worked with this particular candidate before. But one quick glance at her resume convinced me that I needed to change that – her experience was fantastic, her credentials impeccable.

As I reviewed the resume one more time, however, I got the uneasy feeling that somehow, I’d seen this resume before, even if I never forget the name or background of any candidate I place (and haven’t yet, even after hundreds of hires). There was something oddly familiar about it, even if I couldn’t put my finger on where, exactly, I’d seen this resume before.

Then, I looked at the candidate’s name again, and the lightbulb immediately went off: this Carla woman was running some sort of scheme and had stolen Carl’s resume. I pulled up Carl’s old record from my ATS, and sure enough, it was an exact match, save the most recent position, where this identity thief had added the position I’d placed Carl in over two years ago.

My first thought was one of disgust – really, who does that sort of shit? Taking somebody else’s resume and passing it off as their own was one of the weirder candidate tricks I’d encountered, but at this point I wasn’t willing to put these sort of hijinks past many of the job seekers I worked with.

They’ve all got their strategies and workarounds – this one, I thought, was just particularly nefarious, considering she was potentially damaging Carl’s reputation by applying for jobs and sharing his resume with the same recruiters and employers Carl would likely encounter in this fairly insular industry. I just didn’t want him to get burned by this imposter, and figured I’d give him the heads up.

Sure, it’d been months since we’d spoken, but like most of my candidates, I’d send him a quarterly check up e-mail, and he assured me things were going great – in fact, he even referred me a few searches or professional connections over the months, but we’d lost touch since he last left the job market. save these everyday exchanges. I figured I’d do him a solid and reveal this professional phoney for the fraud she was by playing along and actually pretending I was interested in her for a “hot opening” I had at a credit card processing center that I assured her she’d be perfect for.

I’ll admit, this was a lie – and a trap, albeit one done for completely altruistic purposes. I figured I’d catch her red handed, see her reaction to my unmasking of her assumed identity, and maybe even get another good story out of what was sure to be an interesting encounter, to say the very least. I wanted to call bullshit to her face, and let her know that her sick little game was officially over. I couldn’t wait for that moment she realized she’d been found out – or what she’d do or say. The only thing I knew was that I was going to have me some catfish for dinner. Or so I thought.

Everything went according to plan; she immediately responded and agreed to meet at my office for an in person later that week. I showed up more prepared than I probably ever have for another informational interview, coming in with both barrels loaded: freshly printed copies of her resumes and the one I had from Carl, which I was planning on presenting along with a well rehearsed little speech I’d been working on about how recruiters aren’t as dumb as she thinks, or at least, this one wasn’t. Or some shit to that effect.

I forget the exact details, because when I walked into the room, the first thing I heard when I walked in to confront Carla was, “Hey, Derek. It’s been a while.”

Alright. What the hell was going on here?

giphy (85)

Lady Susan In Mansfield Park.

Then – I know this is passe these days, but this was a different time – I realized that Carl and Carla were the same person.

I feel like an asshole now, but I couldn’t help but just sit there and stare, with my jaw in the floor, trying to figure out how that awkward, timid geek I’d met a few years ago had suddenly metamorphosed into a self-assured, confident and frankly fairly good looking woman. Carla was patient with my stupid ass questions – thankfully – and she explained how she’d grown her hair out, had surgery and undergone comprehensive hormone replacement to transition from male to female.

Turns out when Carl moved jobs, he also made the decision to finally give into what he’d always been hiding and use it as an opportunity to change identities, too. She told me she’d always felt trapped in a man’s body, that she felt she was supposed to be a woman and this, not the strange guy I’d met before, was who she really was.

Carla went on to let me know just how much pain she’d gone through – physically and emotionally – to make this transition, and just how much freedom she’d finally found as a result of becoming her best self, even if it cost her some friends and family. If they weren’t going to accept her, then she didn’t need them in her life, which she felt was really just starting out since she’d finished her full transition. She was a different person on the outside, but the same person I knew before – only happy now, for a change.

I don’t know why I was so shocked, or why my instant response was with an angry outburst wondering why she couldn’t have communicated this to me – I mean, this was pretty big news, and I thought we had a good enough relationship where she’d at least give me a courtesy call explaining the situation – I’d have been cool with it, I assured myself.

But it was probably costing her a promising career and certainly most of the clients I worked with would never hire her, which made me wonder why she hadn’t at least sought out my input on the severe repercussions this would have on her hireability.

I know. What a stupid, selfish thought to have. I realized almost instantly that my reaction was not the right one, that I was judging a candidate on the basis of what my clients were looking for instead of who she truly was, and what truly made her happy. For Carla, and so many other people out there, that has nothing to do with work, no matter how much recruiters would like to believe that our careers are the be-all, end-all of our entire identities.

Not so in this case, and in being so quick to pass judgement on her for purely selfish reasons, I realized that I was basically no better than any other bigot out there, a self-serving, intolerant and irrational narcissist whose entire worldview was confined to my own reflection.

But I quickly figured out that not only was Carla looking for a new job, but she could probably use my help now more than ever, since she confided this would be her first search since the transition. And as soon as we started talking about next steps and open opportunities and all of that other standard recruitment shop talk, who she was immediately ceased to matter.

Like any candidate, I was only concerned about what she was capable of becoming – my clients were looking for growth potential, someone who wasn’t afraid of backing down from a challenge or a difficult situation, and in this, Carla might just have been the most qualified candidate I’ve ever come across.

When I asked her about what she was looking for in her next role and how I could help, I could see a look of – well, almost thankfulness – in her eyes, a look that said my desire to deal with her as a job seeker rather than as a transgendered person meant more to her than any other support or guidance I could have given her.

I got the information I needed from her, and it only took me about a week to get her placed into a great new gig at a killer company who was grateful to have the chance to score such a world class hire, and were equally grateful to me for looking out for their best interests and facilitating the introduction.

No one asked about her past, and even if they did, I’m pretty sure no one would have cared. The thing was, no matter what gender Carla identified with, she was still one hell of an engineer. Period.

giphy (89)

 

Sense and Sensibility.

Now, I’m no psychologist – I have only a perfunctory and passing knowledge of the neurological and biological processes working together to make human beings, well, human. I guess I’ve always been lucky enough to take my gender and sexuality for granted, because if there’s one thing I’m pretty damn certain of at this point in my life, it’s that I’m a heterosexual male – which isn’t nearly as much fun as it sounds, particularly when you’re dating.

Trust me. But I’m cool with that, just like I’m cool with the fact that not everyone out there has the same proclivities and preferences as I do. If we were all the same, we’d probably be pretty boring – and recruiting wouldn’t be nearly as much fun, either.

My philosophy, and one that’s served me fairly well over the years, is that you’ve got the right to be you, and as long as you don’t do anyone any harm, I love you no matter who in the hell you are or what you’re about, because ultimately, I’m a humanist – and think you’ve almost got to be to work in this strange industry of ours.

Not too long ago, Katrina Kibben, one of this fine publications’ editorial masterminds and a seriously all around kick ass individual, gave me one of the greatest compliments I’ve ever received: she told me that I’m one of the few men she knew who she considered a feminist.

I don’t know why, but I was deeply touched by that. I’ve never thought of myself as a feminist before, but was honored to be perceived that way simply because I’ve always operated from a place that what you do isn’t who you are, and to accept candidates for what they can do professionally instead of judging them based on their personal past. That in no way impacts job performance or placeability, and frankly I could give two shits about what gender you are if you’re a good candidate, a decent person and not a total pain in the ass to work with. That’s all I ask for, really.

I find it deeply ironic that gender identity has become one of the hottest of hot button issues of our time, with every news cycle seemingly stuffed with banal news about bathroom regulations or some new restriction placed on an entire subset of the population by disguising their prejudice and ignorance as a religious issue instead of an ethical one.

As mentioned before, I’m a straight male, and the first rule of going to the public bathroom for us is that if you see someone else’s junk when you’re in there, you fail. Keep your eyes straight ahead, don’t look down, and take care of your business. Let the person next to you do the same, and everyone wins. This is as true in the boardroom as it is the bathroom, by the way.

We talk a lot about diversity, but as long as we focus on visible differences and quotas instead of shared similarities and experiences, we’re missing out on what really matters. Because if your employees aren’t free to be themselves at work, they’re never going to do their best work. Enough is enough. If you’re still holding onto petty misconceptions or outdated stereotypes, you’d better reconsider this whole recruiting thing.

Because the one thing this profession doesn’t have any room for is any more bigotry or bias. The hiring process already has enough of that built in already. #TrueStory

Derek ZellerAbout the Author: Derek Zeller draws from over 16 years in the recruiting industry. The last 11 years he has been involved with federal government recruiting specializing within the cleared Intel space under OFCCP compliance.

He has experience with both third party agency and in-house recruiting for multiple disciplines and technologies. Using out-of-the-box tactics and strategies to identify and engage talent, he has had significant experience in building referral and social media programs, the implementation of Applicant Tracking Systems, technology evaluation, and the development of sourcing, employment branding, military and college recruiting strategies.

You can read his thoughts on RecruitingDaily.com or Recruitingblogs.com or his own site Derdiver.com.  Follow Derek on Twitter @Derdiver or connect with him on LinkedIn.

3 Productivity Apps for Recruiters

Productive (1)There’s a reason why a quick search for ‘Productivity’ on Amazon generates 83,199 results. Time is the only resource that we cannot get more of. As a result, we’re all under pressure to optimize our output, be productive and ensure that we’re not wasting any precious time.

There are heaps of apps, websites and books that promise you better results. It seems a little counter-productive to burn time looking for apps that save you time, so I’ve pinpointed three simple apps that I use every day to get more done.

These productivity apps can make an enormous difference to your recruiting team’s results. Enjoy:

Plant Your Forest

Are you easily distracted? Do you find it hard not to check out the new photo that you’ve been tagged in on Facebook or filter the latest tweets? You’re not alone. Most of us are addicted to the warm fuzzy feeling we get when we see a new notification. The issue is that it is a serious drain on productivity.forestapp

Forest is here to help.

Soothing, as well as highly effective, this app (iOS & Chrome) helps you focus on the tasks that really matter.

The app is very simple. You open Forest to plant a seedling. If you leave the app in the next 30 minutes or visit any ‘blacklisted websites’, your new tree dies. If you’re successful, you’ve just taken the first step to planting your new Forest.

You can create your own ‘blacklist’, but I’d recommend including classic time-drains like Facebook and Twitter to make sure you’re not sabotaging your productivity.

Cooking Up A Pomodoro

Do you find yourself hopping between tasks like a madman, juggling new emails with requests from your boss, jumping between candidate calls and email follow-ups?ejsedblok6yf3nvlkdya

Again, you’re not alone. Most of us, myself included, find it tough to settle down to a single task and get into what is known as our ‘flow state.’

The Pomodoro Technique is a highly effective antidote for this state of affairs.

It’s a simple time management technique devised by Francesco Cirillo in the late 1980′s. You split your workday into 25 minute periods of intense, focused work, that are followed by 5-minute breaks. The method is based on the idea that frequent breaks can improve mental agility.

I use the 25 minute stretches of focus to tackle my major tasks for the day, (I usually plan these tasks the evening before), and the 5 minute breaks to ‘switch off’ and respond to emails and tweets.

I’d definitely recommend giving it a go. You can even buy your very own tomato shaped timer to keep track of your work schedule if you fancy!

Toggl Tasks

Ever get that feeling that you’re totally rushed off your feet but unable to really pinpoint exactly what you’ve achieved at the end of the day?Toggl-Time-Tracker-Timer-page-screenshot

If you’re not careful, different recruiting tasks blend into each other, and it becomes pretty difficult to make sure you’re moving forward every day.

I use Toggl to keep track of exactly how I’m spending my time (I’m even using it right now to track how long it takes to write this blog post!)

The app lets you track individual tasks, or measure how long you’re spending on different projects each week. It’s essentially a timesheet, but it’s a timesheet that gives you analytics at the end of every day to show you exactly how you’re spending your time.

Not only does this help you become more productive, but it’s easy to share with your boss or your wider team to demonstrate what you’re working on and how efficient you really are.

Summary

There’s a common theme with the three apps that I’ve highlighted in this article. The all require a certain level of commitment from you. Technology can only take you so far; ultimately you’re responsible for your own productivity.

If you’re prepared to make that commitment, then I can guarantee you’ll be surprised at the per-hour efficiency that’s possible. These apps really are pretty great. If there are others that you use on a regular basis, I’d love to know what they are in the comments!

About The Author

Ben Slater Image

Ben Slater is VP Growth at Beamery, recruiting software powered by machine intelligence. You can reach out to him on LinkedIn and Twitter. If you would like more information on Beamery, you can request a demo here.

The Numbers Game: How To Use Data To Land Top Talent

The Numbers Game: How To Use Data To Land Top Talent

More than ever, “understanding the numbers” is an essential for any hiring manager, recruiter, or talent acquisition professional who hopes to compete for the right talent at the right cost. Use data to land the right people.

The first thing you need to know (if you did’t already) is that today’s job market is a candidate driven one and the quality of their application experience can and will influence their perception of the company they’re dealing with.

But how do you know which numbers are important or how to measure the results you have?

Watch as Glassdoor and Greenhouse present “The Numbers Game: How To Use Data To Land Top Talent”.

Hear actionable advice, best practices, and case studies of companies using talent analytics to optimize their recruiting strategy. With real-world data and insights at your command, you’ll make smarter decisions about investing your hard-earned recruiting budget.

What You’ll Learn:

  • The most important metrics and benchmarks to track, report on, and optimize in your hunt for great talent.
  • How to leverage past data to understand hiring trends and create a company-wide workforce planning program.
  • Creating a hiring strategy, building the case for more recruiting budget, and earning your seat at the decision-making table.
  • How predictive analytics, employer branding analytics, and thinking like marketer help you forecast hiring needs and ensure your recruiting message resonates with candidates.

Product Review: Clinch

Clinch.ioCandidates are your customers and they shop for jobs much like they shop for products. There could be a lot of reasons those candidates are not applying for your position.

Perhaps, it could be because your application process takes too long or some other reason that could be easily looked in. The truth is,  you will not know until you ask them why. Clinch.io can help you determine the reason they didn’t apply to figure out if it was your career page or another area of your site.

Clinch Will…

  • Automate your marketing process.
  • Provide you with a mobile-friendly career site.
  • Provide you data on your potential candidates that viewed your jobs but didn’t actually apply.

Clinch Will Not…

  • Replace an applicant tracking system.
  • Create graphics or designs. You will need to create your logos and templates. After you do so, however, the process becomes automated.

Keep In Mind:

  • Clinch is a great tool for large companies with high volume. It has some great features such as workflow tool that allows recruitment/marketing managers to completely own the process.
  • Clinch is very easy to integrate with almost any Applicant Tracking System (ATS)  and has an open API.
  • Clinch saves a lot of time with automating the marketing process. It is very easy to create templates once the graphics are provided. You can also modify existing templates with ease.
  • The data provided by Clinch gives you data on who your potential candidates are and allows you to reach out to them by email.

After my review of Clinch,  I would recommend this tool for enterprise sized companies as the pricing model puts it out of budget for smaller companies with tight recruiting budgets or staffing firms. Pricing started at $1,000 per month.

About Clinch.io:

About The Author

tanya

Tanya Bourque is CEO of OpExpert, a staffing firm based in Wyomissing, PA.  She is a  technology enthusiast who is obsessed with finding the best tools available for recruiters.She has experience with sourcing, marketing tools, CRMs, and applicant tracking systems. You can connect with her on LinkedIn or follow her on Twitter.

How I Stopped Worrying And Learned to Love My Applicant Tracking System.

thebombI’ve been a recruiter for 14 years now, and during that time, have been able to witness the evolution of the applicant tracking system first hand. Over the course of my tenure with my long time employer, I’ve been subjected to at least four different ATS solutions.

In each case, migrating and implementing each successive applicant tracking system represented a significant investment in terms of time and resources. The purported ability of each to help us make better placements faster and more efficiently, of course, seemed well worth the associated frustrations of having to learn all the bells and whistles of yet another new system. Yeah, right.

I will admit, each incarnation of our system of record has been exponentially more sophisticated than the last. They’ve become much more complex, with a litany of additional features and functionalities, evolving from out of the box software to full “integrated talent management solutions” delivered from the ubiquitous “Cloud.” And yet, ultimately, each of them was programmed to more or less achieve the same end: to track applicants.

At this, they have more or less succeeded. What remains questionable, however, is how much impact they’ve ever made on actually converting those applicants into hires. By this critical outcome, it seems to me, the track record is decidedly more mixed.

The Doomsday Machine.

Back in the day, I started off my career in the ultimate old-school: MS DOS. If you’re over 35, you already know what I’m talking about – a completely out of the box WYSIWYG (‘what you see is what you get’) style platform featuring a flashing yellow cursor over a flat black screen. To do something as simple as switch between black screens, you had to enter an F-function button – which was about as easy as that early system got.

Still, with no basis for comparison, it was marginally better than nothing, I thought at the time. I’ve got to admit, I barely remember the names of any of the other applicant tracking systems that followed, much less the pros and the cons. They were basically same shit, different skin. And a whole lot of headaches, too. Suffice to say, these subsequent systems were forgettable, which I suppose is probably a good thing.

giphy (79)

Like any recruiter, I have found my way around these enterprise systems by collecting an ever increasing pile of notebooks and files, which, while messy, is pretty much the easiest and most reliable way to manage candidates and reqs yet discovered.

I know I’m not alone when I say that it’s always been easier for me, as a recruiter, to fill up notebooks with notes and names instead of having to learn an entirely new ATS by scratch, much less migrate data or manually enter records – which is what you’ve got to do when most of your candidates aren’t yet actually applicants. Needless to say, my desk is a little messy, but unlike every ATS I’ve used before, there’s actually a method to my madness.

Of course, these days, my desk is getting a whole lot cleaner, and it’s got nothing to do with my decision to retire my spiral notebooks in favor of file folders. In fact, it’s been quite some time since I’ve even reached into one of these folders, much less populated them with reams of paper records and handwritten notes as has been the case throughout my career.

Old recruiter habits die hard, but in this case, it was pretty easy to give up my OG approach. See, after a whole lot of trial and error, we finally found an ATS that delivers as promised. An ATS that’s actually useful – and actually used.

And that, my friends, has made all the difference.

Condition, Read: How To Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Your ATS.

otbGranted, learning our new ATS hasn’t always been easy. It’s taken me a full on year – more, even – to fully grasp and understand how, exactly, to use this system. That investment has paid off – now that I know how to actually align my system of work with my system at work, I use it for pretty much everything.

I’m talking like, everything – I’ll bet I’m probably one of the few end users who may or may not have, uh, figured out that the custom dashboarding is capped at 50. I have over 150 saved searches in the system – OK, I might be the sourcing equivalent of a hoarder, but I’m telling you, I use them and depend on them.

Most of these features or functionalities I’ve figured out on my own, and while I’m sure I’ll continue to discover new workflows and workarounds, for now, I’m comfortable with where I’m at, and satisfied with my applicant tracking system.

I know, it sounds weird for anyone to say that, but at this point, it’s true.

I’ve learned a lot more about recruiting ever since I took the time to really learn the ins and outs of my ATS. Some of my discoveries were shocking.

For example, when I started building dashboards around the number of applicants for a particular position and the number of candidates in our system who met the minimum criteria for the position, I was amazed to discover how many applicants we were already sitting on that we’d missed simply because we didn’t know they were there.

Or, in most cases, because the recruiter didn’t fully understand how to search through their own ATS. We were sitting on the best talent community conceivable, and turns out, it’s the database of candidates we’ve been building up for years without even knowing it.

I’ll be the first to admit having written off this system, like I had all the others, when it was first implemented. It would have been easy to sit back and dismiss it, figure out more workarounds and fill more file folders, as I’d done over the course of my career. But for once, I decided to suck it up and actually take the time to learn a system, and my newfound productivity and proficiency are worth all the pain it took to figure out how to maximize the return on our ATS investment.

giphy (80)

We all go through a quick training course, maybe get some flashcards, but we have jobs to do and reqs to close and no one has time to really figure out anything more about their ATS than is absolutely necessary. Like any recruiter, I’ve always hated the ATS – until I realized how far applicant tracking systems have come since the days of DOS.

If you’re going to to spend the money it takes to replace your applicant tracking system, as so many organizations are, it’s imparative you spend the time learning to maximize and optimize the new system, too. Remember: what you get out of an ATS depends on what your recruiters put in, first.

If your recruiting is broken, stop blaming your ATS for a change – don’t hate the player, hate the game, as they say.

And never forget, all applicant tracking systems are only as good as the recruiters using it. If you suck, it’s probably not your system’s fault. But if you’re already a good recruiter, having the right tools and tech just might make you a great one.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAUAAAAAJGQ3N2YxZTg4LWRlNDQtNDM2NS1hNDI1LWM5NzUwNGQ0NGM5OAAbout the Author: Bahar Studdard has been an agency recruiter for over 14 years, working in the transportation, manufacturing and logistics fields in staffing. She works remotely, supporting 12 offices in 4 states (Colorado, Albuquerque, Oklahoma & Wyoming).

She directly supports the Regional Vice President by working with her offices on their recruiting challenges and needs and works directly with 2 clients in Longmont for their skilled placements.  She has also owned her own business, and enjoys writing.

Follow her on Twitter @TrendyBahar or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Can’t Tell Me Nothing: Why The Job Interview Needs To Die.

yeezusThere are moments you realize you just need to shut up and stop talking. Whether it’s a heavy sigh or a not so subtle eye roll, that casual glance at a watch or a cell phone or – worst case scenario – that awful instant internalization that happens after you know you’ve just said something you really shouldn’t have (and instantly regret it).

For many, even the smallest of small talk is better than the shrill sound of silence. For many more, talking too much is a well-honed defense mechanism designed to cover up a range of insecurities, primarily a lack of self-confidence or, alternatively, complete overcompensation. I’m definitely one of those people, and I’ll bet you are, too.

Whether it’s your parents, friends, coworkers or clients, we’ve all had that minute where we really would all have been better served, as they say, looking like an idiot instead of opening your mouth and removing all doubt.

You get what I’m talking about – and if you don’t, well, you’re probably one of the worst offenders of the STFU rule of social conscious.

Things, of course, get even worse for celebrities, as their biggest foot-in-mouth moments inevitably occur given the ubiquitousness of the 24 hour news cycle, where a verbal slip up can lead to an epic fall from grace.

Mel Gibson went from Braveheart to avowed anti-Semite almost faster than that dude who played Kramer went from comedic treasure to racist outcast quicker than you can say “Johnny Football” or “Ann Coulter” (shudder). If you need proof that saying too much can be the world’s biggest turn off, two words for you: Kanye West.

Or, better yet, Donald Trump. Seriously. sometimes everyone’s a lot better off if you just suck it in and zip the lip.

You’ve got to know when to drop the mic and walk away.

Watch the Throne.

o-KANYE-WEST-facebookNowhere is this more true than in the job interview. Now, obviously, most candidates come in having carefully rehearsed their best responses to the same silly questions interviewers always ask, or having carefully crafted stories about why they’re looking for a new job or why they left an old one.

These stories are, of course, of varying intricity – and every recruiter has that candidate that they’ve disqualified in like five to ten minutes proceed to drone on for like an hour about their suspect “accomplishments,” not even pausing long enough to graciously end the call with a “we’ll be in touch” kind of coda. In fact, that actually happens quite a lot, come to think about it.

Of course, this diarhea of the mouth is somewhat excusable for job seekers, considering the question and answer format of most interviews puts the onus of them to be the ones filling dead air. And yes, some of them ( a lot of them) don’t know when the hell to shut up. These are facts.

But on the other hand, if we flip the tables for just a minute, have you ever thought of the fact that maybe, just maybe, it might be you, the recruiter, who doesn’t know when to stop talking? That maybe you’re selling just a little too hard, or that you’re asking the kinds of questions that make it feel more like an interrogation than a professional conversation.

Here’s the thing: interviews, as both recruiter and candidate know, are total bullshit. We wear the faces for the faces that we meet, and the entire charade is an exercise in artifice. One only has to do a perfunctory Google search or pull up the company’s profile on Glassdoor to see a litany of the most common interview questions, and the thing is, they’re ready for almost anything any employer throws at them.

We hyperbolize, we embellish, we tell the interviewer whatever they want to hear to get hired. Most of the time, the recruiter wants to believe you, since they want to get that requisition closed. We ask and answer the same lame follow up questions that “make us seem engaged and interested,” even though neither party really cares – and the whole thing is an awkward circuitous conversation that’s like bad improv or a Presidential debate.

It’s all for show, and we really don’t learn anything other than if that person is a complete sociopath or somehow unable to fake it even for the half hour these superficial conversations take.

For some reason, interviews have become sacrosanct in our systems and entrenched in our workflows, a part of the hiring process no one really questions. We spend a ton of money on interviewing tools and training, and countless hours scheduling screens and coordinating calendars, flying in candidates from far flung places and standardizing “scorecards” and other pseudo-scientific ways to justify what’s largely an exercise in confirmation bias.

But have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, it might be time to do away with interviewing altogether? That your best interviewing strategy might be not interviewing candidates at all?

I know what you’re thinking, but hear me out. It’s not as crazy an idea as you think.

giphy (75)

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy: Why It’s (Finally) Time To Kill Off The Job Interview.

First off, I’m not saying we should entirely get rid of this sort of assessment completely – to do so would be asinine. Instead, it’s time we rethink and reevalutate our definition of what an interview actually is. And if you’re going in there thinking that, as a recruiter, your primary responsibility is to assess them and their suitability for a role by throwing them a series of curveball questions, hypothetical situations and ambiguous, open ended, half-assed attempts at Freudian analysis – well, let’s just say that you’re sorely mistaken.

In fact, if you see the interview as nothing more than a chance to try to cleverly trip up a candidate or deconstruct their motivations, experience or expectations, then you’re already in trouble. Look, these are nerve racking, awkward and more or less perfunctory situations for any job seeker without some recruiter trying to figure out what makes them tick with a bunch of “if you were a car, what make and model would you be, and why?” sorts of questions.

Seriously. Stop it.

We go into interviews expecting them to be painless and pleasant at best; at their worst, they’re as painful as anything ever invented by the Spanish Inquisition, Prince Humperdinck or motivational speakers. That’s why it’s time we kicked the word “interview” from our lexicon completely. It’s just a word, I know, but I’m not being pedantic.

Words carry with them manifold connotations, and in this case, really none of them are any good at all. That’s why I think if we’re going to change interviewing, we might start off fresh and rename the whole damn part of the process. There’s just too much baggage if we stick with current conventions.

The problem with interviewing, in the traditional sense, is it feels too much like an exam. One slip and that’s it. It’s like being in some VR version of Slumdog Millionaire. Now, experience has taught me (both good and bad) that most people don’t ever really reveal their true personalities – or their true abilities – at any time during what’s still a largely transactional process. That’s why it’s imperative we dispense with the idea of the “formal interview” and focus, instead, on making it feel like anything but an interview.

The right atmosphere for making the right recruiting decision, for employer and candidate alike, is creating an environment where it feels like a conversation between equals. Ideally, this discussion will be a wide ranging one, focused not only on professional shop talk but also those personal factors that drive our careers and our companies forward. Those “soft skills” that are so hard to ever get out of the traditional approach to interviewing.

giphy (77)

I promise you this: if you want candidates to relax, and you want to see who they really are beyond the resume and some sweaty cipher in a suit, then remember the fact that you just met them. You’re probably in the same industry, know the same people, at least have the common ground of having mutual interest in making sure the same opportunity you’re hiring for gets closed, and quickly – ideally, obviously, with them as the successful candidate.

There’s no reason the Sword of Damocles has to constantly be hanging overhead – in fact, it only screws up what should be a meaningful interaction and chance to chat as humans, not as another unnecessary component of “human resources.”

If you take a step back and really look at the overall objective of interviewing, there are pretty much four primary points – as far as the recruiter is concerned. The four outcomes every interview ostensibly shares in common are:

1. To assess the candidate’s ability to actually do the job.

2. To compare them with the other candidates you’re considering to see who’s the best for the job.

3. To assess their likely cultural fit for the job.

4. To assess the X-Factor that’s going to determine their viability in the job.

We add a lot of complexity to these foundational factors, but it really all boils down to determining these four things. The rest is buzzwords and bullshit.

Late Registration: 5 Keys For Making Job Interviews Better, Faster & Stronger.

kquotePoint number one, obviously, is a given. You’ve read their resume, spoken with them on the phone – you already know damn well they’ve got the skills required to do the job by the time they sit down with you for an in person. If not, Google their name and there’s a high probability you can check that one off the list.

OK, I will accept the fact that for positions like recent college graduates or high volume, high turnover positions, their resume and profile might not be the best way to suss out viability or fit, but that’s why the “interview” should unilaterally address points 2,3 & 4. These are the only things that really matter in any given interview, with any given candidate, at any given company.

I know it sounds simple. It is. There’s no secret, either. Here’s how you start getting the most out of interviews and get maximum gain with minimal pain. Promise.

But I think point number 1 should be a given. If you’re meeting them you should already know they have the skills required for the job. You review the resume….that will give you a good clue, then if you need more information you either telephone screen them or send them a list of questions to allow you to get more information from them relating to those essential skills.

Ok, I accept for positions like school leavers and graduates, it’s not so easy to assess their suitability purely from a resume but for most, the ‘interview’ should be about point 2,3 and 4.

Here’s how it’s done.

Rule One: Don’t meet with someone in person if you haven’t first established that they can do the job for a fact. If you don’t know that, throw in another phone screen or direct follow up and make sure to remove all doubt before moving forward with wasting either of your time.

Rule Two: Meet with them anywhere but an office. I know this sounds weird, but office interviews breed artifice (like everything else at work), and can intimidate the candidate. If you can, going to a cafeteria, coffee shop, pub, whatever – it’s going to be neutral ground and far more natural than sitting on either side of some desk. Desks create a conspicuous physical barrier that inevitably leads to a psychological one. Worst case scenario, conference room and round table. Just please, no desks.

Rule Three: The best interviews aren’t interviews. They’re conversations.

Every interview I’ve been unlucky enough to be sitting on the receiving end of was this terrible exercise in formality, this stiff, stuffy and incredibly intense exchange – which, I think, is completely the wrong approach. Yes, professionalism is essential – but so too is talking to them like someone who in addition to being a candidate, is also a potential colleague or coworker (or, at worst, a potential connection in your network you can leverage down the line).

Don’t go in with the mindset you have to grill them; go in first and foremost with the intention of creating an environment that allows them to relax enough to be their best selves during the interview. Be equals, be peers, and be open, and most of all, be yourself. Smile a bit. Crack a joke. Get the stick out of your ass. Be a person.

Candidates don’t want a machine firing questions at them. They want to see a human being, one who’s able to build rapport instead of red tape, treats them with respect instead of a responsibility, and as someone who cares about them as a person, not just as another job seeker. Focus on substance, avoid asking awful questions, and be authentic.

That’s half the battle right there.

giphy (78)

Rule Four: Always ask what the candidate thinks you should be doing differently or better as a company. Force them to look beyond the role to the bigger business picture. You’d be amazed at how many different angles people approach this answer from – and just how much insight you get into the way they really think. This is what you might think of as a sort of “x factor” question, as it is designed to take every candidate a little out of their comfort zone and give them the opportunity to really speak openly about pretty much any topic they like.

I know what you’re thinking, and yes; most candidates, as with any interview question, have a fairly standard answer, somehow not so subtly working in their skillset and experience, and how, of course, they can help cure whatever ails your company. This is a smart approach, to give some credit, but sometimes, someone will ditch the stock response and give the kind of answer that blows you away. Something that shows just not an intrinsic understanding of the business and its drivers, but an actual vision for the future and an innovative approach on how to get there.

Of course, not every candidate you hire is going to have the “x factor,” because, well, not every search is going to turn up the next great leader or visionary thinker who’s going to take your company to the next step.

A-players, of course, are hard to find, which is why you hire for skills – but if that x-factor is there, it’s worth taking a chance on a candidate, even if their skills might fall a bit short. Someone with a field of vision that extends far beyond the scope of the opportunity they’re interviewing for, coupled with a wider appreciation of the business and its relative strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and threats (SWOT, for all you B-School grads out there) is probably the hardest skill set to find on the market.

With innovation and vision in such short supply, don’t pass up candidates who might be bringing more to the table than your standard resume run through or behavioral based questioning is going to uncover. That’s why I like this question so much – it almost always uncovers the type of people who have the ability to see things in a way others don’t. And that just might be the most valuable asset to your business (and bottom line) any new hire can bring into any organization.

Rule Five: If a candidate is good, tell them so. If a candidate bombs, do the same.

Feedback matters – and the more you can give as a recruiter, the likelier they are to be able to correct those mistakes in subsequent interviews. Whether conscious or not, sometimes a little feedback can go a long way, particularly when it comes to the hiring process. It also has a pretty obvious impact on the candidate experience; just imagine being a candidate finishing an interview for a second. Which of these would you rather hear from the recruiter across the desk you’ve been working so hard to impress?

“We’ll be in touch shortly to let you know next steps.”

I’ve got to say, I love what you’re saying and I’m pretty sure my hiring team will, too.”

Obviously, the second one, but I’m pretty sure most candidates would also rather hear, “I think you really need to refocus your answers on what you can do, not just running through what you’ve done,” or some other constructive criticism, even if it isn’t always positive.

As long as it’s actionable, you’re doing your job as a recruiter – which, at the end of the day, is doing everything you can to help your candidates land their next opportunity. Even if it isn’t at your company, that’s why we do what we do.

Ultralight Beam.

everythingFor me, interviewing is really just about what might be better called “casting.” You’re looking for chemistry and fit with the existing team while still getting a feel for that unique “X Factor” each candidate brings to the table (whatever that might be).

It’s never about getting the answers you want, or even the easy answers – it’s about forcing a candidate into thinking critically not by throwing them curveball questions, but instead by structuring the discussion to focus beyond the narrow scope of the job for which you’re hiring.

It’s easy to get so lost in requirements and resumes that top talent will slip through the cracks, which is why it’s imparative to rethink and refocus your interview process around who’s the best candidate for your company in 3-5 years time. Who’s going to add the most value over 10 years?

While we focus on “just in time” hiring, recruiters should never forget that our job isn’t to just hire the best candidate for right now, but to hire the right candidate.

That’s going to be the person with the biggest upside, not the one, necessarily, who checks the most boxes. Real innovation and safe hires are pretty much mutually exclusive, but disruptors are almost always worth the risk.

The hard part is identifying just who those critical contrarians truly are. The answer to that question, turns out, is the only one that really matters when it comes to recruiting and hiring success.

 About The Author

Nick Leigh-MorganNick Leigh-Morgan is the CEO and founder of iKrut. Nick has over 20 years experience in the recruiting industry, covering staffing firms, direct employers and now web based recruitment software. A graduate of Economics and Politics, Nick specializes in publishing articles on the future of recruitment.

Bringing Experience Back To Candidates With SkillScout

scubaWhen we talk about experiences, what often pops into your mind is something magical or mythical. A vacation to a foreign land, a sci-fi book that takes place in a different world. Something we’ve never experienced.

What we don’t talk about is recruiting. Yet often, you find people talking about the “candidate experience,” a keyword now so often abused by speakers and recruiters alike – it has lost most of it’s meaning.

See, the current status when it comes to candidate experience is that it’s not an experience at all. It’s a quick moment in time – one that can easily be forgotten and dismissed post-apply, as long as you never call back. Your first interaction with a candidate – passive or active – looks the same as everyone else’s. It echoes the same boring verbiage. It communicates one dimension – one that is often boring and inspires nothing. No dream. No vision.

But isn’t that the whole point of work? To dream again? I know that sounds cliché but in reality, taking a new job isn’t a one-dimensional decision. It requires insights and details, questions and answers, inspiration – a real consultative process that normally happens solely on the side of the job seeker. They’re left to inspire themselves which leaves most of them running for the hills after they see your job posting, instead of applying.

Product Review: SkillScout

SkillScout is hoping to change that by changing the way candidates and companies present themselves to make the first moment of contact impactful. How, you might ask? By applying some of the best marketing techniques to candidate interaction and recruiting. They’re creating recruiting experiences, not just recruiting materials.

SkillScout is currently in Beta, coaching employers to create better candidate experiences with the use of context-critical video. They offer…

  • Workplace video creation that provide challenges to the candidates that help them see the future of their work, not just learn more about the company. If we’re getting our recruitment marketing right – we know that we have to make our marketing about the right person to work for us, not about our company. Their team does exactly that. The output? A 2-3 minute video that will convert candidates. In fact, their customers are already 3 times more views on their video based posts than earlier text-only pages.
  • Recruiting campaigns that get more eyes (and conversions) for their pages. These pages look like something we’d actually read in our free time. They’re creative and provide all of the context a job seeker needs to make a decision.
  • Show candidates in action. Let’s face it – manufacturing may not be the sexiest of industries but there’s always an output. Mid- and senior level employees want to show off their skills. This is a simple way for you to provide a method for candidates to do exactly that.

By hyper-focusing and targeting their industry to industrial groups for now, they’ve been able to closely track their data in the context and report back retention rates that are 90% or higher. Yes, that’s not a typo. 90%. But don’t worry, if you’re not in manufacturing – they’re about to extend their business to new industries.

To learn more about SkillScout, go to SkillScout.com or watch our live demo conversation below.

 

RecruitingLive With Leela Srinivasan

It’s another week and we have another great guest in the hopper – but this time, we’re taking a spin away from recruiting…

But quickly, let’s review the premise just in case you’ve missed the show until now.  RecruitingLive is about getting beyond theory and buzzword bingo. It’s about ethical application, and sustaining the recruiter/candidate relationship through live practice. That’s the premise behind this show. From the comfort of your desk, you can have a conversation with the best and see how they approach different recruiting challenges.

If you haven’t tuned in yet, newsflash — you’re missing out.

But let’s take one step back. Being a great recruiter is one thing. However, we can’t actually hire people if we’re working with a hiring manager that just doesn’t get it – what we do, how we do it or the worst kind – the ones who think they could just do it themselves. That relationship is key to making us successful and likely a lot happier, too.

This week, we’ve brought in a hiring manager to tell us what it’s like from their side of the table. We’ll be talking to a bright spot in the land of hiring managers and an all-around good human; Leela Srinivasan.

She’ll be gracing RecruitingLive with her presence to discuss the other side of the table – talking hiring and the often overlooked value of building an honest, open relationship with a hiring manager. We’ll also talk about the tech landscape and where technology might actually make our lives easier when it comes to holding both sides of the equation accountable.

So why not join us this week on RecruitingLive to learn a thing or two about the hiring manager relationship and how things are changing today.

Drop by and drop a line to pick her brain next week.

 

Chrome Extension Review: Profile Hopper

In a new series on RecruitingTools, each week I’ll feature a newly discovered Chrome Extension – breaking down the features and use cases for sourcing and recruiting experts. These short and sweet tool breakdowns will give you a sneak peek into the latest and greatest Chrome extensions I’m using to source right now.

ph_chrome

What Is Profile Hopper?

This tool pulls info from LinkedIn search results into a downloadable spreadsheet.

Profile Features To Check Out

  1. Web and Chrome extension.
  2. Downloadable exports.
  3. Contact info finder.

Pricing:

It has a 15-day trial then you can sign up for one of two programs that cost either $19 a month or $59 a month

Watch The Demo Video:

https://youtu.be/cv7VnH7kqn8

About the Author

dean_dacosta

Dean Da Costa is a highly experienced and decorated recruiter, sourcer, and manager with deep skills and experience in HR, project management, training & process improvement.

Dean is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting. Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter.

Recruiting Hacks for Facebook

Hacks for FacebookFacebook SHOULD be your go-to resource for finding candidates.  As of April 27, 2016, Facebook has 1.65 billion monthly active users. Yes, billion with a ‘B’.’ Compare that to LinkedIn which only has a mere 433 million users.

OK, 433 million users is still a lot, I know, but searching Facebook is free and easy.  Here are some Facebook hacks to get you started on your Facebook Recruiting Campaign.

Call Without a Phone Number.

You can use either the Facebook Messenger app or go straight from Facebook to make a call. All you have to do is click that little picture of the phone. 

To make a voice call from Messenger:

  1. Open a conversation with a friend.
  2. Tap . If the icon is gray, you can’t currently call this person.

Hacks for Facebook
Verify Phone Numbers

If you do not recognize the phone number of someone who calls you, enter it into Facebook to find out who they are. The reverse is also possible if you have a phone.
Facebook allows you to search for people using phone numbers. As long as they have their phone number publicly attached to their profiles, you can find them. The best part, you do not have to be connected with them to see whose profile the number belongs to.

Video Calling

You know that little picture of a phone that we can use to make phone calls through Facebook? There is also an image of a video camera. In the same way, you can click the phone to make a phone call; the video camera button will allow you to make a video call.

To start a video call:

  1. Open a chat window with a friend
  2. Click in the top right corner

Hacks for Facebook

 Spy on Your Competition

Want to see what your competition is doing? Facebook offers a feature called “Pages to Watch.” If you have at least 100 people who like your page, you can watch similar pages and see what they are doing to attract candidates.  To use this feature:
  1. Click Insights at the top of your Page
  2. Scroll down to Pages to Watch and click Add Pages
  3. Search for a Page you want to watch or choose from suggested Pages and click + Watch Page
  4. After choosing at least 5 Pages, click Done

Create an Interest List

Looking for accountants? Maybe Web Developers? Create an interest list or follow ones that someone else has created.  What is great about this is that whatever your interests are will now show up in your news feed.

To create your own interest list:

  1. Scroll down to Interests on the left side of your News Feed. Hover over Interests and click More.
  2. Click Add Interests.
  3. Click Create List.
  4. Search for the people or Pages you want to add to your list using the search box at the top of the page, or use the categories on the left to browse.
  5. After you’ve selected the things you want to include on your list, click Next.
  6. Pick a name for your list.
  7. Select a privacy setting. Choose Public if you want others to be able to follow the list you’ve created.
  8. Click Done.

 

CREAM: The Truth About Compensation Negotiation.

wutang2When I was recruiting, the biggest lie I ever told candidates was that salary is dependent upon experience.

If you ever see anything to the ‘DOE’ throwaway in a job ad, or if you ever hear a hiring manager or recruiter answer your comp question with either a lateral to HR (“we do a personalized comp study”) or some ambiguous reply about a “range,” they’re lying.

The truth is that most job descriptions – those boring, bullet proof lists – are, in fact, nothing more than compensation documents with a boilerplate bolted on.

Ain’t Nothing To F With.

The “minimum qualifications” are more or less set at 50% of whatever the median market is paying for the skills listed on the JD; any potential pushes towards the top quartile (as high as almost any comp group will go) occur only when a candidate meets or exceeds most of what’s listed in job postings as “preferred qualifications.”

The variance between the “bachelor’s degree” required and a preferred “MBA or MS in Economics,” between the approved rate and what a recruiter can realistically expect to offer an extremely well qualified candidate (who, by the way, are almost always employed) is rarely over $5000.

It is never, ever over 20% of comp, and approved counteroffers generally net around 5% of the base offer – this data, by the way, is anecdotal to my experience over hundreds of hires, as obsolete as that may or may not be these days.

This actually works out better for the candidate, monetarily, than if they were to either accept a counteroffer and stay (spoiler alert: there’s a 60% chance they’re gone within 3 months) or accept a promotion.

dgaf

Protect Ya Neck.

At Fortune 500 employers, most annualized merit based bonuses for exempt candidates work out to about 2-3%, and the average promotion yields a salaried employee, on average, 6-8% – the biggest bump occurring when an hourly employee converts to a salaried role, in which case this can often work out to around a 33% increase, although this outlier is relatively rare.

By contrast, most external offers for either lateral moves in terms of title or job level or a promotion (again, for exempt positions) at a new company averages around a 15-17% premium on top of the current worker’s salary.

This means the employee, staying in the same position, would have to have had either 5 years of salary increases at the top of the scale or be promoted twice, such as from Manager to Director to Senior Director (a pretty big jump) to equal what they’d make leaving the company.

Of course, there is a lot that goes into developing an offer – in fact, there’s a dedicated, data driven discipline that’s a specialized function within most global talent groups – and they look out for stuff like compression (ensuring no new hire comes in at a salary that’s too close to their direct supervisor) and leveling (ensuring that no new hire comes in at dramatically above or below similarly qualified co-workers).

In the event that a recruiter is allowed to extend an offer at top of range – this almost always only happens because the position is hard enough to fill the other option is going to an agency or because the position’s original compensation requires re-leveling if a standout candidate is somehow uncovered.

In truth, most extend it at the median point, giving themselves the extra few thousand dollars allocated by their HRBP in case there’s any push back, although generally it’s not enough to make or break a deal.

If, for some reason, an offer is fairly close, but looks like it will fall apart in compensation, a company will offer a signing bonus – this generally accomplishes more than just making sure money talks, and the candidate don’t walk.

giphy

There is often a mandatory period (often 90 days) before the bonus – which can range as high as 6 figures for senior executives, and often in the $10-25k range for highly skilled fixed term or project hires – is disbursed, and most of the time that employee is responsible for reimbursing the bonus on a sliding scale before hitting a defined tenure period, almost always one year.

This more or less handcuffs most employees for at last a year, often longer – 2-3 isn’t unusual at many organizations for highly skilled or commission based roles. Signing bonuses, structured as a one time payment, are almost always more flexible than salary, particularly if a candidate is going to be losing a variable bonus or direct compensation component like an annual stock grant by leaving their current role.

My advice to candidates is unless there’s a significant disparity between expectations and offer – and I’m almost always putting that one on the job seeker, as most recruiters immediately disqualify candidates who are way out of range – then accept the salary offer, but try to negotiate a sign on bonus.

You’ll have more luck, it guarantees at least a year of employment as a rule (hey, stranger things have happened than getting laid off immediately after getting hired) and is almost always a larger amount than the annualized salary increase that, best case scenario, you might get in an employer counter offer (but don’t count on it).

But the recruiter is almost always the intermediary, so you’ve got to trust their power of negotiation if you’re going to push back, and most of the time we have no real power over what the offer is going to come in at, or it’d always be like twice what the market is at so we could close all our reqs really quickly.

That, of course, would probably cause some sort of SPHR shit storm, a back office brouhaha, if you will, so they have to make it more difficult than it is by making sure you’re not paying a red cent more than you have to for any FTE.

odb

Cash Still Rules.

This, however, is not a salary advice or compensation article. I go into this level of detail to demonstrate that where comp comes in, there’s almost never any wiggle room for recruiters, and with some exceptions, that number is as close to set in stone as any piece of data HR touches, “big data” be damned.

For some reason, while we suck at analytics, HR professionals are awesome at figuring out how much employees are making an hour (divide by 2080), then charge them that amount for “time theft” (I seen it).

If it’s about, say, process efficiency, recruiters eyes go glassy any time a number or spreadsheet is involved. Not so when it comes to comp – it’s like sports stats.

For some reason, it’s really interesting, immediately applicable and such an essential part of the job (the offer letter is actually even more important than a JD in a hiring process, as any recruiter can tell you) that for some reason, when we throw salary into the mix, TA professionals go all Rainman and shit. “Definitely 42,891 with a 4% target bonus.”

Uh, how do I do a  source of hire report again? Excel isn’t working…

Championing The Underdog: Why There’s No Such Thing As A “Super Recruiter.”

Big-Law-BustA year or so ago, I saw an internal recruiter from Hewlett Packard bragging on LinkedIn about how successful he and his team had been in filling open job requisitions. He even provided stats.

Amid all the back-slapping and sycophancy – much of it from other inhouse recruiters and, depressingly, some of it from agency recruiters hoping to be fed a few scraps from the HP banquet table – I turned-up and suggested that he’d omitted to mention the biggest contributing factor to his success.

That the company with those job vacancies was called Hewlett Packard.

He confirmed his douchebaggery by deleting my comment.

I’ve seen other blogs and discussions in recent years where some of our recruiting peers were singled-out for special praise. In one case they were being cited as the world’s “super recruiters”. Some even had league tables.

And guess what?

Those “super recruiters” were all in-house recruiters working for companies like SAP, Pepsico and Facebook.

People seem to love to create hierarchies. And lists.

What is that all about?

Putting aside the inhouse recruitment sector’s increasing tendency to fetishsize itself for a moment, recruitment is a tough job.

It’s tough because it’s a line of work that attempts to fill a rational process with irrational participants – so much so that it can make occasional fools of even the most capable of practitioners.

All of which means, that most recruiters are sometimes great and sometimes not so great, depending on circumstances and luck.

There’s no such thing as super recruiters.

giphy (74)

What all of those people who were being cited as super recruiters had in common was that they worked for super companies. And by super, I mean big and well known, not big and nice. Like a really large corporate could ever be described as nice. That would be like trying to describe Kanye West as modest.

I think the real test of a recruiter’s ability is probably how effective they are at filling jobs for employers that aren’t super.

You know, those employers that most people have never heard of.

Those employers that don’t have the luxury of an omnipresent corporate brand.

Employers whose recruiters have to do a bit more than merely mention the company name to get a prospective candidate to listen to them.

For my money, the real recruitment heroes are those who can (and do) consistently fill jobs for those companies that are small, that are unglamorous and that are unheard of.

Those recruiters who work under the ultimate pressure of having to fill those jobs, either because they’re in-house or a retained external supplier.

If you’re one of those recruiters, you have my total respect.

giphy (73)

0a14c40Mitch Sullivan is (still) a Recruiter and sometimes helps other recruiters win retained work, if you ask him nicely.

 

Follow Mitch on Twitter @MitchSullivan or connect with him on LinkedIn.

I am a Robot: The Top 5 Disruptive HR Tech Trends for Recruiters. #TCDisrupt

Disruptive HR Tech Trends for RecruitersAt the conference last week, there were tons of startups trying to get the attention of reporters and Venture Capitalists (VC’s.) Tons of products? Yes. Tons of new ideas? Absolutely. From what I saw, most software products centered around one five things, Communication Tools, Bots,  Artificial Intelligence (AI),  the “Gig” Economy, and Virtual Reality (VR).

Disruptive HR Tech Trends for Recruiters

There used to be a hard line between tools that we used for our professional lives and tools that we used for our personal lives.  That line is more blurred than ever. There is a crossover that allows us to use one device for all of our professional and personal needs.

1. Communication Tools

When it comes to social media, people are pulling back from living life in public and are going to more one-on-one or one-on-few conversations. This is why messaging apps seem to keep growing in popularity.  It makes sense; they are cheaper than SMS; they are faster than email, and you can send practically anything you want from any mobile enabled device.  Gone will be timelines and feeds, and it will give way to heavier use of bots and private messaging.

The folks at Facebook, who also own WhatsApp, understand the push for the future of messaging.

But more than just messaging, there are new communication tools that are emerging. Take a look at:

List (Previously “The List App”)

li.st is a new way to create and discover lists about anything and everything. You can share your experiences, opinions, and expertise through richly formatted lists that include text, photos, and locations.

twillo

Cloud communications platform for building Voice & Messaging applications on an API built for global scale.

Flock

Flock is a free chat service for work and business environments that speeds up and simplifies communication within teams and organizations.

 

Disruptive HR Tech Trends for Recruiters2. Bots

Bots are software apps that automate tasks that are time sucks. For example, a bot can help you order pizza, update your calendar or send out messages.

What we hear about lately are “chatbots” or bots inside of messaging apps that when used feel like you are having a conversation with a human. Kind of like those automated voice systems when you call customer service, just a text version.

Why are we hearing so much about them now?

One key reason: The technology that powers bots and AI  software, is getting better and smarter all the time. This is part because of:

  1. The use of bots in messaging platforms, such as Slack, WeChat, Facebook Messenger and Kik
  2. The growth of web-based APIs used for mobile and partner integration
  3. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), including natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning.
  4. The increasing number of mobile devices. We no longer have to be at our desk to get messages.

Here is Kik CEO Ted Livingston’s take on it:

3. Machine Learning / Natural Language Processing (NLP) / Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Machine Learning, NLP, and AI are often used interchangeably, but there really are differences as to how they work.

Machine Learning

Machine Learning is one example. At first it may sound scary but really it is not. And it is not the same thing as AI. Machine learning happens when computers are fed algorithms and can then determine trends.
The benefit is that when it gets new information, it can make predictions.

To break it down even further, let’s say you want to teach a computer to make spaghetti. So you would program it to boil water to a certain point, teach it when to put the noodles in and take them off. With machine learning, you just show it 100,000 different videos of people making spaghetti and then show it 100,000 where people fail at making spaghetti and let it figure it out.

Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a branch of AI that allows computer systems to communicate better with humans. This is more than just teaching a computer a bunch of words.  It actually allows computers to analyze what you are saying (or typing) so that you can communicate with it as if you were talking to a friend. Like the example, we see with Viv. IT allows the computer to understand language.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Disruptive HR Tech Trends for Recruiters

They have been working on Artificial Intelligence since the 1960’s. AI has to do with the intelligent behavior of computers. This goes further than just learning how humans talk.  Technolopedia explains AI this way:

Artificial intelligence is a branch of computer science that aims to create intelligent machines. It has become an essential part of the technology industry. Research associated with artificial intelligence is highly technical and specialized. The core problems of artificial intelligence include programming computers for certain traits such as:

  • Knowledge
  • Reasoning
  • Problem solving
  • Perception
  • Learning
  • Planning
  • Ability to manipulate and move objects

Programmers are simply looking at more ways to make computers smarter.  And they are slowly succeeding. It is evident that this trend is not going anywhere soon.

 

Launched by the people who brought you Siri, the coolest AI technology launched was Viv. Viv is a virtual assistant that

Like with Siri, Viv wants to build a conversational and smart layer that lets you interact with various services. But Viv is taking everything one step further. It’s more personal, it’s more ubiquitous. More importantly, there’s a developer platform to add more services. A demo is worth a thousand words.

Without further ado, meet Viv:

 

 

4. The “Gig” Economy

People want to work when they want to work how they want to work. We see companies like Uber, Lyft, and Italy-based Vicker is dependent on employees that are looking for ways to earn a living that won’t take over their lives; they want flexible work. And workers are getting picky.  They want to name their hours, benefits and want people to fight over them like the Divas they are. Look at

Some companies are building software that claims to find top talent looking for new positions, but most of these candidates fall into this gig economy mentality. Look at Hired. Hired claims to have three steps.  Anser some questions, company make offers with UPFRONT compensation and then, not only will the ideal candidate get a job, they will get $1,000. Let’s assume the candidate gets there; the salary is good, but they still want more.  Next, they can go to Woo, but even more parameters around what they want and get a “better” job.  (at least a job with more of what they want, until they get sick of that job.) If that doesn’t work, they can play a game at Scoutible or MercerMatch, and get hired somewhere else.

5. Virtual Reality (VR)

How are you sharing your story? Like AI, Virtual Reality seems like some scary weird new age product.  But there is some real consumer use here.  Rather than watching an environment via pictures and videos, we are putting people in the experience. For example, you can feel like you are in a center seat Madison Square Garden watching a game. Or feeling not that you are watching a concert, but you are actually at the concert or other live events. Startups like NextVR and Modsy are creating practical uses for 3D and VR moving from goggles and headgear and moving into mobile devices.

 

What does this mean for Recruiting?

So here is what the future of recruiting will looks like to me.  Abby wants a job in Dallas, so she asks Siri or Viv or whatever new technology is out there by then, what jobs are available for Web Developers in Dallas. She sees a few she likes and says “apply.” Done. In 1/10 of a second, she has applied for five jobs.

Then she plays a few games, like Scoutible or MercerMatch to see if she can find any other positions, and a few more come up.  She says “apply” again. Now in 2/10 of a second, she has applied to 8 jobs.

Disruptive HR Tech Trends for RecruitersShe wants to make sure that there is some element of work-life balance, stable benefits and three weeks vacation, so she goes to Hired or Woo spends a few minutes answering some questions. Then goes to Yuemey, joined the Dallas network group, adds some pictures she has on her phone, and instantly is told who in Dallas can help her find a job and within minutes gets a job interview through the Yuemey app.

Before going to the interview, however, she is sent an AI link that allows her to see exactly what the environment looks like. She can literally see her potential desk, co-workers, break room and neighborhood where she could be working. She now goes to the companies Facebook pages and types in /directions and immediately gets a message back with the companies address and how to get there, requests Uber to pick her up through Facebook and is off to her interview. And all of this is done without ever picking up the phone or using anything other than Android or iPhone apps. (Sorry Maureen.)

This is not to say that potential candidates will never have to engage with people.  There will always be a people aspect but, applying for jobs is going to get quicker and quicker and even more automated. What used to take hours, then minutes will soon take mere seconds.

And that is what I learned from the trends from some of the startups at TechCrunch Disrupt. Don’t worry, none of these apps will work without companies wanting to post open positions to jump on it now before you get left behind.

Remember, even though some of the startups  I have mentioned were not made for recruiting,  but it is easily recognizable how these technologies will be integrated into the future of HR Tech.

#TCDisrupt NY 2016 Technologies Disrupting HR Tech that Support the Trends

devRant

devRant is where developers can express how they really feel about code, tech, and the people that make programming super unique (for better or worse)

Hired

With Hired, your job search has never been easier! Simply create a profile & vetted companies compete for you, reaching out with salary & equity upfront.

HireTeamMate

With HireTeamMate handling all the recruiting, marketing and vetting, hiring managers can focus on what’s truly important – hiring the right person.

Jitjatjo (Coming Soon)

Mobile Marketplace for real-time resourcing and temporary sourcing.

MercerMatch

Identify candidates who wouldn’t otherwise apply and who most closely fit your ideal trait profile. Great talent is everywhere, but recruiting staff cannot be. Avoid the dreaded resume drop black hole and let the Mercer Match search engine find you the best candidates anywhere.

MintMesh

MintMesh is a platform for crowdsourcing referrals from their trusted networks to solve needs and problems. Users can actively engage with their network to provide referrals and be rewarded.

Scoutible

Scoutible is a game-based hiring platform, using immersive mobile games to pinpoint perfect-fit candidates for jobs. Scoutible’s patent-pending technology identifies players’ unique cognitive and personality traits through gameplay, then spots opportunities where players’ attributes match those of companies’ proven top performers. Play for free, learn your strengths and get scouted.

UpScored

UpScored is the only career discovery tool for job seekers that uses advanced technology to provide curated & personalized job recommendations.

Vettery

Top tech and finance companies send interview requests to you with upfront salary offers. You decide where your next job will be.

Vicker (Based in Italy)

In Vicker, there are thousands of selected employees are ready to meet all your needs. Practically everything you can not, you do not want or do not know someone can do it for you. Advert by setting the price you are willing to pay and choose the worker who will do it for you.

Vrse

Vrse is a leading VR company, whose mission is to tell extraordinary stories in virtual reality. Vrse uses custom-built tools and their own VR app to create and distribute the most innovative, story-driven experiences in VR today.

Woo

WOO lets people find out how much they’re in demand in the tech industry so they can make smarter decisions about their career.

Yuemey

With visual profiles, location-enabled groups, A.I. and social tools, Yuemey makes navigating career relationships natural and easy.

**Editors Note:

RecruitingDaily nor I were paid or compensated in any way for the Startups listed here.  The ones listed were the ones that I thought would be the most interesting to our readers. Full disclosure,  I did, however, went to a Mercer Luncheon and got a pink mustache from Lyft.

 

 

 

 

 

Referral, Rewards, and Reality: A Panel Discussion

Referral, Rewards, and Reality: A Panel Discussion

The research is clear. Across the board, employee referrals are consistently the best quality and lowest cost source of hire. Referrals drive employees that are more engaged and stay with your company longer. They have a significantly lower cost per hire – about $1,000 compared to the average $5,000.

It’s good for candidates, too. They’re 4x more likely to get hired when they are referred. Then, when these referred candidates have joined the company, they produce up to 25% more profit for companies than hires sourced from other methods.

So if we know referrals work, why aren’t we focused on making them our leading source of hire? Why aren’t we investing in infrastructure that makes that a reality?  It seems simple, right? Make people happy and then they’ll send people they know to join your company.

Not so fast.There’s work to do before you make the ask. Employees traditionally aren’t motivated to refer unless they’re really happy at work.

We talk through the roadblocks and accelerants of great referral programs with this panel of practitioners who have been there and done that.

You’ll Learn:

  • Action steps to boost employee participation in a referral program
  • Outside-the-box rewards and recognition strategies to motivate employees to refer
  • Practices that will help you ensure both quality and volume from referral hires

Bored Game: Why Keeping It Real Really Matters in Recruiting and Hiring.

boredI’m bored, and it’s all recruiting’s fault.

That’s right. I completely blame recruiting for my current state of ennui (or apathy, more like) – and I regret nothing about finally saying something about this problem in public. In fact, I’ll even say it again – I. Am. Bored. That’s right. Bored. Bored by talent acquisition, by HR, by the never-ending, self-congratulatory, puissant and god-forsaken industry that is recruitment today.

Now, I don’t mean bored in one of those, “I’m going to go take a walk, clear my head and try to refocus my energies” sort of boredom. Nor am I talking about a “hey, maybe I can make this into a game or something to add a little bit more fun” sort of approach to my antipathy. No, my friends. I wish it were that easy – but trust me, I have tried almost everything. And nothing seems to work, really.

No, the kind of boredom I have with recruitment is more a deep, bone weary, want to cry myself to sleep and say, “screw the world” sort of way. This is a type of bored that’s omnipresent, inescapable and immutable.

I don’t know what the exact cause of my boredom has been – whether it’s endlessly talking to recruiters, or reading endless articles on recruitment, the ones that are always on the exact same topics, do nothing but state the obvious without ever actually fixing a single, solitary thing.

Trivial Pursuit.

In recruitment, we’d rather talk about a problem than actually solve it, which is a problem we don’t really talk about enough. But somewhere in the circular argumentation and vapid, vacuous “content” that always flows endlessly through my LinkedIn feed (and I’ll guess yours looks more or less the same), something has killed the light inside of me, and as far as recruitment goes, what used to be a passion for the profession has dulled and gone gray.

Nothing I do seems to help reignite that flame I used to feel. I feel a little lost, frankly.

I’ve gone through this endlessly over the last few weeks, this fading feeling I have for recruitment, picking and pulling at the scabs – and wondering what, exactly, it is that’s urging me to want to throw myself out a window every time I open up my computer at work. I know I can’t be the only one, either. I’m not blind.

I mean, I see the dejected faces of other lost souls like me, those uniform “professional profile” pictures which stare back at me with strained smiles, sad eyes and that soulless look of surrender. For the record, I count my own professional headshots in with this description – my LinkedIn picture looks like I’m some corporate automaton fresh off the assembly line, just another drone in search of a personality (and completely devoid of an identity). It’s truly terrible. What’s worse is most days, this is how I actually feel, too.

But that’s the point, isn’t it? Recruitment is all pretty terrible – and I couldn’t understand what had happened that suddenly soured me on this business and was steadily draining me of my last vestiges of hope.

Why is an industry based on the noble idea of helping good people get good jobs, predicated on personal interactions and meaningful relationships – things that I’ve always thrived on – suddenly become so, well, boring?

Now, let me set the record straight. My antipathy for recruitment has nothing to do with any modicum of misanthropy. In fact, I LOVE people. I know this is a sweeping statement, and there are obviously quite a few exceptions, but for the most part, I really, truly do. I know that for the most part, people can be annoying, demanding and fickle  – we’re real pains in the ass, as a species – but even those who lack personal hygiene or common courtesy I can normally find some sort of redeeming quality about.

I know that it’s probably not cool to admit that I actually like people, but it’s the truth.

Where_are_the_freaks-_i'm_getting_bored

Guess Who?

We’re all so weirdly different, our interests and interactions and world views so disparate and diverse (not always in a cool way), that I genuinely think we can all learn a hundred things from every other person out there you never knew about this strange and fascinating world we live in. Sometimes, and these are the best times, someone teaches you something new about yourself, too. And that, I think, is the point of our entire existence. The purpose of humanity is to share it with others.

People, for the most part, are pretty great.

And yet. It’s people – real, actual, walking, taking people crammed full of personality and humanity, the kind whose unique complexities and contradictions are so compelling, are hard to find in recruitment these days. Sure, there’s plenty of bodies floating around this business. But they’re like the undead, mindless drones without any depth or dimension or really anything special about them at all. It’s as if somewhere along the way, recruitment lost its humanity – not replaced by robots, but with our collective loss of personality and individuality.

This will be the very thing, I think, that kills the industry in the end. Any business built on people cannot survive being run by those whose individual traits, quirks and personalities have so long been suppressed in favor of stasis, the status quo and job security. We’d rather be safe than be ourselves in recruitment, and there will no longer be much time to meet the faces that we meet, with apologies to Eliot.

Recruitment has, as an industry, some abhorrent and deeply seated fear of perceived as ‘unprofessional.’ Now, in this industry, the stigma of saying someone is “unprofessional” is akin to calling them the C word, a scarlett letter of shame that once bourne is almost impossible to shake in such an incestuous and cloistered industry as ours.

And we’ve all become, as a consequence, so caught up with appearing to be “professionals” that we’re professing we’d rather be obsolete than be ourselves. We’re so busy focusing on professionalism I think we’re largely ignoring the existential threat this creates to the continued existence of our profession, period.

Sorry!

jobI mean, look at yourselves, recruiters. We’re all so damned polite. We stand on ceremony, all the time. We don’t joke with clients, candidates or even our colleagues because we fear that something will be misconstrued or misunderstood and we’ll end up with a massive lawsuit on our hands.

When we write about recruitment, it’s done in tones drier than your average textbook, and our propriatary, bullshit jargon and meaningless buzzwords with which we speak about our profession mean little to anyone in the recruitment business and even less to everyone else. Yet, like lemmings marching ourselves off a cliff, we keep doing business as usual because this is the way we’ve always done things – or at least for so long that we seem to have forgotten how, exactly, to step out of the line.

Now, it’s my job to work with new recruitment companies to build websites, marketing plans and brands. I am tasked with helping these fledgling firms write content, curate the best articles about recruitment and use stuff like social to somehow make it seem like they know what they’re doing instead of just making it up as they go along, like everyone else in this business seems to be doing.

These are my recurring responsibilities, and I’m bored.

I want the sparkle, and pop, and magic dust back in this business. I want the laughter, and the traits, and the weird habits and occasional neuroses real people really have. I want to talk about issues of substance, and have conversations that do more than scratch the surface, or interactions where we can be ourselves and not worry about breaking the rules of whatever absurd game it is we all seem to be playing – and most of all, goddamnit, I WANT THE TRUTH.

I can handle it, and so can you.

Because the truth is that recruitment is rammed full of simply incredible people and even more incredible personalities. I know this because I’ve met so many of them.

I’ve sat with recruiters in the pub on a Friday night and laughed until I cried or talked until I was hoarse; I’ve spent my weekends hanging out with them shooting the shit or telling stories, spent countless coffees and infinite meals getting to know recruiters – I mean, really get to know them.

It’s not easy, but it’s worth it. We’ve had the best chats about everything from pop culture to our own sense of mortality, talked about life, death and love – and everything in between. Recruiters, you know, are real people, believe it or not, not the much maligned, amorphous aggregate of assholes that is the only side of recruitment so many others see. This is because the moment we get into work on Monday morning, it’s like we’ve all gotten lobotomized in the lift on the way up.

Somehow, we metamorphose into these strange, soulless and empty shells of the people we are outside the office, instantly afraid to tell the truth, be candid or be ourselves. Our true colours get hidden behind so many shades of gray in a world that’s depressing, dull and drab.

This, I’m afraid, is the world of recruitment today.

new york

Risk.

Well, I’m calling bullocks on the whole business. It’s time we cease and desisted with this bullshit, people. That’s right, let’s stop this crap, once and for all, because I just can’t bear to be this bored for much longer – and need to finally take a stand. So, what do you say?

Will you come stand with me, and maybe let your true self show just a little bit, and get out of the line you’re marching in and start marching to a different beat. Will you never forget that we’re in the business of improving lives and livelihoods instead of putting butts in seats, and that a job is more than a requisition, but represents a large part of our self-identity and personal dignity?

What we do isn’t who we are, but that’s what we’ve become, and I think it’s time recruiters gave each other permission to be ourselves in the office and in our working lives. Let’s stop these stupid hashtags and silly conversations about meaningless crap like “employee engagement” or “building brand advocates” and all of that nonsense that has nothing to do with finding candidates or actually making hires happen or hiring managers happy.

Let’s stop being led by the blind and start showing the world that recruiters are more than mindless drones ready to be automated out of existence.

Let’s start writing articles about the shit in recruitment that really pisses us off instead of simply dabbling in hackneyed cliches and atrocious aphorisms. There’s plenty of material there, I assure you. Let’s start treating our candidates like real people instead of interchangeable commodities, bags of money to be moved around the board as we see fit.

Let’s start telling our clients what we’re really going to do when we open a req and how, exactly, we’re going to help them find the top talent they’re looking for instead of hiding behind that “world class service” speech that’s like the worst pick up line out there.

Recruitment has spent altogether too long working in binaries, and it’s blurred our collective vision; just because there are parts of recruitment you find irritating doesn’t mean that you necessarily hate your job, you know. Just because you take the time to show some chill with your candidates and not call them a hundred times a day doesn’t mean that they’re going to suddenly drop out of process or lose interest in that position you’ve got them in process for.

Just because you tell your clients you’re going to work your ass off for them doesn’t mean that they’re going to believe you’re doing a thing other than bilking them out of their time and money, like every other recruiter out there.

18286918

The Game of Life.

The human condition is, unfortunately, by no means binary – and it’s the fickle nature of humans and the predictable unpredictability of our behavior that gave rise to recruitment in the first place. If we were all rational actors working in a logical, black and white world, in fact, we’d have no need for recruiters in the first place.

This is, of course, why I find it so ironic that we’re trying to force an industry predicated on the human condition to try so hard to suppress the very same impulses that make this a viable business to begin with. We need to stop thinking of “professional” or “unprofessional,” in short, and start thinking about people. Period.

I know. You probably think I’m some sort of naive waif or crazy hippie living in some Utopian fantasy land that’s never going to happen, and I say to you, go screw yourself. There’s enough negativity around this industry we don’t need to add anymore than we’ve already got, so lose it or get lost.

As our world consistently moves towards merging the formerly distinct distinctions between our work and our lives into some constant state of being on call, if we let our professional personas win out, we all lose.

We can’t just have a few fleeting hours a day or maybe a rushed half day on the weekends to be a real, live human before reverting back to being robots the rest of the time. That’s not a sustainable life, nor is it one that anyone can live too long without losing their sense of identity, self-worth, or, worse, that personality that makes them unique and human and different from everyone else. Those are the best qualities in a person, and we shouldn’t encourage anyone to give these things up so easily – particularly in the name of “work” in general, recruitment in particular.

So, if we could kindly all take that stick out of our asses and stop pretending to be “professionals” all the time, and instead relax a little bit and just be ourselves again, then maybe, just maybe, recruitment can start to breathe again. And we can both stop being bored out of our minds and maybe move forward as a profession instead of simply treading water.

Hey, a girl can always dream, right?

salmaAbout the Author: Salma El-Wardany, Head of Marketing, Recruitment Entrepreneur cut her teeth in recruitment at a global Plc, working in business development to win new clients and accounts into the company. She gave up corporate life in favour of the startup world, specifically recruitment startups.

Salma spends her days advising recruitment companies on their marketing, digital and branding strategies, and how to make their voice heard in an industry that is already overcrowded and full of voices clamoring to be heard. By night, she writes about many things, mainly all the things in recruitment that vex her.

Check out her blog, The Chronicles of Salma or connect with her on LinkedIn.