Blog

The Good, Bad And Ugly: Job Descriptions

The Good, Bad And Ugly: Job Descriptions

Poor job descriptions don’t have to be a necessary evil. Flooding you with unqualified resumes and wasting your time and budget. Done right, they can help turn a job ad from post and pray to post and prey.

With the right job ad strategy, you can stand out as an employer of choice. Conveying your company culture and setting realistic candidate expectations about what working at your company are really all about.

Keeping it real means not only recruiting the right talent, but retaining it, too.

But what does that mean? How do you take the theoretical and make it practical for your recruiting team? We’ve gathered a panel, thanks to our friends and sponsor Glassdoor, to answer this important question. Bill Boorman – RecruitingDaily EMEA Director and head judge for the EMEA Candidate Experience Awards, Stephen O’Donnell Founder of the National Online Recruitment Awards and Bethan Davies, Strategic Talent Resourcing Consultant will discuss strategies and real examples from top companies around Europe.

Key Takeaways:

  • Optimise your job ads, by choosing the right titles, keywords and distribution channels so the talent you’re looking for can find you, too. We’ll discuss processes and best practices for improving the quality of your applicants.
  • Taking your advertising beyond traditional job boards with new and emerging solutions, from social media ad retargeting, to better sourcing.
  • While Better job ads can attract twice as many qualified applicants and drive cost-per-hire down by up to 30%. Learn the role job ads play in building an effective employer brand, and solutions that can help you make the most out of your job advertising efforts.

Write Emails that Don’t Suck With Chrome Extensions: #ThinkGeek Pt 3.

In this series, we will focus on sharpening your skills so that you can become a better technical recruiter. You’ll learn tactics and strategies to apply before, during and post search to improve your results. Seriously, if you have not read part one and part two of this series, stop now and do that. This is serious, y’all. You can’t just start contacting people. 
spam7

Now that you’ve completed parts one and two of this digital recruiter training, you know a thing or two about who your candidate is (and why that even matters). But if you thought the sourcing part was the hardest, think again because now it’s time to put that best practice into practice and let the real work begin. It’s time to talk about how you contact and actually get a response out of these hard-to-reach candidates.

I Can Hear You Now: How Candidates Want To Be Contacted

Everyone has their own idea about what actually works when it comes to candidate outreach. The old school folks will always preach the value of the phone while the new kids are still convinced that LinkedIn works (you’re wrong, by the way) so I decided to take a data-first approach to get a real answer. In the most recent StackOverflow  “Developer Landscape Survey”, they post the results of more than ten thousand top talent interviews to debunk everyone’s theories and see what’s actually working, according to the talent themselves.

Become a Technical Recruiter

Yes, that says email is the best way to contact top talent. Contrary to the old-school beliefs, email is not dead. 65% of respondents said email is a “great” way to hear about new job opportunities.

But before you go sending email blasts, expecting the candidates will come running, consider this.  MailChimp did a survey that said for every ten emails you send, only two will open your emails. One out of fifty will actually respond. My exact reaction when I saw that?  “Ah, hell naw.” E-mail is our best option, yet it’s clearly just a shot in the dark.

Now, typically, we’re starting with just a name and if an email is our best point of contact – our first stop should be sourcing the email address.

The Best Chrome Extensions to Find Email Addresses.

Chrome extensions are where most recruiters start the email address hunt. While I could offer a few hundred options, let’s not waste your time with a list. These are the extensions I actually like and use for finding email addresses.

Prophet

There is no question that we are fans of Prophet. It can help you find anyone’s email plus social profile and phone numbers. Note – it can be glitchy, but overall, I get pretty good results. And it is free!

Connectifier

A bit pricey but a great platform.  I like it because it remembers where I’ve already looked and pulls that information into a single repository.  That makes it great for people working quickly who may forget where they saw someone.  If you are sourcing on a site where Connectifier can pull information, it will.

Email Extractor

I like this tool because I always seem to get more emails than I expect. The way it works is, when you go to a website, Email Extractor searches the source code for all the emails listed on the page. You can then export them into a text file, copy and paste them or save them.  I use this tool more to see what the email pattern is more than anything else.

GetEmail.io

All you have to do is go to a LinkedIn profile and then a button appears that says, “Get Email.io.” Click on it and in a few seconds, boom email. It has worked each time I have used it.  What sucks is, it only seems to give me one email, so I’m constantly wondering if it’s the right one. Comment if you’ve had a different experience and I’ll keep testing.

No Chrome? No Problem: How to Find Candidate Emails.

Hate Chrome? Then don’t use Chrome extensions. Here are a few options.

Conspire

Conspire is kind of like a LinkedIn connection request, but better. This tool analyzes your contact list and looks for someone that you may know who has the best chance of getting you an invitation to the person you want to reach.

Email Hunter**

Know where someone works but not their email? Email Hunter will show you every email that has been shared online using that domain name. I like it because it also allows you to verify the email and the sources used to find the email.

Viola Norbert

Simple Interface. Just enter name and domain you want to search. Really,  it is that simple.

Google / Boolean Search

Google stores every user into its database. That said, there’s a high chance you’ll find their email address if you use these keywords:

name + contact
name + “email address.”

Stop Wasting Time: How to Write Emails that Don’t Suck.How to Find Email Addresses

This is the most important part. Bad emails from recruiters are an epidemic. We get so much spam every day that to get noticed; you have to have an email that stands out and for every bad email, you send, another recruiter gets ignored.  Now, everyone has their best practice ideas so let me share what works for me. 

Attention! What are the Best Subject Lines?

Subject lines really can determine whether or not your email is going to get opened; it’s your digital first impression to help a candidate decide if you’re worth their time. But these tried, and true strategies can help.

1. Company Name 

This works especially well if you work at a well-known company.

2. “Quick question.”

Everybody has time for a quick question, right?

3. “Guess Who is Hiring?”

Have you ever heard of FOMO – Fear of missing out? This email subject line plays on that.

4. “No Rush.”

Marketers have been coached to emphasize urgency. Taking the opposite approach works too.

5. “Hate your Boss?”

Huh? This isn’t a question people ask often.

6. Leave it Blank

If there’s nothing in the subject line, the candidate might be curious what exactly you have to say.

How to Find Email Addresses Nice Body: Creative Email Content.

No, that’s not an inappropriate pick-up line. Just like the subject line, recruiters overthink what they need to put into the body of their email to drive responses. The best tip I can give you: kiss it. No, not that way, K.I.S.S – “Keep it Simple Stupid.” In other words, just give them enough information to get interest without giving them a reason to say no. Here’s what you should include:

  • Who you are.
  • Why you are emailing.
  • The required skills for the job.
  • The action to take if they are interested.
  • Where they can look online for additional information.

Here is an example:

Hello (Potential Candidate Name),

I am recruiting for a Front-End web developer. After I read the answer you posted on Quora about CSS coding standards, I wanted to reach out and see if  you would be interested in joining us as a web developer at [company name.]

  • Responsive Web Design, HTML5/CSS3, LESS/Sass Experience
  • Agile Methodology
  • Requires Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Management of Information Systems, or relevant discipline, or 4+ equivalent experience

This is a new position due to company growth.  We are a 4.4 billion dollar company. People in the current role appreciate that here developers have full life cycle responsibility for their code and the team environment.  Here is a link to the full job description. www.link.com. and our company website. www.mycompany.com

If you are interested, please email me back as soon as possible even after hours. You can also apply online here www.apply.com.

Jackye Clayton

Recruiter –  Technical Development Division

[Email]

[social media profile links]

[Company Career Page Link]

When you pull together this e-mail, beware of being creepy. Even though you may know a lot about your candidates, don’t make it obvious. Sure you have looked at all of their social profiles and probably find out if they have kids or not, saw that they went to their best friends wedding recently or that they are selling Girl Scout cookies. But you don’t tell them that.

And don’t forget to follow up. Following up each email with a phone call letting the candidate know that you sent them an email can also improve your response rate because they know that the email is not from a robot. If you have to leave a phone message, do, but personalize it as well. Real personalization lets the candidate know that you have done your homework.

Beat the Clock: Use Automation to Save Time

Email is important but no doubt, it can be time-consuming. As with everything, some tools can help. Here are three I recommend:

1. SmashFly:

No, SmashFly is not a fly swatter factory. It is a Recruitment Marketing Automation software. They must be doing something right considering they just received a $22 million Series B round led by Bessemer Venture Partners. Check them out.

https://youtu.be/ZS1p0QALy8I

2. iCIMS:

I can’t get away from iCIMS. Their tool just seems to have everything that a recruiter needs. With iCIMS Connect, you can create and schedule email campaigns but then report on whether or not the campaign is working. Love them or hate them, if you are looking for an ATS that does everything you need, it’s iCIMS. And no, they did not pay me to say this.

3. HubSpot:

Although not thought of as a traditional recruiting tool, HubSpot offers the ability to truly personalize your emails. You upload a list and then can personalize it from one of over one thousand fields. They have a huge database and designs so you can make your emails pretty.

The trick is practice.  Keep trying and see what works.  If you have tips for sending awesome emails, please leave them in the comments below.

The Cost Of Elevating Your Career.

elevatedWorking in a company with less than 10 employees has its perks. For one thing, there’s a lot less politics.

I mean – the rumors can only spread so far amongst people usually confined to their home offices.

We work as a holacracy – and it actually works – allowing every member of our team to drive campaigns and concepts while we pursue our dreams, not just corporate to do’s.

We have our bad days, but most of the days aren’t so bad. Plus with no corporate headquarters, I feel justified to spend most of my days working in sweatpants.

Each of us is very different and if you tried to personality test your way into pulling this team together, we’d have a very different team dynamic and likely,  different faces altogether. In the last two years I’ve spent with the company – our dynamic has changed, too. People have come and gone, our focus has evolved and with those inevitably shifting dynamics, our culture has changed too.

I’ve seen this shift in every startup I’ve worked at – 4 in total now. As we’ve added new people, the original definition of our culture naturally shifted and evolved. It became a word with multiple definitions – some representative of the company as a whole while others represented teams and microcosms that are inevitably created when you very suddenly don’t know the name of every person who works for your dot com any more.

teamwork funnyAs someone who has witnessed these inevitable and highly unpredictable shifts, it has been this first-person data collection that primarily justifies my fundamental issue with using compatibility or personality tests to match people with companies.

No matter how hard your hiring team tries to define culture, it’s not in their purview. Trying to define it inherently ignores all the custom elements that happen to create it. Rather, culture is truly defined by teams, by partnerships, by location of your branch, etc because they’re the ones that have to survive within the constraints.

There are a million variables and each push the culture to evolution. That’s why culture, while falling in a very broad set of buzzwords, is a valued commodity. If there were actual tests that could prove fit, more than a handful of companies would be trying it. But we know the unpredictability of people and culture is a consequence of people, not corporate predictors and analysis.

Those natural fluxes and waves are good. When people start talking about “homogenous” cultures – ones that they believe can, in fact, be defined for a period of time longer than a week or so –I get a little nervous. Even in the largest corporations I’ve worked at, culture has constantly evolved whether that be by mass layoffs or business initiatives and controlling it with predictive testing that “weeds out” people with differing ideas sounds more like a scary anti-diversity case study that will happen if Donald Trump gets elected instead of a true technological advancement.

Testing For Talent

elevated careersThe latest predictive algorithm for culture in HR technology has not come in the standard package – all about personality fit in a world of cultural ambiguity – but rather in the application before the actual application, or job matching as the creator eHarmony describes it. Initially, it sounds a little like a communist theory but what do I know without signing up and checking it out for myself?

So I did, inspired by the tweets I caught during the #ECBELaunch this week,  saying things like “Imagine a world where everybody was 100% happy w/their marriage and their jobs!” @eHarmony founder/CEO Dr. Neil Clark Warren.” I may have laughed a little too hard at the fallacy of this magical, happy world.

This isn’t Disney World, Warren. It’s the World of Work – and it’s a lot more fucked up than any test can predict. Now, at the mention of Dr. Warren, I have to say – I’m not going into this without my own bias. As part of the LGBT community, I have my hesitations about eHarmony – the parent company of Elevated Careers – as they’ve historically taken an anti- approach toward allowing gay people into their dating community. It took litigation in 2010 before they finally conceded to allowing gay people on their site. I think of, and mention, that fact every time I talk about eHarmony because I acknowledge that as one voice in a sea of voices, all I can do is inform and educate people on discriminatory policies. But that is neither here nor there. Their Elevated Careers site says nothing about being gay or straight, so really – it doesn’t matter. It’s just a fact that I know impacts my initial perception and something, as a writer, I feel the need to be honest about.

I Tried: A Marketer’s Review of Elevated Careers’ Candidate Experience

All right, so let’s dive in on the candidate experience, since the topic itself is all the rage these days to those of you playing buzzword bingo. Please note, I am only testing from the candidate perspective. I have not seen the employer product and I’m going to put that in italics again at the bottom for anyone who feels threatened by honesty.

I started with a simple search on the homepage – Director of Marketing in 37122 – and was pushed to a registration page telling me to get my compatibility report. As a marketer, I would have allowed the job seeker to get at least one more page deep before forcing a login, but it’s their product – not mine. I’ll sign up with my e-mail, I don’t need anyone accessing my social media profiles and contacts like another big bad wolf has.

Easy enough, I’m in. After a series of standard e-mail validation steps, I’m asked to upload a photo. As a job seeker, I think I was just trying to get my compatibility report. Why do you need my photo? I know it’s standard to have a picture on a CV in other countries but not here in the US – which I’m assuming the customer would have to be based on your standard 5 character zip code/keyword only search.

kibblesI uploaded a completely random photo – an ode to my Levy nickname, Kibbles – and without any validation or verification, I’m told it looks great. Warning to the site creators – you’ll want to hand review photos if you’re going to take them. Trust me on this before it becomes a job board for those prostitutes that have cards on the Vegas Strip. Been there, screwed that up.

Next, I’m asked to provide my resume. Fair enough. I click “Upload a resume.”

Time check: I’ve been working for approximately 2 minutes now. Yes – I have set a timer. Science. 

On the other hand – my marketing brain turns on, wondering about the abandon rate at each step. In my experience, and every recruiters – every click along the job hunt drives up the departure rate as much as 80%. Three clicks and three minutes in, odds are I’m gone but for science, here I am.

nobody has time for thatAfter two 504 gateway errors, (in plain English, that means their servers aren’t sending data fast enough so even the internet was like “oh fuck it, I can’t”) waiting to upload my resume, I say screw it, click cancel and skip to the questionnaire. Nobody’s got time for that. I will note, there’s also a place where I can skip to job matches. Wait, how? They didn’t get any information about me yet? If this isn’t a job board – how are you making matches without using your algorithm? Regardless, twenty-four “perfect jobs” are waiting for me.

Ok back to the questionnaire. First, they want to get some of my current job information and demographics. Fair enough. I will commend them that any of the information I provided earlier is pre-populated into the fields to streamline the experience and they’re only asking one question per page, stripping out the potential of overwhelming someone with one page that has 100 questions on it. Unfortunately for me, I couldn’t upload my resume so none of my current work experience is pre-populated.

relationship statusA few questions later about my current company and then… my relationship status? Sneaky, big corporate entity. Why don’t you just slap an eHarmony banner ad on the page and call it a day? While optional, I don’t get why they’re asking and I swear if my work e-mail starts getting clogged with potential love matches…

Time check: 14 minutes. Honestly, I’m also writing notes and taking screen shots as I go so let’s generously call it 7 minutes.

Next up is the values profiles to identify what I think is most important in the workplace. I have all of the questions listed in my notes but for your sanity’s sake, I’ll give you an overview. I was told to rank how important different ideas were to me on a scale of 1 to 7, with 7 being most important. Here’s a brief overview of the first 8 questions I was asked, to which I answered a solid 6 for each one:

  1. Recognizing employee contributions
  2. Not requiring employees to perform tasks outside the job
  3. A brand that’s winning in the marketplace
  4. Maintaining morale
  5. Strong culture of self-management
  6. Takes care of the customer
  7. Free snacks (is this really a value?)
  8. Job stability
  9. Leadership that listens
  10. Cross department collaboration

After 10 questions where I’ve taken the time to type out the actual question in my word document, while also answering 6 for every question which is how every job seeker will, too, because, let’s face it, they just want to be agreeable and get a job, I’m told to “slow down, speedy!” Uhhh, I couldn’t go slower unless I paced my house pondering between each one but ok.

Slowly but surely, I make my way through fifty-two questions. Yes, you read that right – 52, fifty-two, cincuenta y dos. These questions started becoming pretty repetitive and clearly focused on perks, testing leadership and customer-orientation.  In the process of those 52 questions, I was told to slow down four times. By the second “slow down,” I was just plain bored.  I know I’m not your average job seeker but I know I have a longer attention span than one. But for science, I kept clicking 6 and telling myself it would be over soon.

By the third “slow down,” I couldn’t help but think I was taking WAY more time to answer these questions than any job seeker ever would. By the fourth, the frustration started to set in and I started saying “seriously??” out loud to no one. I mean, we all know no job seeker is going to write a thesis in-between answering these repetitive questions. This is also when I started trying to expand my browser the widest it could go for some sense of hope in the form of a completion bar. No such luck. Back to it.

Time check: 27 minutes. Let’s call it 18, adjusting for writing time.

52 questions and 5 “too fast, speedy” prompts later, it’s over.

But, as a candidate, there’s bad news. The completion bar is updated and…  I’m only 50% done. In my notes, you can see that I wrote in all caps: FIFTY PERCENT?!? 52 QUESTIONS GETS ME 50%???? I’m starting to wonder if this is punishment and what I did that was so bad in the first place.

If it is, I know I’ll never do it again. That’s for sure.

Now, I’m supposed to take a personality test. I really hope this goes faster… they’re asking about words that describe me. Again, I’ll be answering six to each one. Three questions in, I’m told I’m going too fast. Nine more questions later, I’ve already seen 2 repeat questions and it’s apparent that I know myself too well because, yes, I’ve been told to slow down again. Another nine questions down, another too fast prompt. I think you get the idea now about how this repetitive and seemingly endless experience sucks.

After twenty-four personality questions I stop to wonder how much work a company has to put in to even get a match. If you can get a recruiter who’s trying to fill ten or more roles today to fill one of these survey’s out – you have more marketing capacity than I.

Ok, enough distraction. Onward!

The next series of personality questions – 25 – 35 were mostly repeats, asking about my general tolerance for other people’s beliefs and goal-setting. But I survived. I’ve landed on the… wait a minute.

fmlFML. Now I’m only 75% of the way done and they want me to tell them about the culture I work in now. At this point, I’m actually a little angry about how much work it has taken.

Time check: Timer just hit 40 minutes. FORTY. Again, we can narrow it down but with the prompts that I was going too fast, I’d say we’re looking at about 25 minutes.

Question four of the “about your company” made me laugh. It asked if “workdays are enjoyable” and I thought – believe me, no job seeker who loves their job made it this far. My sarcasm and pace are yet again underappreciated by the system because, apparently I’m answering too fast, again. This makes me stop to ponder why straight people would put up with a comparable test to find their soul mate. I guess the same tolerance for pain is a compatibility factor.

Seven questions and one annoying prompt later, I want to throw my laptop.

Sixteen questions later, I quit. I honestly couldn’t take any more of the repeat questions and vague descriptions. It’s awful. My threshold for digital disasters is high, but not that high.

Time check: 48 minutes. Subtract for writing and we’re looking at +/- 35 minutes.

Here’s the reason I’m publishing this article and not just putting my notes aside for when someone asks me for commentary.

After answering 139 questions, I was still given the same 24 jobs I saw before every starting this process that were all scraped from SimplyHired.com and are only a match because I entered “director of marketing” as my job title.

This test had me thoroughly annoyed and I bet any job seeker would be, too. In press releases and quotes, I read that their VP of Matching Steve Carter “believes companies should have, and are more successful when they have, a fairly homogeneous, consistent culture profile.”

Well, if you can boil out someone’s actual values by asking them multi-phrased questions about the same 5 concepts on a scale while they’re trying to impress you – not be honest with you – you’re beyond lucky. You’ve turned water into wine and gone pure Touched By An Angel on their ass. I mean, let’s think about it this way. If a friend asked what you do in your free time, would you have a different answer than if your employer asked you the same question?

Precisely.

And if all of your technology is based on an algorithm and years of dating and compatibility matching, does that mean I’m technically not represented since LGBT people weren’t allowed to use your dating algorithm until the last 5 years?

So, in short, my review is – this is painful and I would recommend job seekers avoid this bar-setting bad candidate experience… which means you probably don’t want anything to do with it as a recruiter or HR department either.

Author’s Note: Let’s go over a few things:

  1. I was invited, but did not attend, the “glitterati” meeting of HR and recruiting influencers to launch this brand. I chose not to attend because I am, honestly, too overwhelmed currently with my day-to-day work to lose a few days for an analyst meeting.
  2. I have not seen the employer product and this review is restricted exclusively to Elevated Careers by eharmony’s candidate capabilities.

LinkedIn? Never Heard of it. Not an April Fools Joke.

LinkedInThere are people in this world who do not use LinkedIn. This is not an April Fools joke. I have clients that do not know of or ever heard of Linkedin. As a person who has built a career around being a LinkedIn specialist, this baffles me. As odd as it may seem,  these people do exist. Believe it or not, there are actually recruiters who have never heard of RecruitingTools either. #WaitWhat?

So how do you explain Linkedin to someone who has never heard of it before? This is my attempt.

Explaining LinkedIn

Me: Today, I am going to explain LinkedIn.

Client: Great, can’t wait.
Me: Okay, first there are connections. You can send invitations and get connected to other people on LinkedIn.

Client: Invitations can be sent to anyone?

Me: No, only to people you know well.LinkedIn

Client: Like my Mom?

Me: No, not your Mom, this is a professional network

Client: Then why is there a math problem on the page in front of us?

 

Me: Don’t pay attention to that. No, you only connect with work people you know well already.

Client: Why would I want to do that? If I already know them well, why would I need to be connected with them on LinkedIn too?

Me: Well, you can send messages to each other.

Client: What’s wrong with email?

 

LinkedInMe: Listen, just keep up here. Now, see on this page? Those are your second degree connections.

Client: Can I send them messages?

Me: No

Client: Then why are they called “connections”?

Me: Because they just are. Next you have groups. You can join LinkedIn groups and be a group member.

Client: Can I send group members messages?

Me: Yes, up to 15 a month

Client: So they are more important than second connections?

Me: No.

Client: There’s a girl in a bikini on the front page now. Are you sure this is a business network?

Me: Just ignore her. Another thing you can do is follow people whose writing you like.

 

Client: If I follow them do I get notified when they write something?

Me: Occasionally.

Client: Occasionally?

Me: Well, sometimes you get notified and it’s easy to see and sometimes you get notified and it’s virtually impossible to see.

Client: Are you sure LinkedIn isn’t run by Monty Python?

 

LinkedINMe: Shall we move on?

Client: I suppose so. We might as well find someone for me to connect with. Can you search New Jersey?

Me: No

Client: Why not? The page here says “advanced search”

Me: If you want North New Jersey you have to search New York City, if you want South New Jersey you have to search Philadelphia.

Client: Do the people in New Jersey know about this?

Me: I hope not.

Client: If LinkedIn can’t find New Jersey, which part of the search is the “advanced” part? And who’s that gray guy?

Me: That person is anonymous.

 

Client: “Anonymous” ?? Okay let me summarize: You can only connect with people yoLinkwdInu know already, you can’t talk to “2’s”, when you sign up for notifications they only show up sometimes, and LinkedIn hates New Jersey. And to top it all off, there’s an anonymous zombie person wandering around. Are you sure this isn’t the anti-social network?
Me: He is not an “anonymous zombie person”, he just doesn’t want anyone to know who he is.

Client: Sounds good to me, I want to connect with him.

Me: No

Client: Or the girl in the bikini.

Me: No

Client: And the answer to that math problem was “6”.

Me: I think we’re done here.

Client: Yes, I agree. Well this has been very illuminating. Why don’t you just send me an invoice and I’ll “notify” you when I am ready to pay.

Linkedin

 

Anyone who uses LinkedIn often has had one or more of these experiences. This one’s for all of you.

3d483fe

About the Author: Bruce Johnston is sales coach and strategist specializing in LinkedIn. He believes LinkedIn is not all about your profile; it’s not all about being found. It is about being proactive. LinkedIn is a contact sport. He also trains a module on how to search LinkedIn effectively. If you would like to get in contact with him, feel free to reach out on LinkedIn, Twitter or via email brucejohnston115 [AT] gmail.com

Content Marketing for Recruiting: 5 Key Tips on How To Write Good.

quote3While there are a lot of great software products out there for the HR and recruiting market, let’s face it. You’ve got a limited budget, and even more limited time.

Which, of course, makes you the ideal mark for a bunch of B2B blog posts, social media updates and content marketing talking about how much time and effort their products save you, so you can do important things like read more B2B blog posts about HR and recruiting software you don’t really need.

Don’t worry, though. Even if you’re not on the market, these tools often save you so much time that you have the time to respond to the million phone calls and e-mails you get from some recent college grad in “marketing” trying to set up a demo so they can close you this quarter and hit quota.

For more information on how content marketing can supercharge your recruiting business, click here for the full whitepaper from our friends at The Ladders.

Now, I know what you’re thinking. You’re no HR Technology company, so there’s no way you’d ever have the time or ability to write disposable listacles, pimp out infographics clearly made in MS Paint or have a college intern tweeting out Fast Company articles from your company Twitter handle.

The fact that all they talk about the importance of marketing all day is all the proof you need these companies get this concept. But you’re a recruiter, so it’s likely you’ll never be able to have a voice, perspective or the ability to challenge obviously misleading or silly, specious claims using common sense.

No, my friend. You need marketing.

How To Build A Smarter Workforce (TM) Through Recruiting Content.

Did you know that organizations who do content marketing as part of their recruiting process are 80% more effective at wasting time on bullshit than those at the lagging edge of the “paying obscene amounts of money for access to mediocre Bersin reports” maturity model? It’s true.

According to a report by a Polish workforce management solution written in 2012 and found on the second page of Google results by some junior level account executive pretending to know what the hell is going on, 99% of companies who don’t do content marketing as part of their recruiting strategy report not seeing any results from their content marketing efforts.

Furthermore, another 68% of HR Leaders say they’re either thinking about or plan to initiate some sort of content marketing initiative “sometime in the future,” according to the Society for Human Resources Management’s occasional .pdf newsletter. This is what marketers refer to as “intent,” which means that if someone might be making a purchasing decision sometime in the next decade, it’s important to serve them up with a ton of touch points to stay top of mind if they ever decide to shit and get off the pot.

This is where content comes in.2016-04-01_10-22-07

Don’t worry. If you’re a recruiter, there’s good news.  You too can become a content marketer, even without any formal training, writing skills or even an understanding of the concept of return on investment. Hell, you’ve been paying for job board subscriptions for years and have made like three hires, so it’s not like anyone’s going to know your content campaigns aren’t working.

All that they need to know is it’s there, and it’s a best practice. Just ask the content marketing consultants and agencies who are writing the content telling you how important content is. I’m sorry. You probably know them as the thought leaders and influencers you need to follow on Twitter. And let’s face it, you need to follow a bunch of “employer brand gurus” on Twitter, or else catastrophe may well ensue for you and everyone you know. Think of it like a chain letter – I mean, it doesn’t hurt to send those along just in case those stories are true, right?

Well, meet content marketing for recruiting – it’s the chain letter of the new generation. Here are 5 things you need to write great content about recruiting while thinking like a marketer, earning a seat at the table and becoming a data driven recruiter who thinks buzzwords and best practices are more or less interchangeable.

5. Use Exclamation Points!

If you’re not passionate about something or don’t know what to say, don’t worry. That is why the exclamation point was invented – it feigns excitement so you don’t have to. There’s nothing that says, “wow, we totally get your pain points” more than emphasizing every single declarative sentence with the proper punctuation!

It never gets old! If you want proof of how convincing this convention is, try using them in an offer letter!

giphy (59)

4. Have You Thought About Asking Rhetorical Questions?

 

Recruiters know what most other business functions obviously don’t – that human beings are too stupid to start their own conversations on topics that interest them on social networks or any other communications channel for that matter. Just kidding. Twitter is obviously the only communication channel people pay attention to. But did you know asking rhetorical questions is the only way you can get people to join the conversation? Why didn’t you think of that? How is this not the key to building engagement?

Here are some great questions to try if you’re stumped.

“Did you know we’re hiring?” “Did you know we were just named a Best Place to Work by the Boondock Business Journal?” “Did you know that metrics like reach or impressions are worthless?” “Did you know your social media analytics that you get weekly from your agency are a screenshot of Sprout Social’s dashboard and you could get the same exact thing for like a tenth of the price?”

Are you ready?

3. #HashtagsAreEverything #Recruiting #WorkTrends

So, you want to look like the cool kids on the social media block, but you aren’t a cool kid and you don’t know a thing about social media, right? No problem! That’s what hashtags are for – the more of them you add in an average update, the more people will be able to find you – and likely, see how awesome you are at social media. This will inevitably lead to them following you or clicking the link to your product site and making a purchasing decision, so don’t worry if your bosses ask what you’ve actually accomplished pimping out your brand name on a hashtag, because you’ll have millions of impressions! Suckers!

2016-04-01_10-26-28

Just tell them that your company account has a Klout score of 42, and they will be so impressed by your grasp of big data and marketing that you will not only have a seat at the table, but you’ll buy the thing at Ikea and assemble the particle board yourself. Here are some reasons why branded hashtags are a good idea.

We might not all recruit for sexy brands with big budgets like Google, Exxon Mobil or the law offices of Larry H. Parker, but hashtags are free – and a great way to prove how much your five employees in the recruiting function love working at your company (until they get a new job and say the same stuff from another company’s account).

If you need to create a really unique, memorable and effective branded hashtag, all y9u have to do is simply take the name of your company and append the word #Life to the end (or #LifeAt before the company name if it sounds cooler). Thus Boring Business Systems, for example, becomes #BoringLife.

The occasional pictures you’ll get from a company BBQ or weird all hands team building offsite are just the thing that will convince top talent to work for you – and they’re too busy following branded hashtags to find out about your company otherwise.

2. Don’t Worry About Facts.

Because you work in recruiting, no one expects you to actually tell the truth, do any modicum of research or correctly cite data or fact check sources. You can make any claim you want, really. “Our people are our greatest asset” is used by almost every Wall Street Investment Bank, which shows that even the SEC doesn’t actually care about employer branding enough to actually investigate these kinds of claims.

Candidates, as we have established, are idiots, which is why obviously the reason they want to work for your company has nothing to do with money, but everything to do with that foosball table and free bagel Friday. Also, if you put out any content on salary data, this obviously means you can pay whatever the hell you want, you market maker you.

6-Careers2-911x1024

This means you can say you’re the greatest company in the world, or that you’re one of the most respected companies in your industry, or hold more patents than AT&T and GE combined, and the good news is – no one will ever, ever know. If you have trouble fabricating or misrepresenting information for the purposes of lead acquisition or to win a numbers game, try talking to your HR Technology service provider. They often have deep expertise in this critical core competency, particularly during the contract renewal process.

While 87% of unsubstantiated claims and unverifiable facts are never questioned or called out, try building a landing page that reads “404” on the top and use this as an anchor link to any citation that might involve a little old fib. This way, if you’re ever called out (this never happens) you’ll be able to say, “but I swear I read it there. I don’t know what happened.”

Make sure to schedule these regularly in a social media management tool like Buffer – doing so on Tuesdays at 11:37 AM can cut your cost per hire by close to 25%, according to Buffer’s official blog for employers.

1. Recruiting Is Like Dating.

If you know this metaphor, you now have a decade’s worth of “thought leadership” content sure to get your Klout score and valuation soaring through the roof. You’ll build followers, fans and keep current employees engaged, satisfied, and smoking a post coital cigarette before they’re spent. According to Zenefits, retention is like dating, too – the sex better be good or else, there’s no way workers are going to stick around when there’s an issue performing.

Remember. Your job should be your happy place. But if it’s not and you have to write content, you can always at least fake it!

giphy (58)

3 Reasons Why I Love Using Slack

Do you know what Slack and cool have in common? Everything. I know I’m not the first person to discover slack, but I am definitely a huge fan. We started using the messaging app for internal communication here at fltr.la  about two months ago. Our team runs on slack. So here are three reasons I love using slack, besides that awesome noise it makes when you get a message.


1) It’s super easy to use. 

Download the app on your desktop and your phone and take your messages anywhere. Everything on the app is very intuitive and well designed, two things I always appreciate. Not to mention there is a ton of customization that can be done, which is always fun.


2) It allows cool things to happen

Advanced users can come up with some pretty interesting stuff. One guy on our team is linking slack to forms on our website. When someone fills out a form, we get a slack message instead of an email. Also, you can create private and public boards to chat on and manage permissions pretty easily. For example, we have a board for each client where we can all discuss the status of a project. We also have private boards (one on one conversations) and group party boards where we can chit chat around the water cooler.


3) It helps us stay in contact.

Oddly enough, it feels really good to communicate through slack. Earlier today I was on the phone with a co-worker, and we moved the conversation to slack. What we were discussing didn’t
necessarily require a phone call so we hoped on slack and chatted it up. The emoji sending was off the hook! Also, it’s not weird to add to chat after work hours. It’s nice to drop a line in a group chat on a Sunday, so you don’t forget to on Monday. It’s kinda like adding to a group task list; eventually, everyone sees it, and it gets taken care of.

Slack is just one of the tools we use here at fltr.la to run our business more efficiently. We are always looking for awesome new productivity tools so; please let us know what you’re using.

 

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAU_AAAAJGZjMmE5MTNlLTBlOGItNGY0OC05MWVlLTMwZjkzZTM4MTQ0ZQQuintin Ford is a recruiter and entrepreneur focused in the areas of tech, media and finance. He believes in building solid, long-lasting relationships with his candidates and clients. Quintin is interested in forward thinking recruitment technology. Much of his day is focused on finding or developing smart, simple recruitment solutions that are flexible, efficient and productive. He is the founder of fltr.la – a company that focuses on delivering up to 3 stellar candidates to your inbox daily. Learn more about Quintin on LinkedIn.

A Tribe Called Quest: How To Fix What’s Really Broken In Recruiting.

can-i-kick-it“Never forget son, people will forget your name or forget your face but they will never forget how you made them feel.”  

Monica Zeller

I know you’re probably wondering who Monica Zeller is, but if you know me, you already know a whole lot about her.

See, Monica was my grandmother – and one of the most formative influences in my family life – which, whether they’d like to admit it or not, was structured as a strictly matriarchal society. The women were in charge, and my grandmother wouldn’t have it any other way. I’m not sure if she even knew another way, really.

My grandmother was a font of great phrases, homespun sayings and anachronistic aphorisms; I remember so many of these great little turns of the phrase she taught me.  Every one of them, in retrospect, also carried with it some sort of life lesson, like “you can win over more people with persuasion and honey than vitriol and vigor.”

That’s as true now as it was when I first learned that expression as a child.

It’s this skill, I suppose, that’s helped me build a successful career as a recruiter, despite the constant ups and downs that come with more or less being the professional equivalent of the canary in the macroeconomic coal mine, a never ending series of ups and downs that I cannot control.

That’s why my grandmother’s words, while more than likely a loose paraphrasing of Maya Angelou, still resonate with me, even after all these years.

Because there is one thing that always has been, and will always, be mine to control – and it’s a burden, unfortunately, I have to bear alone.

That is to say, while I might not be responsible for some of the situations, personal or professional, that I might find myself in, I bear full accountability, and responsibility, for the way I choose to handle these situations.

The Low End Theory.

bonitaNow, please understand that I’m by no means apologizing for anything I might have done in the past, nor am I for that matter trying to indemnify myself in the future. Shit happens, and sometimes, it’s my own damn fault for stepping in it.

But my, uh, passionate and somewhat spontaneous personality (and propensity to get real emotional, real quick) is who I am, an enigma wrapped in a riddle tied with a bow of confusion, really.

But I digress. Let me tell you where I’m going with all of this.

We can sit around and talk until we’re blue in the face (and do) about how important candidate experience is, how ethical we are in our recruiting, how the employer brands we represent are genuinely great corporate citizens and even better companies to work for.

Well, you know what? I call BS. Hey, someone finally had to. The thing is, no one actually gives a shit about any of this stuff we pay so much lip service to; these spurious concepts represent nothing more than a Potemkin village for passive candidates. Whatever helps you sleep at night, I suppose.

While recruiters are busy polishing a turd that they have no hope of ever making shine, the whitewash is peeling off the very walls of our workforce, revealing a historically unprecedented amount of pent up animosity, hatred, anger and inner rage that’s been simmering under the surface for quite a while now. And it looks like Pandora’s Box might finally be opening for recruiters and employers, bringing with it a genuine distrust and underlying disrespect for recruiters and the profession we practice each and every day.

Even though we’re doing the best we can, it’s becoming clear that our best really isn’t good enough.

The Scenario.

giphy (56)Our profession stands today at a critical crossroads, and what we do now will forever determine the future (or lack thereof) of the talent acquisition function. Our decision is incredibly important, and if we continue along the path we’re on, it’s clear that our very existence could be torn apart by the extreme voices of the “influencer” and “thought leader” echo chamber.

Those of us who are actually on the front lines are allowing our public image to be shaped by the cult of would be (and mostly, never were) recruiting “experts” whose voices drown out the sensible and moderate among us. It is, in fact, a dangerous time for our profession – that is, if we can even still call it that.

You see, recruiting today has become inundated with an epidemic of unprofessionalism to the extent that the function has functionally ceased to be recognizable to those of us who have made helping others find work our lives’ work, and I know I’m not alone when I say that the state of things makes OG recruiters like me miss the good old days when we were first getting started. But the Golden Age of Recruiting has dulled to the point of darkness.

The light that used to guide so many of us has more or less faded to a flicker. And I’m afraid it’s close to blowing out forever, for all of us. If I have to get a real job, I’m going to be pissed. It’s not too late to turn the tide on the unprofessional behavior plaguing our profession. But it’s going to mean making some real changes to the way we recruit.

I promise you, though, it’s going to be worth it for those of us who care enough to finally draw a line in the sand and make our final recruiting stand. We’ll see who survives the nuclear winter of the next economic downturn.

But I’ve done it before, and I’m pretty damn sure I’ll do it again.

People’s Instinctive Travels and the Paths of Rhythm.

giphy (55)“We’re all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn’t. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing.”
Charles Bukowski

There’s been an increasingly intense, increasingly rancorous tone to the recruiting related banter of ugliness being flung on Facebook and Twitter each and every day. It’s becoming increasingly impossible to miss, really.

It’s the tenor of this conversation that has me the most worried about the health of our profession – what used to be collegial has become a death match for share of voice, and a death march that only proves the people who distrust or dislike recruiters are probably right about us, after all. The bad vibes are everywhere, and they’re poisoning us all.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at the way this is all spreading – all you have to do is turn on a computer, pretty much, and you’ll be able to see plenty of examples of what I’m talking about without really having to dig all too terribly deep – from the manifold recruiting related Facebook Groups to the comment section of blogs to the links we share on LinkedIn, it’s clear to see just how much bad blood exists within what used to be one big recruiting family.

Sounds corny, I know. But it’s true. We used to all be on the same side, even when we were in direct competition. Now, it’s every man for himself, and man, it’s kind of a lonely existence. I want to go back to the way things were, because the way things are going scare the absolute shit out of me.

Something about the mix of passive-aggressive remarks of people being pissed off at getting left off the most recent Top 50 Whatever HR Keyword We’re Targeting List on some blog you’ve never heard of before (and let’s face it, these lists have no foundation in any science beyond the alchemy that is social media metrics) and sweepingly self-aggrandizing behavior triggers some sort of nauseous (visceral) reaction in me.

That sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach only gets made worse when I see some poor sap getting smashed on social for putting out an opinion that doesn’t conform to the “thought leadership” norm. Yeah – go ahead and say phone sourcing is archaic and how Boolean is obsolete at your own risk, and don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Somehow, these antiquated trending topics live on because of social media, which, if you think about it, kind of defeats the entire point of the argument, really.

Or am I the only one who sees that?

Beats, Rhymes & Life.

tumblr_nmfclwXPWT1uqswx1o1_500I recently read an article on email aggregation written by three very well known, well respected sourcers, and while the advice was topical and more or less on point, that still didn”t deter the trolls from coming out from under the bridge and taking the authors to task in the comment section about the relevancy (or lack thereof) of what I thought was a pretty decent post, all things considered.

One of the authors and myself, watching the comment string quickly turn from constructive to cutthroat, decided to intervene and call out one of the worst offenders for his complete lack of commenting decorum (or any semblance of humanity, for that matter).

I attempted, in my response, to at least try to add a little value to the conversation by adding some commentary explaining that even though there’s a lot of dead weight in the industry, there’s a continuous infusion of new sourcers and recruiters swelling our collective ranks each and every day.

It’s these neophytes, who have yet to pick up the bad habits and pervasive cynicism of our more veteran counterparts, that give me what little hope I have. ‘

I, for one, would like to see the new recruiters entering our industry given the tools, technologies and training they need to source, engage and convert top talent the right way. If you’re a recruiter, you should be rooting for the newbies as well.

The better training and the more mentorship we’re able to provide to our less experienced counterparts, the better equipped they’ll be to represent the profession with consummate professionalism, doing right by doing good. As they advance through the ranks, the best practices we teach them today might just make the difference when it comes to seeing our profession survive – and thrive – tomorrow, too.

When less experienced recruiters succeed, we all win; that is, if they’re doing it the right way. Reinforcing and modeling exactly what that right way is our job. If we can’t get it right, we might not have many of those in the not too distant future, the way things are heading.

For all the knocks that trainers and professional educators take – and let’s be real, they have one hell of a hard job – they have an intrinsic understanding of two imparative concepts: mentoring and collaboration. The more experienced among them already know that new teachers (or veteran ones) can’t hope to get any better at their craft without leveraging the collective years of knowledge and professional practice their colleagues have collected over the years.

In recruiting, however, this sort of knowledge sharing seems sporadic, occurring more in isolated pockets than as an industry wide strategic initiative. Of course, a big reason that the necessary support structures for professional training and development aren’t really there in recruiting is that there’s no universal method nor unilateral approach for sourcing, screening or selecting candidates.

It’s an art as much as a science, and your recruiting abilities are developed through applied practice, not imparted theory, as is the case in so many other disciplines.

The Lost Tribes.

giphy (54)Unlike more formalized functions like PR, payroll or even product marketing, most of us are just making this up as we go along. Almost no one went to school to be a recruiter. Hell, how could we?

Most of us had the good fortune of having recruiting somehow find us somewhere along the way, but it’s not like we went out looking for jobs helping people find jobs. With no barriers to entry, many of us just kind of wandered in here one day and ended up staying for the course of our careers.

And we’ve been teaching ourselves as we go ever since.

It doesn’t have to be this way. We’d be wise to take a page from our L&D counterparts and start focusing on building a culture of collaboration, constructive conversation and collegiality. Let’s go from being seen as some sort of HR backwater and start rebuilding the perception of our profession as the critical core competency and strategic business driver recruiting really is.

What we need to do as an industry is to come together and build the future of our profession as a collective from the inside instead of letting it be torn apart by individuals on the outside.

The best way to ensure increased professionalism and improve prevailing perceptions around the recruiting profession, of course, would be if recruiters finally get together and create…wait for it…an association which can help govern our actions, provide training, learning opportunities and mentorship programs, and, most importantly, provides both external advocacy and internal support for the recruiting profession writ large.

Both myself and Pete Radloff, who helped me put together this post, can attest to the power that comes with actively participating in stuff that’s aligned with supporting our profession – and each other. The thing is, at some point, recruiting stops becoming a job and starts becoming a part of your identity, both personal and professional. As a result, many of us seem to have coalesced into a fairly tight knit community made up of members who constitute, for lack of a better word, one hell of a tribe.

Both of us, not to mention countless dozens of other volunteers working behind the scenes, are happy to help set up stuff like happy hours, lunch & learns, webinars and networking opportunities on our own time, with our own dime.

I know that sounds crazy, but because we’re a tribe, we know that we’re all in this together, and each of us has a critical stake in helping raise the bar on the level of professionalism by which recruiters are expected to operate. Similarly, a professional association would work not only to set these standards, but ensure we’re able to ultimately be accountable to each other.

That’s what tribes do.

The Love Movement.

tumblr_mfc1lsNSoI1rhsncgo1_400Of course, it’s not just here in the DC area that these sort of community based, grassroots recruiting initiatives are popping up. Consider Bill Boorman’s #TruMunity, a series of unconferences that have brought thousands of talent acquisition professionals together across hundreds of cities all over the world, and has been doing so for years now.

The main mantra driving #Tru is to create an environment where new and experienced recruiters alike can come together and talk about the topics and issues that matter most to them, and know they’re doing so in a safe, supportive and non-judgemental place – and in this case, IRL beats online every day of the week.

While #Tru has built a brand on the basis of real recruiters really keeping it real in real life, its model is set-up to add value and democratize access to anyone who wants to attend by asking for a nominal donation to help keep the wheels turning, an amount that’s anything but mandatory. People like Bill aren’t in this for the money, but somehow, are able to provide an invaluable learning experience that everyone walks away from, somehow, feeling good (and even excited) about the future of our profession. And you know what? No one has ever said that they wasted their time or didn’t have a learning experience.

Movements like #Trumunity give the rest of us out there in recruiting a great model to follow, proving you can provide a ton of value value without costing a ton of money or time, too.

So, why not build our own National Recruiting Association? Why not work together and be part of a collective that can help provide direction for junior recruiters and sourcers while helping repair our collective reputation and rebuild the trust that so many of us have lost from our candidates, clients and colleagues?

It seems like a pretty simple, straightforward solution to a pretty complex and convoluted set of challenges plaguing our profession. Even an incremental improvement or iterative step in the right direction would be better than simply standing back and doing nothing, as is too often the case today. I’m sick of watching Rome burn, and I’m not fiddling anymore.

Look. The whole agency versus in-house battle royale is really played out and kind of old hat by now, and I think we need to stop berating other recruiting professionals. It doesn’t matter where you recruit.

What really matters is how you recruit, and I truly believe that a professional association can create a way to improve our communication, strengthen our community and provide a powerful platform – and collective voice – for our entire industry. I know that sounds a little bit naive, but I don’t think we’re tilting at windmills.

We’re reaching for the stars.

Find A Way.

giphy (57)That’s why I’m so excited by the work that Pete, myself and a select group of some of our more esteemed colleagues have been doing the past few months to start laying the foundation for this much needed (and long overdue) National Recruiting Association – a group that’s being built by recruiters, for recruiters.

Real recruiters, that is; one of the best parts of coalescing around a professional association is that the very existence of this kind of formalized group will allow us to not only set standards, but also start weeding out the RINOs and LIONs and Robert Half recruiters of the world.

Through this sort of association, we can replace the so-called “thought leaders,” “career coaches” and “recruiting rock stars” (gag) with real talk about the stuff that really matters to real recruiters instead of letting some talking head or “personal branding guru” set our professional agenda for us.

It’s time recruiters took back recruiting.

This is an important first step to getting us away from the infighting and the backstabbing and bitching and moving the recruiting conversation – and vocation – to a higher standard. Which, let’s face it, recruiting desperately needs right about now.

While I know I’m being a little obtuse, we wanted to make sure we were able to offer you the chance to help as we build this association from the ground up. If you’d like to be a part of what we’re working on, we’ll be happy to fill you in on the details. Just drop me or Pete a line (I’m [email protected], by the way, if you’re old school) or leave a comment in the space below and let’s get you onto the team. Hopefully, we’ll be able to cross paths at a conference, grab a drink or even just set up a brief phone call and figure out how we can work together to make this work for all of us.

We want your ideas, we want your thoughts, and we need your passion if we’re really going to make this thing work. But the good news is, we’re getting there – and we’d love some help. Because we can’t do this by ourselves. So help a brother – and a profession – out and join a movement that’s actually trying to move our profession forward for the right reasons.

The cost of staying silent and doing nothing to change the course of our profession is a future where top recruiters actually look like Top Recruiter. The choice is yours. #TrueStory

Additional Reporting (and Snark) Provided by Pete Radloff.

Derek ZellerAbout the Author: Derek Zeller draws from over 16 years in the recruiting industry. The last 11 years he has been involved with federal government recruiting specializing within the cleared Intel space under OFCCP compliance. Currently, he is a Senior Technical Recruiter for Oracle.

He has experience with both third party agency and in-house recruiting for multiple disciplines and technologies. Using out-of-the-box tactics and strategies to identify and engage talent, he has had significant experience in building referral and social media programs, the implementation of Applicant Tracking Systems, technology evaluation, and the development of sourcing, employment branding, military and college recruiting strategies.

You can read his thoughts on RecruitingDaily.com or Recruitingblogs.com or his own site Derdiver.com.  Follow Derek on Twitter @Derdiver or connect with him on LinkedIn.

 

unnamed (11)About the Author: Pete Radloff has 15 years of recruiting experience in both agency and corporate environments, and has worked with such companies as Comscore, exaqueo, National Public Radio and Living Social.

With experience and expertise in using technology and social media to enhance the candidate experience and promote strong employer brands, Pete also serves as lead consultant for exaqueo, a workforce consulting firm.

An active member of the Washington area recruiting community, Pete is currently a VP and sits on the Board of Directors of RecruitDC.

Follow Pete on Twitter @PJRadloff or connect with him on LinkedIn, or at his blog, RecruitingIn3D.

Sending Out An SMS: Recruiting Texts From Last Night.

Screen shot 2011-10-20 at 9.43.44 AM_0In recruiting we spend a whole lot of time talking about striking the balance between automation and personalization, and how best to blend high tech with high touch. But for all the talk about email blasts, talent communities and employer branding, for some reason it seems like we’re all ignoring what seems to be a pretty obvious solution to what’s become a fairly endemic problem in talent acquisition today.

Imagine if a new SaaS product came out today that could guarantee a 90% open rate within three minutes of being sent. You’d probably pay whatever it takes to get your hands on what sounds to be a silver bullet for sourcing and candidate development.

I mean, 9 out of 10 candidates read my message within three minutes, I’m pretty sure we’d all throw obscene amounts of cash in whatever vendor could confidently make that guarantee – those response rates, after all, are pretty much unheard of in traditional talent acquisition technology.

Seriously. Name your price.

Why Text Marketing Kicks The Crap Out Of Social Recruiting.

The thing is, that product already exists, and you’re probably already using it; it’s called texting, and several studies support the fact that texts are by far the best way to make sure your message gets heard by the right person at the right time, in real time, all the time.

With an open rate ranging from between 90-99%, and with 9 out of 10 texts being read within three minutes of being received, the most powerful weapon in mobile recruiting may have been sitting there on your phone this entire time.

How many millions of dollars, after all, have companies spent to buy up followers and friends on Twitter or Facebook simply so that they can have the capability to get their brand message out to hundreds of thousands of people who could give two shits about your sponsored story, in the unlikely event they’d actually see it?

It’s easy to forget, but the reason Twitter is capped at 140 characters is because it was developed based off the SMS (that’s short message system, for short) limit of 160 characters; Twitter caps user names out at 20 characters, thereby splitting the difference and establishing a whole new form of communication that’s never betrayed its origins as an SMS service. Texts were the entire point of tweeting, once upon a time not all too long ago.

Still not convinced? Well, let me try the old peer pressure approach: dude, everyone’s doing it! Last year, users around the world sent an estimated 200 billion Tweets, a big number dwarfed by the deluge of an estimated 7.2 trillion (that’s ‘trillion,’ with a ‘t’) text messages sent globally in 2015 alone.

I mean, if that statistic doesn’t convince you of the case use behind using texting for talent acquisition, then you’re a lost cause. Think about the sheer volume of data represented in those 7.2 trillion texts (and counting) we send every year. It’s mind blowing, really, and it’s fairly safe to say that texting has become the predominate form of human communication in the 21st Century.

Don’t worry. It’s not a sign of the Apocalypse. It’s actually a pretty kick butt opportunity to transform your applicant acquisition and candidate engagement strategies to be more efficient, and effective, than ever before.

statistics2

Recruiting Texts: High Touch Meets High Tech.

I know what you’re probably thinking. Sure, you send lots of texts, but those are personal messages, not professional ones. Am I right? Please. Come on, man. That’s kind of the whole point of recruiting, if you’re doing it right.

That said, the perception that SMS communication is entirely driven by individual users isn’t completely accurate. According to a Pure360 report from 2013 , 54% of US consumers receive at least one branded SMS message daily, and 50% of those who receive branded texts at some point convert into actual buyers. That’s right – fully half of those potential prospects actually closed due directly to a branded text message.

I have to believe that, three years after this original study, that the reach and ROI demonstrated by such successful texting trial runs have made this marketing approach even more prevalent, with the volume of brand-based texts skyrocketing to the point of ubiquity in 2016.

What limited data there happens to be available on current consumer trends support this belief. But for some reason, even as marketing departments embrace texting, recruiters are well behind the professional adoption curve on a technology almost all of us are already using for personal purposes, never thinking that maybe, just maybe, that silver bullet might have been in their hands this entire time.

This shouldn’t be a surprise, as recruiters are often late adopters, but this is one trend no talent pro can afford to miss. So, once again, it’s time for all you recruiters out there to put your marketer hats on and start thinking differently about candidate communication and engagement. Yeah, again.

Consider the question of where, exactly, you’d find candidate cell phone numbers to call if you were starting a search today. I’m going to guess it’s your ATS. Even in the few cases where a candidate’s cell phone number isn’t a required field, almost every resume in there is going to have their direct cell number prominently posted right at the top of the page.

If you’re not finding what you’re looking for there, I’d look at tools like ZoomInfo, Netprospex, Prophet or Spokeo. If your candidate has a cell phone, there’s a good chance the number is accessible on one of these profile aggregators, which makes building a lead list for texting campaigns far easier than trying to test a bunch of email matrixes to find out what address to start spamming.

Converting Contacts Into Candidates With Text Messaging: A Case Study.

OK, so you’ve got a bunch of cell numbers. Now, most of the time, you’d probably start straight cold calling through your lead list, but this is where the true power of texting truly comes in. But chances are the only way you know how to send texts is through your cell phone, and if you’re like me, there’s no way in hell you’re giving that number out like candy to candidates.

Good news: there’s actually an app for that. TextMe is a free recruiting tool that allows users to generate a random number to send anonymized texts from. While you’ll receive responses directly to your phone, you’ll hear a different tone to let you know whether or not it’s from a candidate. Pretty cool, right?

So, what more can I say? If you know how to cold call, the rules of the recruiting road still hold true when it comes to approaching text messaging. As evidence, I’ve got an actual example that I really used in my real job with my real team at Hudson. Contact information has been hidden to protect the innocent.

texts

 

And just like that, what would have been a wasted InMail turned into an actual phone interview easier than if they’d actually replied directly on LinkedIn, where we had originally connected. Now, I know what some of you in the back of the room are probably thinking: “phones are for calling (or sourcing) – they’re certainly not for texting!” If that’s what you really think, well, all I can say is, think again. In fact, there are a few things wrong with that mindset that seem to be fairly self-evident.

First, calling and texting aren’t mutually exclusive; second, while I still believe that you can’t replicate the connection you can make with a candidate over the phone, when it comes to sourcing, the number of recruiters actually making cold calls has plummeted precipitously.

As the old adage says, “you can’t change the wind, but you can adjust your sails.”

How do you know whether or not recruiting related text messages are working for you? Well, if your texts show up on the site textsfromlastnight.com, you’re either doing a really great job engaging candidates, or a really non-compliant one. Or, if you’re like most of us, somewhere in between. But, like The Great One once famously said: “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.”

And you’d miss about 90% of the candidates you could otherwise be reaching if you put down the phone and sent some texts out for a change. If you’re not already sending out an SMS, you’re headed straight for the biggest iceberg our business has seen since the invention of the Internet. Seriously.

wolfordMike Wolford has over 9 years of recruiting experience in staffing agency, contract and in house corporate environments. He has worked with such companies as Allstate, Capital One, and National Public Radio.

Mike also published a book titled “Becoming the Silver Bullet: Recruiting Strategies for connecting with Top Talent” and “How to Find and Land your Dream Job: Insider tips from a Recruiter” he also founded Recruit Tampa and Mike currently serves as the Sourcing Manager at Hudson RPO.

An active member of the Recruiting community, Mike has spoken publicly in an effort to help elevate the level of professional skill.

Follow Mike on Twitter @Mike1178 or connect with him on LinkedIn.

 

The Disturbing Influence of Glassdoor

GlassdoorLast night a colleague went to Boston University to do a focus group on how undergraduate computer science majors perceive various aspects of a company’s employer brand. The results were quite interesting…

What Went Down

A software engineering job posting at a local company founded by some MIT folks was projected on a wall. Then, the speaker asked: “How many of you would apply to work here?” More than a quarter of the students in the room raised their hands.

Next, he showed this company’s Glassdoor page for 1 minute. In a quick scan, the students could see a rating below 3.0 and limited, or lame, reviews. Then the presenter asked again: “Now, how many of you would apply?”

Not a single hand went up!

“Why not?,” he asked the millennial group. Some of their answers were“It’s not worth my time to apply to this company,” “their best rating is a 4-star review that I don’t even believe,” “all I know is that this isn’t a great place to work, why would I apply?”

This is happening every single day to companies who aren’t managing their employer brand.

Glassdoor

Ratings And Rankings: How It All Adds Up

The average Glassdoor rating is 3.4. That probably doesn’t seem half bad until that rating is the reason why you’re nauseous in the backseat watching a batshit-crazy Uber driver, bob and weave through heavy traffic.

Think about it. You wouldn’t get in the car (in fact, if they are below a 4.6 they are gone anyways). You wouldn’t eat at that restaurant. You would check the reviews and pick an alternative. That’s what candidates are thinking, too. They don’t want to apply unless you give them a reason to think they should. Being average isn’t good enough.

Of course, we know that 1/3 of people leave negative reviews for a company they leave, and, therefore, Glassdoor is negatively biased. Ask anyone you work with; they will tell you they take Glassdoor with a grain of salt. “It’s like Yelp.”

Take Note

Companies need to pay attention to Glassdoor – but the real lesson is that your broader online brand is important. We’ve all heard how candidates are now “job shoppers.” But, very few companies have actually worked to build proactively an employer brand. Bottom line: Don’t let your worst employees define your brand?

The top brands (Google, McKinsey, Goldman, etc.) spend millions each year on their employer brands. And here’s a hint, in case you haven’t caught on: they aren’t doing this because there is a low ROI. If Google needs to spend time and resources building their brand, do you think you can get away with simply spending more on Indeed postings?

GlassdoorRemember how no one wanted to apply to the test company once they saw the Glassdoor rating? Take a step back – remember that only 25% wanted to apply based on the job description – and this isn’t top talent. This is for undergrads who don’t have any experience!

Be proactive. This is costing your business every single day. Stop the bleeding and start reaping the rewards the best companies do from attracting the very best candidates. Get your best employees out there as ambassadors. Create interesting content and make sure it lives in the right places! You can start with a hashtag or a few Youtube videos. And, for companies beyond the startup phase, graduate to employer branding software that can scale.

Remember, the power of Glassdoor is that people trust people. High-level marketing influenced scripts, c-level execs talking about “innovation,” and cheesy background music just doesn’t cut it. Be authentic, own your brand, and get it out there!

About The Author:

philPhil Strazzulla is the CEO of LifeGuides, a software company that creates, manages and shares employee authored content about life at your company. In minutes, you can create employee testimonials with LifeGuides, automatically distribute the content via social, you careers page, relevant Google queries, and job postings. Phil started LifeGuides at Harvard Business School where he earned his MBA. Previously, he was a venture capital investor at Bessemer Venture Partners.

Melancholy and the Interview Sadness: The 10 Weirdest Interview Questions Ever.

dumb-questionsI hate interviews. And I know I’m not the only one. Hell, I’m pretty sure I’ve never met anyone who actually claims to enjoy interviews, and that includes recruiters.

OK, there might be one or two of those overly confident, cocksure bastards out there who go in knowing, and genuinely believing, that they’re going to ace the interview – after all, they always do. Except when they don’t.

It happens to all of us, really. Of course, in my case, I can’t even say I have a whole lot of fun even in those rare situations where I thought I’d nailed it. I’ve been wrong before.

Chances are, you’ve walked away confident that the offer was in the bag, only to hear a “thanks but no thanks” (or more often, nothing at all) instead for subjecting yourself to the painful protocol that is the professional interview.

And, of course, you take it personally – was it something I said? Should I have worn something different? Was it my chronic halitosis again? What’s wrong with me?

Even in the best case scenario, when you like the interviewer, and it seems like the interviewer likes you, there really isn’t a whole lot to like about interviews.

Rotten Apples.

pOBAx33First off, there’s the logistical element involved. Before even going in, you have to find some excuse to get off work, find a tie or slacks that fit (or make that last minute trip to Marshall’s, more like), and, most dauntingly of all, find out where the hell the interview actually is in the first place.

It’s a nice bonus when recruiters send any modicum of instructions whatsoever besides maybe some address that you plug in only to realize that it takes you to the front gate of some huge office park, or else the lobby of a highrise with no contact person or suite number listed, an anxious security guard and a growing line of people waiting impatiently behind you.

I mean, in a lot of cases, fighting your way through traffic, finding parking and finding the right address should be enough to prove you’re sufficiently interested and qualified for the job. Unfortunately, of course, that’s only the first step in a very arduous, very painful march through the interviewing gauntlet.

If you arrive safely – and that’s a big if – you get rewarded with a ride on the “which floor is it?” game, where successful winners move onto the next round, a little something we like to call “The Lobby Game.” You know the one.

It’s like being in a giant labyrinth (only without David Bowie or a Minotaur), a maze game where you’re lucky if you don’t end up locked out in a stairwell wondering if the emergency exit is activated, or else having some awkward encounter in some executive washroom in some strange corner of the building you’re not supposed to be in.

It’s like Minesweeper, only way shittier – if such a thing is even possible. Either way, if you beat the odds and make it to the right place at the right time, somehow, you’re still no closer to winning than when you left the house. This, my friends, is the stuff we really should cover when we talk about improving the candidate experience. Because it sucks, big time.

When you show up panting and out of breath, of course, pressed suit wrinkled and brow dripping with sweat, having made it right in the stroke of time, are told by some secretary to take a seat. You plop down in the lobby, trying to catch your breath as you give the stink eye to every person entering or exiting the joint, pretending to thumb through some financial report or company brochure so you’ll win brownie points when your person finally shows up.

Whenever the hell that might be. And you wait, and you wait, and suddenly you’re second guessing yourself as to why you’re even there in your newly purchased Penny’s suit. Despite all your rage, you realize, you’re still just a rat in a cage. You’re trapped. And you’re going nowhere, fast.

Moments in an Elegy.

HZwmRsBTypically, about 20 minutes after the scheduled start time, just when you’re about caught up on breath, out of patience and about to walk on back to the parking lot, some other secretary comes out and calls your name. You think, ‘finally’ – only they’re only there to show you to another room, where there are always a million chairs and never any windows.

It’s like a doctor’s office in there otherwise, spartan, starkly decorated, and you pull out your phone and try to keep your mind off the ticking clock, ears trained hopefully for the rattling of the door handle. Then, finally, you hear footsteps outside the conference room, the creaking of the door, and then…

I know. It sounds more like some episodic crime drama – or a horror movie – than a standard part of every employers’ hiring process or recruiting protocol. Not that there’s anything “standard” about them at all. Because, turns out, the typical interview is really anything but.

The fact is that candidates aren’t the only side to the interview equation, and while there’s always going to be a fear factor inherent to any process in which you’re more or less submitting yourself to subjective judgement by strangers, for some reason employers seem to do little to nothing to allay those fears or help candidates come in feeling confident, prepared and equipped to succeed in an interview.

Instead, it’s almost like we’re set up to fail – and the “make or break” stakes of this critical part of the process are often enough to break even the best candidates. Even the best opportunities might not be worth the opportunity cost of a crappy interview.

Transforming interviews from your greatest weakness into something that at least doesn’t suck all that badly for either side requires a little bit of strategy – and often, a fairly dramatic departure from the traditional approach many employers have traditionally taken towards interviewing. We need to get away from looking at interviewing as just another quality control check in which candidates are grilled with stupid questions instead of engaged in meaningful conversation.

We need to stop subjecting seekers to asinine questions about hypothetical situations instead of substantive, structured questions designed to dig deeper than the silly superficial stuff candidates are currently subjected to (no one’s going to give a meaningful answer when asked to “tell me about yourself.”) More importantly,we need to take a little advice from that old adage about interviewing and realize that preparation and practice really are everything – for recruiters and hiring stakeholders as well as candidates.

A study released today by career and recruiting marketplace Glassdoor suggests that not only do strategic interview questions and challenging selection processes enable employers to make better hiring decisions, but that there’s actually a statistical correlation between a tough interview process and long term employee satisfaction.

Now, let’s be clear – by “tough,” this means creating challenging questions predicated on core competency models or company culture fit, not making it impossible for candidates to figure out where the interview is, who they’re supposed to meet or even what position it is that they’re actually interviewing for.

Zeitgeist: The 10 Weirdest Job Interview Questions of 2016.

eqBc64PSometimes, though, as the Glassdoor report demonstrated, some of these tough, effective interview questions from some of the world’s most competitive employers and biggest brands may sound a little silly, a bit strange or completely freaking weird.

Of course, that’s not necessarily always a bad thing. And there’s no way these questions could possibly be any worse than asking people about their greatest weakness, after all.

After looking through the complete report of Glassdoor’s Top 10 Oddball Interview Questions of 2016, I thought I’d cut through the career advice or job search “coaching” crap and try to have some fun with these batshit crazy interview questions.

So, I’m not going to tell you how to address or approach answering these, because hell if I have any idea, either.

But I thought I’d give each of them my best shot, since while there may be no such thing as a stupid question, there sure are some stupid people out there.

And there’s a good chance you’ll probably have to interview with a few of them on your next job search.  Consider yourself warned.

  1. “When a hot dog expands, in which direction does it split and why?”SpaceX Propulsion Structural Analyst job candidate (New York, NY).

giphy (47)

 

  1. “Would you rather fight 1 horse-sized duck, or 100 duck-sized horses?”Whole Foods Market Meat Cutter job candidate (Lexington-Fayette, KY).

giphy (48)

  1. “If you’re the CEO, what are the first three things you check about the business when you wake up?” – Dropbox Rotation Program job candidate (San Francisco, CA).

1PzqaRm

 

  1. “What would the name of your debut album be?” – Urban Outfitters Sales Associate job candidate (New York, NY).

loser

 

  1. “How would you sell hot cocoa in Florida?” – J.W. Business Acquisitions Human Resources Recruiter job candidate (Atlanta, GA).

giphy (52)

  1. If I gave you $40,000 to start a business, what would you start?” – Hubspot Account Manager job candidate (San Francisco, CA).

cat juggle

  1. “What would you do if you found a penguin in the freezer?” – Trader Joe’s job candidate (Orange, CA).

giphy (45)

 

  1. “If you were a brand, what would be your motto?” – Boston Consulting Group Consultant job candidate (Washington, D.C.).

giphy (50)

  1. “How many basketballs would fit in this room?” – Delta Airlines Revenue Management Co-op job candidate (Cincinnati, OH).

4

  1. “If you had $2,000, how would you double it in 24 hours?” – Uniqlo Management Trainee job candidate (Los Angeles, CA).

crack

To see the full Glassdoor report on the Top 10 Oddball Interview Questions for 2016 across North America and Europe, click here.

Editor’s Note: Glassdoor is a Recruiting Daily client, however, Recruiting Daily was not compensated for this post. The opinions expressed in this guest post do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, nor do they constitute an endorsement for Glassdoor’s products or services.

 

Tangled Up In Who: Building The Business Case for Personality Assessments.

backgroundFor well over a century now, industrial and organizational psychologists have turned their collective focus towards a singular goal: trying to explain why employees behave the way that they do.

While these hyper-focused disciplines have generated a significant body of knowledge about the complex correlations between human behavior and business outcomes, most of these models rely almost exclusively on the joint influence between individual characteristics and cognitive factors.

By individual characteristics, of course. I’m referencing stuff like intrinsic motivation, interpersonal dynamics, cognitive ability and personal skills or experience. Contextual factors, on the other hand, lie either somewhat or entirely out of the control of the individual employee.  These contextual factors include such considerations as job characteristics, company culture, leadership communication, performance management, organizational structure and development.

While the interplay between the individual and the bigger business are essential to understanding the bigger behavioral picture, the best way to understand (and thereby, have the ability to predict and manage) the variable of human behavior is to recognize the fundamental reciprocity that must exist as a prerequisite for any successful relationship between employee and employer.

In this area, the scientific study and application of personality theory has yielded a wealth of insight (and terrabytes of data) when it comes to collectively managing individual outcomes.

A Quick One: Building The Business Case For Personality Assessments.

First off, let’s start with a simple definition of the word “personality.” When we’re talking about the functional relationship between work and work environment, probably the best way to conceptualize this critical concept is to look at personality as the unique cluster of each individual employees’ consistent behavioral patterns.

This framework allows us to look at the way we select and manage top talent based on such an amorphous, ambiguous concept as “personality” with an understanding not only of how each employee relates to their employer, but also why that person behaves differently under diffuse situations or changing contexts.

For example, by assessing “personality” by applying the above definition, we can see if an employee or candidate is likely to:

  • Show the potential, patience and perseverance to go above and beyond for a client.
  • Push hard (but not too hard) to appropriately close clients in selling situations.
  • Make the right decision by considering all relevant details, inputs and potential outcomes when situational judgement or thoughtful deliberation is required.

Similarly, the above definition of personality is a highly concise, highly effective framework for framing the relationship between individual employees and the greater work context factors in which each operate in order to best understand the intrinsic motivators that define an individual employee’s unique drivers. These include:

  • Distinctiveness: By distinctiveness, we’re simply referring to the aspects of an individual’s personality and interpersonal dynamics that make them different or unique from other employees and/or job candidates.
  • Consistency: In this context, we’re defining consistency simply as the aspects of an individual’s personality and interpersonal dynamics which provide enough input points to allow us to reliably predict that employee’s behavior across a wide range of different dynamics, situational approaches and potential business scenarios.

Personality assessments have consistently and repeatedly proven themselves to be highly valuable to both the individual employee and bottom line results when they’re effectively leveraged as part of an integrated talent management approach. By utilizing personality assessments holistically across a wide range of potential situations, senior managers and executive leadership can have a much better understanding of why individuals behave the way they do in various professional contexts or workplace conditions.

Once you know the why, of course, you can better control the how when it comes to people processes, programs and policies – and finally maximize that “greatest asset” every employer always seems to be talking about.

It’s Hard: Aligning Mission, Visions & Values.

1975, USA --- The Who Performing in Concert --- Image by © Neal Preston/CORBIS

Having accurate insight into the intrinsic motivators that differentiate individual employees and candidates with some level of consistency provides obvious clarity behind performance drivers in a variety of divergent contexts, which obviously, optimally, profoundly impacts organizational efficiency and efficacy when it comes to such critical competencies as employee selection, professional learning and development and performance management programs.

One question, of course, remains: how exactly do we know when those drivers are pointed in the right direction or whether or not it might be time to rethink our overall organizational approach and alignment? That is, how do we know when the behaviors that drive decisions across the employee lifecycle, from selection to succession, are actually aligned with the bigger business picture. If our people strategies and revenue strategies don’t match, we’re more or less dooming our organizations to death by a thousand cuts.

The only way to truly survive – and thrive – is by ensuring that employee selection and talent management programs align with the company’s bigger business or bottom line strategies, and making sure that those initiatives are flexible enough to continually adapt and adjust to the rapidly changing, constantly evolving business environment so endemic in the world of work today.

The best way to do this is by creating competency frameworks for every critical role within an organization, and making sure that the way in which both prospective and current employees are measured or managed strongly supports the bigger business strategy and aligns with the company’s greater vision, purpose or mission.

How effective those competency models will actually be, of course, varies drastically depending on how accurately employers can articulate, communicate or inculturate organizational expectations to individual employees around such high level considerations as competitive landscape, shifting consumer or customer demands, legislative or economic environment, technology and talent trends.

Once these variables are controlled for, competency frameworks can them be created by aligning them with internal factors such as measurement systems, company culture, HR policy and practices or organizational structure.

Odds and Sods: A Closer Look At The Personality-Competency Connection.

m_226386589_0A well-defined competency framework, therefore, must vertically link the behavior of each individual employee to all of these larger organizational, strategic and business or bottom line outcome considerations, clearly linking which personal attributes and personality characteristics, skills or abilities work best within your work environment to deliver the best performance every time, all the time.

Furthermore, that performance should be linked to the most critical areas of your business. Any company operating in a highly dynamic, rapidly evolving business environment – and let’s face it, that’s almost all of us – must compete primarily on iterative improvements and/or innovation.

That means the most successful employers consistently build the best workforces by focusing on finding current and future employees with strong potential across key competency areas. These include:

  • Adaptability: the tendency to work effectively and shift course when external influences affect an initial plan, condition, or situation. Willing to change own ideas or perceptions on the basis of new information or evidence.
  • Creativity & Innovation: the tendency toward divergent thinking; the propensity to question existing practices; challenge commonly held assumptions; originate new or radical alternatives to traditional methods, processes, and products.
  • Managing Innovation: the tendency to foster an environment open to new or radical alternatives to traditional methods, approaches, and products.

Of course, the true power inherent to this approach comes from exploiting the proven scientific link between personality assessments and these business-critical competencies. While I’m afraid fully describing the complex methodology and field of research behind this correlation is beyond the scope of this article, at a high level it includes conducting in-depth interviews and focus groups with all stakeholders, then quantifying the pre-identified performance criteria proposed for assessing business outcomes and aligning those to various personality characteristics and interpersonal or group dynamics.

It’s only through thorough analysis of the company’s mission, goals and strategy within the context of broader business factors and the bigger economic environment and how those components correlate with organizational design and workforce development that we can come to truly understand not only what a company stands for, but why a company exists, too.

The better we understand our corporate mission, vision and values, the more informed our decision making when it comes to aligning individual employees with the bigger business picture.

By employing personality assessments, therefore, companies can finally figure out why employees behave the way they do. 

And that right there, my friends, is more or less the silver bullet for HR, recruiting and everything else even tangentially related to talent. If you’re not aiming for the right target in terms of personal dynamics, however, your business – and your bottom line – will almost inevitably miss the mark.

Don’t take that shot. Seriously.

frankAbout the Author: Frank Costanzo has more than 30 years of experience building and leading technology-based business enterprises across multiple industries, including education, banking, online brokerage, and publishing.

Frank currently serves as Senior Vice President and Executive Committee Member at Caliper, a pioneer in talent management, data, and knowledge for over 50 years, has conducted more than 3.5 million assessments for over 30,000 companies. In this role, he is responsible for providing strategic direction and ensuring that Caliper is delivering solutions that maximize clients’ human capital potential.

Prior to joining Caliper, Mr. Costanzo spent 13 years in a variety of leadership roles with Peterson’s, a division of Trinet; Mr. Costanzo started his career with Applied Graphics Technologies (AGT) and Computer Graphics Resources, where he served in a number of key management roles in sales, marketing, product development, product management and innovation.

A graduate of the University of Western Ontario, Frank currently resides in Princeton with his wife and two sons.

Click here to connect with Frank on LinkedIn.

 

16 Places to Find Tech Candidates: Tools for #TechRecruiters ThinkGeek Pt 2

This article is part of a 4-part series,  focused on sharpening your technical recruiting skills. You’ll learn tactics and strategies to apply before, during and post search to improve your results. 

In part one, we learned about what we should do before even attempting to call yourself a technical recruiter. Now that you understand more about technology and the various IT positions to may be recruiting for it is time to start your search for tech candidates.

In general developer positions are harder to fill than infrastructure jobs for tech recruiters. Tom Leung, CEO of Seattle-based Poachable stated, “There are certain job functions where the battle for talent is just ruthless. If you’re a Seattle company looking for a mobile developer right now, it may take you six to 12 months to find someone.” So where do we start?

Tech RecruitersThe Starting Line for Tech Recruiters: The Dreaded Job Description

This has got to be one of the suckiest parts of the day for tech recruiters. If you are lucky, the hiring manager that you are recruiting for is also a good writer. But the chances do that are about the same as finding a rainbow colored unicorn.

The process of writing a job description requires having a clear understanding of the job’s duties and responsibilities. The job posting should also include a concise picture of the skills necessary for the position to attract qualified job candidates. Organize the job description into five sections: Company Information, Job Description, Job Requirements, Benefits and a Call to Action. Be sure to include keywords that will help make your job posting searchable. A precise job description will help attract qualified candidates, as well as help, reduce employee turnover in the long run.

For more information about writing job descriptions, check out “Content Marketing and Job Descriptions: A Recruiter’s Guide to A/B Testing.”

 

Top Sites for Tech Recruiters to Post Jobs

For niche jobs, it is best to post them on a niche job board. Here is a list of some go to job boards to check out. I can’t tell you which will work best for you, but I can say that the ones listed target IT professionals and developers.

1. Dice

Dice is the Godfather of all tech job boards. When I started tech recruiting, it was the ONLY niche job board worth using. I am glad to say that Dice has come a long way since then has come a long way since then.  With their Open Web, Tech News and Twitter Job Cards, it is obvious that they are trying to meet today’s recruiter.  Dice is a great job board, but while you are on there, look around.  There is some good stuff on there.  #Dice141 is their latest offering.  Check it out:

https://youtu.be/8BKv_c-Av24

 

2. CrunchBoard

Truth be told, I am a total tech dork.  TechCrunch is one of the sites I go to daily to see what is going on, and I know I am not the only one.  So it makes sense that it would have a job board for technophiles to search.  CrunchBoard is the official job board for TechCrunch. It is pretty cheap too; only $200 for a two-month post.

3. Angel List

I love free stuff. That is pretty much why I love the Angel List job board. “Posting a job is free. Meeting candidates is free. Hiring is free.”  The other thing I love is that the candidates here are interested in startups. Please keep that in mind when you are posting here.  Odds are, these are not the candidates looking for a full-time web dev position.  But at least you don’t have to jump through hoops trying to explain why they should work at your company that no one has heard of.  Well, in theory…

4. GitHub Jobs

Post here to meet the cool kids. But the coolest thing of all is that the Github API is so open you can virtually get anyone’s email address out of it who did a public commit over the last 12 months (even the people who hide theirs). Check out what Willem had to say about it!

5. StackOverflow Careers

Stack Overflow is a popular site for programmers that have questions about specific technologies. There job board lists -time and contract developer and engineer positions, although you are welcome to post any position you want to.

6. Smashing Jobs

Born out of the popular Smashing Magazine site, Smashing Jobs targets tech professionals, mainly freelance,  in the creative space. Primarily development jobs.

7. Hired

Not to be confused with SimplyHired! I love the story behind this product. Two guys met at a bar and while discussing the woes they were experiencing finding candidates, they built hired.  Hired.com is a developer auction site with a mission.  Check them out:

8. Mashable Job Board

I love Mashable.  It is another site I go to daily.  That is why you should post jobs here, millions of people make this a go to site every day. I like that you can set up candidate alerts. This is one of those places it just makes sense to post on.  Bonus: You get access to a resume database.

9. IT Job Pro

I used this site primarily when searching outside of the US although you can list stateside jobs. Solid job board, nothing fancy. If you have listings in Europe, Asia, Australia,  and New Zealand, this is the place to post.

10. KDNuggets

No this is not a site to find the best chicken. KDNuggets is geeky even for geeks.  It is like a data scientist’s playground. Everything you could possibly want to know about Data Mining, Analytics, Big Data, and Data Science is there. Just want to hire someone who knows all about that stuff?  You can do that there too.

The Hunt: Where to Find TalentTechnical Recruiter

Trawling for candidates? Make the most of your time by targeting your sourcing. These are some water cooler sites where techies hang out.

11. Geeklist

Kinda like GitHub or Stack Overflow, Geeklist is a global social community for developers to earn “GeekCred” by sharing great work they have done. It is a social network for developers.

12. Gild

I put Gild on here because Derek Zeller likes it. “Gild Source is a recruiting tool that applies predictive analytics to solve hiring challenges many recruiting teams have faced for years. They deliver a solution based on intelligence, analytics and raw hard data to determine the best leads your team should approach for company openings.”

13. Experts Exchange

The Grandfather of Q & A sites, Experts Exchange, has been around since 1996. Very early in my career, I trolled EE just to try to figure out what the big deal was.  The cool thing about this site is that you can meet experts, recruit experts and maybe even become one. Join in topic-specific groups,  and network with solid IT pros.

14. Entelo

Entelo combines, analytics, social media, and common sense. RecruitingTools has been a fan of Entelo since its inception. It is like social media meets data analytics.  The best thing about Entelo is that it helps you save time when recruiting by narrowing down the candidate pool to just those that you need to focus on.  It has a cool diversity platform as well.

15. TalentBin

TalentBin went to the open web and found profiles from IT pros. It also has messaging capabilities that will let you reach out to then.

Click here for an article about we wrote about TalentBin not so long ago.

16. Stack Overflow

Look for people based on their ranking for certain subject matters, help to identify experts in a given field.

Think of this article as a knowledge buffet. Keep what you like, throw away what doesn’t. Just don’t stop looking for your silver bullet. Tech recruiting is hard, and it does not look like it is getting any easier but these tools should make your job more efficient.

Who Reads Your Documents? Find Out With Attach

Know Who Reads Your DocumentsDo you know who reads the documents you send? Like to you really know? Sure there are many tools that will send you a read receipt to let you know when someone opened your email. But what about the links you send? Ever wish you could tell if your candidate opened the link to the offer letter you sent? Better still what about that Friday email.  Were they in the office or at the bar? Well, you can find out with Attach.

Know Who Reads Your Documents, InMail, Texts, Tweets, Facebook Messages, EBooks, Whitepapers…

The list goes on and on because the tracking is attached to the link, to just the attachment. The Attach Chrome Extension will let you know who reads  your documents. And what they read. And where they read it. And if they forward it. What I like about this tool is that no matter if I send a text message, Tweet or InMail, because your documents can be sent in a web-based format, it can be read from any device. You can also get:
  • Document open notifications
  • Page view engagement tracking
  • Event tracking including link clicks and downloads
  • Device tracking
  • Location tracking

In this video, join Dean DaCosta as he shows us how Attach works for him.

 

Dean DaCostaAbout the Author: Dean Da Costa is a highly experienced and decorated recruiter, sourcer and manager with deep skills and experience in HR, project management, training & process improvement.

Dean is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting. Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter.

Ask The Panel: Interviewing Strategies

Ask The Panel: Interviewing Strategies

Quickly and strategically growing your team with top talent isn’t so easy. Every element of your hiring process must go smoothly.  What is your interviewing strategy?

There is no moment more critical than the interview. Even the best candidate won’t join your company if they have an awful interview.

Recruiting and HR practitioners need to be the proverbial lube in the process to ensure that there’s a minimal amount of friction between talent pros and hiring managers during the interview process, and preempt any associated pains that come with finding out whether or not someone is actually a fit.

One way that we can do this, of course, is by actually taking the time to fully prepare hiring managers for every step of the interview process, letting them know what to expect and making sure that they know what they’re doing. This means going beyond a simple intake meeting and hoping for the best; it means going past just spelling out the workflow or explaining their role in the process and where they should send feedback. It even goes further than having a discussion to clarify the desired KSAs and benchmark the recruiting budget and required compensation associated with any given requisition.

World-class talent groups do not let bad interviews happen.  Delivering excellence in your organization is your responsibility. While there’s no blueprint for interview success, there are ways you can set yourself apart.

 

Get the Hell On: Profanity, Insanity and Human Resources.

iu-1-7378One of my favorite things in the world to do is read speaker evaluation forms, largely because I love the hate – let’s face it, if there’s one thing I think we can all agree on, it’s my ability to be polarizing. Boom.

But at event after event, my presentations – whether keynote, panel, breakout or concurrent – almost always tend to average a solid 5 out of 10, a score of “average” that’s really anything but, really.

These averages scores are not, turns out, because of general mediocrity, of course; this is the average of a bifurcated audience, who almost unilaterally split their reviews right down the middle; half give me 9s and 10s with rave reviews and flattering comments, while the other half apparently relishes giving me a 1 (or 0, when possible) and, of course, filling out the anonymous form with more vitriol than I could ever muster about any topic tangentially related to talent acquisition or management.

The Bitches of Eastwick all pretty much sound alike, but I’ll cite a recent example from an event where the attendees were almost exclusively corporate recruiters from enterprise employers. In this particular presentation I scored a 2.68 out of 5 – again, consistently splitting the middle. At one point I actually got a little applause from half the room, while the other half mean straight up mean mugged my ass. Standard, really.

Of course, mean mugging is HR being polite, by their standards. That’s kind of a core competency of the job, if you think about it. Pro tip: if an HR Lady is smiling, look the hell out. If they’re glaring at you with beady eyes through bifocals, it’s business as usual, you ingrate. They’re hard to read, as a rule, except when they want to give you the finger without actually deigning to do something so crass and common (they save this for snack foods).

Instead, the ultimate manifestation of the kind of passive-aggressive animosity the traditional HR set is famous for happens when they zip up those stupid legal pad holders they jot notes on after being told the slides will be published online, as if to say, you’re not good enough to waste the ink from my branded pen.

Good thing these people generally have never seen my back channel social snark, or the shade would really be slung. But if they ever paid attention to Twitter, they’d know what was coming, but sometimes I feel a little bit like I’m living in Pygmalion as written by Shonda Rimes or seeing what Ms. Trunchbull would look like if written by Hunter S. Thompson instead of Roald Dahl. Only, I don’t seem to be the one who’s tripping out when it comes to profanity and professionalism.

Nope. There’s a line, and it’s relative, and I never know if I’ve crossed it until that moment where a couple of otherwise Emily Post abiding HR ladies actually throw social convention to the wind and conspicuously walk out of the room, RBFing it all the way. You can practically hear the harumph.

They remind me of of the stock character of the puritanical, tyrannical Victorian nanny that appeared in every classic Disney movie or the board of directors of any local SHRM chapter I’ve ever had to apologize to for doing something as simple as swearing. These ladies will suffer through hours of complex compliance updates and read books on payroll best practices, so this crowd has a pretty high threshold for pain.

That is, until someone drops an F bomb, and it’s someone took a shit on their SPHR certificates. When they do the walk out of any presentation, and a few always do, it’s kind of like my standing O, really. Don’t get trapped in the Tar Pit on your way out, you old biddies.

Of course, they never do. They just leave feedback on the eval forms in precise, stern looking lettering, leaving gems like the one from my most recent, relatively profanity free (relative being the key word) presentation:

“The final speaker was not impressive. I feel there was a lot of insensitivity regarding the topic of diversity as well as many inappropriate expletives used during the follow up commentary. The speaker seemed defensive to follow up questions. I don’t mean to sound like a “negative Nelly,” but I found the entire presentation completely inappropriate and unprofessional.”

IDGAF, HR.

giphy (44)I kind of like the guy who said I was a breath of fresh air in an otherwise pretty boring day or the woman who admired my saying ‘what’s on everyone’s mind’ quite a bit better, but you know, we’re in this weird period of time where our entire industry seems similarly split, a divide, selfishly, that shows a profession in f-ing flux, my friends.

It’s divided into two camps, and the divide isn’t, as you’d suspect, between sentient, somewhat interesting people and HR Business Partners. It isn’t between specialties, level experience, industry focus or really any of those more traditional dividing lines that functionally fragment out function.

But the prevailing attitudes towards profanity and professionalism seem, for whatever reason, to be the biggest line I’ve seen in the sand between the progressives in the people business and the more patrician prudes who have set the puritanical precedent for the profession.

While it’d be convenient to attribute this to generational attitudes, this, too, isn’t the root cause of this status quo schism – I know based off literally thousands of speaker forms that there are a ton of Gen Yers who I offend the shit out of, but there are just as many boomers who think I’m “refreshing.”

Side note: I don’t know why old people seem to use this superlative unilaterally more than any other on my feedback forms, but I’ll take it – of course, when you can’t make it through the night without waking to take a piss, your definition of refreshing and mine are probably a little big misaligned.

The difference is simple: there are people who are OK with a few curse words, mostly for effect, and those who still give a fuck when someone drops that bomb, even casually or with conviction. And all I have to say to the latter group is, fuck you all.

Because while you may find profanity to be “unprofessional,” “uncouth” or “you’re fired,” all feedback I’ve gotten on my choice of choice words, this is how I speak – and whether or not you’d like to admit it, this is how you speak, too.

106735-thats-alright-gif-Imgur-Chris-MFcp

Seriously. I’ve heard you – your average HR generalist or like, wellness or payroll specialist has an everyday vocabulary that approximates a 17th century pirate or a CBGB headliner – at least behind closed doors. It’s only in public, after finishing cursing their system of record, their employee population, whichever colleague or counterpart happened to piss them off that day or just their abhorrent lot in life to be fighting for a “seat at the table” (use your elbows, bitches), that they put on that Maggie Smith face and adopt social mores last seen in the Edwardian era (approximately the same time most of them finished high school, coincidentally).

The thing is, we’re in the business of people, and people use profanity. It humanizes us. It adds emphasis. Some of the bluest of expressions have the most utility, and the most impact, on the listener, the conversation and the dialogue – particularly when the point of that interchange is to facilitate new ideas and to challenge conventional wisdom.

It saddens me that so many people seem to be missing out on so much just because of a few goddamn curse words thrown in for effect, dismissing any associated content or context (and any value that it might actually have for them, were they to grow a pair and join this century).

Four Letter Words: Calm Down.

ice-cube-bye-felicia

See, most of my presentations these days revolve around writing or recruitment marketing, specifically those amorphous tenants of voice, tone and style – and how not to sound like a corporate automaton if you actually want candidates to treat you like a person instead of just another recruiter automating away the asinine.

If you can’t handle a few swear words, good news – if you’re in HR, you’re in the exact right job. The bad news is, your feigned indignity isn’t doing you any favors, either.

Just drop the facade and say “fuck it” (or your profanity of choice) for a change. You just might find that not only does it feel pretty good, but it does a better job getting your point across than some worthless acronyms, buzzwords or, God forbid, a written performance review. That bullshit is way worse than the word “bullshit” itself. Trust me on this one.

Obviously, if you have religious convictions preempting you from using profanity, than you’re not included in this, although I’m pretty sure that there’s no scriptural prohibition to words like “douche canoe,” “basic bitch” or “assclown.”

And if there is, please, let me know so I can start citing my fucking sources.

Because it’s Good Friday, you ain’t got no job, and you ain’t got shit to do (if you’re reading this, let’s go ahead and assume that’s true).

 

Loading...