Blog

How to Recruit Engineers When You’re Not a Tech Company

How to Recruit Engineers When You’re Not a Tech Company

Once, the way to an engineers heart was a fat salary, a fatter pile of stock and a sleek new laptop. Today, a company’s culture, employer brand and product or service count just as much when recruiting this in-demand workforce.

Running any kind of business is hard work. Hiring people for that business, of course, can often be even harder. The amount of time and energy we dedicate to making every successful hire happen can leave most of us feeling downright exhausted.

Sometimes, that fatigue can set in, often in the form of picking the first candidate who walks in the door – if they’re even reasonably close to a fit, then you’re willing to make that hire simply so you can stop working 14 hour days all the damn time – you get to the point where you’re too tired to really care all too much about “top talent.” You’d much rather take a little rest.

In fact, a Glassdoor survey says 52% of engineers would accept lower compensation to work at a company with a cool reputation. That’s good news for companies in retail, manufacturing, healthcare and other industries not typically thought of as high-tech.

Looking for a few good ones? Join us for “How to Recruit Tech When You’re Not a Tech Company,” where we’ll explore:

  • Best and worst recruiter tactics revealed by themselves
  • The importance of company reviews, social media outreach, friends and meet-ups in winning the hearts and minds of engineers
  • Recruiting and hiring in a competitive landscape

Using Google Plus for Recruiting

Using Google Plus for Recruiting and SourcingGoogle Plus is a hidden treasure trove for recruiters and yet it is still largely undiscovered and unutilized by many recruiters. Many people write it off with the belief that no one uses Google Plus. Well, that’s not entirely true. People do still use it and you can use Google Plus for recruiting.

Google Plus is integrated into Google search results so if a candidate is on this platform – or any other Google platform – then chances are you can find them on Google Plus too.

Why Use Google Plus?

Besides being another place to share your jobs, there are three key reasons to use Google Plus.

  1. Sourcing candidates – You can search Google Plus’s entire users by keywords such as job titles and locations.
  2. Building and sharing talent pools – Google Plus has a feature called Circles. This allows a recruiter to build talent pools of candidates in relevant sectors which they can target specific content for.
  3. Search engine optimisation – Google Plus is great for SEO purposes. It can improve a recruitment agency’s search visibility and help put them ahead of any rivals who are not on Google Plus.

Sourcing Candidates

There are two ways of searching for candidates on Google Plus – within Google Plus and a standard Google search.

Once you have created your Google Plus account searching for candidates is easy. Go to plus.google.com and sign in. Once signed in you will see a search box at the top of the page. Select the option for ‘People and Pages’ and then try a keyword search e.g. project manager and London.

If you are searching via a regular Google search, you can also find candidates Google Plus profiles. Begin your search with site: plus.google.com e.g. site: plus.google.com project manager lives in London.

Building Talent Pools

One of Google Plus’s most popular features is Circles. These Circles allow you to create your private groups and add candidates to them as you wish. Circles can be shared with colleagues if they are looking for the same types of candidates.

Google Plus users often create their industry-specific public circles. A recruiter can see these and expand their talent network instantly

  1. Creating your circle – To create a circle hover over the menu under the Google Plus logo and click People. Then click Your Circles and use the + button to create a new circle. When you study your Google Plus search results and browse profiles, hover your mouse over a candidate to add them to a circle you have created.
  2. Sharing your circles – Choose People then Your Circles in the top left menu. Just hover over the circle you want to share.
  3. Finding public circles – Once you start accumulating followers, you will be able to see some of their shared circles. You can use the search box at the top of the Google Plus page to search for ‘shared a circle with you’.

Google Plus SEO Benefits

Search engine optimisation is more important than ever. Most candidates will now search on Google for a job role rather than ring a recruiter. As a Google product, it is no surprise Google Plus is great for search engine optimisation. It’s not too difficult to take advantage of this fact either.

  1. Create a company page – If you have a Google Plus page and a website, then you have two chances of being found by candidates.
  2. Link your business page to your site – Linking your brand page and website helps you connect with your friends, fans, and customers. It also provides Google with information that helps determine the relevancy of your site to a user query on Google Search.
  3. Google Plus authorship – Have you ever noticed in Google search results you will see the profile photo and the name of the author? That is Google Plus. It is an excellent way to make your job listing or posts stand out on a search results page.

Visit the Online Resourcing website today and contact our Digital Marketing team who are experts in using social media platforms in recruitment.

Originally Posted on RecruitingBlogs by Mark Cook edited by Jackye Clayton

Fast Company: High Growth Hiring Hacks for Successfully Scaling Recruiting.

4055923_is-no-management-right-for-your-business_11faa7bb_mScale is the key to sustained success for any business, but far too many struggle with striking the right balance between proactively hiring too many people too soon and building a bench that goes largely underutilized, or overburdening and overwhelming existing team members forced to compensate for the drastic disparity between headcount supply and business demand.

While any business unit, level or function can be susceptible to employee overload and worker burnout, customer service teams in particular tend to be the biggest victims of success for any high growth company, forced to consistently operate over internal capacity as recruiting consistently acts more as a lagging than leading indicator of growth.

High Growth Hiring: The Limits of Doing More With Less.

Risk

Given the mantra of “less is more” is more or less ingrained in the culture of many rapidly growing organizations, the overburdened and overwhelmed front line support teams at these employers are forced to put on a happy face, so to speak, when speaking to customers – and consistently provide reliable service while never letting the cracks show.

Perpetually strained at the seams, the expectation is that support teams suffer in silence.

Customers could care less how many issues they’ve got piled up in front of them, or how many open tickets they happen to have on their plate.

They want their issue resolved as quickly as possible, their ticket closed right now, and not treating every customer like a top priority can have a big impact on a business’ bottom line.

This creates a tremendous amount of pressure on both sides for customer service and support professionals.

These frontline workers are trapped between being held accountable for maximum efficiency and efficacy from the company they work for and the customers they support, creating tangible tensions and no-win situations for those intermediaries caught in the firing line between dealing with the ever increasing volume of inquires and the inability of their organization to hire enough hands to effectively meet such seemingly unlimited demands with such a limited supply of service staff or support resources?

As with most hiring managers or anyone responsible for managing a P&L, customer service and support leaders know that their functions, while fundamentally important, also represent prominent cost centers, a significant line item whose ROI can be difficult to manage or measure, much less justify allocating the budget required to recruit and retain more service staff.

Unfortunately, most companies realize the critical importance of effectively scaling a support function too late, when turnover spikes, customer satisfaction slips and existing staff seem on edge and visibly stressed out. By the time they start recruiting, it’s often already too late to turn the talent tides, a revolving door leading to recruiting becoming too backed up with backfills to strategically add the necessary staff.

Unless this pattern is broken, this vicious short term cycle can doom any organization’s ability to survive (and thrive)over the long term.

But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Here are some ways you can make sure that any organization can use to effectively scale a customer service or support team to deal with the business demands of today – and tomorrow.

Data In the Forecast: Doing The Math On High Growth Hiring.

high growth hiring analytics

In business today, that ancient Zen proverb, “awareness is the greatest agent of change,” remains as relevant an aphorism as ever, particularly for companies undergoing the growing pains that so often come with rapid growth.

For customer support and service leaders to proactively take action and preempt team burnout, it’s imperative these line managers align their expectations with front line reality.

Leaders should get an accurate understanding into the team’s current capacity, and understanding exactly how hiring new employees will help with specific team objectives or broader business outcomes.

Many support and service staff are managed primarily by a metric called “average handling time,” which represents something of a baseline for functional leaders to measure and manage both departmental and individual performance.

This critical benchmark is determined by the average duration of customer calls, and includes not only the time staff actually spend interacting with a caller or resolving their issues, but also the hold time and subsequent time required to do any administrative tasks or internal follow up related to that call.

Average handling time, obviously, isn’t particularly effective as a standalone metric, since it ignores a host of extenuating circumstances and external factors out of the company’s control. It does, however, help support managers keep track of whether current support staff aligns with demand, and how to better utilize and allocate existing resources and staff.

But while it’s a good baseline for seeing how many hours are being worked and how current resources are being allotted, AHT plays only a small part when it comes to forecasting growth requirements for future employees or providing meaningful metrics for measuring future performance outcomes.

Instead of considering changing things like processes and policies to increase the efficiency of their existing team, support managers and service leaders should consider a much broader range of factors before deciding that growing the team is the only answer and moving forward to making hires.

The Sweet Spot for Support: Taking the Equations Out of the Equation.

optimized-hiring-xq-questionsTo make sure you’ve got the right resources for scaling a support team the right way, it’s essential to look beyond ticket time and at statistics that have nothing to do with this baseline, but are just as important when it comes to finding the perfect balance between making too many hires too fast and not making enough in time to successfully support business growth.

For instance, consider the following non-ticket variables for scaling a support team when formulating any forecast:

  • How many total days off does your support team currently have for paid time off for things like vacation, illness, training or personal development?
  • How many hours does your team or support staff currently commit to meetings each week?
  • How much time do you give your staff to work on projects or processes unrelated to the transactional task of closing tickets?
  • How does your team’s efficiency stack up to the competition? Remember that on average, approximately 39% of support employees spend about an hour a week on non-work tasks – which is a pretty good baseline to keep in mind.

This data should be analyzed in context, and tracked and aligned against associated customer growth statistics. It’s possible to determine whether a company’s current customer base, average annual client acquisition and average monthly churn, as well as the number of expected incoming inquiries and conversations will occur each month, the amount of man hours required to resolve these requests, and whether or not your support team is sufficiently staffed, or if it’s time to staff up for sustained, scaleable customer service success.

By positioning these seemingly nuanced data points against the bigger business picture,you’ll preempt burnout and propel productivity by periodically and proactively keeping the pulse of your workers.

While data driven recruiting and predictive analytics might seem challenging for those hiring managers and support leaders who don’t have a great grasp on statistics, but you don’t have to know a lot about math to make the math add up – the good news is there are also a ton of tools for taking the equations out of the equation.

At the end of the day, the goal of successfully scaling a support function is to keep customers happy. And the best way to do that is by keeping your employees happy, too – and there’s no better way to do that than by making sure everyone has the resources they need to succeed in providing world class customer support and client service that ensures growing businesses keep growing.

Susanna_JamesAbout the Author: Susanna James is a content marketer at Kayako, the customer service software provider. Her expertise lie in helping tech companies reach bigger audiences through awesome content.

You can find Susanna over at the Kayako blog where you can get the latest tips and insight on delivering great customer support.

Follow Susanna on Twitter @susannaja or connect with her on LinkedIn.

All’s Fair in Love And The War for Talent.

2015-08-24_11-05-02In her recent Vanity Fair feature on love in the age of Facebook, “Tinder and the Dawn of the Dating Apocalypse,” (which, in fact sounds like a decent description of my high school years), Nancy Jo Sales writes:

“As the polar ice caps melt and the earth churns through the Sixth Extinction, another unprecedented phenomenon is taking place, in the realm of sex. Hookup culture, which has been percolating for about a hundred years, has collided with dating apps, which have acted like a wayward meteor on the now dinosaur-like rituals of courtship.”

I am well aware there’s perhaps no recruiting related cliché more hackneyed than that spurious, specious and suspect job search as dating metaphor. Already among the more trite trending topics in the canon of crappy HR content, I disdain this simile.

But as I read through this sociological expose of dating apps, which I somehow managed to barely miss, I couldn’t help but think of its parallels to the world of online recruiting and talent technology adoption.

Online dating has been around for a really long time, and as Sales points out, as soon as we got online, we’ve been discovering and perfecting how to use it to hook up, from UseNet forums to AOL chat rooms to Craigslist “Casual Encounters” postings.

It’s only been through the ubiquity of smart phones and soaring use of dating apps, however, that meeting a partner online has become the rule rather than the exception. And as recruiters finally wake up to that whole mobile thing, we could reasonably expect the same sort of seismic shift in the way that we look for jobs as have irrevocably impacted the way we look for a partner.

Sales writes:

“People used to meet their partners through proximity, through family and friends, but now Internet meeting is surpassing every other form … It’s changing so much about the way we act both romantically and sexually … It is unprecedented from an evolutionary standpoint.”

Matchmaking in the Modern Age.

Let’s talk about the evolution of dating for a minute. There used to be a time, not too long ago, when it wasn’t so easy to meet a potential mate. In that age before the ubiquity of laptops and cell phones, your network was essentially limited to your extended network of family and friends.

Maybe you’d go to a bar, but the possibilities there all reeked faintly of desperation, whiskey, and Axe Body spray. Active candidates are never ideal in dating, either – particularly the ones who are looking just a little too hard.

When you finally did get successfully set up, you did some digging – since meeting people was so hard, it was important to meet the right kind of person.

So instead of simply swiping, you actually evaluated stuff like financial stability, family background, whether they had a solid job and the kind of stuff that matters when the purpose of dating is to find someone who would be a long term fit instead of just another one night stand.

When you actually found someone with potential to start dating in that age before algorithms did all the leg work for you, you had to try to figure out whether or not there was really chemistry. There were no screen names or social personas to hide behind, and every match mattered, because the supply of potential partners was limited to who their friends knew, or else trust in the universe to deliver a “meet cute,” but as everyone knows, those are every bit as big a myth as the concept of “the one.”

From Famine to Feast.

img-feast-famineThis brings us to this particular moment, which is something of a momentous inflection point in technology (and Western civilization in the most literal of ways).

Whether looking for a date, or looking for a job, everyone is always just a few clicks away from a seemingly infinite amount of options – what were finite resources have become disposable commodities.

With the veritable cornucopia of options available to people looking for love or those looking for a job, our mindsets have shifted from playing for keeps to playing the numbers – and in both scenarios, we’ve gone from looking for “the one” to anyone, from searching for the right fit to searching for right now.

Asking someone for a date or applying for an open position have become more or less risk free with these completely automated processes.

You don’t know the person, and they don’t know you, but since they’re out there, the worst that can happen is you never hear back. That happens a lot, but then again, economy of scale is the currency of connectivity.  And as much as we hate an ATS, they sure beat paper job applications

No matter how advanced the algorithms become, no matter how technology evolves, the ubiquity of both online dating and the online job search point to the fact that both are fundamental human needs, and sit squarely atop Maslow’s hierarchy. Without love, or the food and shelter our jobs enable us to afford, self-actualization is actually impossible – and that’s the end goal of both recruiting and romance, really.

The need to identify with others – whether a significant other or within a workforce – is hard wired into our core collective consciousness. None of us want to be alone and most of us will do whatever it takes to achieve this basic need, but evolution also tells us that we will satiate these primal urges by expending as little energy as possible in the process. The need to do the bare minimum is a Darwinian threshold for survival, although that’s likely true in neither the corporate world nor the relationship world. That, or I’ve yet to find the right woman or the right job.

So, we’re content to have our resumes or romantic preferences crunched, interpreted and reported by some matching algorithm no one really understands using math and modeling no one really takes the time to look at in order to tell us who we should date and where we should work.

Better Living Through Chemistry.

chemistry-loveThese are some of the most important parts of the entire human existence in general, our own lives in particular, and for some reason, we’re OK trusting these outcomes to a robot without even questioning whether or not the product delivers as promised, and that the end result is worth the time and effort populating each proprietary platform involves.

Dating app OKCupid (which, coincidentally, I did use for a couple weeks before a fateful meeting with a crazy girl who ended up totaling my car) has released a ton of research on the psychology of affinity, and what drives interpersonal attraction. The ostensible goal, of course, is to tweak the matching engine to best stack rank the results of only those we’re most likely to stay with forever.

While we play the field, switching employers or partners whenever the next best thing comes along (or balancing several at the same time, in some cases), that’s really what we’re all looking for in love and in our working lives.

That’s why our employer value propositions and career site copy all speak towards advancement opportunities, professional growth and a familial work culture – we’re attracted to stability and want someplace where there’s a reasonable chance of putting down roots.

It’s why eHarmony commercials have that creepy old dude promising to play wingman in your quest for matrimonial (and soon, career) bliss. It’s why candidates are willing to take an hour to apply for a job, or dating site users spend so much time answering personality assessments and answering those never-ending quizzes.

We’re all looking for a match, and we all trust machines to do it. Just as dating moved from personal connections to classified advertising to profile based websites before the rise of intuitive, effective mobile apps finally disrupted the market, recruiting stands poised at the edge of a similar seismic shift in the status quo.

The abundance of options and ease of use of these next generation recruiting solutions will finally turn looking for a job fit from a dark art akin to alchemy to a data driven science.

We won’t need to rely on that gut feeling that comes with something as subjective as chemistry when we have the formula for creating that chemistry by mixing together the right elements needed to trigger the right recruiting reaction. These next generation recruiting tools mean more first choices and less second-guessing.

Despite this imminent and inevitable industry disruption, the shake up in the recruiting and talent technology vertical has created a tremendous opportunity for established and emerging technology companies to capitalize on the relatively green field market for matching.

This will inevitably alter the competitive landscape, but the technologies best positioned to dominate the next generation of recruiting seem not to be any of the many upstarts entering the market, but instead, more established players who already have the scale, reach and most importantly, the terrabytes required for these matching technologies to be effective – the more data points, the better decisions that underlying algorithm is able to drive.

Talent Technology: The Past is Prologue.

splashMost importantly, a handful of established companies have experience that no startup can replicate – having built a track record of surviving – and even thriving – against all odds.

Recruiting technology companies have been forced to change dramatically since the rise of job boards nearly two decades ago.

While you might recognize the brand names, chances are you would no longer recognize what’s under that hood.

Perhaps no company better exemplifies recruiting technological evolution in action than CareerBuilder, whose own history is more or less a microcosm of the industry at large – and company who I truly believe represents something of a bellwether for the recruiting technology industry, the canary in the candidate coal mine.

Consider the fact that they’ve managed to maintain viability in the face of the dot-com bust, the Great Recession and the competitive threats inherent to our societal shift towards search, social and mobile.

While the dustbin of HR Tech history is littered with the corpses of startups that never started up or major players who weren’t too big to fail, the ones left standing are still around because they’ve more broadly focused their offerings beyond the traditional, transactional job board or stand-alone point solution model.

Yes, CareerBuilder is paying me to write this post. But I’m paying out of pocket to attend their CareerBuilder Empower event, kicking off September 8 in Chicago. Now, as a rule, I never attend user conferences – if I want to watch an infomercial, I turn on the Time Life channel. But in this case, I can more than justify ponying up for a boondoggle professional development event in Chi-town (or Shot City, if you’re a Talib fan).

I could go on about the manifold reasons I’m headed to CareerBuilder Empower instead of my other options that week, which included an invitation to speak at the Wharton School of Business on the evolution of online recruitment advertising as well as a trip to help produce #TruStockholm, since that’s now part of our business.

Yeah, I know – but instead of launching into that list, I’ll tell you the two reasons that don’t involve me trying to make money or increase their spend with me in 2016. Hint, hint.

1. The Agenda Actually Kicks Ass.

I’m old fashioned, but I actually judge conferences by their content – which is why I wanted to poke my own eyes out about 15 minutes into my first OHUG (that’s Oracle Human Resources User Group, for you non-cool kids out there) or my first Cornerstone Convergence dog and pony show.

You know the drill – a product manager and a client talking through a deck of how they stopped sucking with whatever software happened to be footing their travel and bar bill and making them feel HR famous for their 15 minutes.

I’m sure there will be some of that at Empower – after all, with the launch of CareerBuilder 1, probably the biggest strategic directional shift in the company’s long history, necessitates some end user education and enablement.

But for the most part, it’ll be a bunch of former SHRM keynoters – luminaries such as Condoleezza Rice (Class of #SHRM13) and Mike Krzy…the coach at Duke (Class of #SHRM15), but in a much more intimate, interactive setting.

While I couldn’t even get in the 10,000 seat ballroom in Vegas to hear Coach K at SHRM this year (I had to watch it via CCTV instead), and had to spend most of his presentation making peace for my earlier Twitter trolling on the official event hash tag, I heard enough to know that his stories about my boy Kobe Bryant alone are worth the price of admission.

empowersocialimage

2. The Talent Technology of Tomorrow, Today.

CareerBuilder, like a few other established brands, survived by expanded their offerings, moving from job publisher to recruiting platform, enabling rich analytics and meaningful metrics made possible by streamlining software suites to a single, simple system of engagement.

The recruiting ROI that these insights enable impact not only recruiting efficacy and efficiency, but also, bottom line results. With the right recruiting tech stack, talent acquisition can move from cost center to strategic partner – and have the numbers to prove it.

This is pretty powerful for a profession that hasn’t had much power – and should finally get some long overdue respect from clients and candidates alike. And I firmly believe that CareerBuilder should be as integral part of that stack – and your recruiting strategy – as it was back in the good old job board days. Of course, CareerBuilder today is anything but a job board.

And the fact that they’re paying me to byline a post on their behalf not only speaks to their exceptional taste, but their willingness to push the envelope and evolve from a staid job board into a cutting edge, enterprise grade SaaS solution.

My job is staying on the cutting edge of recruiting, and looking at the line up of awesome speakers and thought leaders coming together to talk talent in the Windy City, I can’t help but have something of a nerdgasm. After all, it’s not every day you get front line seats to watch the future of recruiting firsthand.

If you’re a recruiting or tech geek like me, you should think about joining me. It’s going to be pretty kick ass – and I can tell you from experience, CareerBuilder throws one hell of a party. Professionally speaking, of course.

And one that’s worth 10.5 HRCI credits, too – just in case you needed another argument for what’s already a pretty damn compelling business case for recruiting and HR leaders looking for a sneak peak at what’s new and what’s next.

See you in Chicago.

1ef9205

Click here for CareerBuilder Empower information and updates, and check out the Talent Advisor blog for a deeper dive into the trends and topics on the Empower Agenda from some of the biggest game changers in recruiting and talent today.

Disclaimer: Recruiting Daily was compensated by CareerBuilder for this post. But we’re totally psyched for this one of a kind event, so in this case, the facts and opinions contained herein do, in fact, represent those of the publisher. Because we’re all about making candidate experience better, too.

 

Recruitment Marketing Shouldn’t Have To Be PC.

WARNING: This post contains straight talk, simple facts and a ton of stuff that most people might consider “politically incorrect.” If you can’t handle the truth, please stop reading immediately.

Looking to be Loved: My Dixie Darlin’.

tumblr_m2w7waaFBj1qbff4xo1_1280For all y’all had the pleasure of hearing my Southern come out after a night of too much wine (or beer, once in a while), it should come as no great shock that I have a personal connection with what could be considered one of the Deep South’s deepest traditions and most deeply entrenched institutions.

You see, I was – I am – a proud member of Phi Mu (#PhiMuForever), as much a rite of passage for Southern girls of countless generations as football games on Saturday or fraternity parties Saturday night. I wasn’t just any old Phi Mu, either – I was actually even an officer.

“…Being steadfast in every duty small or large.
Believing that our given word is binding.
Striving to esteem the inner man above culture, wealth or pedigree.
Being honorable, courteous, tender,
Thus being true to the womanhood of honor.” – The Phi Mu Creed

Womanhood of Honor.

4425bdfc9292a7eba3de997cb81a82bbGoing away to school for the first time was the most nerve wracking experience I’d ever been through when I first left for school, and it was traumatic enough where it remains pretty high on my list (no easy feat). But even though it was frightening, it was also liberating, in a weird way.

I had lived my entire life in the insular, familiar, safe and completely boring world of my home and hometown, and now I was leaving for somewhere where I didn’t really know anyone, I didn’t really know my way around and I didn’t really know what the hell was going to happen – or what was possible.

It was the first time Bridget could figure out who Bridget really was, and leave behind that little girl and all the awkward moments or hurt feelings that little girl lived with when she lived at home.

Now, even though I wasn’t the most worldly or street smart new kid on campus, it didn’t take me long to figure out how college life really worked. A few days in, I had figured out that it had nothing to do with books or exams. A few weeks in, I figured out it had nothing to do with beer or parties, either. Nope.

College was all about exploring, experiencing and fully living your own life, on your own terms, and not being held back by the limitations that come with living in a small town where there’s not much to do but talk. It was a bubble I was all too eager to burst my way out of, and I binged on every moment of life on campus, having as many diverse experiences and making as many diverse friends as was humanly possible. It felt like the perfect existence.

Then, just as I was finding myself and discovering who Bridget was and was going to be, I found myself instead accepting a bid to join a predominantly white, blue blood sorority. Why would I join a sisterhood that was whiter than Miracle Whip, Macklemore or Mitt Romney when I was looking for diversity? That’s a complex question with a deceptively simple answer:

I fit in.

I didn’t fit in just because my new sisters and I shared the same color of skin. It wasn’t because we were all raised in the same sort of small towns throughout Alabama, or because almost all of us looked alike (including 5 redheads in my rush class alone) or talked alike, I swear – bless your heart, it wasn’t none of them things that made me decide I’d take that bid and become part of the Phi Mu sisterhood. It was because I identified with the bright, witty, strong women in the house who were not only outstanding students, but knew how to have a little fun while getting their education, too.

Diversity Isn’t About Race.

edit-14272-1422330716-18I know I’m Southern. I know I’m white. And I know that makes me the type of person who shouldn’t question diversity, because I’m part of the problem, not the solution. I get that. But what I don’t get is that, in both employment law and employment branding, race largely sets the stage for the larger diversity discussion.

As a result, when we see a workforce that’s predominately of a single ethnicity, we assume that company is not diverse; similarly, we look no deeper than the surface to judge the employer with the United Colors of Benetton branding as progressive and inclusive.

I’ve always felt that this misses the entire point, and might be one of the most limiting, most idiotic ways conceivable to define diversity, much less actually build a truly diverse workforce. Just because everyone looks the same doesn’t mean they think the same, and diversity, I think, is an intellectual issue, not a human capital one.

You see, my sorority sisters might have looked like we were the White House, the rich girls, the party girls, the ones who never had to worry about money or getting into trouble you couldn’t flirt your way out of. But looks can be deceiving. Because while we might have looked like the Stepford Wife sorority on the surface, if you just went even a little bit deeper, you’d see that collectively, we were so much more than we looked. Those superficial similarities, in fact, hid shockingly drastic differences when it came what truly defined us.

We weren’t dumb sorority girls. We majored in chemistry, math and finance. We studied to become teachers, nurses and lawyers. We had 30 or so different majors in our house, and we all worked our assses off for our grades – and were proud of having that work pay off. No matter if you majored in the liberal arts or the hard sciences, or whether you studied social work or sociology, everyone in the sorority was expected to excel at school, and we did.

We not only studied different subjects, but our worldviews were shaped by an equally broad range of backgrounds, mindsets and experiences. We were Christian, Jewish,Buddhist, you name the religion, we probably had at least one member – not to mention the substantial amount of those of us who were simply spiritual, agnostic or even outright atheists. Like most sorority girls, we were crazy about boys, but we also had a few members who were bisexual, homosexual, asexual, everything above and sometimes in between. None of that stuff really mattered to any of us.

Neither did the fact that despite appearances, we came from backgrounds ranging from dirt poor to dirty rich, from blue bloods to FOBs. Our political views ranged from militant leftist to staunchly conservative, from Marxist-Leninist activists to ardently free market Milton Friedman fans.

Outside the classroom, we were gifted dancers, actors and artists, world class volleyball and tennis players and were all amazingly active in pretty much every student group on campus. We were singers, we were painters, we were dreamers.

We were cancer, rape, bully and abuse survivors.

We were Phi Mu.

And that, folks, is what diversity means to me. Diversity shouldn’t be defined by skin color, or any other superficial or societally dictated difference. It only comes down to these sweepingly oversimplified stereotypes if you yourself perpetuate the myth that diversity is something that you can spot on the surface. The real diversity, however, goes much further than skin deep.

Beautiful Girls, Football and Glitter.

6356024450182590711882661928_Screen Shot 2015-02-22 at 6.28.00 PMBy now, you’ve probably seen the University of Alabama sorority recruitment video that’s roiled social media and had fingers and talking heads alike pointing fingers at the sad state of affairs this abhorrent video represents, and what larger issues it suggests about women in society.

The widely disseminated, dissected and discussed footage features girls who seem to confirm every stereotype most people probably already have about Southern sorority women. Racially and aesthetically homogenous. Openly objectifying themselves. Rejecting feminism, embracing sexism, putting a premium on breasts over brains.

These are some of the criticisms that have been levied at Alpha Phi’s now infamous 2015 rush video, and yes, there are a ton of young, blond white girls wearing the bare minimum amount of cloth to quality as a swimsuit as they dance around, doing a little day drinking.

Yes, those are bikinis, piggyback rides, long walks down a pier while randomly waving a flag, and of course, a ton of glitter swirling all around for no apparent reason whatsoever. So what’s the problem?

Sure, this probably doesn’t paint a complete picture of this Pan-Hellenic organization, but come on – at least they weren’t featured in the middle of a game of flip cup or holding up another sister’s hair while she spews in the corner, or the underhanded compliments or outright backstabbing that are part of the politics of every sorority. They didn’t show wild unprotected sex, random people passed out in random places, or any stealing of boyfriends, no breaking of hearts or crushing of hopes. All of which I’m pretty sure still occurs at every Greek organization out there, the same as it always has, and, for better or worse, probably always will.

For me, the worst part about the way this so-called news story was covered was the widely held stance that the Alpha Phi video was the racist product of a racist organization, one that was all white and therefore, completely lacking in diversity in addition to common sense or tact.

The funny thing is that at the University of Alabama, the same chapter of Phi Mu, the very sorority I’m proud to be a part of, could probably be called out for being anti-Semitic or not inclusive of any religion outside mainstream Mainline Protestantism. Why? Because a recent recruitment video of theirs highlighted group bible study as a selling point and evidence of their style of sisterhood. But in this case, there was no outrage – only a collective yawn (God bless you).

[youtube url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpcl403tOAc” width=”500″ height=”300″]

The same goes for Wikipedia, which has a list dedicated to “African American Greek and Fraternal Organizations,” but doesn’t extend that same equal access for Greek or fraternal organizations of any other race or ethnicity. By being inclusionary, the end result seems to be exclusionary, and I for one fail to understand how that’s in any way seen as acceptable. That’s just one small example of course, but is evidence of a bigger picture that’s not about race, religion, gender or sexual preference. Rather, it’s about the imperative for creating true equality, on a truly equal playing field. Inaction on inequality seems inane.

But sadly, after it quickly racked up half a million YouTube views and thousands of nasty comments, Alpha Phi decided to delete the video while shuttering the rest of their social media accounts. They caved into the pressure and public outcry, but I, for one, wish these women would have stood their ground and stood up for themselves, no matter how much shade was thrown their way.

The Whole Truth (And Nothing But The Truth).

200_s (2)In marketing, broadcast advertising, social media or any other form of mass communication, any story told through any medium, from printed word to interactive images, can only be compelling when it’s unflinchingly accurate and totally transparent.

Nowhere does this fact hold more true than when it comes to employer branding and recruiting. It’s the job of every recruiting organization, and every recruiter, to publicly present an employer brand that’s an accurate representation of the company’s culture, mission, vision and values.

Convey what your company really believes – and practices – when communicating with candidates, not what you think they want to hear.

The point of recruitment marketing isn’t only to attract the right talent, it’s to turn off the wrong ones. That’s why it’s never a good idea to try to present an employment brand that’s everything to everyone – you’re not looking for everyone. You’re looking for the right one, and the right fit. So instead of speaking to the masses, speak to reality.

Make sure any potential applicant knows what it’s really like at your organization, and what work is really going to entail. Don’t try to sell work-life balance if all-nighters are the norm; if you’re a suit and tie shop, don’t feature some pictures of employees in T-Shirts and flip-flops. If you’re a conservative, old-school company, don’t try to act like you’re the coolest kid in town; if you’re a competitive, cutthroat kind of company, then own it instead of throwing out a few vague phrases about collaboration and teamwork in your careers copy.

Here’s the thing about employer branding: it’s not going to work if it’s not true. Sure, you might make a few hires over the short term, but once they see the bigger picture, they’re going to run for the hills – and drag your reputation as a recruiter – and your company’s reputation as an employer – down with them. You can sell a fake culture to candidates, but you can’t keep employees in a toxic environment, nor can you keep them from warning their network about their terrible experiences working there.

The one thing you can’t sell is buzz, which is why I think it’s OK to take a page from the Alabama playbook and create recruiting videos that aren’t afraid to stir the pot a little bit. After all, show me another recent recruiting video that made the nightly news or generated half a million YouTube views – the point of employer branding isn’t to be liked, it’s to be remembered.

Which is why what you see damn well better be what you get, or you’re going to get more than you bargained for.

bw-headshot color

About the Author: Bridget Webb is a Recruitment and Marketing enthusiast, leader, and speaker. Her specialties include Demand Generation (customers & talent), People Analytics, Employer Branding, HR Technology and homeroom mom duties.

She graduated with a degree in Design and Business Management from the University of Montevallo and currently resides in South Carolina.

Follow Bridget on Twitter @Webb_Bridget or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

 

Workers Behaving Badly: A Business Immaturity Model.

“I’m youth, I’m joy,” Peter answered, “I’m a little bird that has broken out of the egg.”  – JM Barrie.

ppEvery so often – like when I’m presenting for an auditorium full of serious looking people in suits frantically scribbling notes, or when I’m sitting listening to some C-Suite exec drone on about product roadmap in a board meeting – I can’t help but feel like I’m a little out of place.

In my mind (and fortunately, in the minds of most others in the industry), my work life is a lot like when I was a kid and used to try on my Dad’s neckties and walk around the house with one of his battered old briefcases.

While I’m a decade or so in my career, I still feel distinctly like I’m pretending to be an adult – and for the most part, people seem to be buying that act, even with the ubiquitous baseball hat, hip hop tee shirts and hoodie.

I have some props I use to sucker the suits I meet into treating me like something other than the punk kid I really am – my beard helps, of course, and I grew it because when I’m clean shaven, I look approximately 12 years old, a little like Sean Astin in Rudy. I hand out business cards mostly because they’re a little accouterment of adulthood, my company name and job title coming in handy in my daily charade.

But I’ve never felt entirely comfortable in the Corporate world, even when that world involves working in a bathrobe and playing Xbox One during the most noxious conference calls and virtual meetings on my calendar. Every time I meet a client, every time I present at an event or put my byline on a post about best practices, there’s a surreal sense that I’m living in some weird piece of performance art, and I’m constantly in character.

Because the truth is, I still haven’t fully come to terms with my adulthood, even as I inch up on midlife (an imminently depressing thought).

And I’m not alone, either. It’s funny that many of the biggest degenerates, dope heads and delinquents I grew up or went to school with – the guys who I did stupid shit with, basically – have somehow all become, well, serious professionals.

There’s my buddy who’s the principal of a charter school in Harlem; the one who’s the CEO of a billion dollar mobile security company and the one whose a tenured professor of media studies at a prestigious university, for example – not to mention the dozens who have finished walking that long road to the middle, ending up in distinctly dull, very grown up sounding jobs like financial advisor or project manager. None of us know how we got here, and none of us know what the hell we’re actually doing (or at least will admit to it).

Take My Hand, Off to Never Never Land…

PeterpanbluraydvdWe’re still the same people who not so long ago used to light shit on fire, smoke a ton of pot and do all the dumb stuff that kids do – and when we’re not playing grown-up, frankly, we still pretty much do the same shit.

It’s only the odd anecdote about having trouble with a direct report or someone showing up late to a kegger because they had to close out month end that reminds us all that times have changed, even if most of us fundamentally haven’t.

This isn’t a reflection of maturity; rather, it’s a realization that you can grow up without ever having to really grow up, and I hope to God I never do, because, well, acting like an adult is really, really boring.

Instead, I’ll just keep on faking it while I sink my paycheck into stuff like vinyl records, console games and all the candy I care to eat (which is one of the only good parts about adulthood, in fact). If business or public responsibilities dictate decorum, well, I’m always ready to snap into character and play the role of someone who knows what they’re doing instead of simply faking it while figuring out what the hell I really want to be when I grow up – although at this point, depressingly, I suppose this is kind of it.

I haven’t really ever openly admitted that I still don’t know what I want to do, have no idea what I’m doing and am basically suffering from the same existential crisis as most people my age – or any age, really – rejecting the inevitability of age and the finality of our reality. You can be anything you want when you grow up, we were told, but for some stupid reason, this shit is what we chose, and we’ve just got to make the best of what’s more or less a bad situation.

The good news is, when it comes to acting like a punk kid in the world of work, I’m in pretty good company. A survey released today by CareerBuilder reveals that 3 in 4 workers report to observing some form of “adolescent behavior” in the workplace. 77%, in fact, say that at some point, they’ve seen their colleagues digress to the kind of childish behavior that we supposedly left on the elementary school playground – stuff like whining, pouting and throwing a temper tantrum.

Which, come to think of it, describes most of my bosses’ management style.

Being Young At Heart Never Gets Old.

wdThe point is that this behavior is not only endemic, but symbolic of the fact that there is a constant internal struggle most of us have between the person we are and the professional we’re supposed to be, and at some point, our inner child triumphs over our adult facades.

You probably don’t have to dig too deep to think of a time where you thought that a colleague needed to grow the hell up, or was acting completely immature and childish.

How dare anyone do something as sophomoric as whine while they’re at work? I mean, this is Corporate America, people, show some respect, even if that’s not reciprocated and most employees are essentially treated as children by the powers that be, constantly patronized by our leaders and policed by draconian policies and HR rules (like personal phone call prohibitions) that seem to reinforce that these childish behaviors, while not tolerated, are the expectation instead of the exception. But few employers trust their employees to act like adults, which, conceivably, is why childish behavior at the office is so statistically prevalent.

While the best of us can break down once in a while, according to CareerBuilder, “displaying childish behavior can also take a toll on one’s professional brand,” (or help it, but realize that I’m kind of an outlier on that front) with certain actions negatively impacting employees’ development and career advancement opportunities.

For example, 62% of employers reported they were less likely to promote employees who displayed negative behaviors like pouting or whining; 51% consider “vulgar language” an indication that an employee isn’t ready for a promotion (fuck that, right?) and 44% say that gossiping or socializing too much with coworkers can kill advancement opportunities. So, long story short, if you want to get ahead, you’d better start acting your age and grow the hell up, already. Even if that’s not nearly as much fun, frankly.

Because I still laugh at fart jokes, enjoy watching cartoons and start every morning with a bowl of Lucky Charms or Cap’n Crunch, I must admit that reading the CareerBuilder results, I was surprised by what’s considered a “child-like” behavior at work. I mean, sure they’re slightly sophomoric, but among the examples respondents cited as the most commonplace adolescent behaviors they’ve witnessed at work include “refusing to share resources with others,” “forming a clique” or “throw a tantrum.”

These all seem like B-School best practices; after all, the goal of business is to gain market share, not share resources. Forming a clique seems like an optimal outcome of corporate culture and a potential reflection of engaged, collaborative teammates.

And throwing a tantrum? That’s one of the most pervasive (and accepted) styles of situational leadership out there, the preferred tactic of lauded luminaries ranging from Jack Welch to Steve Jobs whose business acumen we otherwise celebrate.

Babying Workers: 8 Real Examples of Employees Behaving Badly.

Of course, senior leaders and executive managers have the prerogative of acting however the hell they want to get the results they need, and those ends largely justify the means. But that doesn’t mean that every incident of workers behaving badly is even close to justifiable – in fact, sometimes, workers act so childish that they’re memorable enough to warrant a specific shout-out in the survey results.

While these real life anecdotes from the CareerBuilder survey serve as cautionary tales, they’re also pretty friggin’ hilarious, too:

  • When he didn’t get his way, a company owner was known for throwing a temper tantrum by flailing on the floor before dramatically slamming the door on his way out of the room.

 

  • Faced with an important deadline, an employee hid in a utility closet to avoid having to present their work in a departmental meeting.

giphy

 

  • Looking to get a co-worker fired, an employee planted a Ziplock bag full of oregano in their counterpart’s desk drawer, then called HR to report the employee brought marijuana to work.

giphy (16)

  • An employee, upset that someone accidentally ate their food from the fridge, proceeded to empty the entire fridge out by returning the favor and eating at least a dozen coworkers’ bagged lunches before being caught in the act.

giphy (18)

  • Frustrated that others kept parking in his reserved spot, an employee blocked the space with a traffic cone and “Do Not Enter” sign they brought from home.

giphy (19)

  • After presenting an employee with an award recognizing them for 10 years of service, a manager accidentally sent the entire department  (including that employee) an e-mail asking “why the hell are they still here? They should have been fired years ago.”

giphy (17)

  • One worker was infamous for interrupting company meetings by playing porn on their cell phone at full volume to signify they were bored – a practice soon adopted by others within their “clique.” 

giphy (20)

  • One new manager offered to treat his new team to lunch; after being presented with the bill, the manager excused himself to use the restroom and was never heard from again.

giphy (21)

You don’t have to be childish to think those are hilarious – and realize that no matter how sophomoric your coworkers might be, it probably could be worse. And behaving like a child isn’t all bad – because if we all transformed ourselves into consummately professionals and serious adults, we’d be stifling the main drivers of imagination and innovation. These two qualities are all too rare in business, but represent a significant competitive advantage if properly harnessed and channeled (as any Silicon Valley startup or agency can tell you).

The “adolescent behaviors” cited in the CareerBuilder study are often hard wired into our nature – we all whine once in a while, or sulk when things don’t go our way. That’s part of what makes us humans, and what makes work sometimes feel a little bit less like work, and our coworkers feel a little less like “colleagues” and “teammates” and more like, you know, real people who you can really relate to.

These are the fundamental building blocks of what’s become codified as company culture, and if we suppress these behaviors for the purposes of conformity, then we’re missing out on those twin goals of transparency and authenticity in favor of conformity. And that’s not only boring, but bad business, too.

At least that’s my excuse for being a brat.

The Thrill is Gone: How To Avoid A Bad Recruiting Breakup.

ca11cdf9efef96278483de40090d7c6fYou know those old “recruiting is dating” and “interviewing is like dating” aphorisms? I hate those damn cliches, too. In the HR and recruiting worlds we’ve beaten those metaphors to a pulp, falling back on these silly similes with such alarming frequency over the years that there’s hair growing on our (collective) palms.

Some folks treat this concept as gospel. Even eHarmony, long the repository for desperate singles looking for a little loving served with a spoonful of sanctimonious superiority, finally got in on the action earlier this year. The launch of Elevated Careers (still in beta) promises to use eHarmony’s proven algorithm to match employers with potential new hires based on stuff like skills, culture and personality fit.

This is great news for the lovelorn and hapless; if you’re the kind of person whose idea of an exciting Saturday night involves a pint of Ben and Jerry’s, Netflix and a couple of cats, you can now use the exact same platform to find that career destination as the one you use to algorithmically find a life partner.

The good news here is you don’t have to wait until marriage to get a little eHarmony action anymore – you can now catfish recruiters instead, and they’re far easier marks than the average sugar daddy or total hottie out there online. For some reason, when I think about these people, I can’t help but look at all the lonely people – and feel for them. I mean, this is not a good place to be in life, thinking in between rounds of playing Cookie Jam on their iPads:

I can’t find love. I can’t find a job. I DID find a bottle of white zin for under five bucks. Maybe that will give me the courage I need to switch over from getting no action on eHarmony to finally scoring that job I’ve been putting off since I was put on disability for gout six months ago.”

Shut up, already.

Look, I get it. The whole recruiting/dating comparison is superficially relatable, since pretty much everyone has both looked for a significant other and looked for a job at some point in life. We may have foundered our way through countless infatuations, been on one end or the other of an unrequited love (or lust, more often), or struggled through a passionate relationship turned dysfunctional trainwreck.

From Lust to Dust: The Six Phases of A Recruiting Relationship.

I’m tired of all the talk about finding (and winning) the love of your life your latest crush. Instead, I want to talk about something that’s far too often overlooked in this whole courting conversation – and something that’s far more important than simply successful talent attraction, in recruiting or in romance.

I want to talk about what to do once you’ve landed that perfect match. It’s one thing to start a meaningless fling (that’s what Tinder or oDesk are for), but building and maintaining a meaningful relationship that actually leads somewhere is another thing entirely. 

Phase One: Infatuation.

70923779Here’s the part of the candidate and recruiter relationship that’s the most obvious alignment with the old dating aphorism. That initial, instinctual attraction (“her profile is so sexy – she knows Python and Ruby. Just my tupe!”) quickly segues into an obsession fueled by the hormonal need to find and be togther no-freaking-matter-WHAT! Kisses.

While we like to think we can stay objective and learn from the painful lessons of past experience (“I’ve been burned before – and with these new knock out questions I’ll make sure it never happens to me again.”), the reality is that we exercise confirmation bias in almost everything we do.

In this case, that earlier infatuation leads us to largely downplay any potential flaws and often miss really obvious and overt objective red flags because we’re too busy trying to win someone’s heart to take the time to use our minds and realize that in the end, we’re just going to end up hurt again.

Phase Two: The Girl is Mine.

dwzkliAfter you’ve won her heart and she’s yours, once she’s signed the marriage certificate (or offer letter) dotted line and showed up to the altar (or her first day of work, as it were), if you think the hard work is over after you’ve made everything official, you’ve got another thing coming. At this stage, many of us have a tendency to settle into complacency wedded bliss.

Hey, you’ve landed the one you were after, and should be able to at least savor that honeymoon period before real life inevitably intervenes.

This mindset is the same one used by recruiters, who manage to ignore the other 59 requisitions they’re working on and the dozens of candidates clogging up their inboxes and ATS in an inordinate display of time, attention and effort to a single suitor. While you’re giving chase, your hiring managers and candidates sit wondering why you don’t love them anymore – but inevitably, that honeymoon period comes to an end, the new hire actually onboards, and you promptly drift apart. It’s just not the same anymore now that you’re actually working together. It never is.

Oh, sure, you play along for a little while, doing a few requisite checkins and shooting off a periodic “hope all is going well” e-mail, but let’s face it: it’s time to move on. Sure, it might get a little weird if you run into them somewhere in the office or pass them in the hallway, but you’ll both know it’s for the best – they’re with their generalist, now, after all.  But let’s get real – that new hire wasn’t your first, and won’t be your last.

The average recruiter places around 30 new hires a quarter, or 120 candidates a year, according to the ASA. That means when it comes to matters of the heart, we’re a pretty promiscuous profession. But that new hire probably thought that recruiting relationship meant more than it did. You were their first – before you they hadn’t even talked to anyone at your company. Now, they work there – but even after closing the deal, no one ever forgets their first.

Sure, you might smile at that candidate in the lunchroom or give them a perfunctory “hello” as you pass in the hall, but you haven’t even had a real conversation since that offer was verbally accepted. Not that they can forget you – every week, your name comes floating through her feed on some social network or internal e-mail asking for a referral or to share a job posting or remind her (along with her 4,000 coworkers) that their benefits acknowledgement form is due Friday.

And just knowing you’re there makes her feel bereft and utterly alone – you were their lifeline to the company, and now you’re just somebody that they used to know.

Phase Three: Hit the Road, Jack.

giphy-facebook_sOne day, a year or so later, you’re looking at the very latest “termination report” on your HRIS (which, since HR lives and dies by old data is no newer than a quarter old already), and you notice that candidate you had such a crush on just a few months ago has called it quits with the company.

That’s right – they just upped and left, without even so much as saying goodbye. Wait, what? They weren’t even here for a year?

That might impact your bonus – that pesky retention metric is always kind of a bitch, am I right – or damage the trust your hiring manager has in you to actually deliver a candidate who wants more than a one night stand out of this relationship, and doesn’t take kindly to being used. They got burned, and you introduced them. That’s never a good thing.

You want to know what the hell happened (the hiring manager will never tell you the full truth when you ask why the position is open when you have to refill it) – but since you work in recruiting, you’re not really in HR, and therefore cannot access the termination data fields in your HCM system. So, you call up your good pal Susie, an “HR Analyst” whose real job is more or less serving as the in-house HR data entry clerk, bless her heart – and ask her to take a peek for you.

“Well, let’s see here,” Susie says, “I’ve got her coded as leaving due to perceived lack of upward mobility or advancement opportunities.” Susie, on the other hand, has gotten a two dollar an hour raise in the past decade or so she’s spent as an employee, and clearly finds this a ridiculous reason indeed. There must be more to it.

That night, at home, you cry yourself to sleep.

Phase Four: Picking up the Pieces.

Well, like it or not, they’re gone. And because you no longer have them, for the first time in a long time, they’re the only thing in the world you actually want, desperately.

You go through the Kubler-Ross five stages of grief grieving your lost love: denial, anger, chocolate, scotch and finally, acceptance. THIS is the moment, besides that awful bitter aftertaste Dewars and Toblerone, that will define the rest of your recruiting life. You won’t take being a victim anymore.

In this defining moment, you decide you’re going to finally grow a pair and vow, once and for all, to change the way you – and your entire organization – recruits and retains top talent.

For yourself. Forever. 

First things first: you build an alumni network and put an emphasis on “boomerang” hires so that you can start getting the ones who got away back – they loved you once, and can learn to love you again. There’s still a place for you in their hearts, if only they listened. It’s your job to help them, so you set up alerts and track any and all activity for any former employee with the same diligence as the fresh meat you’re trying to snare in your ATS trap.

Don’t think it’s a good idea to stay stuck in the past, to go after the very same people who already hurt you once? Well, even old employees can be new talent, and hopefully, they’ve grown – personally and professionally – since the last time you were together. They’ve changed, and if they realize you were meant to be together, after all, they’re unlikely to make the same mistake twice.

Even if they’re never coming back, that doesn’t mean you can’t at least have a healthy relationship with your ex. Besides, they probably have a few eligible friends they’d be willing to hook you up with if you can stay on somewhat civil terms after you go your separate ways. Goodbyes don’t have to last forever.

Phase 5: Paging Dr. Ruth (or Dr. Feelgood).

MjAxMS05YmJiNWU5OWQ0MGVkZGQ0So here’s how I see it: the average in-house recruiter spends 80% of their time on Phase One, 15% of their time on Phase Three, and maybe – if we’re being really generous – maybe 5% of their time on Phase Two.

I’m completely making those numbers up, of course, but I can safely say this because – confession time – that’s about the same time as I allotted when I was an in-house recruiter, and trained my recruiters to allocate their efforts accordingly.

It’s the same mix that I’ve seen in most every company or HR function I’ve encountered. I’m talking about those who are 100% dedicated to recruiting candidates and personally responsible for, in my case, anyways, over 150 reqs across the Southern US – which was a ridiculous workload for any individual recruiter, much less one like me who actually likes to interact more with candidates than just getting them in, getting one hired, and passing them off to their new Hiring Managers and HR Business Partners before moving onto the next open position. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Now You’re Just Some EE That I Used to Know.

largeOf course, in my entire career as an HR Generalist or later, an HR Leader, I always had some responsibilities related to recruiting, and when that became only a fraction of my focus, I was forced to spend a considerable amount of time stuck in Phase Two. This is the meat and potatoes of both the employee lifecycle and the employee experience.

Sure, even if you’re an in-house recruiter reporting up through the CHRO, you might not feel like you belong in HR. But that’s absolutely not true – in fact, recruiters can make a bigger difference than almost anyone else in the organization when it comes to employee retention.

Instead of always looking for who’s next, it’s important to also look at who you’ve got, and remember that recruiting doesn’t end at onboarding. It’s a continuous process, and while it takes time to look inside instead of simply outside the organization, it takes way more time to backfill a role when that new hire leaves for a reason that could have been easily preempted and prevented.

6 Ways Recruiters Can Shape Employee Retention.

Here are some small things recruiters can start doing today that will make a big difference tomorrow when it comes to shaping employee retention:

  • Be A Part of Onboarding. Seriously. Even something so simple as having a spot for a recruiter to sign an offer letter along with the hiring manager can make a significant impact on your ability to impact retention. Why is the VP of HR, who has never met the candidate, signing the offer letter or that official welcome letter? Why is it that if they have any questions about anything related to working at your company after they choose to actually work at your company, it suddenly becomes HR’s responsibility instead of yours? You know I’m right. So change that shit.
  • Be There On Day One. Even if it’s just to drop by and say hi, every recruiter should make a point to show their face at new hire orientations if one of their candidates is just starting out at the company. In most cases, you’ll probably have several recruits who will be glad to see you, catch up and maybe even ask for your advice. Just don’t get too buddy-buddy with HR and get sucked into playing along while they do some cheezy sketch or trust exercise – if you’re at an orientation, you never know how weird stuff is going to get when there’s some maniac from L&D in charge of running the show. Unless, you know, that sort of thing is your thing…
  • Roll Out the Red Carpet. Something as simple as sending a personalized welcome e-mail so it’s waiting for your newest hire when they first open their new inbox is the kind of small gesture that gets remembered a long time – and serves as a welcome diversion to the impersonal forms, policies and procedures they’re likely overwhelmed with on Day 1. It’s important they know that even though they’ve already been recruited, their recruiter is always there for them.
  • Welcome to the Neighborhood. If you want to go the extra mile, think about going old school and shooting them a postcard through snail mail – yes, with a stamp and everything – to their home address. If that seems a little overbearing, have a handwritten note waiting for them at their new desk. Follow that up by stopping by and putting in a little face time with them sometime during their first week. Those are the kinds of interactions that become the foundations of meaningful professional relationships – and sometimes, personal friendships, too.
  • Never Stop Engaging: You don’t have to be besties with every new hire, or gossip over lunch or cocktails every week, in order to build a scaleable, sustainable relationship with each candidate you successfully bring on board. Develop a process with periodic touchpoints – make a regular phone call, give them a shout out on Twitter or Facebook, shoot off another follow up e-mail or text message or hell, send a smoke signal. Just make sure you’re constantly providing them with a personal connection by Day 30. Repeat at Day 60. And Day 90. And Day 180. Year 3. Year 5. The moment you stop communicating is the moment your relationship begins to slip away. Better to continually build and strengthen it, instead.
  • Be With HR, Not Against It. Recruiters often set themselves somewhat apart from the rest of the HR department, who conversely often don’t see the TA team as “real” HR. That’s bullshit – and it’s up to recruiters to break that impasse and get HR to work with them instead of against them (or work with them at all, as the case may be). This starts with gaining enough cache to convince HR to give you access to their super duper top secret HR systems. While recruiting can talk about predictive analytics and big data all day, the truth is that being able to answer questions like why people leave, who the top performing and high potential employees are within an organization or which department is in danger of having headcount cuts and losing a slew of staff can only be answered with the data that sits in the HCM systems recruiters rarely have access to. The reality is recruiters can probably run rings around their HR counterparts when it comes to tech, and actually apply that data to driving actionable change in the way you recruit. This information is much richer, much deeper and much more potentially prescriptive than even the most robust data contained within an ATS, and if you’re a recruiter, you’d be wise to butter up one of those HR ladies to spread the love and somehow help you get access into these systems.

Love Will Keep Us Together.

All of us have that new hire we used to be infatuated with, who you couldn’t live without – only once you actually closed the deal, you both moved on. Different directions, different priorities, drifting apart.

But no matter how far past that fling might have been, never forget what you used to have – that connection where you knew all of their dreams, aspirations and career goals and would do whatever it took to help get them there.

That intense longing for them to say yes to your proposal, that fear of rejection that gnawed your stomach when you finally called to make them an offer.

When they said yes, that rush (it’s an HR high, almost) of closing that requisition with your dream candidate was enough to almost make up for having to deal with all the other crap that comes with recruiting. But now, the thrill is gone.

But you should never stop fighting for that special candidate, even after you’ve hired dozens more after them – now that they’ve seen the realities of working for that jackass hiring manager and realized that copy on your career site about your culture was complete BS, and they’re feeling like they’ve been hoodwinked, it’s important that you remind them why it was they fell in love with the job in the first place.

You’re probably the only person at the company who remembers that, after all – and there’s nothing like reliving the good times to temper the bad ones. At the office or otherwise. Make sure you fulfill your promises and keep them in mind for internal promotions, recognition opportunities or even just the occasional cup of coffee. You promised that candidate sunshine, moonbeams and an endless Sinatra soundtrack when you were trying to close the deal – don’t let them down. If you promise something as a suitor, you’ve got to follow suit, whether it suits you or not.

Because you know what? If you leave that new hire adrift, drowning in a sea of corporate bullshit, backstabbing and back office politics, they may blame you for sweet talking you here with a bunch of lies – and that whole relationship you’ve worked so hard to build can come crashing down in an instant.

They no longer trust you, and certainly feel no compunction about giving you the heads up when they start updating LinkedIn, refreshing their resumes and, ultimately, not letting the door hit them on the way out. And you’ll be left alone, again – and forced to find another match for that role after already losing the perfect fit – forever.

No, forget that. You know what I want? Every candidate I hire, I want to grow old with. I want you to do the same thing and make sure that no matter what, you keep the romance alive. I don’t believe in a whole lot these days, but I believe in the power of a couple of crazy kids coming together over a job – and building their lives and careers together at the same company for the rest of their working lives.

You can make it last. I believe in you. I believe in us. And I believe in the power of relationships in recruiting.

unnamed (4)Robin Schooling is on a mission to make organizations better by making HR better. With 20+ years of senior HR leadership experience in a variety of industries, she consults with organizations, advises HR teams, speaks to HR and business audiences and writes for a variety of sites and publications.

Schooling has been an active and involved SHRM volunteer leader, holds a few of those HR certifications herself, and at one point in time even received an award as “HR Professional of the Year.” She has been known to search out the perfect French 75 and is a fervent and unapologetic fan of the New Orleans Saints, even if they did trade Jimmy Graham.

For more for Robin, check out her blog, follow her on Twitter@RobinSchooling or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

School of Hard Knocks: Why Experience Matters More Than Education in Recruiting.

we-dont-need-no-educationEvery summer seems to fly by far too fast, but the waning days of this summer are a bit sentimental for me. See, I’m getting ready to send my son off to college, which is a little surreal, considering it feels like just yesterday when I was snapping pictures of that gap toothed little boy smiling before his first day of school.

Then, next thing I know, I look up, and he’s counting down the days until he can get out of the house while I try to savor every moment we have together. I knew we’d get here, eventually – I just didn’t realize it would happen so fast. Too fast, really.

I am proud of my son for everything that he’s accomplished, and all the hard work and dedication it took for him to get to this moment. But it’s a moment that, if anything, is a bit bittersweet.

And as I look back on where my son is at, and where he’s going, my thoughts inevitably turn to when I was the same age. While it’s always been assumed that my son is going to college – we started saving for it as soon as he was born – I wish someone, anyone, had told me that this was an option for me, too.

Growing up like I did, college wasn’t even discussed; it just wasn’t something that people like us did. Nope, even though I was always smart, I was never really educated – at least not when it came to knowing what options I had to continue my education and ostensibly, improve my life. I’ve been lucky enough to do pretty well for myself, but every so often, the thought of having missed out on college crosses my mind. And it makes me a little sad.

When people ask where I went to school, I dance around the question; when people ask what year I graduated college or what I majored in, I change the subject. It’s not that I’m ashamed that I didn’t go to college, but in today’s world, that seems to be a somewhat damning indictment of who you are, what you’ve done and what you’re capable of. Hell, even in the recruiting industry where I work, not having a degree is often a non-starter.

No Degree? Don’t Bother.

 

no_diploma_157Some days, I stumble across a job description listing a bachelor’s degree as a minimum requirement. When I read these, frankly, I just get pissed off.

I don’t know whether it’s that my son’s college years are imminently impending, or if I’m just over it, but recently, every time I read that ridiculous college degree requirement on a JD, I just snap. I don’t know what my trigger was; maybe it was that LinkedIn InMail I recently received, one that informed me that a big brand, big deal kind of company looking for candidates just like me.

I looked at the list of opportunities, and one in particular stood out; it was basically the exact same job I do now. I know this because my company is a direct competitor, and I poach (or, recruit, if you prefer) people from this talent acquisition team all the time.

Out of curiosity, I clicked one of the job descriptions and read through it. It basically described my current gig, including my recurring responsibilities, workload, expectations and accountabilities. Reading it, I thought that it was amazingly identical to my current role, more or less – same kind of daily duties working with the same kind of talent.

I got down to the requirements list, which were fairly minimal. They were looking for someone with five or more years of recruiting experience (check), advanced online sourcing skills (check), the ability to interface with all levels of hiring managers and candidates (check, and check), and, finally, a bachelor’s degree (wait, what the…?).

I kept reading and re-reading the posting, thinking somehow I must have missed something. We’re talking about a job whose duties mirror mine perfectly, not to mention the required experience and expertise. I even met every one of the preferred qualifications given my industry focus and experience at a direct competitor – what we use to shortlist the short list – I’m telling you, I had them all.

But no matter. The fact that I didn’t have that piece of paper certifying I’d graduated from college was a deal killer – and even though I was otherwise a perfect fit for the job, the brass ring, as such, was beyond my reach, no matter how much I stretched.

What a load of bullshit.

You Can’t Teach Common Sense.

11333720_601208923315945_1553318516_nHere’s the simple, difficult truth. Even if I had applied for the role, I would have been rejected by some automated ATS assessment before human eyes ever had the chance. Now, don’t go feeling sorry for me; the point of this post is not to have a pity party, pity though it might be for all of candidates with all the necessary qualifications save a college degree.

I’m not looking to change jobs, but if I were, I’d start off by contacting my friends in the industry. I feel reasonably certain were I to throw my hat in the ring for this specific role, or most roles, really, I could probably leverage my connections to score at least a perfunctory phone screen.

No, this isn’t about me.

Instead, it’s about the asinine, unhelpful and antiquated degree requirement on so many requisitions that seems to serve no other purpose than to weed people out, no matter how perfect a fit they might otherwise be.

 

Therein lies the danger. Certain roles, obviously, require degrees – I get that. I even understand, as a tech recruiter, that without understanding the fundamentals of computer science or formal coursework, being a successful developer or engineer would be pretty damn near impossible. Then again, so is equivalent experience. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg – ironic that none could get jobs if they applied to the companies they created today, since none have a degree.

Why “Equivalent Experience” Matters More Than Education.

 

learning-470x310Equivalent experience – these two little words on a JD can make all the difference between unnecessarily eliminating great candidates from consideration and finding people who can do the job.

Why limit your talent pool with such a sweeping, yet often unnecessary, non-negotiable? If we’re truly responsible for looking for top talent, it’s a fair assumption that not everyone meeting that moniker necessarily possesses a college degree.

Instead, we, as employers, send the message that if you don’t have that precious piece of paper proving you had the time and money to sink into an extra four years of often unnecessary coursework, then don’t bother.

I often wonder, if I had degree in, say, philosophy, or Women’s Studies, or maybe even good old Underwater Basket Weaving, if that would have made me any more qualified to do what I’m doing or any better at doing my job. I’m pretty sure this in no way would make me magically more qualified – but it would, at least, get me through the ATS.

I’m relieved my son won’t face the same obstacles I do during the course of his career, but while I don’t have a degree, I know that it doesn’t make you smarter, more competent or a harder worker. All that piece of paper does is prove you graduated from college. But since it says nothing about company or culture fit, professional qualifications or related experience – all those things that really matter to recruiters –  maybe it’s finally time we looked beyond checking the college degree box and considered the rest of the resume, instead.

amy alaAbout the Author: Amy Ala is a staffing consultant & talent sourcer forMicrosoft, where she supports the hardware division as a member of Microsoft’s in-house talent acquisition team.

Amy has over a decade of recruiting experience, starting her career in agency recruiting running a desk for companies like Spherion, Act One and the Lucas Group before making the move in-house, where she has held strategic talent roles for the State of Washington’s WorkSource employment program and Zones, an IT product and services hub.

Amy is also a featured blogger on RecruitingBlogs.com and is a member of RecruitingBlogs’ Editorial Advisory Board.  Follow Amy on Twitter @AlaRecruiter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

 

 

21 Recruiting and Sourcing Tools in my Toolbox

I am going to make it easy for you all. I decided it’s time to ‘open-source’ my tool belt when it comes to recruiting and sourcing tools. So you guys can stop googling ‘best-recruiting tools’ and get Recruiting And Sourcing Toolsfrustrated because the top 10 Google results won’t bring you any further.

I have divided this up into four sections: sourcing, information retrieval, productivity and platforms. Also, you can find some new ATS players, as I can’t help it to follow this space and report about it.

SOURCING:

Sourcing has been made quite easy with all the tools out there nowadays. If you don’t know where to begin this list is quite useful. Some are free, some you must pay for– however I recommend learning to google x-ray sites yourself since it is basically what these tools do.

Aevy

Excellent tool, in my opinion one of the best. Also useful for information retrieval. Not expensive, not cheap. Let me show it to you with a video:

Recruit’em (Now Recruitin)

Tool to generate boolean strings for people who like a nice GUI on sites like LinkedIn, Google, Github, StackOverflow, Xing & Twitter.

Entelo

Have been using Entelo for a few days and it is a pretty reliable sourcing tool, with excellent functionality and web hooks into your ATS. Pretty expensive, though.

Good Old Google

Use this string to search for resumes online: intitle:resume OR inurl:resume OR inurl:CV) -job -jobs -sample -samples -template -”resume service” -“resume writers” -“resume writing” (Location) AND (Study) AND (keywords)

Edit location study and keywords to your liking and get resumes. Also, think broad and bold. Every page that has a user base (from Couchsurfing to Strava) is x-rayable. Do not begin at Linkedin, where everyone is, and do not stop at Github. Think bold.

** Webinar from 2012 ** Still relevant. Watch and learn!  Get your FREE LinkedIn Custom Search Engine HERE

Slack

You might be using Slack for internal comms, but there are also lot’s of public channels where you can scout people from. Check out //www.chitchats.co/ to search for public chat channels.

 

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL:Recruiting and Sourcing Tools

One of the most important things to get is information from people you find. The art is not to abuse this information — which is quite hard for the shitty recruiters.

Connectifier

A good tool in your chrome that aggregates information such as email, phone numbers & social media pages. Also a ‘Project’ page where you can store the people you find. Good bunch of people too just got a massive investment so here to stay!

360 Social & Falcon

Same as Connectifier, but then not so good.

WhoIs

When you find peoples websites, paste the URL and mostly get their email from the WHOIS registry.

PRODUCTIVITY:

I love hacking all kind of free programs together to get a healthy and productive workflow. These two apps are must haves for all your talent stuff.

Sidekick

Sidekick is a free app from Hubspot that will let you track your emails. Bit controversial but I always like to know if people read the highly personalised emails I send out — especially to give me an idea when and how I should follow up. Sidekick works with Google Mail and Outlook.

Calendly

The biggest thing I hate about the whole talent game is the scheduling of stuff. Calendly is an excellent tool to schedule calls or Skype interviews with potential hires. You open up your calendar to them, send a link and they can pick a time instead of the usual mail slinging which costs valuable time.

Sunrise

This calendar app is super useful for scheduling as well and it runs as a full calendar program as well, has excellent timezone support and is fast.

 

RECRUITING PLATFORMS:

Lots of platforms out there right now to match you with people, here are my favourites:

Interviewing.io

Chatroulette1 for technical interviews by my lovely friend Aline Lerner. I also recommend everyone to read her blog when you are hiring technology, people. Well written, data-driven, smart, ballsy — can’t recommend enough.

Workshape

My friend Hung Lee handles this platform, basically trying to kill the job description. They make you ‘design’ your job based on a ten variable graph and match engineers and companies together.

Landing.Jobs

Seems I am only posting friends platforms here, but Pedro of Landing.jobs and I also go way back, even crashed on his couch in Lisboa when I was training some startups over there. Previously called Jobbox.io they have landed in London and built a platform for getting tech jobs based on a referral system. They welcomed their 10.000th user yesterday, congrats!

TryCatch

More friends, curated tech talent, perfectly matched. Built by developers, for developers. Very thorough screening of candidates and good talent on this platform, very much worth checking out when in need of Developers!

Hired

I think everybody knows Hired, heard some good stories although I have never used them or made a hire through it. Matching Database, very solid marketing machine behind it. The obvious choice.

 

APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEMS:Recruiting and Sourcing Tools

I do not want to go too much into depth on ATSs as you guys know that I am kind of biased to Workable and Lever. But these two Dutch vendors should be put on the map.

Homerun

These guys sprouted from one of my favourite Dutch design/UX minded job-boards Fontanel. What Homerun does differently than any ATS (and what I admire them for) is the focus on the design aspect of your job page combined with a Trello-like dashboard for the backend. Well designed and already trusted by some of the top Dutch startups as Blendle.

Recruitee

Recruitee is an ATS-startup that I met during my training sessions at Rockstart, the startup incubator based in Amsterdam where I am part off. They provide a good, solid foundation to your recruiting admin side and launching a sourcing tool in the not so near future. Good alternative to check out while hunting for the ATSs out there.

So that’s it, my toolbelt and some tips open sourced. I will probably release a part II in the coming six months as the HR-tech space has been very innovative.If you like this stuff: Follow me And leave a comment if you want to add to this post or just have something nice to say.

 

 

 

How To Apply The Rules of The Pub to Recruiting and Hiring.

I spend a lot of my recreational time in pubs and bars. This will probably come as no great surprise. Everyone has to have a hobby, they say. I suppose knocking back a pint qualifies as mine. No matter. The absolutely brilliant part about pubs is that if you ever wanted to really understand how networking and influence work in the real world, all you have to do is look around the bar.

It’s just a different place than we’re used to seeing this sort of thing. I have become something of an expert at the rules of pub networking over the years, and they absolutely always apply in every bar in every city in the world.

Anyone Without A Nickname is Not Worth Talking To.

funny_bar_signs_18If you ever found yourself in my pub, you’d find regulars like Cabbie (drives a cab), Chippie (because he’s a carpenter) and Bed-Wetter (because he’s an accountant). No matter when I go into the place, night or day, the damn bar is always a line up of these same people. I am, naturally, one of those people. I mean, it’s my neighborhood pub and all.

We talk about loads of different things. Just nothing to do with what we do. When I talk to Bed-Wetter, we don’t talk about general ledgers or auditing or accounting. That would be dreadfully boring for the both of us. No. We talk about football and the X-Factor, or politics, or who’s shagging whom. The standard stuff, really. The thing that never comes up is the work we do.

This makes sense, since this is where we go to escape it.

It’s Not Just Who You Know, It’s What They Know.

Once a year, though, I pretend I am actually a grown up adult man, I will contact Bed-Wetter (at this stage, I even revert to calling him Chris) and say, “Chris, can we go have a drink? Just the two of us?” And of course, because there are drinks involved, he says yes.

Later, when we both have pints in hand and the world is an infinitely better place, I’ll show Chris my hand. “Chris,” I ask him, “Tell me what you know about tax.”

And, he’ll tell me what he knows about taxation, which it turns out is really quite a lot, poor bastard. It’s all a bit dull, but after I let him go on for a bit, and at the end I will thank him and ask him to do it for me, since I trust him to do a good job.

Chris not only knows more about tax returns than anyone ever should, but if he screws up, I will shame him in public. He’s my go-to-guy, and he hasn’t let me down yet. I trust him with my taxes, and gladly pay him a good price in return for that peace of mind, and because we run in the same circles.

Every recruiter needs to build relationships like this throughout our network; just like I wouldn’t dream of trusting anyone but Chris with my taxes, your connections should see you as the go-to-guy (or girl) for recruiting.

How do you become that connector, the one who you can always trust to find the right candidate or the right job and your network will turn to before turning to anybody else? This is our mission as recruiters, you know.

When I want to know anything about taxes, I know all I have to do is ask Chris; similarly, our contacts should want to turn around at any time to tell them all about the market and anything about recruiting.

The Rules of the Pub Apply to Recruiting.

9425268_f520The reason why recruiters tend to be great at networking and making connections is that we tend to know a little about a lot, since we deal with multiple skills for multiple disciplines with multiple expectations.

We hold multiple conversations about these manifold multi-faceted, multi-skilled things, and can hold our own. This is because the rules of the pub always apply.

What do I mean when I talk about the rules of the pub? Well, let’s say you were a recruiter specializing in auditors or accountants, and I were to tell you that just around the corner, at the Red Lion, there was an Accountant’s Happy Hour every Wednesday night.

You would, presumably, show up the very next Wednesday ready to work the room. But while you’re there to talk about jobs and opportunities and all of those things recruiters talk about, they’re there to talk about accounting. If you walk straight in and announce, “I’m a recruiter, I have lots of jobs, who wants to come talk to me?” you are unlikely to have any takers. While they probably won’t throw you out, they are likely to direct you to old Charlie over in the corner, who’s been unemployed for three years and certainly would love to talk.

You look at Charlie, he looks at you, and you both know, at that very instant, that even if you’re the very best accounting or auditing recruiter there is, you’re not very likely to find him a job. No recruiter, of course, can ever simply say, “thanks, you seem like a lovely enough chap, but I don’t think I can place you,” wish him luck and move on. Instead, we have to be a little more subtle about who we meet and how we approach them.

How To Go To Becoming A Go-To for Recruiting and Hiring.

craftbeerweek_cheersThis is why recruiters do what I like to think of as “the networking dance.” You know,  where we spend lots of time making small talk and trying to find some sort of common ground. We go on about our social lives, our personal interests, current affairs or, when all else fails, move onto complaining about the weather, the traffic, or both.

This talent tango can be time consuming and tiring. But it’s necessary, because this is where people become engaged.

Somewhere down the line, they will invariably ask what you do. This is the moment you, of course, have been waiting for, that perfect chance to finally reveal that you are, in fact, a recruiter. Then, after all that small talk, you can finally on the shop talk. Brilliant, really.

How does this work online? You engage in a conversation, share content and exchange comments with whomever is talking about what you’re targeting, even tangentially, on whatever channel you happen to be on.

If you’re interesting, add value, and come across as the kind of person worth knowing on these networks, even if the engagement has really nothing to do with jobs or recruiting directly, you can be sure that they’ll do a little digging, look at your profile and see that you are actually a recruiter. If you’ve built a relationship with someone that runs deeper than recruiting, than you can be sure that you’ll be the person who they ask about their next career move.

They’ve made a personal connection, and they trust you because you didn’t hard sell or go for the jugular. You weren’t the guy at the party who ended up in the corner with Old Charlie. You became a part of their circle, and in doing so, built up enough trust to become a personal advisor and a go-to for anything recruiting related.

In networking, whether online or on a pub, proximity is key to results. It’s all about making a personal connection first and finding topics of mutual interest; once you have that foundation, you can pretty much go from there. The only selling you will have to do is by being yourself – and if you can do that, people will want to know more about you.

Then, you can make sure they’re aware of what you do, and that when the time comes and they need a go-to-guy (or girl), you’re the recruiter that they’ll be going to first. That is really what all of recruiting is really all about.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAACYAAAAJDg0MWE0MTUwLTMyYzgtNDU4OC05YzI5LTQ1Y2IyYTQ5NDgzYgAbout the Author: Bill Boorman is the Managing Director of Technology & Innovation for Recruiting Daily, where he focuses on leading the global expansion of Recruiting Daily, helping drive strategy, operations and recruiting industry reach in Europe, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific.

Boorman used to have a real job, and wear a suit, and everything; now he does what he describes as “stuff he gets paid for.” He has worked in and around the recruiting space for the past 30 something years.

As the founder of #‎tru‬ (the recruiting unconference), Boorman hosts 100 recruiting related events in 65 countries around the world every year, speaking and listening to over 2,000 recruiters about how to collectively make the world of work work better for everyone, everywhere.

Boorman is the lead advisor to talent technology companies such as RolePoint, Take the Interview, Work4Labs, Job & Talent, Universum and Clinch, among others. He also advises companies like KPMG, Oracle, BBC and Hard Rock Cafe on adopting new technologies and working practice, and is a judge for the UK edition of the Candidate Experience Awards.

Follow Bill on Twitter @BillBoorman or connect with him on LinkedIn.

 

The Best Applicant Tracking System of 2015?

What is Recruitee?

To cut to the chase, Recruitee is the best Applicant Tracking System I have tested this year so far. You ever try a product and think, “They made this for me!” You know like you look at something and say, “Finally, I have needed something like this for years!” That is how I felt when I tried Recruitee.  It is so freaking easy; it was fun.  Not kidding.  And it is not “stupid”  like those ATS systems that force you to create a requisition number.  Or an ATS that expects candidates to spend 30 minutes filling out an application. Think about it.  Recruiters these days also have to be data analysts, report writers, marketing professionals, copywriters and Social Media experts.

The days of settling for a tool that does not do all of these things are over

As a reviewer of recruiting technology, let me tell you, everyone says that their software is the best new software out there.  Then I test it only to find that it isn’t new or better at all. When speaking to Perry Oostdam, Co-Founder of Recruitee, he understood the pain points that recruiters experience trying to navigate through current Applicant Tracking System tools. Perry said, “Recruitee derived from our own need. We couldn’t find a tool that was truly intuitive to use, yet contains powerful features.”

[youtube url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk8A8YWCh7o” width=”500″ height=”300″]

Recruitee does not stop here:

  1. Distribute your jobs: Automatically push your job offer to free job boards. Recruitee is integrated, just push the button.
  2. Simple Employer page editor: Your mobile-friendly employer page contains all your open positions. Impress new candidates. check a live site out here
  3. New Apps: Optimize mobile recruiting. Stay up to date on new candidates or emails thanks to smart notifications.
  4. Data: Candidate data is stored in our encrypted servers. We will never use or sell any of your data. Feel free to export.

Recruitee engineers get it. They are always adding new functionality to make Recruitee better. “We like to say that Recruitee is developed by fast-growing companies, for fast-growing companies. We include our users’ feedback in our daily development sprints, which can be experienced throughout the product. The souring extension for Chrome and Firefox, for instance, was created after user feedback. The new career site editor as well: we noticed that many startup team were struggling with their team section. We’ll keep releasing features and fine-tune the product until we’ve got the best tool out there.”

I am telling you after testing Recruitee, I would say they are on track to be the best out there.

 

Recruitee

Pricing starts at $49 USD.  Monthly and annual pricing available.

Sizzle:

Drizzle:

  • Needs more US job boards
  • No Current Video Interview Integration
  • No Enterprise Version

 

Jackye Clayton Editor RecruitingTools.comAn international trainer, she has traveled worldwide sharing her unique gifts in sourcing, recruiting and coaching. She offers various dynamic presentations on numerous topics related to leadership development, inclusionary culture development, team building and more.Her in-depth experience in working with top Fortune and Inc 500 clients and their employees has allowed her to create customized programs to coach, train and recruit top talent and inspire others to greatness. Follow Jackye on Twitter @JackyeClayton  and @RecruitingTools or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

A Post About Nothing.

GeorgeCostanzaThe goal of recruiting and HR content, or any content, is not to be good – it’s to be read. That’s the same with any corporate content, really.

That in and of itself is a tall order, considering the finite niche readership and the infinite amount of content on any topic even tangentially related to talent. It’s also got to be read by the right people, and in no case are the right people voluntary consumers of your branded content.

Whether it’s a passive candidate reading a job description, an active one reviewing the culture related copy on your company careers site or a successful one pouring over pages of benefits information, recruiting related content is a necessary evil.

It’s the most pointless prose possible, content written for an audience that largely doesn’t want to read it by people who largely didn’t want to write it.

The same goes for core HR – in this case, the audience is not only captive, but are required to read that content, no matter how poorly written, dense or mind-numbingly boring that content might be.

The Audience Isn’t Listening.

slide_318481_2947013_freeThe average HR document reads about as easily as an Apple End User Agreement or a class action settlement agreement, with similar effect – everyone signs a legal document verifying they’ve actually read what no one, particularly the company producing said content, expects them to read in the first place.

Everyone is complicit in this arrangement, but the convenience of agreeing to something you’ve never actually read comes at a cost – no one gets anything out of the exercise. It’s the same thing as a performance review, job application or employment agreement, really – the only people who give a shit are lawyers. The rest of us sign on the dotted line and trust the people who put it in front of us.

The problem with recruiting or HR related content is that it’s intrinsically asinine and pointless, so of course must be the result of policy and not practicality. Recruiters wonder why so many unqualified candidates apply for jobs; generalists wonder why they get asked about things explicitly outlined in the employee handbook.

This content is so disposable that it’s not even consumed, but it doesn’t have to be that way. The point of a job description is to, well, describe a job. The point of providing written performance reviews is to review an employee’s performance. The obvious goals also make it obvious that the intent of this content is not only to be read, but meaningful enough to drive some sort of action.

Getting anyone to respond to written content isn’t easy for even the best writers. Getting a professional, passive audience to respond to HR or recruiting related content isn’t just hard, it’s damn near impossible. That so much of it is so bad – or so meaningless it’s moot – must mean that we’ve come to accept this in our business as business as usual.

Stop the Inanity.

83974-George-Costanza-watching-laund-d6pJIt doesn’t have to be this way. So, how do non-writers forced to crank content crank content? Content is a big deal these days, and kind of a commoditized buzzword, but it’s one that’s actually prevalent enough to at least justify that buzz a bit.

Whether that’s suddenly going from cold calling and reference checking to running career sites and social recruiting accounts or giving an employee detailed, specific performance written feedback (as most get annually), all of our professional lives have been somewhat subjected to the servitude to content’s proverbial “king.”

What most HR professionals know, but few care to admit, is that most of what we read as professionals is never read, largely because it’s written not so that it’s intrinsically memorable, but instead, so that it’s quickly forgotten. After all, the point is largely legal, and therefore, paying attention to the means Is pointless – it’s only the end goal of compliance that matters.

While content might indeed be king, compliance complicity carries the constant capability of committing regicide, if needed. Tbis very real threat makes the rest of this a theoretical exercise, sure.

Job descriptions largely exist as EOE/AA and OFCCP documentation, and at the end of the day no one watches sexual harassment videos for the production values or just can’t put down the page-turner that is your internet policy. I get that.

But here’s the question that it seems no one is asking: if this stuff is important enough to be a prerequisite for all employees (or future ones, for recruiting), why isn’t it important enough to actually be worth reading?

Style Points.

gcEven current employees don’t respond to content without duress or direct threats, with the default action to anything HR related seemingly set on inaction; for less captive audiences, well, candidates aren’t candidates if they don’t click ‘apply’ but click onto a competitor’s job ad.

The thing about content is it’s hard demonstrating direct ROI or bigger business impact even for companies getting it right, but it’s impossible to accurately estimate (or overstate) the opportunity costs of getting it wrong

If you’re still reading this, you’re likely wondering what the point of all of this is. I’ll tell you something: I don’t have one, except to point out you’ve already read nearly 1000 words of a lead that was leading nowhere.

Here’s why:

It sounds like it came from a person and not a persona.

It doesn’t matter what you say, it’s how you say it. And if you say it with voice and tone, it really doesn’t matter how boring your topic might be. If you have a point, it’s easier, but even that’s really extraneous if you can get that whole tone and style thing down, instead.

Trust me – I’m an HR blogger. Voice is everything, and that’s something no one can really teach, because the only way to learn how to be you is by being yourself. And chances are, whoever you are, the last thing that you’d want to be is just another HR or recruiting professional.

Because, well, they kind of suck. Kind of like this post. Sorry, not sorry.

The Recruiters Toolkit: A collection of 46 Chrome Extensions for Sourcing

You may want to sit down for this one – it will change_your_life.  There is a brand new world of tools for us that increases productivity, decreases time-to-hire, and increase quality-of-hire. These mysterious tools are called Google Chrome Extensions.  Chrome extensions can prove to be a wonderful addition to any recruiters toolkit, if integrated properly. Unfortunately, chrome extensionsChrome Fingers can also be a massive time suck which is why we’ve decided to outline 46 of the best extensions the RecruitingTools community loves to use.

The Matrix of Chrome Extensions

Ok, all sarcasm aside, finding the right mix of extensions will absolutely give you some time back, and make sourcing, recruiting, employment branding and marketing quite a bit easier.  Extensions definitely have more impact than what the nay-sayers have to say about “those extensions.”  It’s possible extensions created trauma for folks stuck in their ways. Sometimes, it’s easier to use a quick tool you know produces 90%+ of the same results versus using “tried and true” best practices, it’s a basic prioritization decision (disclaimer: mad respect to industry leaders, but sometimes old-school logic seems, well, not logical).

In the last nine months, I’ve researched, tested, and evaluated more extensions than a normal person should, and pulled together what I lovingly deem GSD: A Talent-Pro’s Chrome Extension Guide.  If GSD is foreign, you’ll be enlightened by this definition.

Combining Chrome extensions bodes well for workarounds and increasing efficiency. Let me rephrase this: we all do more with less and are running, errr, sprinting to keep up, so simplifying life seems like a natural solution.  I promise, tested Chrome extensions are not trying to harm us or our industry, so just download and download and…

With any luck, this Toolkit will add a few extra hours to your day.  With no further ado, let’s review…

Extensions No One Should EVER Live Without

  • ProductHunt: Hunt for inspiration, creativity and keep up with new products and possible disruptions to our industry.
  • Sortd for Gmail: Organize your gmail life, more user-friendly than expected.
  • Dropbox for Gmail: Have Dropbox?  Add the extension.  It makes sending years of files to your sourcing and recruiting buddies so much easier.
  • Streak: A top-notch email tracking, mail-merging, template building and CRM all-in-one.  Since we have additional tools to stalk, I mean research, candidates, Streak has the most robust features.
  • Pocket: How much content do we try to keep up on while at work?  Save articles for later.  There’s an app for that, too.

 Recruiting and Sourcing

  • Prophet: Prophet finds email addresses and uses smart technology to guess if a person has no social footprint. Plus, it gets better every week.
  • Connectifier: Find emails for anyone.  Best return comes from LinkedIn and Twitter searches.
  • Email Hunter:  Hello company email directory! Visit a site and get a list of their email addresses directly in your browser.
  • Thrust.io:  “Quickly find anyone’s email at any startup.”  Enough said.
  • Mentor-Social Talent:  If you aren’t addicted, you will be.  First, sign up on socialtalent.co, download the extension and source like a champ.
  • WhoWorksAt  Know who you’re connections are working at a company just by visiting their company site.
  • Search Bar:  A power search for just about anything.
  • Import.io: Create awesome sourcing lists, similar to Scraper, but easy with a magic button.  Sign up then add the “magic” bookmarklet.
  • Discover.ly: connect with your team to view everyone’s collaborative connections.
  • Archively: A candidate CRM/database ideal for start-ups.  Create an account, download the chrome extension and their API directly uploads candidates from the web into the database.

Creative and Recruitment Marketing

  • Pinterest: Personal and employment branding on Pinterest is gaining momentum by the week.  The Pin Button lets you pin articles, decks, and much more.
  • Canva:  Need to create something quickly but aren’t a perfect designer?  The extension keeps it easy to jump in and out.
  • Search by Image:  Find the source of any image plus find perfect images for any project.
  • TweetDeck Launcher: Click. Launch. Source and research.
  • Buffer:  Ahhh, Buffer.  The extension simplifies social content extension even more.  
  • Grammarly: Don’t get caught with poor grammar (nervous just writing that).  Download the extension.
  • RiteTag:  Know your #hashtags mean something to the Twitterverse based on color-coating.

Chrome Extensions for Productivity

  • Silencer: Mute people, phrases, hashtags, and more on Twitter and Facebook to keep unnecessary distractions at bay.
  • YouTube AdBlock: It’s true!  Liberate yourself from YouTube ads.
  • AdBlock General AdBlock is available, too.
  • Evernote Clipper:  Effortlessly add info into Evernote sans toggling back-and-forth or copy-and-paste.
  • Momentum:  Keep yourself on task with a minimalistic background, reminders and inspiration to GSD.
  • Evernote Clipper:  Easily add info directly to Evernote.  Save yourself time and headache.
  • Hangouts:  Jumping from call to meeting to Hangouts. Use the start extension to join the meeting that began – crap – five minutes ago.
  • Bit.ly:  Shorten your links with the press of an extension.
  • Pushbullet:  Text, IM, etc from your computer, keeping all communication streamlined versus loading your purses and pockets with four devices.

Miscellaneous Must-Have Chrome Extensions

  • Check My Links:  Ensure all hyperlinks work before pushing content live.
  • Save As PDF:  Just as the name implies, save any web page as a PDF.
  • Clipular: Easily cut graphics, text – you name it – from any web site. Free yourself from cut-and- paste, ‘save image as’, etc.
  • Print Friendly:  Print any web page without annoying banners or ads.
  • OneTab:  Are you slightly obsessed and having CPU issues?  Install this friendly performance enhancer.
  • The Great Suspender Automatically disable un-used extensions and increase your CPU.
  • Ghostery:  Decide who can and can’t follow your behavior or web site; safety for you site and personal data.
  • MyPermissions:  Clean up any Chrome crap that is taking up space instead of taking up space.
  • Extensify: All your extensions kept in one place, plus you can quickly enable or disable any extension.
  • @deandacosta:  Ok, he’s not an extension, but he’s a Master-of-Tools who knows which extensions rock our world.

I hope you find this toolkit proves useful and you get some time back. A wise man once said, moderation is key, so an obsessive, extension-only lifestyle isn’t recommended. Formulate an extension toolkit perfect for you. It’s your turn to chime in!  Which extensions improve your workday?  Tell us how work extended beyond the web page onto a toolbar.

In the meantime, go forth and Extension-away.

Here is a playlist of RecruitingTool videos (not mentioned above as extensions) to keep you even more busy

[youtube url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmrWwr-eg1w&list=PL17581B0487FC88F3″ width=”500″ height=”300″]

 

About the author

Marie Burn Recruiting Tools AuthorMarie Burns is a Boston based talent acquisition and management, culture, and organizational development leader who rapidly scales companies, primarily startups and mid-sized orgs, through strategic programs, motivating teams and executing fresh innovative ideas. She is consistently referred to as a “hired gun”​ (no pun intended). She founded TalentAmp in 2014 to accelerate, empower and train entrepreneurs, start-ups, hiring managers and recruiters on how to effectively hire the best and knock their hiring strategy out of the park.

Marie speaks at national and local conferences, panels and coaches young entrepreneurs in the Northeast, from high school to post Bachelor’s. She is published with some of the cool kids such as The Muse, Mashable, Forbes and the likes.

You’d Better Ask Somebody: Why Employee Referrals (Still) Matter in Hiring.

If you think about it, we live in a world that’s increasingly become driven by referrals; hell, in our society, it’s become almost ingrained for us to defer to our extended network before making pretty much any decision. We rely on the wisdom of crowds for recommendations, input or advice, crowdsourcing everything from which car to buy, where to vacation or even whether or not to propose to a significant other or not.

Seriously – the last one showed up in my timeline just last week, and I thought to myself about just how busy our “Phone a Friend” line has gotten, of late. That’s the paradox of social networking; while our updates ostensibly reflect what’s going on in our life, we can no longer lead lives that aren’t largely informed by what happens online, and how our connections will react, no matter how much of a stretch that “friend” moniker might in fact be. There is no longer such a thing as “in real life” when these platforms have become so embedded in our psyche that we defer to our friends and followers to ask even the most intimate questions or solicit highly personal advice.

Beware, the Wisdom of Crowdsourcing.

crowdsourcing-tap-500x360If you think about it, it’s kind of weird how willing we are to ask other people almost anything – hell, as they say, it never hurts to ask, and now that we’ve all got someone there to listen, constantly, we seem to err in favor of oversharing, and it’s always too much TMI, it seems.

I mean, no one really wants to know every detail of that weird medical malady you’re dealing with, but that doesn’t stop you from sharing what used to be a confidential medical issue with the whole world; often, asking for online feedback even preempts people from seeking out a doctor in the first place.

Who needs a diagnosis when you can just share the symptoms with your network for their qualified advice and input?

This, of course, often exacerbates the problem; we’ve all had that moment where we think we’re dying and then look up our symptoms in WebMD (don’t lie, you know you have), only to find that weird rash you’ve developed suddenly looks a lot like Stage IV melanoma, and suddenly, you’re posting pics and announcing your battle with cancer to the world before realizing that you, in fact, just ran into a patch of poison ivy instead.

Hell, why wait for a doctor when diagnosis has become so damn easy? The seriously sad part is that I’m not even making that example up – and I’m still a little pissed at having to suffer through a friend’s completely fictitious cancer scare (fortunately, she copped up within a week of the initial announcement; a little aloe, and that patch mysteriously disappeared as quickly as it came).

I don’t blame her for anything other than poor judgement; the fact is, for better or for worse, we live in a feedback culture. And we’re constantly looking for referrals, because getting advice from someone (anyone) online seems somehow preferable than just listening to our guts. In a world where expertise has become an egalitarian effort, what we read on the Internet is the truth, regardless of its factual veracity.

In an age where the only encyclopedia or reference source anyone consults is Wikipedia, this tendency to place absolute trust in others’ references or opinions without questioning their expertise or experience (or lack thereof, more often) has skewed the way we look for, consume and act on information, opting for the recommendations of others over our own research; it’s easier to do due diligence when it’s done for you, after all.

This trend is why sites like Yelp!, Glassdoor or TripAdvisor are multinational, multimillion dollar businesses. It’s nice to have a destination for reviews from real people who, you assume, will give you real information. We feel like we’re getting the inside scoop or behind the scenes look as consumers before making purchasing decisions, and almost invariably, feel we’re able to easily sniff out the real deal from the marketing CTAs, or filter the organic reviews from the sponsored content, even if our track record suggests most of us are pretty easy marks as consumers for the rapidly evolving marketing strategies required by such a rapidly evolving market.

Referrals shape how we view the world, whether that’s who to marry, where to eat, or, increasingly, where to work.

It’s All About Who You Know, You Know.

employee referralThat’s why I wasn’t terribly shocked (or even mildly surprised, frankly) to read Glassdoor’s most recent study on interview sources, which only reiterated what recruiters have long known: referrals are by far the most effective source of interviews (and hires) out there – and always have been, even before our social lives moved to social media.

The referral preference phenomenon might be new in the context of our personal lives, but that referrals have spent decades at the top of every source of hire report in the history of ever prove that this is nothing new in our professional lives.

In fact, the efficacy of referrals, if anything, only seems to be amplified by social sharing and review sites – as is their importance to every employer’s talent attraction strategy. Think about it this way: we’re currently taking more of our most valuable (and valued) information from either anonymized internet users or our specious “network” of online connections who are likely unqualified or misinformed about whatever issue or question they’re weighing in on.

But none of us would ever suggest anyone should only trust what the Internet has to say about any given topic, particularly when it comes to hiring someone. This is why reference and background checks exist, after all.

Glassdoor’s data found that only 10% of all in-person interviews originated directly with an employee referral, compared to 42% of hires who applied directly online (although obviously some of these were likely referrals that weren’t formally submitted or correctly tracked as the source of hire, which happens more than any of us would care to admit). Now, I don’t know about you, but in most cases, I’d probably take 10 highly qualified leads who are already at least a little referenced by our network than 42 irrelevant, unqualified or non-vetted ones any day.

As a marketer, I know that conversion rates are far higher for the former than the latter, and turns out, the same is true with recruiting: quality not only beats quantity for interviews, but  but referred leads also tend to close quicker, and at a higher percentage; Glassdoor data suggests that referrals are 6% more likely to get hired than other final candidates slated for in-person interviews from other sources.

Stepping up or refreshing your referral strategies – and increasing the time and resources recruiters currently allocate towards this critical source of hire – just makes sense. But let’s take a step back: do you know where your referrals are coming from? Do you know how they convert? Do you have a separate process for referrals? Do you even care?

Why You Can’t Ignore Employee Referrals.

GD_EmployeeReferrals_JobInterviews_PieChartIf you’re like most employers today, you’re likely spending almost all of your time, budget and bandwidth on all other external sources of hire (eg job boards, search agencies, career sites, social media) which are historically much more expensive and less effective, than you do on generating and nurturing referrals.

As much as we talk about the importance of “brand ambassadors” in employer branding, we never look at the ultimate goal of these initiatives, which is to increase qualified referrals – and turns out, you don’t actually need brand ambassadors to make a significant impact when it comes to driving employee referrals or recruiting ROI.

But you’ll never see a payoff if you’re not even paying attention. Promise.

Here’s the thing about work: unlike, say, leaving a restaurant review or responding to a Quora post, when it comes to career related content, the stakes are higher than that of any other random review site or random repository of sponsored posts than any other vertical.

But career related content still has the same bogus reviews and user bias as any other review or recommendation platform out there. This actually negatively impacts the quality of old fashioned employee referrals, considering that it’s easier than ever to find an employee at a target company and simply ask a random stranger for a referral to a posted position – particularly if there’s an incentive attached as part of a formal referral program, which is most commonly paid out in the form of a cash reward.

These programs widely lack any controls around quality or baseline for preexisting relationships, incentivizing employees for successful referrals while not penalizing them for poor ones – and not all referrals, as recruiters know, are created equal.

That said, it’s easy enough to submit a referral, but making sure to follow up on the nature of the employees’ work relationship with their referrals or even a few sentences to justify why their referrals are a good fit for the position or company can fairly easily filter out examples where a “referral” is really nothing more than an employee forwarding a resume or directing a potential applicant to indicate that they initiated the conversation with a candidate instead of vice-versa.

This might not be a surefire solution for qualifying referrals, but by requiring a positive endorsement or additional information from the submitting employee, this simple step should completely preempt referrals where the worker actually has had a negative experience working with (or simply doesn’t like) the candidate in question.

If someone really had a negative experience with a former coworker, client or colleague, then they can’t be persuaded to put their reputation on the line, which is the end effect of requiring more than a resume submission when submitting an employee referral. No money, reward or whatever perk in the world is going to convince an employee to refer them to a job if there’s not just a reward involved, but a slight bit of risk, too.

Think about it. We all have a person – or a few people, in my case – who we’d never, ever work with again. Whether that’s a shitty boss, a lazy coworker or an asshole intern, whatever the case may be, if they burned you at a previous employer, they’re dead to you as far as working with them again is concerned. People are honest about their black list, and actively seek to block these hires; this is why it’s not a bad idea to double check with future co-workers or teammates before extending an offer.

Remember, references cut both ways – and chances are the employee referring a past coworker or colleague isn’t the only one who’s encountered that candidate professionally. Trust, but verify. Similarly, this same system can help surface the best hires, because multiple employee endorsements about one candidate are rarely wrong (this can also be the best way to get a hiring manager off the fence and onto next steps, too).

By not only referring a specific person to a specific role, but also requiring employees to speak to why their referral is a good fit ensures that not only does the candidate have the right professional skill set, work ethic and interpersonal style, but  the right personality for your company culture, too.

Employees know their teams and your business better than anyone, and, unlike, say, some stupid behavioral interviewing question (“which type of car would you be and why?”), referrals can be the most reliable way to determine culture fit and predict quality of hire. In fact, Glassdoor data shows that employee referrals not only increase the likelihood a candidate will get selected for an interview by 2.6-6.6%, but also increase the chances that candidate will get a job offer by a similar coefficient, which, statistically, is nothing to sneeze at.

6 Keys For Building An Employee Referral Program That Doesn’t Suck.

GD_InterviewSources_LeadtoOffer_Draft2So, how do you drive more qualified referrals and build a more effective, efficient employee referral program? Well, if this study didn’t reinforce the need to ask this golden question about the source of hire silver bullet, then you seriously need to go get your head checked – as recruiting goes, referrals are kind of a no brainer.

If you care big data, or need to pull together the metrics to build a business case for more budget, resources or headcount (or to just justify that you’re doing your job), then you might consider looking at referrals, first – there’s no recruiting strategy on earth that gives you more bang for your buck.

If you’re still spending money on stuff like social, SEO or search firms, but don’t have a robust employee referral strategy in place, then you clearly aren’t ready for “big data,” because you haven’t even looked at the small stuff.

When broken down into any recruiting-related metric you measure – from speed metrics like time-to-fill or qualify metrics like application to interview ratio – referrals outperform all other external sources of hire across the board.

A predictive analytic for you: if you allocate a bigger share of your budget or resources to employee referrals, you’ll see at least a proportional improvement in your recruiting related ROI. And when it comes to aligning your efforts to bigger business objectives, the bottom line is the only baseline that really matters.

With that end goal in mind, here are 6 simple steps for building a better employee referral program:

1. Don’t Be Afraid To Ask (And Ask Again).  On a recent appearance on the Animal radio show, Matt Charney was talking about what constitutes “great” recruiting content. Charney mentioned that the goal of great recruiting content doesn’t have to be to drive just-in-time hires, but instead, to keep your pipeline warm enough to drive referrals and positive word of mouth.

Since he’s both my editor and my boss, I hope that he’s not completely full of shit when he’s talking about recruiting [ed: in fact, he’s only mostly full of shit], but assuming he’s right [ed: big ‘if.’], I can tell you that this is one area where marketing rules seem not to apply. In marketing, we’re a one call to action kind of group – the goal of our discipline is to get as many people as possible to take one pre-defined action.

Unlike consumers, though, the target audience for recruiting content is the same one that will take an hour just to fill out an application, if needed. They’re willing to do what a recruiter asks in the middle of the hiring process, or provide any information required; any truly active leads are really looking for a friendly face or an ass to kiss in the hopes of making the impression they need to get the offer they want, when you get right to it.

That means they’ll actually respond to multiple calls to action; it only makes sense for recruiters to directly ask these candidates for referrals while they’re really motivated to show who they know and what they can do. Even if they’re not a fit, if they’re qualified, interested or available, chances are they can think of at least one person who would be a great fit – all you’ve got to do is ask them. Problem is, too few recruiters do.

Never be afraid to ask for referrals – if a candidate thinks your company is worth considering, they’re not doing you a favor – they’re helping someone they know get their foot in the door of a great employer. That’s a win-win, no matter how you look at it.

2. Referrals Aren’t For Employees Only. To the earlier point, it’s important to know that whether actively sourcing a candidate slate or passively posting and praying, if you’re talking to external candidates, then you’ve got to have a process and program for external referrals, too.

Now, I realize that an external referral is technically an “online” or social network specific source most of the time, but if you’re building a magnetic employer brand, then even the people who don’t work out will work out to spread the love (and your EVP) to their closest friends and most valued colleagues (and whomever else happens to be part of their digital footprint).

Because their connection with your brand is deeper than one job, and they’re already engaged with you online, these external brand advocates can actually be better referral sources than current employees. Why not motivate them in the same way as current employees and figure out some way to reward them when those referrals lead to hires?

Toss them a few bucks, buy them a gift card – even a token shout out on your social recruiting accounts are all the recognition that most of the most engaged members of your talent network really need to keep the great referrals coming (and keep your employer brand top of mind, too).

3. Sharing Is Caring: Hell, if I’ve said it once, I’ll say it again. There’s no shame in asking for a favor, particularly if that favor is asking for help finding awesome people for awesome jobs at an awesome company. Or even a halfway decent one, for that matter – which is why it’s always OK to go straight to the source and straight up ask your employees and external connections to help share a job.

Start with the hiring team and have them tap into their networks, first – they have the most at stake since your new hire is their new teammate, which should be enough motivation where you don’t have to do too much arm twisting to get help getting the word out about an open job. But here’s the critical next step that’s really easy to forget – give them an ideas of what to say and when to say it.

Coach them into marketing the job and you’re more likely to see one of their friends in the lineup. It can be as simple as “tweet this” or “here’s an example from Bonnie in Accounting.”

referral tweet

3. Stop Writing Job Descriptions That Suck. So here’s the thing. No one wants to share something that sucks. You don’t want to show off your kid’s ugliest drawing or failing report card any more than you want to show off your company’s ugly career page and poorly written job description. Give employees something to be proud of – something that not only represents your employer brand, but one that speaks to them and the work that they do, too.

5. Real Employees > Stock Art. People are vain. So vain. They know this paragraph is about them (yes, I had to make the Carly Simon reference.) If your top employees are featured on the page you’re not only showing your culture but giving people a reason to share. They love to show off to their friends that they’re featured on the company website. Plus, it’s a great retention vehicle – no one wants to leave a company when they’re literally the poster child for employee success. Period.

6. Build a Kick Ass Reward Program. Give points for every activity someone can do to refer an employee – social sharing, sending an e-mail, sending a resume, that sort of thing. Run competitions or sweepstakes or something similar (if that sort of thing works for your company). If not, make the reward good enough that people want to earn in and make sure they know it exists in the first place. The biggest reason programs fail is because no one knows the program exists.

These six seemingly small steps should make a big difference in your employee referral program. And feel free to share this post to anyone you know who might be interested.

Bait and Switch. Software Review : Jobularity

Software Review JobularityJobularity was… meh.  That is what I thought when testing this product. I didn’t get it. There were some glaring issues that I just could not get past and in honesty, I stopped reviewing it when I hit major strike 3. I should have stopped when I got a headache after strike one.

From this reviewer’s perspective, Jobularity seems to be part of the movement to white label rebrand and change the order of products that we already use to fool us into thinking that there is a new product available. I was feeling the old bait-and-switch trick. The problem is, if you are copying another company’s software architecture without knowing the foundation behind it, your product will suck. Jobularity is no exception. It had a beta release in 2013 and as far as I could tell, they never went back to fix it.

I started out this software review in my usual testing manner of creating my company profile and job description yadda, yadda, yadda.  All tools can do that.  Here is where the real testing comes in; with the candidate.  I want to know how to get candidates, communication, workflow, job posting etc.  And here is where the sucking starts. With Jobularity, it gives me the ability to post jobs on Twitter.  As you know if you have read my stuff, I love twitter.  When went to send it to my followers, this is what pops up:

Software Review Jobularity
Click to see Strike One

Immediately, my OCD kicks in and I am annoyed. It says, “Schedule posting date.” BUT YOU CANNOT PICK A DATE! Argh. So I select post once, and the incorrectly labeled box disappears.  What happened?  I am not sure.  I immediately go to my Twitter thinking that maybe I tweeted my fake job out.  But no it is not there. (Poof -Gone) This is every internet doomsday prepper’s nightmare.  That stuff just goes to the cloud and stays there.  Out of your hands and into the hands of the Illuminati and Anonymous. That is strike one.

 

Next I look at the candidate workflow functionality.  I go to my candidate  page and see this:

Software Review Jobularity
Click to see Strike Two

That is simple enough.  I do like cute things.  I love the cute little clouds and the city and suburbs on the globe but, when I try to drag and drop a file, it takes me to my browser to upload a resume.

It is now that I am thinking that someone must be playing a joke on me. If it says drag and drop, let me freaking drag and drop.  Is this too much to ask?  I don’t think so! This is strike two.

 

So now, I try one last thing, their extension.  Jobularity offers a Chrome extension.  To me, if the extension is awesome, it could make the software behind it worth the other pain involved in using it. Here is the information on the plugin:

Import account with a single click to Jobularity.

Software Review Jobularity“jobularity google chrome plugin – allows you to send job opportunity invites to possible candidates from Linkedin and import their profiles directly into Jobularity.com service. Also sends a notification to candidate to activate his profile and apply to your job opportunity. This plugin is specially designed to work with Linkedin serviceCertainly, this would work as promised because a bad extension can break a companies reputation right?

Well, my friends, I tried it and it did not work.  I added my LinkedIn information, I followed the instructions and nothing.  As of press time, the thing has been spinning for about 20 minutes.  I am sure whenever you read this, it will still be spinning. I am starting to really HATE when a company has hired a great marketing team for a subpar product.  When the marketing is good, and the website is pretty, you really want it to work and want to like it.

Dear Jobularity and other company’s trying to market a product still in beta.  Rather than spend money on top marketing professionals, please reinvest the money into your product.  Trust me, if the product is good, you won’t have to spend as much on marketing, Capisce? So where is strike three?  Keep reading…

Pricing AKA Strike Three: I could not find any true pricing information; not anywhere. I found this article on ITBusinessEdge.com where Don Tennant asked the question for me:

“Finally, I asked Freeland if he could give me an overview of his revenue model. He said there is none:

Right now, we don’t have a revenue model. We think we can charge based on utilization. A very crude example we’ve kicked around, and I’m not even sure if this is one we might use, but just to give you an idea of what we’re thinking about: We allow the individual to have three videos that they can store. They’re allowed to share with the world one of those videos. Let’s say you’re the kind of person who can’t make a decision on three, and you want five, or 10. If you want 10 videos, I’m going to charge you a buck a month to cover the cost of storing those videos. That might be part of my revenue model. On the employer side, right now the review committee can be up to five people. So if we’re going to review candidates, I as the person who is developing this job campaign can include up to five people in the reviewing of candidates for this specific job. Let’s say the company wants a bunch of feedback, so they want a review committee of 10 people. There’s more information that flows through the system, there’s more storage that’s required, so we would charge for that. We’re thinking of charging for usage, but making the rates so low, we’ll get a lot more adoption than we otherwise would. So we don’t have a model right now, but we have some good ideas on how we can monetize this.”

Sizzle:

  • Great Marketing and U/I Design

Drizzle:

  • Doesn’t work as advertised
  • Chrome Extension Did  Not Work
  • Missing Functionality Regarding Dates
  • Social Recruiting Did not Work

Another article about Jobulartity was written by Don Tennant in 2013 and can be found here: New Job Site Aims to Break Away from the Video Interview Pack If you have used this product and think otherwise, please let me know. I am not to proud to change my mind!  What do you think of Jobularity?

About the Author: Jackye Clayton is a recognized people expert who puts the Human in Human Resources. Jackye Clayton Editor RecruitingTools.comAn international trainer, she has traveled worldwide sharing her unique gifts in sourcing, recruiting and coaching. She offers various dynamic presentations on numerous topics related to leadership development, inclusionary culture development, team building and more.Her in-depth experience in working with top Fortune and Inc 500 clients and their employees has allowed her to create customized programs to coach, train and recruit top talent and inspire others to greatness. Follow Jackye on Twitter @JackyeClayton  and @RecruitingTools or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

https://youtu.be/p5IU9aJ5Nww