Blog

Don’t Call It A Comeback: Marketing Is Actually Recruiting.

ll-cool-jIf there’s one recruiting anthem we’ve all probably heard before, it’s these three, seemingly simple words: “Recruiting is Marketing.”

The two distinct disciplines have long been compared to one another, and probably for good reason — the emergence of both the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) and the Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) have uncanny similarities.

Some are obvious  — corporate brand vs. employer brand, lead nurturing vs. candidate nurturing, company website vs. career site, and on and on. However, there are also some more nuanced parallels like the technology, impact of mobile, and funnel approach.

But the ability to track performance in both lines of business has led to the the elevation of those departments and earned seats at the exec table, a classic, albeit cliche story about the importance of data.

Here’s my thinking on the past, present, and future of the “recruiting is marketing” school of thought, and why we might one day be saying it the other way around.

Hit ‘Em High: A Parallel History.

comeback Let’s think back 25 years ago, when both of these departments were in the early throes of their development. Before the dawn of marketing systems and the emergence of the web, marketing’s impact was nebulous at best. In principle, it wasn’t vastly different from what we do today:

  1. Buy an audience (print advertising, broadcast advertising, tradeshows, etc.),
  2. Build an audience (public relations, analyst relations, referrals, philanthropy, etc.),
  3. Share content with your audience (post mail, telemarketing, etc.).

The problem was that almost no marketing activities were trackable. Things like coupon codes were used, but the results were mediocre at best. The development of tools like CRMs (Salesforce, Siebel, SugarCRM) and Marketing Automation platforms (Marketo, Eloqua, ExactTarget), in combination with the parallel explosion of the world wide web, made it possible to track the buyer journey like never before.

The development of these new ways to track ROI and the performance of marketing programs led to the emergence of the CMO and a seat at the exec table. It was history in the making — now, a quick LinkedIn search reveals over 87,000 CMOs around the world.

HR, and recruiting in particular, followed suit several years later, implementing ways to track recruiting spend for finding candidates (job boards), tracking those candidates through the hiring process (applicant tracking systems or ATS’s), and eventually monitoring their performance once working for the company (performance management).

In groundhog-day fashion, the CHRO emerged out of this “systems renaissance” is almost exactly the same way that the CMO came into being. The CHRO thenjoined the c-suite, elevating the presence and importance of HR and recruiting.

The parallel evolutions don’t stop there though — marketing developed lead scoring, and recruiting technology companies are currently working on this same issue. Jobvite offers integrated CRM capabilities, and there are a number of other players in the space making significant headway in this area of CRM (Candidate Relationship Management) like Avature and Clinch.io.

Loungin’: How Recruiting Is Playing Catch-Up.

llRecently, one of the most exciting developments in marketing technology is around predictive lead scoring. We use Infer here at Jobvite, but there are a number of others like Mintigo and Lattice Engines that offer comparable technology. And true-to-form, this same technology is now in its infancy in talent acquisition.

Logically, now that we have the capabilities to capture and understand our prospects and candidates better, data is driving this next phase of evolution for both marketing and recruiting. How do we score the potential “match” and predict the probability that they’re a good fit for both a company and a specific role?

Companies like Bright (acquired by LinkedIn), Evolv (acquired by CSOD), and Gild are working on solutions for “predictive candidate scoring,” but it feels like we’re just getting started with this technology on the recruiting side.

Predictive lead scoring, prospect matching, and remarketing have become fully viable possibilities in marketing — and as expected, recruiting’s adaptation won’t likely be far behind.

But judging from the way the last few years have gone, what used to be a three-to-five year gap is now getting even closer. I believe this is due to increased focus on recruiting, especially for STEM jobs. And of course, social fits into this paradigm.

As brands took to Twitter and Facebook to gain new customers, recruiters weren’t far behind in using networks to source and screen candidates. Mobile is the final area of innovation to follow this same pattern.

It’s now a dominant force in the recruiting game, and it wasn’t long ago that marketing departments recognized the demand for mobile-specific strategies and tactics. One thing is clear — the distance between the two is growing smaller and smaller by the year.

Phenomenon: Recruiting Is Marketing? Not For Long.

dreams

Today, it’s clear that these two industries are essentially neck-and-neck when it comes to rapid innovation and trendsetting. But I am willing to bet that within the next decade, recruiting may just emerge as the leader of the two. After all, recruiting is the lifeblood of any company.

Marketing is critical, but a business will literally wither and die without good talent. And recruiting has never really been just about marketing — it’s about closing the deal and selling too. Recruiters spend hours of energy building a passive pipeline, and then they have to close the deal; there’s no handoff process here.

Even recruiting strategies and HR policies are pushing the envelope past where marketing has already tread. Look at Netflix’s year-long paid parental leave policy it enacted last year — which it also extended to hourly workers in early 2016, clearly enticing more parents to not only join but stay at their company. (Other companies that have great policies include Etsy, Facebook, and Twitter.)

Or the increasing popularity of the “unlimited PTO” policy at companies like Kickstarter, General Electric, and LinkedIn. Clearly, in both policy and practice, the recruiting industry is taking its progress and growth seriously — and I predict that innovation like this could ultimately push recruiting past marketing in its evolution.

As we’ve seen, data and analytics has enabled every step of this parallel evolution. The emergence of big data and mobile will continue to drive innovation in both recruiting and marketing. Being a VP of marketing at a recruiting company, I have one foot in both disciplines — and I’m excited to these two functions continue to converge.

Editor’s Note: Jobvite is a Recruiting Daily client, however, Recruiting Daily was not compensated for this post. The opinions expressed in this guest post do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, nor do they constitute an endorsement for Jobvite’s products or services.

matt singerAbout the Author: Matt Singer is Jobvite’s fearless marketing leader. He’s officially been in marketing and sales for the past 15 years, but informally for 30+ years starting with cookie, lemonade, and lawn mowing businesses in his neighborhood at the age of 8.

Outside of work, Matt is a proud husband, father, and “manphibian.” He tries to spend as much time as possible in the water abalone diving, fishing, and surfing.

A self-proclaimed data geek, Matt has spent his career channeling that data obsession into building great brands and scalable marketing machines. His career in B2B has focused primarily on the world of HR software, but recruiting is his biggest professional passion.

Follow him on Twitter @matthewdsinger or connect with him on LinkedIn.

Sister Act: The Sorority Girl’s Guide to Corporate Culture.

Whoopi-GoldbergFun fact about Katrina you probably didn’t know: I was the president of my college sorority. Yeah, I know, if you know me today, you’re thinking, “yeah, right,” if for no other reason than my physical appearance.

But let’s just say I’ve grown into my style (and skin) in the intervening years; back then, if we were to meet on the street, bet you anything there’s no way in hell even some of my closest friends would ever recognize me.

Not in a million years.

See, back then, I had long, curly hair that I spent way too much time worrying about. This is hard to admit, but you’d be hard pressed to find me without my letter jacket on.

Don’t judge. I mean, it’s not like I said “what if?” or did that Kardashian whiny voice or wore Bebe or anything that extreme.

I mean, I just wanted to fit in, really. Who doesn’t, right? But the thing is, fitting in didn’t actually fit in with our sorority’s reputation, nor our culture.

Getting Into The Habit.

fatnunWhen I tell people I was in a sorority (much less the Queen Bee), I’ve always gotten a range of responses from a confused “really? You?” to a “why the hell would you ever subject yourself to that shit?”

The perception, of course, is that being part of a “sisterhood” of over forty women was kind of a pain in the ass, for which I, as the ringleader, was ultimately to blame.

People instantly think I was one of those girls who chose backstabbing over books, or spent more time at flirting at frat parties than I did in class. And they’re partially right.

I mean, it was an arduous ordeal most of the time, particularly because my presidential duties involved being the accountable party any time anyone in the whole house messed up. And hey, we were sorority girls. We can’t all be the brightest bulbs in the box, right? But it’s not like we were the ladies of Legally Blonde, either.

What people associate with sororities is thanks in large part to pop culture’s presentation of pedicures, pink and parties when, in fact, maintaining an official campus-recognized sorority was one of the hardest jobs I’ve ever had in my life – and simply being a member wasn’t easy, either.

To stay in the sorority, everyone was required to have a GPA of at least 2.5 or higher, attend weekly mandatory meetings and periodic philanthropy or sisterhood building events, and to top it all off, pay dues for the privilege. This emphasis on dues, which more or less were our sole means of sustaining our sisterhood, meant that we actually operated a lot less like a social organization than a corporation. And at no time was that more true than when Rush Week rolled around.

OK, let me take a step back here. If you didn’t attend a college with an active Greek scene, or did, but avoided it like the plague, let me explain to you how recruiting for a sorority or fraternity works on most campuses. Each house starts by looking at our total membership, who would be leaving (through graduation, transfer or just plain dropping out), and then figuring out how many new members we needed to cover that projected deficit in our precious dues.

At my sorority, we were limited to 50 total members, and were prohibited from having a single member more than our quite limited allotment, putting an emphasis on selectivity over availability. And from there, we’d figure out how to get the best rush class we could by kicking off our recruitment planning process.

These included a series of increasingly elaborate events, intricately coordinated outfits and rituals, both esoteric and mundane, that were coordinated with absolute precision and comprehensive planning.

But there was a catch: unlike fraternities, sororities couldn’t have booze – like, zero, nada, zilch – at any rush related events, meaning we couldn’t just Shanghai our way to sisterhood. We had to be smart about recruiting, and even before Pinterest, learned to be thoughtful and crafty about the strategies we employed in the process.

Rescue Me.

lhEach event on our packed schedule, however, took more than just choosing some theme and a costume – we had to market the hell out of them, too.

There’s no Greek Life program where someone leads everyone interested in a sorority over to your house and introduces you to your prospective pledges.

Nope, we had to find the girls to fill our quota all by our damned selves, and that meant marketing the hell out of ourselves.

We had posters hanging everywhere, custom T-Shirts and fliers and all the stuff that used to be a standard part of sorority rush before Facebook made all of that stuff more or less moot. But let’s face it – joining a sorority, any sorority, is a really big decision, and some poster isn’t going to make or break a potential new pledge from accepting a bid.

There’s no emotional tie-in with events like ice cream socials or brunches or house tours. That doesn’t get people to pledge. You want someone to make a commitment, you’ve to to inspire them to go deeper. Way deeper.

A few of the wiser ones among us realized that to recruit college girls to our events without the inducement of free alcohol, unlike the fraternities also competing for a limited supply of available women. I can’t say I necessarily blame them for choosing a kegger over sun dresses and small talk.

But finding the few, the proud, the ones who’d actually say “yes” and stick to that commitment through commencement? In sororities, as in companies, success really came down to building and executing a referral strategy.

We started by going on a hunt not for just any available and unaffiliated undergraduate woman, but really working our asses off to find the ones who we thought had the potential to be great members and future leaders of our sorority – keepers of our legacy, more or less.

We weren’t just looking for some basic, ratchet, everyday kinda girl – we needed people we could trust implicitly. We were looking for our life long sisters. That sounds corny, but it’s a pretty big consideration during the screening and selection process.

We recruited our members continuously, squeezing every hour out of our allotted week to pitch potential pledges. We’d recruit in our classrooms, our dorm rooms, hell, even those fraternity parties we were ostensibly competing with for women. But there were a whole lot of them there, turns out – and in those cases, we didn’t have to supply the booze (as a bonus).

That said, we were also careful to find girls with that right mix of being able to have fun while also remaining a functional, respectful representative of our house and its members.

sa3Just A Touch of Love, Everyday.

Sorority rush was my first ever recruiting experience, and as you can imagine, it was, uh, interesting (to say the least). But looking back on that time, I’m really grateful I learned early on some of the most critical lessons anyone in the business of hiring needs to know.

Lessons like which candidates aren’t worth the time or effort; the importance of individual personalities but also interpersonal dynamics, and how essential referrals and networks really are. It taught me to trust in the judgement of others, and to listen to my gut when it came to acting for the greater good.

I learned that every decision we made would impact the lives of 40 independent minds, which is why, when it came down to picking new members, we had to do our best to act as one and look out for each other. This experience also taught me the true cost of bad recruiting, a painful reminder for which I was constantly repaid with a barrage of daily complaints and drama that resulted from making the wrong decision.

In my case, it made my life a living hell, occasionally. At least at work, you can go home. Not so when you’re the president of a sorority. Those are some high stakes right there, my friends.

Sorority rush taught me about more than recruiting, of course; it also taught me about the power of building real, authentic connections with people, the importance of being there for others and how true sisterhood meant putting the needs of the group before your own, no matter how hard that sometimes could be. Those are invaluable lessons, and that’s what I think people miss when they talk about “sororities” as if they were the punchline to some dumb blonde joke.

Sororities are just the structure, but it’s the sisterhood, not the organization itself, that really makes this such a special, and meaningful, experience. In a sorority, you get immersive lessons in things like respect, trust, love, honor and pride wrapped up in the tidy bow of an umbrella organization and bundled together in the hardest crash course you can have in college.

Let’s just say, going Greek takes a hell of a lot more out of you – and gives a hell of a lot more back – than joining some intramural sports team or study group.

Ain’t No Mountain High Enough.

sisterWhile I might no longer look like a sorority girl, much less the head of the house, I will still, to this day, proudly recruit on behalf of my chapter and my sorority.

If I have a daughter, they will be granted legacy status, and I’d probably press them to take advantage of their automatic membership – because if they got half as much out of it as I did, it’d all be worth it.

I didn’t make a lot of great decisions in my late teens and early twenties, but joining and rising through the ranks of my sorority were among the best of them. They’re still paying dividends.

With this kind of experience, you don’t need to give me gift cards or incentives to motivate me to actively generate referrals – unlike most company referral programs, I want to do my part.

There’s no need to motivate me any more than the support and sisterhood I was able to get by being a member of my sorority. I do know that it’s not a great fit for everyone, but it’s an experience that everyone who’s serious about leadership and family at this pivotal period of personal progression should have.

That’s powerful. And that right there, that’s what people are really talking about when they talk about creating a culture, specifically, recruiting for culture fit. When I think about what this might entail, I realize the entire construct of culture is inherently a feeling, some sort of subconscious sense of belonging and conscious sense of pride that’s nothing you could ever distill into a mantra, mission or motto.

You can’t draw culture on a whiteboard, nor stick culture on a spreadsheet. It’s a living, breathing and ultimately profound feeling that you can’t quite describe, but you know it’s there when the fit is right. And when it is, it’s pretty awesome. Now, I’m not crazy enough to think that culture is going to create some utopia at the office, an Eden for employees. Work is still work, and it still sucks sometimes.

But if work doesn’t suck most of the time, and occasionally, you actually like it or find personal pride or edification in it, guess what? You’re doing better than almost everyone else out there, 4 out of 5 of whom are disengaged or actively disengaged. Disengagement is where culture goes to die, which is why so many of us feel nothing more for our jobs than the paychecks they provide. It’s a living, but it’s your life, too.

The way we talk about company culture and hiring for fit today makes it sound almost mythical, like some elusive self-help serum that will help drive revenues, productivity and morale.

Culture change is seen as a silver bullet, and in fairness, I think that part of the value we place on company culture comes from the fact that so few companies have any cohesive culture at all. Even fewer have a culture that’s going to make an impact on their business or bottom line. Hope springs eternal, but ping pong tables and cafeteria slides aren’t culture. Don’t fool yourselves – culture isn’t a place or a perk. It’s a feeling.

And it feels like home.

Just A Touch of Love Every Day: 3 Sorority Secrets for Company Culture Creation.

happyday

Now, when I think back to my time in the sorority, I can point out to the things that made it so much more than a social club, but part of the very fabric of our lives, our identities and our interpersonal relationships. It felt kind of like a family – and that is, at the end of the day, what I think companies really need to do to make culture fit work. You build a team that wants to be there, and is always there for each other, even when they’re not on the clock.

This isn’t easy, but neither was running a sorority. But I learned some pretty important lessons about culture along the way, and many of them are as relevant today as they were back in the day.

Even if I no longer have long hair and would kick my own ass if I saw myself in a letter jacket in public. Of course, come to think of it, I’ve really just replaced that with a branded hat and t-shirt. Of course, rush really isn’t all that different from recruiting – particularly when it comes to culture fit.

Here are some sorority secrets for culture creation every hiring pro should know.

1. Relationships Matter Most.

Throughout the ‘new member’ process, sororities and fraternities match each with an older member to help them navigate their way through the pledge process,. In my sorority, as each new member begins their path towards full fledged sisterhood, they are assigned yet another mentor – called a “big sister” – who shares responsibility for their little sister’s growth and guidance throughout their sorority experience.

This, of course, creates the kind of familial bond that makes sorority life so special – and in turn, provides each with an essential support structure and shared accountability for success. A little reciprocity goes a long way in building and maintaining a meaningful relationship. Big sisters and little sisters choose each other based on just a few meetings up front, but the bond that forms is meant to last not just until graduation, but for a lifetime. It’s a big decision for both parties.

Companies should consider setting up a mentorship program where employees are matched with more experienced employees or leaders who can help not only facilitate a smooth and successful onboarding process – making sure every new employee has someone they can go to for insights, information or simply support as they ease into their new roles, modeling and reinforcing company culture in the process. That same mentorship program should also evolve over the employee lifecycle as employees develop, grow and advance throughout the organization. These are the ties that bind – and increase employee morale and retention, too.

One of the interesting parts about the ‘big sister-little sister’ model is that it creates a sort of lineage, one that ties individual identity to the greater history and legacy of the organization by creating a sort of family tree that creates deep roots while continuing to branch out and grow into a much larger network based on these shared connections.

Eventually, new employees will move onto mentorship roles at some point in their tenure, creating a cyclical system of support that’s built to last from hire to retire, as it were. This builds a dynamic company culture built not on function or on ‘fun,’ but on relationships, instead. Which is really what the construct of culture is all about.

2. Conversations Count.

Sure, you’ve got to communicate to your colleagues and coworkers since you’re all officially part of the same team, but I’m telling you right now, when it comes to collaboration, everything from meetings to project planning should happen in an environment where ideas and insights are democratized, not dictated. This means providing forums – whether through periodic meetings or as part of your everyday process – where every employee has the opportunity to speak (in the right context, of course) and help drive decision making by providing their unique voice and perspective to each respective situation.

Instead of running meetings with formal agendas, designated speakers and a regimented hierarchy where the boss drives the discourse, it’s important to provide opportunities for teams to come together, face-to-face, and have meaningful conversations where every employee’s voice is heard. Which is really what every employee really wants in the first place.

hm

3. Fund The Connection.

While a successful mentor relationship doesn’t necessarily require anything but mutual commitment, respect and time, investing in this sort of relationship building by putting a little bit of budget behind your program can help ensure employee engagement and successful outcomes.

A little bit of money can go a long way in building bonds (and informing culture); it might seem silly, but little things like parties, fun activities or peer-driven recognition and reward programs mean that your employees aren’t just bonding over work, but shared interests, affinities and experiences. This is the sort of stuff that makes relationships work at work (and outside the office, too).

4. Roll Out the Red Carpet.

They say recruiting doesn’t stop at onboarding – and they’re right. Sororities know how essential (and impactful) those first few days with new members can be, and what happens during that introductory period can have a profound impact on their entire outlook towards the organization and their overall experience.

When our sorority held our initiation ceremonies, we made sure to roll out the red carpet and make sure our members – new and existing – knew that this event was something special. We told them so, and it became a central part of our shared experience, an integral component of our shared rites and rituals. This wasn’t just something that we had to go through every semester – it was truly an event, where we did everything from giving gifts to new members to throwing parties in their honor – whatever it took to make them feel welcome, at home and a part of our family.

When it comes to building a culture that works, success has nothing to do with inducements like gift cards or spot bonuses or some other half-assed incentives program, gamification tool or any of the other stuff that might temporarily motivate your people, but never actually engages them over the long term.

Culture is created because of lasting relationships, not temporal rewards. The reward comes in the fact that employees not only feel an attachment to your company and a commitment to your culture, but pride in where they work and what they do.

Which is what the construct of culture is really all about, really – as every sorority girl already knows. Like, duh.

Product Review: Hiretual

In a new series on RecruitingTools, each week I’ll be featuring a newly discovered Chrome Extension – breaking down the features and use cases for sourcing and recruiting experts. These short and sweet tool breakdowns will give you a sneak peek into the latest and greatest Chrome extensions I’m using to source right now.

What is Hiretual?

Hiretual is a Chrome Extension that shows you more information on candidates you find in LinkedIn. This tool is great. Especially  if you have found a candidate in Linkedin and want to know more. Hireatual reveals things such as like compensation, likely fit, expertise, and relativeness.

compensation

Hiretual Features:

  • Free Chrome Extension
  • Candidate Ranking
  • Compensation Data (When Available.)

Overall, I recommend you give this one a try soon while it is free.

About the Author

dean_dacosta

Dean Da Costa is a highly experienced and decorated recruiter, sourcer, and manager with deep skills and experience in HR, project management, training & process improvement.

Dean is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting. Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter.

 

Aha Moments: Recruiting with the American Heart Association

RecruitmentRecruiting can be expensive if you are not careful. I am the Director of  Talent Acquisition at American Heart Association (AHA) so trust me, I know. When you recruit in the nonprofit world, your hiring budget is very limited. We do use some great technology but have been lucky enough to find some great free sourcing tools to fill our jobs. Below, I’ve shared both the paid and free recruitment tools that we cannot live without and the American Heart Association.

Worth the Money

Take The Interview

Video Interviewing tool from Take the Interview (TTI) . TTI implementation is easy and quick. We have had over 1700 candidates who have gone through the TTI interview process and it has lowered time to fill by five days. Our hiring managers are ranting about how great this tool is. Most importantly, our recruiters harecruitmentve saved an average of two hours per position by not having to spend an inordinate amount of time with unqualified candidates on the phone.

Glassdoor

We just purchased a software license for Glassdoor. It made great business sense and gives us the ability to expand our profile where we average 17K visits to the page each day. We believe this is another significant avenue to communicate our brand. Stay tuned for a follow-up.

Social Talent

After we completed our Sourcing Ninja Training from Johnny Campbells’ Social Talent, I strongly recommended that companies use it when developing strong sourcers and recruiters. I love that they training videos are short and that the classes are self directed.

The Free Stuff

Email Hunter

Launched in 2015, Email Hunter will find up to 150 emails per month for free. Email Hunter crawls the entire web and index (almost) all publicly available email addresses.

Prophet

Prophet is a free chrome extension that when on a specific social profile and will pull other information such as email addresses and contact data (if posted on a social profile.)

OneTab

I have found that while searching for candidates, I could have 3, 5, 7 or more tabs open at the same time. OneTab helps me cut down on clutter, and distractions, by putting them all into one tab. This is not traditionally used as a recruiting tool, but it helps keep the team on track and saves time.

Boolean

Simple Boolean language allows us to produce Google Search results for free. We find we can capture a lot of potential candidates from Google rather than going into the different resources like LinkedIn Recruiter and GithubGoogle Groups also return great results.

Periscope / Twitter

We use a Periscope / Twitter combo to do a monthly chat where we discuss topics like open AHA positions, information on our hiring processes, how to ace the video interview and more. We started in February 2016 and average 550 hits with 1—15% retention for the full 30 minutes. Most importantly, we’ve already hired four candidates as a result. Next one is June 29th at 11 AM via the American Heart Association Periscope and Twitter pages.

About The Author

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAUlAAAAJDQ0NGM1ZmU3LTQ5MjktNGRiNi04ZjdkLWRlYThiZGU1NmU1NA

Michael Goldberg (a.k.a. SuperRecruiter) has over 25 years of Human Resources and Recruiting experience. His specialty – coming into organizations and rebuilding Talent Acquisition functions from non-producing to superstardom honing in on his team’s skills, the employment brand, social recruiting, process, metrics, and partnerships. Follow him on Twitter or find him on LinkedIn.

You’ve Got To Know When To Hold ‘Em: Spam Is Not A Recruiting Strategy.

TBuXZQSyCcAAqSdche overlap between recruitment and inbound marketing has been widely discussed, and rightfully so; they’re more or less same exact stuff, different purchasing decision.

Both of these trending topics have moved to the mainstreams of the corporate margins, and no matter whether you’re driving applicants into an ATS or marketing qualified leads into a CRM, the rise of both disciplines seem linked together by a shared connection.

This connection is a focal point that, for recruiters, represents a radically different way of thinking about the recruiting process – or “funnel,” as marketers and sourcers both refer to the concept of turning a cold lead into a customer.

The thing is, what we think of as the traditional “recruiting funnel” has, in fact, significantly shifted recently. Today, if recruiters and employers can’t come up with scaleable, sustainable strategies for recruiting and retaining top talent, then they’re pretty much screwed.

Of course, this is easier said than done; the very nature of that infernal “funnel” has moved from a more or less static database into something much more dynamic, thanks in large part to the introduction of new technologies, like automation and federated search. The ease of reaching out means that even as we cast a wider net, recruiters, inevitably, come back empty handed.

kr2

Islands in the Stream.

The waters have been severely overfished by now, with mass email blasts, automated job tweets and crappy careers content making it even harder to get through to candidates than before. Not that cold calling was ever easy.

But somehow, it worked. Then, we made things all complicated in recruiting, so let’s make it simple: the only way any of these efforts or initiatives is ever going to pay off, as any inbound marketer can tell you, is through actually engaging that funnel of yours.

Yeah, I know it’s cliche and buzzwordy and probably overplayed. But engagement is still the only thing that separates success and failure when it comes to recruiting and inbound marketing alike. It’s not just the most important thing, it’s the only thing. Because a passive candidate you don’t engage with isn’t a candidate, nor are they passive.

They actually probably have no idea your company exists, much less that you’re hiring. If you don’t let your purported target audience know you’re there, how in the heck do you ever expect to make hires? Magic? Aside: if you could, that’d be really cool. If there are any magicians out there or anything…

OK. Before we get started with the whole actionable talent attraction tactics and staffing strategies and stuff, I have to ask. Do you even know who it is you’re trying to target? Do you know a single thing about your purported prospects? In other words, if you’re going after “top talent,” do you know what that looks like? Do you even have an ideal candidate?

If you don’t know where the candidates you’re looking for tend to hang out online, what they’re interested in (personally and professionally, in a non-creepy sourcing way), hobbies (extra points for LARPing), what communities they’re a part of or what groups they’re a member of online?

And by this, I’m not talking about a single candidate or a single search. Nah. You’ve got to know the jobs as well as the people you’re hiring – at least in terms of culture fit and business need. No one expects you to do anything but try to sound cool when you butcher some technical buzzwords you heard your hiring manager say during a meeting once.

But you do know a thing or two about your own company, as a rule.

The Gambler: How To Have The Winning Hand in Sourcing and Recruiting.

hqdefault (9)So if you don’t know what it takes to make it as an employee at your company, then you’re already going to fail, because candidates can spot BS a mile away, and they’re going to run from your Potemkin village the moment they realize there’s nothing behind the career site facade but another worthless recruiter who doesn’t even get what they do, much less why they should make a major life change and put so much on the line by switching jobs and making a move in the first place.

If you don’t know what you’re fishing for, then put that rod and bait back in the truck and get up on out of here, because no one has the money, time or energy to waste in trying to fit a square candidate into a round req. If the match isn’t there, a priori, than your expectations or requirements don’t really matter.

As Kenny Rogers once sang, “You’ve got to know when to hold ’em, know when to fold ’em.”

If you are one of the rare recruiters, however, who knows the prey they’re hunting for, where you can find them and what matters to them most is critically important, because it’s only by thinking like a candidate that you can actually even think about developing a successful strategy for attracting the mission critical hires your company needs to succeed, increase trust and build positive word of mouth (and referrals) from both internal and external stakeholders.

In other words, know the candidate, know thyselves or no candidates. Stick that in that funnel of yours.

You and I: A Recruiter’s Guide to Candidate Segmentation.

gottodyThe easiest way to segment your prospects in inbound marketing is by starting at the very beginning, as it is a very good place to start. It’s also imperative if you want to truly understand who it is you’re talking to and who you need to be targeting.

There are an infinite number of ways your company can choose to approach segmentation, but here are the most common ways to slice and dice their freshly converted leads through structured forms online.

“Apply Now” is basically just a call to action that doesn’t seem to work all that well, but chances are you’ll get at least enough of this information to start with building an audience persona:

  1. Demographic: Age matters to marketers and recruiters, only recruiters refer to it as “experience,” and HR and your hiring managers refer to it as a job level (or grade, or rung, or whatever weird convention you may have for their years running the recruiting rat race. But just like ad agencies buy commercials targeting specific age groups, recruiters need to consider this as a primary filter for thinking about just how to make their message meaningful to the candidates and connections they’re trying to reach.
  2. Industry Experience: Let’s face it, recruiters are perpetually on the lookout for niche industry experience, which seems to matter even for roles like accountant or executive assistant. For example, if you’ve got a couple years biotech or pharma experience at one company, you’re more or less set with the rest of them – you’ve got that coveted industry experience everyone wants but very few people actually have. If you’ve had success hiring from certain competitors, or if your req requires industry experience, knowing what’s worked before helps make knowing what’s going to work on the same sort of role a no-brainer. Even for recruiters. I kid, I kid.
  3. Language Skills: For English, press 1. Para espanol, primera dos. And for anyone who speaks Mandarin with native fluency and doesn’t require sponsorship, name your price. If it is gold ye seek, matey, it is gold ye shall get. Or, you know, restricted stock options (that’s dinero falso en Espanol).
  4. Hard Skills: Does your candidate need to know a certain software package or have specific professional certification? Do they have the right experience for the role, and how can recruiters best make sure they’re not falling for a bunch of hot air when it comes to candidates’ credentials – since most potential hires, let’s face it, do stuff most of us who do the hiring really don’t know what that really entails for most of our reqs. We do a good job of being unconsiously biased and consciously bored, which are kind of critical competencies in recruiting.
  5. Online Behavior and Marketing Intelligence: This is some hardcore inbound stuff, but the thing is, tracking online behavior from things like conversion events (when a prospect completes a form, or a candidate an application – this happens rarely), expressions of interest from trackable touchpoints like email opens or display ad click throughs, page views, SEO/SEM and that sort of marketing stuff that’s so imparative for building a sustainable, scaleable funnel (and knowing where to spend your budget, too).

Once you have this information, segmenting your audience by these sorts of sweeping brushstrokes can at least help a little painting the right picture of your audience and what they’re interested in – and once you know that, you’ll actually be able to create compelling calls to action and campaigns that they actually care about (and take the time to engage with, too). If a career site falls in the forest, and no one is around, does it make a sound?

The answer is, unfortunately, yes, there’s probably some cheezy corporate overview on autoplay, an infinite loop of the same diverse professionals talking about how much they love your company and how miserable their lives would be if they weren’t helping make the world safe for capitalism and Secret Santa celebrations.

But if you really want to get the right list of leads, try looking at how you segment your database and the sorts of searchable fields that exist within your system. By looking at your database not as a system of record, but as a great repository of market research with really specific information on the kinds of people who are applying for your jobs, where they came from and, with many dynamic profiling systems, what they’re doing now.

Don’t Fall in Love With A Dreamer.

kennyThis is all critical information not only for building targeted lead lists, but also, knowing who not to send certain content to.

For example, you would not want to blast a funnel of recent silver medalists a few days after that “thanks but no thanks” call with some automated e-mail about how awesome working at your company is and how kick butt your culture is.

This makes you look, well, kind of evil to recently rejected candidates, but that’s exactly the collateral you’d want to target to those who just entered the process or who had started an application they hadn’t yet submitted.

E-mailing your database without careful segmentation and persona specific messaging isn’t inbound marketing.

It’s not recruitment marketing. It’s spam, and no one likes a spammer – particularly not those needle in a haystack candidates you need to really make sure every interaction counts as much as possible since their skillset is so rare there are only a finite number of qualified workers in the world to burn through, much less with lazy e-mail sends.

Other easy fixes to make the intersection of inbound and recruitment marketing work better at work: make sure the email is in the correct language, you refer to them by the correct name and double check to make sure the system didn’t screw up any fields (like inverting a job title and company name, keeping it short and making sure before every send you think: “is this something these candidates care about?”

Because as a recruiter, your company reputation and professional relationship with most candidates are often only as strong as the most recent interaction you’ve had with them. And if they don’t care enough to engage with something that you don’t really give a crap about in the first place (e.g. how sweet a deal the optional vision insurance is), then why the hell are you doing it in the first place?

Remember this is still all about relationships – and inbound marketing, like recruitment marketing, is still about people, no matter what the technology is capable of. And if you’re not someone that top talent wants to work with, well, it’s going to cost your company.

If you work in a niche or highly skilled kind of function or in a highly regulated industry or other places where talent pools and networks are tied up quite tightly, as an example, you don’t want to go down as “that guy who accidentally sent the hourly applicants the executive benefits package information and stock schedule.”

It’s about kicking butt and generating names, but if you can’t turn those names into actual leads and ultimately hires, then you’re probably in the wrong line of business – no matter whether that happens to be inbound marketing or recruitment marketing.

Same difference.

corsoAbout the Author: Adriano Corso is currently the Founder and Head of Solutions with Talent Brandly where he works to develop innovative talent attraction strategies leveraging inbound marketing.

Previously Talent Community Manager and Recruitment Marketing Consultant with IBM Talent Acquisition & Optimization, where he was working to solution digital and online recruitment marketing activities for the IBM’s RPO division, across the APAC, North America and European regions.

Prior to joining Davis Nolan and IBM, Adriano has amassed diverse experience in digital marketing, sourcing, lead generation, marketing automation, social recruiting, employer branding strategies and email marketing in a variety of talent related leadership roles, both as an internal employee as well as an external consultant. A native of Italy and a graduate of the Università di Catania, Adriano currently lives in Krakow, Poland.

Follow Adriano on Twitter @AdriaCorso or connect with him on LinkedIn and check out

“Talent Brandly” with https://www.talentbrandly.com/

What The Microsoft Acquisition of LinkedIn Means for Recruiting.

clippy-with-textWhile I’m generally pretty good at reading the M&A market in the HR Technology space, I admit that the announcement that venerable tech titan Microsoft was acquiring LinkedIn took me, like many in the industry, by complete surprise.

It is not an obvious fit, by any means, other than the fact that both are basically kind of the Miss Havisham (or maybe Norma Desmond) of the tech world, fading category killers whose happily ever after has been perpetually mothballed in the court of public perception.

This acquisition is sort of reminiscent of when Dell bought EMC; for forward thinkers and cutting edge companies, this announcement likely is the equivalent of two dinosaurs battling as both sink into the tarpit of technology.

Of course, the merged entity is now being bought by VMWare, which might make it the Amazon in the future of this marriage of convenience. But it’s one Hail Mary for both companies that actually makes a ton of sense.

Keeping It PC.

giphyIt’s a combination of two incredibly unsexy brands who have seen better days, and whose combination seems certainly predicated less on the resulting alliance than the primary competition both companies face, which, obviously, comes from the company headquartered across the street from the LinkedIn Death Star in Mountain View.

That said, it appears as if Google in fact was in talks with LinkedIn last year before a deal sheet fell apart, according to a well placed source who requested to speak with Recruiting Daily off the record. As their stock precipitously declined over the past few months and LinkedIn unsuccessfully tried adding new revenue streams and sources to offset their shrinking Recruiter customer base, it seemed to many observers that they were treading water, trying to preempt the inevitability of going completely underwater.

But now Microsoft has thrown them a lifeline, or, more accurately, shown up for their newest rescue operation in a yacht (that might soon beat even Oracle’s).

$26.2 billion – in cash, nonetheless, for which Microsoft is actually taking on debt to pay down (their reserves are apparently pretty robust, but unlike Apple, not the strongest part of their balance sheet). This seems like a questionable call for to acquire a company with plateauing active monthly users, a rapidly shrinking market share for their talent solutions business and enough outstanding legal liabilities and court actions to have a huge potential impact on future revenue streams as well as business practices.

The obvious winners here are Reid Hoffman, Jeff Weiner and other major LinkedIn shareholders, who have been quietly dumping LinkedIn stock before the chance to convert increasingly worthless equity into hard currency miraculously presented itself, preempting the company from becoming the next Theranos, which looked exceedingly likely until the news was announced. Not so obvious, of course, are the fact that this acquisition is not only a win for recruiters, but if they can maximize the impact of this acquisition on their core product suite, it has the potential to be an absolute coup for Microsoft.

Control, Alt, Delete: Why The MSFT-LinkedIn Deal Could Restart Recruiting.

Assuming Microsoft can do a better job than they’ve historically done with post acquisition integrations, in which their constantly expanding portfolio of hugely valuable properties seem to operate as stand alone entities with little tie-in with the other parts of Microsoft’s business, then I’d expect them to evolve into offering a integrated talent management system, something they’ve hinted at with the announcement.

Given their already significant enterprise software footprint, extant product portfolio and, apparently, deep pockets, I think this acquisition marks the opening salvo for Microsoft’s move to compete with the Oracles, Workdays and SAPs of the world, and take a bite out of the multi-billion dollar HR Technology market, where they’ve largely (and inexplicably) not played previously.

This is all speculative, but here is how Microsoft could pretty quickly emerge as the dominant player in HR Technology, and recoup their seemingly oversize investment in LinkedIn many times over – of course, this is largely theoretical, and will take some time, but this has the potential to significantly alter the recruiting and talent management landscapes in a way that will improve not only the recruiter and candidate experiences, respectively, but also how companies look at talent, make hires and guarantee a maximum return on investment for their “greatest asset.”

1. Bing Becomes The New Sourcing Silver Bullet.

I know, no one even talks about Bing in most sourcing settings, but this acquisition makes sense given the fact that with LinkedIn’s questionable native search product and prohibitive competition on Google caused by the Glassdoor vs. Indeed spending spree, this would not only give LinkedIn a much needed propriatary search feature (a major pain in the ass, as is), but also, enable Bing to reposition itself as a “people search engine,” similar to most profile aggregators.

This would create a distinction between them and Google that’s badly needed given the dominance of their rivals and fact Bing is so lightly used they actually offer consumers incentives for using it as a search engine through Bing rewards; it would also give the thousands of point solutions and core ATS/HCM systems integrated with LinkedIn or built on its API a federated search tool that would potentially act as a single search across not only the ecosystem of HR Tech tools in the average company’s stack, but also, other Microsoft products as well. Think if you could do a single search for LinkedIn profiles and also return candidates from your ATS, Sharepoint or Yammer network and any Excel spreadsheet running through MS Office Exchange and have those seamlessly stack ranked. I’d buy that in a heartbeat.

giphy2

I imagine that LinkedIn will become the exclusive provider of job content for Bing and its ad network, which is a huge business (it’s the reason Monster bought HotJobs! and Indeed bought Simply Hired). LinkedIn has been trying to break into the marketing solutions and display ad business for some time, but this fast tracks those efforts by providing the ability for clients to do things like behavioral targeting, beaconing and buying inventory across multiple mediums, enhancing the potential value of buying a LinkedIn job slot and certainly guaranteeing increased visibility for job postings and better ROI and insights into ad spend efficacy.

In turn, I imagine Bing will likely change its algorithm to be the go-to search engine for sourcing due to its repositioning as a profile, not keyword, based site – they already beat Google in the obscure world that is indexing press releases and patents, meaning they can compete when it comes to very niche, highly targeted search functionality.

This is a pretty smart – and pretty lucrative – place to start that won’t take a ton of effort to quickly elevate market share. Also, the content that LinkedIn publisher is generating can become exclusively indexed within Bing, as can the scraped search results pulled from profiles using Google’s current algorithms.

You want to source someone, with hundreds of millions of profiles (of varied accuracy), you’re probably going to have to start building those Boolean strings in Bing, not Google.

Microsoft more or less shuttered its failed Nokia line of business last month, signaling that it was giving up in the mobile market, so adding LinkedIn’s obvious capabilities in app development and responsive design, not to mention its one click apply capabilities and decent UI/UX on mobile instances, signals that this acquisition is likely a critical component of Microsoft’s long term plans in this critical area where they’ve fallen so badly behind the rest of the market.

LinkedIn won’t save them from getting dominated in mobile, but it will help staunch the bleeding long enough to develop a differentiated strategy for this market while also getting Microsoft squarely into the “social networking” space, which even Google has not been successful at penetrating (remember Wave? Yeah, no one does).

LinkedIn isn’t a social network, but it does have the data Microsoft needs to develop better search traffic, more highly targeted ads and better analytics and reporting capabilities for online user activity (for candidates and consumers) to justify its continued positioning as one.

2. Dynamics Becomes The Applicant Tracking and CRM System To Beat.

msftOf course, this was alluded to in the official announcement of the acquisition, and seems to be the most obvious next step for these two companies.

LinkedIn has seen InMail response rates tank, it allows for an integrated application feature but does not have a standalone applicant tracking system, and its CRM capabilities, particularly around lead nurturing and segmentation, are virtually non-existent.

Similarly, Microsoft has many of these ATS and CRM capabilities built into Dynamics (which isn’t terrible, by the way) but without an HR module or suite to offer customers, means that they are lagging behind the Oracles and SAPs of the world when it comes to the ability to offer a fully integrated, true Tier One ERP solution.

If they can tie in accounting, finance, marketing and other core functions with their core HCM system. Microsoft can start offering this almost immediately while doing minimal work on developing this tool. They already have the products to pull it off, in theory.

The fact that most companies are already using Microsoft Office products, mostly cloud based, from Excel to Word to Explorer, as part of their standard employee tool set (not to mention most companies’ insistence on remaining Windows shops. This means that unlike most point solutions or stand alone vendors, Microsoft already has gone through whatever procurement process and data privacy/network security audits are part of the purchasing process.

This would indicate they’re already approved vendors who could literally just flip the switch off for all other ATS systems using the “Apply with LinkedIn” functionality and API capabilities for other recruiting related CRM or profile aggregation plays instantaneously, cornering the market overnight while royally screwing the many small guys competing in this cutthroat and competitive category.

3. Windows on the World: Microsoft and Market Disruption.

I am most excited about this because while LinkedIn has fairly rich data on individual employees at companies as well as a host of analytics related to things like where the most alumni at a company are coming from, or shared internal connections, or past hiring data, this is, as of now, more or less limited to information that the users choose to share on LinkedIn – data that, you’d better believe, is now being used for market research and consumer advertising. It also has pretty decent (comparatively) benchmarking and business intelligence functionalities in its Recruiter product in terms of external candidate flow and baseline performance.

By integrating this external data with internal systems like SharePoint and Yammer, Microsoft can not only create end to end visibility into both internal and external talent markets in a single standardized instance, but boost referrals by adding visibility into open jobs (which will ostensibly help push up internal mobility, too), capture the conversations and information that matter to top talent.

This can include enhanced recruitment marketing and branding insights, offering immediate “voice of the customer” insight, uncover the best employee advocates and brand ambassadors and better connect HR with the rest of the organization by tying LinkedIn to current intranet and employee collaboration tools and enabling much deeper succession and workforce planning capabilities than were possible with these two stand alone solutions. This should make it easy to see supply, demand, pipeline and market conditions with a single sign on application. LinkedIn’s acquisition of Lynda, similarly, gives companies access to a huge repository of on-demand training modules that could be applied to things like L&D and performance management.

ballmer

Given the fact that LinkedIn has enough social network stickiness to feel a bit less, well, like a Microsoft product and more like a true consumer grade social network, this should push up end user adoption of intranet solutions, encourage more sharing of content and cross-functional collaboration, not to mention making it easier for hiring managers and other internal stakeholders to take a much more active role in the recruiting and retention process.

I also imagine (gag) that given the fact Explorer and MS Office still dominate the enterprise market (the illusion is that they’re safer than the alternatives, which is ironic considering how easily LinkedIn’s data is breached), this opens up the avenue for some really needed functionality like sourcing or profile aggregation extensions that work on IE, similar to the many (like Connectifier) that were exclusively on Chrome, helping extend Internet Explorer’s inherent recruiting value by overcoming its largest capability gap in this vertical.

If they bring back Xobni or a similar tool within the MS Outlook/Exchange environment, this alone would be worth it for recruiters, and also allow for a range of capabilities (like candidate records or communication history embedded directly in an inbox) that PC users so desperately need, and data can much more easily be exported or manipulated through a direct integration with Excel and Access, automating pain in the ass processes that remain a mainstay of the way we deal with data in recruiting and HR.

Add in the fact that Skype could easily become the go-to tool for VOIP in recruiting and enable both messaging and candidate outreach directly into a company’s existing tech stack and workflow, the ability to amalgamate Slideshare with enterprise Powerpoint instances, the ability to parse and share documents through a secure cloud instance (Azure for the infrastructure, OneDrive for the end users) and Microsoft has all the critical pieces it needs to more or less disrupt the HR Technology market and emerge as its biggest player – if they play their cards right, that is.

Of course, if not, enough people will still be playing Minecraft and XBox One to render the opportunity cost of the LinkedIn acquisition more or less moot.

Your move, Amazon.

 

 

RecruitingLive With Dean Da Costa

In the words of Eminem: Guess who’s back, back again.

After a brief hiatus to the west coast to watch the future of the workforce graduate from college (warning: it’s scary), I’m back with a guest we all know and love for his digital tool expertise – Dean Da Costa. If there were a Lowes for sourcing and recruiting tools, Dean would be the CEO.

Tools and tech are a constant question in our industry as we increasingly realize that we can’t solely rely on LinkedIn any more. All of the fish just aren’t in that pond and we can’t be either. In that migration away from the machine, I’ve seen more and more recruiters and sourcers posting in recruiting groups on Facebook with questions about this sourcing tool or that and challenges they’re experiencing.

While most of us find a handful of favorite tools and stick with what we know, Dean is constantly testing and trying out new options for sourcing hidden talent. He’s optimizing and organizing, making him everyone’s go-to resource for what’s next in sourcing technology.

This episode of RecruitingLive will be a lot less conversation and a lot more screen share, while we answer your sourcing technology questions live.

Warning: If you’ve ever seen Dean talk tools before, you know he moves quickly. In fact, fast paced is probably an understatement for this maestro. Plan on watching and asking questions during the live event on Friday, then taking notes while you watch the recording.

From Chrome tools to downloads, we’ll go over… well, whatever you want. That’s what RecruitingLive is all about. In case you haven’t attended an event before, you’re missing out. We’re taking the time to answer your questions and coach each other on the things we’ve learned.

See you there?

Microsoft to buy LinkedIn in a cool $26.2 billion cash deal

scuttlebutt-microsoft-was-close-to-buying-linkedin-for-2-billion-prior-to-linkedins-ipoIt is official. On June 13, 2016 Microsoft and LinkedIn announced their definitive agreement under which Microsoft will acquire LinkedIn for $196 per share in an all-cash transaction valued at $26.2 billion, inclusive of LinkedIn’s net cash. The deal is expected to close by the end of the year. Reid Hoffman, chairman of the board, co-founder and controlling shareholder of LinkedIn, and Jeff Weiner CEO of LinkedIn both fully support this transaction.

LinkedIn will still be the LinkedIn we know and love. At least for now. Jeff Weiner will remain CEO of LinkedIn, but will report to Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft. And LinkedIn is going to keep the branding and culture we are so familiar with.

Microsoft to Acquire LinkedIn

 

As we have felt, especially in the recruiting space, LinkedIn has been buying some of our favorite apps starting with Rapportive, moving on to SlideShare, Connectifier and more. While to us it felt like they were trying to take over the world, Microsoft saw how this was making LinkedIn more valuable in the professional network space. These purchases along with the updated Recruiter product resulted in increased membership, engagement, and financial results, specifically:

  • 19 percent growth year over year (YOY) to more than 433 million members worldwide
  • 9 percent growth YOY to more than 105 million unique visiting members per month
  • 49 percent growth YOY to 60 percent mobile usage
  • 34 percent growth YOY to more than 45 billion quarterly member page views
  • 101 percent growth YOY to more than 7 million active job listings

microsoft-ceo“The LinkedIn team has grown a fantastic business centered on connecting the world’s professionals,” Nadella said. “Together we can accelerate the growth of LinkedIn, as well as Microsoft Office 365 and Dynamics as we seek to empower every person and organization on the planet.” “Today is a re-founding moment for LinkedIn. I see incredible opportunity for our members and customers and look forward to supporting this new and combined business,” said Hoffman. “I fully support this transaction and the Board’s decision to pursue it, and will vote my shares in accordance with their recommendation on it.”

Microsoft and LinkedIn will host a joint conference call with investors on June 13, 2016, at 8:45 a.m. Pacific Time/11:45 a.m. Eastern Time to discuss this transaction. The call will be available via webcast at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor and will be hosted by Nadella and Weiner, as well as Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood and Microsoft President and Chief Legal Officer Brad Smith. The presentation for the call is available on the Microsoft News Center.

Find out more about this acquisition by clicking here and watching the video below.

https://youtu.be/-89PWn0QaaY

About LinkedIn

LinkedIn connects the world’s professionals to make them more productive and successful and transforms the way companies hire, market, and sell. Our vision is to create economic opportunity for every member of the global workforce through the ongoing development of the world’s first Economic Graph. LinkedIn has more than 400 million members and has offices around the globe.

About Microsoft

Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT” @microsoft) is the leading platform and productivity company for the mobile-first, cloud-first world, and its mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more.

 

Poetic Justice: Why Machine Learning Matters in Recruiting and Hiring.

jjhilltopThe first time I used Waze was a revelation. This was not because of the network effects it generates, but more importantly, because of how transparently the application’s user interface (UI) exposes them.

This means every time I open the Waze app, I’m implicitly participating in the system. In doing so, I help improve every other user’s driving experience, and as an added bonus, all the other Waze users participating around me improves mine, too.

This example shows that when you’re an active participant in the learning loop, everyone benefits – in this case, because everyone reaches their destination faster than we could by ourselves.

Two important things have changed in the last few years to accelerate both network effects and the feedback loops that they support. The first was the commoditization of what’s commonly referred to as “machine learning” technology.

The second major factor was the increased transparency around the intrinsic relationship inherent between using a piece of software and contributing to it through your behaviors, much like the Waze example we’ve already discussed. ‘

Together, these two trends will not only coexist but become increasingly intertwined as they power the next generation of technology: learning loops.

Dream Street.

dreamstreetI know what you’re thinking: “what the heck is a learning loop, exactly?” This is of course an excellent question, and fortunately one with a relatively simple answer. You see, learning loops combine machine learning with large scale data sets provided through social networks and human behavior.

What you, the end user, provides in terms of social data has nothing to do with your status, your photos, or the books on your reading list. Instead, you’re providing a direct feed of your behavior in real time, all the time.

The idea is that in learning loops, everyone in a given network will collectively benefit from the programmatic experience and analytic insights generated by everyone else in the network.

Just like Waze is designed to get me to my destination faster in exchange for me allowing it to track my location in order to do so, learning loops in general are designed to generate better results for everyone than what any individual could ever get on their own.

This makes learning loops faster than previous technologies – a whole lot faster, in fact. Within the new wave of apps built around this core concept of learning loops, the lag time is not just zero – in most instances, there is in fact no lag time; they’re predicting what’s next, not responding to what’s now.

And if you think about it, that’s pretty profound: learning loops can not only react to behavior, but anticipate it, too.

Rhythm Nation.

giphy101A quick look at the consumer software landscape reveals the increasing ubiquity of learning loops, which have more or less taken over the category – Waze, Yelp, Tinder, Netflix, Amazon, Facebook, you name it, if it’s tech, its business model was likely built on the basis of leveraging machine learning based on user generated information to provide better experiences for those users.

Whether you’re figuring out what book to read, what music to listen to, who to date or which restaurant to eat at, someone has conveniently created some form of learning loop to support you.

The experience you’ll get as an end user is completely unique, and yet, it’s been built upon millions of data points collected and captured from previous users who are more or less just like you. Which is pretty cool, right?

The only thing is, you’ve got to live up to your side of the bargain: to use the product and contribute your individual data to the greater good of the network and the learning loop this information creates, in aggregate, at least. In fact, ask any VC firm how many consumer tech products they’ve funded in the past year that don’t have some sort of learning loop, you’ll see how pervasive this phenomenon has truly become for the consumer market.

When it comes to enterprise software, however, things are just getting going when it comes to machine learning.

As this concept steadily takes root, as is already the case at many forward-thinking enterprises and companies on the cutting edge of what’s new and what’s next, this new category of software presents the promise of not only transforming an organization’s ability to compete (and win) when it comes to their business and bottom line, but to do so seemingly overnight.janet-stop-lyin-gif

All For You.

One business segment where learning loops have historically been highly operationalized is in security and fraud detection, where they’ve become a pervasive and powerful tool in companies’ abilities to control and protect propriatary networks and data.

Consider the case of Area 1 Security, an innovative cybersecurity startup in which network participants send a constant stream of sensor data back to the core platform, which, in turn, uses this information to enhance its capabilities and more effectively deter security risks for everyone in the network.

Anyone who participates directly benefits from the experience of everyone leveraging that learning loop (and the more participants, the more data generated, and the better the app works. It’s a pretty simple, pretty cool phenomenon, and one that’s becoming a huge part of our everyday lives and interactions.

While this seems like a no brainer, remember that only a few years ago, for any company to share any sort of data about what happens within their firewall to anyone outside it was a seriously big deal, and a relatively rare phenomenon. This was seen as information that needed to be protected, propriatary information that had the potential (it was thought) to put both the bigger business and its employees at risk.

A few enterprises, however, had the foresight to recognize that a closed network, particularly when it comes to data privacy and information security, provides far less security detection and protection capabilities individually than can be achieved by benevolently (and, selfishly, given the increased efficacy) being a part of a network, like Area 1, which is powered on the premise of learning loops and the economics of the economy of scale.

In a totally different domain, we see analogous effects in the application of learning loops to recruiting and hiring. For example, in almost every multi-tenant, talent related SaaS instance, companies are contributing their unique hiring data to their recruiting systems or talent solutions providers, who are in turn starting to use this data to look at anonymized information such as job posting and recruitment marketing performance, applicant stats and recruiting baselines like time-to-fill and cost per hire.

In turn, these talent-specific learning loops provide companies with a predictive engine that looks at massive amounts of historical data collected from the broader network and gives them concrete guidance that’s proven to be successful in filling roles with increasingly diverse and better qualified candidates than competitors who don’t use similarly structured software solutions (and by a pretty significant amount, too).

As in the cybersecurity example, the capability gap between those participating in learning loops and those using their own data to act independently is only widening every month as these networks’ data sets continue to grow at a rate far faster than any individual company or enterprise could ever conceive of generating by themselves.

Together Again.

latelyIn both cybersecurity and recruiting, companies in the learning loop realize concrete advantages that have a tangible impact on their competitive standing, often almost immediately after initial adoption.

We’re talking days, in many cases. The days of waiting three years for a version update are long gone; learning loops are exponentially faster, and getting faster and more efficient as each network gets larger. This means as learning loops get exponentially more effective, the impact of not participating in these networks continues to get exponentially more painful for those outside of it.

If you take a step back and look beyond security or recruiting, you’ll quickly realize that pretty much every other part of your business is likely ripe for upending by learning loops.

Finance, for example, can now leverage software that considers your previous spending patterns in the context of your coworkers and competitors and tells you how to budget. A CRM can tell you when the optimal time to pitch a lead might be based on when in the fiscal companies with similar profiles generally purchase products or services like yours.

These opportunities are one opportunity cost no company can afford to pass up, period. So, here’s a brief lesson plan on how to make learning loops loop in with your policies, processes and people, and how this emerging category is one platform every business will need to stand on if they want to survive (and thrive) in the ever changing world of work.

Poetic Justice.

assNow, I’d like to point out that learning loops already integrated into our consumer software today goes way beyond discovering some cool band or figuring out what movie you’re in the mood to watch or which online match is going to be the most compatible in a long term relationship.

No, that’s just the beginning – and as big as the impact of learning loops has been on consumers, the social implications of this revolution as it takes hold of enterprise software are equally (if not even more) profound.

You see, if you’re in the learning loop – any learning loop – you’re going to hire, sell, market or build better, more beautiful and more profitable things than anyone else outside the loop ever can.

That means that everyone inside the learning loop wins, because they all benefit from the collective experience generated from an entire community, whereas anyone outside the loop is going to lose, because they’re using data that’s just too limited to effectively compete with the network effect affected by these networks.

If you’re building or developing your own learning loop, know that formerly prohibitive obstacles like machine learning technology and artificial intelligence are no longer barriers to success; similarly, they’re also no longer competitive differentiators, either. Machine learning has become increasingly commoditized as bigger technology companies are trying to enter and compete in a category that, while it’s the future, very few seem to have any capabilities around at the present.

This has turned the whole conversation and concept, sadly, into something of an amorphous buzzword or tired cliche, which is too bad, considering it’s one of the most exciting technological developments we’ve seen since the invention of the internet – and every bit as disruptive.

With machine learning, business as usual is anything but – and so too is the concept of success.

giphy (100)

Any Time, Any Place.

With this new revolution in technology, winning means applying learning loops and similar machine learning models to new and novel combinations of social data, which can only be generated if users within a network’s  learning loop are provided with an experience – and results – which clearly and unambiguously outperform their expectations by far surpassing any outcome they could conceivably generate on their own.

It’s a basic precept of human behavior that we work better together than individually, and across domains as diverse as sociology or software engineering, our collective experience consistently solves problems better than a single brain working in the absence of experience or the vacuum of isolation.

I know when I’m trying to get home during rush hour, or how my job ads sound to my target candidates, for example, learning loops provide infinitely more insight that takes me vastly further than I could ever get on my own, and that data is predictive, not prescriptive, something consumer products have already largely embraced.

For enterprise recruiting and HR technology, the writing’s already on the wall – and if you choose to keep your business outside the learning loop, there’s a good chance you’re going to be going out of business. No one can stay viable by staying disconnected anymore.

In the world of work today – and tomorrow – winning at business is no longer about individual competition, but interpersonal collaboration. If there’s one lesson no business can ignore, it’s that learning loops are the future of enterprise technology, and, my friends, the future is right now.

And you’ve got to admit, it’s pretty cool.

Read more at the Textio Word Nerd Blog.

KieranSnyder-MediumAbout the Author: Kieran Snyder is the co-founder and CEO of Textio, a recruiting technology startup based in Seattle. Kieran holds a PhD in linguistics and has held product and design leadership roles at Microsoft and Amazon. She has authored several studies on language, technology, and document bias.

Kieran earned her doctorate in linguistics and cognitive science from the University of Pennsylvania and has published original research on gender bias in performance reviews and conversational interruptions in the workplace over the last year.

She participates actively in Seattle-based STEM education initiatives and women in technology advocacy groups.

Follow Kieran on Twitter @KieranSnyder or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

Boolean Power Search No. 6: Searching for Years of Experience

When you use Boolean search, you can get hundreds of thousands if not million of results.  To narrow your search down, try looking to target the years of experience someone has. By searching based on years of experience, you are able to:

  • Target the proper level of candidate
  • Prevent salary inequities by ensuring proper salary and experience level
  • Search a prospects experiences in their own words “I have been..”

Here are the Boolean Operators required for this search.

site:

Allows you to get results from a particular site or domain.

  • Example: site:recruitingtools.com will allow you to search RecruitingTools.com from Google.

*:

The asterisk acts as a multiple character wildcard.

  • Example: “Software *”

” “:

When you add quotes around a word or phrase, it will give you results that only include the exact word or phrase in the same order as what you put in the quotes.

  • Example: “Recruiting Tools” or “Jackye”

OR:

With OR  you are able to get broader results by adding all of the potential results that are acceptable. This is especially helpful if you add synonyms.

  • Example: Dog OR Puppy

():

Parenthesis allows you to group multiple keywords using the same operator.

  • Example: NOT (Pizza OR Pasta)

-/NOT:

Will narrow your search by allowing it to eliminate search terms following the keyword. This is helpful if you are seeking very particular results.

Will narrow your search by allowing it to eliminate search terms following the keyword. This is helpful if you are seeking very particular results.

  • Example: Not Cat

 

Watch the video to create your own Boolean search by years of experience or click here to download slides.

Product Review: ZipWhip

In a new series on RecruitingTools, each week I’ll be featuring a newly discovered Chrome Extension – breaking down the features and use cases for sourcing and recruiting experts. These short and sweet tool breakdowns will give you a sneak peek into the latest and greatest Chrome extensions I’m using to source right now.

ZipWhip

What is ZipWhip?

Text messaging is a go-to resource for many recruiters, this allows you to do it without giving out your personal number. Zipwhip allows you to send and receive text messages through your desktop or landline number. You can even track whether or not your text messages are getting through with its reporting feature.

Recruiters love this tool because  you can easily communicate with candidates.  You can even schedule text reminders in advance to a candidate who has an interview scheduled.

ZipWhip Features

It works on your desktop.
It allows you to use your landline number.
Billing is month to month so no long term commitment.

Click Here to Try ZipWhip for yourself.

 

About the Author

dean_dacosta

Dean Da Costa is a highly experienced and decorated recruiter, sourcer, and manager with deep skills and experience in HR, project management, training & process improvement.

Dean is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting. Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter.

 

The Next Tinder for Jobs?: Monster Acquires Jobr

JobrWe have not heard from Monster in a while. I have a feeling that is about to change. On June 8, 2016, Monster announced that is has purchased Jobr. Jobr, once called the “Tinder for Job” app was released in 2014 but quickly launched to #2 business app on itunes.

“In just a few short years, Jobr has built a simple and consumer-friendly, mobile-first approach to connecting jobs and people. Bringing the Jobr app and team to Monster will enhance our leading global talent platform for job search, people search and related solutions across mobile channels,” said Mark Stoever, President And Chief Operating Officer, Monster.  “Our company’s promise is to bring humanity and opportunity to the job market. Adding the impressive Jobr team to the Monster family is another incremental step in delivering on this promise and bringing new opportunities to connect jobs and people to market.”

HT_jobr_app_phone_grab_tk_140505_4x3_992The Jobr app uses a ‘Tinder-like’ model, allowing job seekers to quickly connect with or dismiss job opportunities by swiping right or left on job postings and then apply to those jobs.  Jobr also provides tools for recruiters to manage and interact with applicants. Jobs posted on Monster are already featured on the Jobr app but now will be integrated with the monster global talent platform. This acquisition will also allow Monster to have more of a Global presence.

 

 

Going Old School: Jose Watson’s Top 3 Recruiting Tools

Top 3 recruiting ToolsWhen I started my recruiting career, I was bombarded with recommendations for the “must-have” tools I needed to excel in this field. Even now, I receive messages almost daily asking if I’m interested in a new tool to add to my recruitment strategy. Don’t get me wrong. I love me a shiny new object. However, when it boils down to trench recruiting, I find myself relying on what some describe as ‘old school’ recruiting tools.

  1. Networking

When I say networking, I don’t mean 5-minute monologues where I’m selling my company or a job but rather conversations that provide personal value. On Twitter chats, Facebook groups and Instagram, I give my thoughts on job seeking and personal branding. Why? It helps to build relationships and create opportunities to move those conversations offline to turn a follower into a candidate. At face-to-face events, I’m not talking constantly. I’m listening to the needs of those around me (and rarely mention open positions).

  1. Applicant Tracking System

Yes, the tool that asks applicants to upload their resume and then re-enter the information anyway. When I receive new requisitions, this is the first tool I begin mining for potential candidates. It is a resource for individuals who are/were interested in a position or your company. These people are already sold on a position or brand, and that warm lead makes my role a little easier.

  1. maxresdefault (5)The Phone

The small rectangle that we have become addicted to does more than take selfies (although in truth, that fact is not reflected in my Instagram feed). When I’m sourcing candidates, cold-calling (or warm conversation) consistently recruits my top performing employees. I’ll be honest – it’s intimidating and took me a full year to be comfortable with it but, it is still relevant in my recruitment strategy.

I know, no ah-ha moments. No brand new tools. That’s because people who are new to recruiting don’t need fancy tools and big budgets to be successful. Look at the OG recruiters. They did it without our modern technology. They just had the four P’s…pen, paper, phone and of course, personality.

About The Author

Jose watsonJose Watson is a market recruiter with Lowe’s Home Improvement and supports full cycle recruiting by working with HR Managers to develop the market recruiting strategy (internal and external).
Twitter: @josewats
Connect on LinkedIn

Secrets to Social Media Recruiting

There are 2.3 billion active social media users in the world. With all of those users, social media recruitment is a no-brainer. But where do you start? I can’t tell you which social recruiting tools will work best for the type of candidates you are looking for. But,  as for me, I like to try out all the new and different social resources for my recruiting efforts. In this article, I will be sharing what has worked best for me so far.

TwitterSocial Media Recruiting

Twitter is one of my staple social media sources. It’s a great tool for blasting out your message to the universe! For example, if you have a job that you’re recruiting for, and you want to drive traffic to the actual posting, then you’ll want to post on Twitter with sort of a catchy tweet that includes the link to the job that they can apply to.

Another reason why Twitter is one of my favorite tools for recruiting is because you can easily search for topics and talent by using specific hashtags. Of course, you as a recruiter can easily be found by candidates using the same hashtags! I don’t use Twitter as my main source for recruiting but it is a favorite supplement to my overall recruiting/sourcing strategy mix.

Pinterest

I like to use Pinterest because it allows me to add targeted information, AKA “pins”, for specific interests. One of my Pinterest boards is called “Interview No-No’s” and I post fun photo tips of what not to do in job interviews. Then I Social Media Recruitingadd a hashtag the pinned image to attract attention to the pin and my board.

Instead of throwing jobs out there, I create content that is valuable to the job seeker. There are tools you can use to track the effectiveness and reach of your pins as well like Tailwind.com.

Your target audience is going to want more from you than just links to a job application. Create content that is going to be valuable to your target talent audience that will inspire them to want to follow your content and ultimately encourage them to apply to your jobs.

Social Media RecruitingInstagram

Another great tool if you are interested in creating visual content on social media for recruiting is Instagram. It is also a great tool for people that have cool, exciting work environments or even beautiful scenery. In the past, I have taken a photo of my workspace with the space needle in the background and that actually got quite a few views. I also add hashtags that I need to attract the type of talent that I was looking for.

So for example, when I worked for Amazon,  I posted a picture with the space needle in the back and my desk in the forefront with a note that said, “You know I’m hiring for payroll and tax and finance professionals at Amazon… wouldn’t you love this view?!” Then I added hashtags like Seattle, Finance, Tax and Jobs within the post. I specifically got responses and direct messages from local talent with payroll and tax and finance background based on that specific post.

Snapchat
Social Media Recruiting

Another source that I find very valuable as the content creator is Snapchat. Snapchat is awesome because the filters changed daily and you can customize the filters to what you want to kind of focus on for that particular day.
For example, yesterday, they had a filter of a fireman. So I used that as inspiration for me to post about hot jobs – get it? They’re so hot they’re on fire. While it’s punny, it was also a fun 10 seconds of content for candidates. You can also download that 10-second video and  post it to Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram.

Facebook

Social Media RecruitingLastly, Facebook is my favorite source for recruiting and engaging with my target talent audience. Facebook is such a great tool because there are so many users ; approximately 1.5 billion daily users on Facebook, to be exact, so you really should be primarily focusing on Facebook as yours talent source.  You can post all of your content there for the world to see. As long as you hashtag specific keywords that relate to the position you are trying to fill, you will attract talent with mutual interests.
Another reason I really like Facebook is because there are specific groups that you can use for posting your content. Nobody is attracted to posts that just link to a job when you post in those specific groups, however. Your audience is looking for unique content.

One thing I’ve done to appeal to this audience is visit my managers and their work sites and take photos with them. Then, we’re using those photos as content within the specific groups. When you post these photos, you can also include your contact information and links to your career page.  Remember (I can never say it enough,) hashtag key terms! I have my own hashtag that I add to most of my posts: #TerryJobs. That way I can track my posts on a more personalized level because it’s not something that others use. Hashtags also make it possible to track your post effectiveness.

More Social Recruiting Hacks

Social Media RecruitingTrack Hashtags: Hashatit.com.

One tool you can use to track your hashtag effectiveness is hashatit.com. You enter your specific hashtag, and it will show you the reach and impact of that specific hashtag.

  • Add Personal Social Media Links.

On all social media channels, make sure that you are including your social media links so that candidates can find you. I typically add my company’s career page and links to Twitter, and LinkedIn.

  • Reuse Content.

The great thing about using Pinterest and Instagram is that you can create and curate relevant content that’s reusable and can be posted to other social media accounts. That’s ultimately what you want to do. You want to create your own content that is visually stimulating and engaging that is going to cause your talent to want to respond to you and engage that talent.

  • Social Media RecruitingUse Quotes.

Quotes are also a great way to post on Instagram and Pinterest and Twitter so don’t think that just because you don’t have a great photo that you can’t use those as content sources as well. There’s an app I use for editing and adding text to my own images; it’s called Phon.to. You can use it to add text to any image including a plain image or a photo you’ve taken that you want to add text to.

The possibilities are almost endless if you want to be creative with your social recruiting efforts. You simply need to open your mind and try new things! So, get outside your comfort zone and create some genuinely fun and unique content to attract and recruit your target talent!

About the Author

thHeadshotTerry Hall is a Senior Recruiter at Providence Health & Services which is headquartered in the Seattle-Metro area.    Terry is a Marine Corps Veteran and has over a decade of recruiting experience, starting her career in agency recruiting running a desk for Select Personnel and Manpower Professional Finance before making the move in-house, where she has held strategic talent roles for Washington Mutual Corporate Human Resources, Amazon, and T-Mobile.

Follow Terry on Twitter @TerryJobs or connect with her on LinkedIn.

 

 

Rejection Hotline: Why It Matters That You Say No

Rejection isn’t anything new. Even the most suave among us have experienced it at some point in dating or life – whether it be rejection by a potential partner or from a job. While all failure has a familiar sting, the folklore and fairy tales are most  when it comes to rejection in dating. Sitting around the bar recounting dating nightmares, each story just a little more epic than the first, a badge of honor in the ranks of 20 somethings everywhere.  What we don’t realize at that point is that these are preparing us for the inevitable evolution of rejection because it only becomes more severe in nature as we get older and a marriage fails, you’re turned down for a promotion or ostracized by a new neighbor for God knows what.

Slowly but surely, we acknowledge and respect the lessons of rejection. We accept that rejection is an inevitability. It’s one of those fun facts parents never share with us. As we get older and start our own families of children doomed to this same recurrence of rejection, we experience a new challenge – watching our children learn to navigate the torment, too. It’s significantly harder from that second hand perspective and likely why our parents never gave us the heads up about that part of life.

While we want to remain the protector of their youth and innocence, we know that rejection has positive effects, too. We’re reminded of those moments where we, too, sat on the bottom of the totem pole – set back by a crashing tide of “no” – either the singular or the recurring type.  Like the Rolling Stones said, “you can’t always get what you want.”  But we also bring with us lessons where we can change. After 15+ years sourcing, I know exactly where I want to start.

The Familiar Stink of Failure

waiting rejectionHere’s a scenario we’re all familiar with: You are going through the interview process for a job you really want. You know you did well – in fact, you aced it like a teen genius taking the SAT. However, you hear nothing. Not even a “hey, thanks for playing.” Just the long dark silence of the Darkness between the Stars.

Why is it that so many of us interview for jobs (and interview well) but never hear back? It isn’t that the recruiter doesn’t care, though that is what it feels like to any candidate who has lived in this black hole. Little do these poor souls know there’s an answer besides “you suck.” It’s that the recruiter is not being measured by anything except getting butts in seats.

Agency or corporate, commission checks and bonuses are based on how many people are placed. Unfortunately, as Rick Sanchez says, “second place just means that you’re the first loser,” and this is the mantra of recruiters, consciously or not. Their actions, or lack there-of, mirror that mantra.

Knowing that a recruiter’s employment is based on filling open roles, is it any surprise that a staffing specialist works on what keeps them employed? If I take 20 minutes to help someone who was the “first loser”, that is twenty minutes I’m not working towards my career and company’s goals. Twenty minutes I just spent with someone who isn’t going to help me in achieving the immediacy of what I need, which is the golden candidate who will get me to the numbers I am expected to meet every month.

Recruiting: A Rejection Business

rejection

But those stuck in a rut of check boxes and quotas have to accept that recruiting is a business of failure. Look at our candidate pipeline metrics – for every hire we make, how many phone calls do we put out? How many candidates fail our first round screen? How about those who fail a tech screen with a manager or bomb the in-person interview?  In a typical scenario, we start with over 200 resumes to narrow down to just one. That’s 199 times using the templated “thanks for playing, but for some reason I don’t even really understand, we’re going to pass” rejection letter. Without question, this conversation can be even harder than firing someone.

At least when someone is fired,  there’s some sort of reason like “you really have to wear pants” or “you can’t call anyone that, let alone a pregnant lady.” On the other hand, when telling someone they didn’t pass an interview – you don’t have as many options. You can’t even use the classic breakup line, “it’s not you, it’s me.”

There are a few reasons I can point to that explain why we may not specific when delivering rejection to a candidate. Most of the time, you just don’t even know why they were rejected. The other major factor? Quite simple, it’s because we feel bad.  It’s soul crushing when you know how bad the candidate needs this job and still have to call and say “Thanks for coming out but you failed.” We hear the excitement when the person thinks they did well. Is it any wonder a recruiter will avoid making this call if they can? And they do. In fact, recent studies show that about 75% of candidates don’t hear back after the interview. So we, along with the majority of other people in our field, simply say nothing and hope they’ll get the hint. It saves us time, right?

Wrong.

Apply Now: Rejection Artist

Despite the feelings and empathy, this doesn’t change the fact that a candidate deserves a phone call (or at least an email) to be told why they are out. Every single person we lead on with a potential opportunity deserves closure. It is a personal point of pride with me to get back to everyone, no matter what. I despise recruiters who don’t get back to a candidate who didn’t make the grade. It’s a poor reflection on our industry, not just them.

So, I am going to try and offer a solution that will satisfy everyone. I want to create a new role (or aspect of someone’s role) to add to a talent team. Rather than describe it, I am going to provide a job description for a role that doesn’t exist. Yet. The purpose? To help a company’s brand, a recruiter’s soul and most important, the candidates who deserve a lot better than we often give them.

Company: An Amazing Global Organization with Offices Worldwide

Role: Candidate Relationship Manager

Requirements:

  1. 7-10+ years Full Lifecycle Staffing
  2. Excellent phone manner and demeanor
  3. Attention to details and data without overlooking the person the data represents
  4. Experience creating talent pipelines

The Day to Day:

  1. Review a rejected candidate’s resume and interview feedback. If there is any role within the firm that might be a fit besides the one they screened, and the feedback implies they are good for the company, make sure they are told about the new role(s) and get them engaged.
  2. If there is no chance of getting them into something else, call (or email) and offer as much closure as you can within what the law allows. If there is anything you can suggest to help them further their job search, do so (even better, ask them if they wouldn’t mind you telling others about them)
  3. Make them feel valued about the time they gave to our company.
  4. Maintain a database we can go back to when the company’s needs change or the person gains more experience.

About the Author 

Jeff NewmanJeff Newman has been a full life cycle recruiter for over 17 years. His staffing philosophy is simple: interview to hire as opposed to looking for reasons not to hire and speak with each person instead of simply pushing paper. He prides himself on always making sure that what he is offering a candidate is an opportunity and not just another job. Currently, Jeff is a technical sourcing specialist at Indeed, the world’s number one job site. Follow Jeff on Twitter @Apikoros18 or connect with him on LinkedIn.