Blog

Yes, Your Candidate Experience Is Probably Worse Than You Think

The first sentence in the CareerBuilder press release about their latest survey says it all:

Your candidate experience is probably worse than you think.”

I wouldn’t call myself an expert on the candidate experience — I leave that to people who watch it closely, like Gerry Crispin, Elaine Orler, and Kevin Grossman — but I do have a fair amount of recent experience with how organizations mistreat the people who are actually interested in working for them.

As I wrote last month, when it comes to the candidate experience, it’s the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

That’s why I was happy to see the latest CareerBuilder survey tackle this topic and break down the 12 Missing Links in Your Candidate Experience. Although the headline data didn’t wow me — it said that “while 78 percent of employers say they feel they do a good job setting expectations in terms of communication at the beginning of a potential hiring interaction, only 47 percent of candidates say employers actually do” — the 12 “missing links” were interesting.

The insights and research are from CareerBuilder’s 2017 Candidate Experience Study, and they “show what peers and competitors have identified as shortcomings in their process, illustrate the role for technology to help improve the process and provide tips to make things easier for employers and prospective employees.”

Here are some aspects of the candidate experience, according to the survey, that employers are struggling with. I’ve trimmed it down to what I consider the Top 10 and added my 2 cents as well:

1 – Not having a quick apply process for every device

From the survey: “The application process itself can contribute to a negative experience for modern candidates as ‘applications taking too long’ (28 percent), ‘having to customize documents for every job’ (34 percent) and ‘uploading a resume into a system but still having to manually fill out fields’ (29 percent) are … frustrating aspects of the process (for) a considerable amount of candidates.

My take: No doubt about it; the job application process runs from easy to outrageous, but really, this is a minor issue when you’re talking about how companies treat candidates.

2 – Not preparing hiring managers

From the survey: “On average, only 2 out of 5 hiring managers are prepped by recruiters or talent acquisition specialists. Of those who do, only 2 out of 5 prep hiring managers specifically on the topic of candidate experience. This means only 16 percent of hiring managers overall are prepped … to help manage the candidate’s experience.”

My take: Like so many things in life, you focus on what people measure and pay attention to. If only 40 percent of hiring managers are prepped on how to navigate the candidate experience, is it really surprising that it is so bad in so many companies?

3 – Not having an effective career site

From the survey: “An employer’s career site is important for getting key information, according to 89 percent of job seekers. But a quarter of employers (24 percent) say their company career site doesn’t accurately portray what it’s like to work for their organization, and only 45 percent of candidates say they can typically tell what it would be like to work for a company based on their career site.”

My take: Company career sites are like Forrest Gump’s proverbial box of chocolates — you never know what you’re gonna get get. I’m not an expert on career sites, but I have seen very few that really jumped out and grabbed me. If anything, these survey numbers make them sound better than they actually are.

4 – Not tailoring communications methods to specific segments

From the survey: “The ever-emerging multigenerational workforce demands a shift in the way we communicate. Millennials significantly prefer email communications (57 percent) over phone calls (31 percent), whereas Baby Boomers significantly prefer phone calls (58 percent) over emails (37 percent). Gen X have equal preferences towards email and phone calls (47 percent for both). Further, Millennials are 2-3 times more likely to prefer alternative communication methods (text messaging, social media messaging and video calling) compared to Gen X and Baby Boomers.”

My take: It’s not a surprise that different generations have different communication preferences. What IS surprising is how few organizations tailor their communications along generational lines. It’s a big missed opportunity, I think.

5 – Not recognizing when the employee experience really begins

From the survey: “The lines between the candidate and employee experience are blending – at least in the eyes of candidates, as 3 in 4 say their candidate and onboarding experience with a company is the first part of their broader employee experience with that company.”

My take: This is a good thing, because the sooner you can start the onboarding, the sooner the new employee will be engaged and productive.

6 – Not building relationships with candidates for future opportunities

From the survey: “The most valuable resource an employer has is their talent pool. While it is important to attract the top candidates, it is equally as important to frequently and effectively communicate with your talent pool, but more than a third of employers (35 percent) say they don’t put time into doing this.”

My take: In my experience, companies stink at this. Way too many are focused on the specific job they’re hiring for today and don’t consider A) whether the candidate might be good for a similar position down the road; or B) if the candidate might actually be a better fit for something else the organization needs. This is called managing your candidate pool, and I don’t know many companies who manage it very well. It’s a shortsighted, stupid, and wasteful approach.

7 – Not having an efficient background check process

From the survey: “Employers that want to keep top talent from talking to other companies while they want to receive employment screening results should improve their screening process. Sixty percent of candidates continue communicating and interviewing with other companies while waiting on background results.”candidate experience

My take: This is pretty simple; if I know a company is doing background checks on me, I know they’re pretty serious. That also means I’m less likely to push ahead with any other companies. There are quick and easy ways to do background checks, and I worked briefly for a company (Checkster) that has a great automated process for it. There’s no excuse for recruiters and hiring managers to dawdle when it comes to vetting candidates.

8 – Not informing the candidate where they stand 

From the survey: “More than half of job seekers say employers don’t do a good job of setting expectations in terms of communication at the beginning of a potential hiring interaction. Eighty-one percent of job seekers said continuously communicating status updates to candidates would greatly improve the overall experience.”

My take: This is the big enchilada in the candidate experience. The single worst thing for applicants is to not know where they stand, and I have had companies swear they would let me know quickly and then fall off the face of the earth and not communicate at all. Timely communication is the biggest thing that organizations could do to fix their candidate experience, so why don’t they do it? It is abusive and short-sighted to not let job candidates clearly and quickly know where they stand.

9 – Not staying connected once they have accepted the position

From the survey: “Once the hiring process is in the post-acceptance and onboarding stage, the expectation is for the process to be … frustration-free for new hires – yet a noticeable number of candidates say this stage has not been ideal. Two in 5 candidates (40 percent) say they’ve experienced a lack of communication between when they accepted the job and their first day of work. This is not surprising, since less than half of employers (47 percent) have a formal process in place for communicating and interacting with candidates between acceptance and the day they start.”

My take: I’m surprised more companies don’t focus on this, because newly hire employees are probably at the peak of their enthusiasm for your organization after they accept a job. Failing to stay connected with them, and building on their enthusiasm before they start, is a major miss for way too many employers.

10 – Not treating candidates with the same respect as employees

From the survey: “While the majority of employers (51 percent) say the line is blurring between the company experience and employee experience, less than half of job seekers (49 percent) say employers treat candidates with the same level of respect and accountability as current employees. This is an issue since the vast majority of job seekers (nearly 4 in 5) say the overall candidate experience is an indicator of how a company values its people.”

My take: Candidates are right to assume that how a company treats its candidates is probably how they will treat them as employees. Things are usually as good as they are going to get at the start of a relationship. So, if the candidate experience is bad, the culture and workplace experience for employees may be bad as well.

Simple Courtesy is the Key to a Good Candidate Experience

CareerBuilder’s 2017 Candidate Experience study was conducted by Inavero between March 7 and March 14, 2017. It included 4,512 workers ages 18 and over, and 1,500 hiring decision makers in the U.S. and Canada.

Rosemary Haefner, CareerBuilder’s Chief HR Officer, had this to say about the survey and the candidate experience:

A positive candidate experience is a competitive advantage in a job market where candidates have flexibility in their job selection. To remain competitive and create a candidate experience that attracts, secures and retains today’s top talent, you need to determine how your current hiring methods measure up to what candidates are looking for.”

I agree with this, but I also think that a good candidate experience is predicated on a recruiting team that puts the quality of how they treat applicants front and center. What amazed me in my recent experiences as an applicant is how many organizations simply ignore the basic courtesies one would expect — most of all, a simple update on the state of a job application.

As a longtime journalist, this reminds me of what happens when members of the media get covered in the news and have some “journalism” done to them. They’re shocked to find out how callous and indifferent many reporters and editors are about the people they cover.

The same is true for recruiters and talent managers who apply for a job and see how equally callous and indifferent many companies are about how they treat job candidates. That’s what this latest CareerBuilder survey is getting at, and it’s something that really needs to get a whole lot better if organizations truly do want to cut down on their turnover and create cultures that employees actually want to engage with

Chatbots, AI, Machine Learning, and Recruiting

Call this the “clear the air” opening line for what otherwise is an informative article, at least that is the goal around the judgement that has most likely, and for good reason clouded your thoughts after your read the title but before you clicked in to read this master piece.

Let’s get cliché for a moment

Will Recruiters have a job in the next 10 years?

No doubt.

Will machine learning and artificial intelligence replace recruiters?

No, but it will have a huge impact on all areas of business. Do you want to be a Google hacker scripting Boolean searches to make yourself feel like a word class sleuth or do you want to make great placements and land the best talent for your organization?

What role will machine learning and AI have in recruitment?

Process, research, recommendations, repeatable tasks. The recruiter’s role will evolve to a relationship manager, a role of persuasion and deal making, but we are safe, for now.

AI Is The New Social Media

The goal of AI and automation in recruitment is to streamline process with the end goal to reduce cost of hire while improving candidate experience. In one sentence, this has been the scramble over the last couple of years as behemoth companies like IBM and Microsoft battle to disrupt industries with the latest “powered by watson” or 365 gadget.

I can remember just a short 10 years ago, companies were “investigating” social and the value that social would or wouldn’t bring to their organization. Legal teams blocking social updates and companies launching a Facebook page. We are at that very same place today with AI. Companies are interested, investigating and discussing, but not yet ready to make the investment.

All AI Is Not Created Equal

Chatbots, NLP, machine learning, deep learning – these are the new buzzwords in recruitment but unlike Big Data and a few other gems, artificial intelligence and the like are here to stay.

As with all things technical in our world of recruitment there is the sexy version and then there is the “recruiter’s version,” in this case Open AI and Programmatic AI

Here’s the difference:

Open AI is sexy, futuristic, IBM Watson type of stuff – Cure the world and feed the planet missions, which is why most companies haven’t yet grasped the idea around how AI can help scale their recruiting organization. It’s not an easy sell.

Programmatic AI on the other hand is where we see the vast majority of startups building amazing products like TextRecruit’s Ari or HiringSolved’s Rai, X.ai for calendaring and one of my favorites Wade and Wendy. Programmatic AI is set to attack specific tasks, process and gaps. It’s a core business process killer that when employed properly will allow a recruiting team to do amazing things.

3 Ways To Prepare To For Chatbots and AI in Your Recruitment Process

Use Chatbots to eliminate calendars

You know how the story goes. You land a great resume and you spend 3 days chasing the applicant down to schedule a 30 minute call, send the calendar invite, confirm the calendar invite and the applicant misses the meeting because they misunderstood your voicemail message.

Schedules are tight and applicants are on the go. How many calls go unanswered simply because the applicant wants to make a great impression and is stuck commuting on the train?

Find a Chatbot that allows your recruiters to connect with applicants on their time.

 

Use Chatbots to Build a Data Driven Interview Process

30 open requisitions, 50 candidate calls, 8 phone screens, and 5 candidate submittals per day. These are realistic numbers, albeit not the best case scenario to hire the best candidates – one that a recruiter lives every day. How can you be accurate at that volume?

Chatbots can listen, build and assess. They can build complete profiles and make assessments on candidates, rank them accordingly skills both to other applicants as well as internal employees. Bots can output a full comparison of skills with recommendations on how to find better talent.

Head Shakers will disagree and argue that human touch is important, and it is. I just believe that human touch can be better used on non-process / relational aspect of recruitment, items such as phone calls, relationship building, persuasion and facilitation.

 

Use Chatbots to bolster candidate experience and Messaging

Early stage communication is one of the most important touchpoints during the recruitment process, it can also be time consuming and is often poorly executed. These are the steps that are often removed because they are viewed as “time wasters”.

Once removed, your candidate experience is shot, your recruiters become frustrated and your hiring mangers exit stage left.

Think about messaging, tone, response times and putting the right job in front of the right prospect, at the right time. These are part of the recruiter’s job that they like, but often fail to complete in timely matter, ultimately losing the candidate and the hiring teams trust.

Picture This

Here is a real scenario that can happen today, and one that will be better as this process gets smarter. Your job is not at risk unless you refuse to grow with technology. Be a recruiter, not a Google hacker.

A Job requisition is created and placed wherever you place your jobs

Your company than targets your key persona (target applicant) on Facebook via ads, video etc.

Candidates once they engage are redirected to Facebook messenger where they immediately interact with your recruitment bot, completes a fast interview and auto applies

If the prospect is scored as qualified the bot begins the scheduling process while they have them there in messenger, pulling both calendars simultaneously and confirming the phone interview.

Enter Recruiter.

 

10 Reasons Your LinkedIn Invitations Are Getting Ignored

LinkedIn is a powerful networking platform and every week we create new virtual connections with people who send us invites and with those we would like to add to our network.

If you send a LinkedIn invitation to a friend or work colleague, it is often accepted within 24 hours. Then you see some influential people on LinkedIn and you think that it would be great to connect with them.

You read all their articles on LinkedIn Pulse and you would love to meet them if they are available, or just chat with them over LinkedIn. Maybe you are just expanding your network and you find some interesting people that you would like to add to your network, in case you ever find yourself looking for a job.

So, you decide to send them an invitation.

After two weeks, they are still not in your network and you are wondering why they did not accept your invitation. You aren’t sure whether it is just pending or if they declined. Maybe they did not even receive notification from LinkedIn, or perhaps they are on vacation, or just busy.

Or maybe you just did something wrong. You never get a second chance to make a first impression!

So, here are the main 10 reasons people decline invitations. Please note: I changed the names of people in these invitations and examples.

1 – Incomplete LinkedIn Profile

Do you have a complete profile? Not sure? Check again. One reason your invitations are declined is that your profile is missing a title, job description, and perhaps even good content.

Make sure that your photo is full-size, professional and not a random (fake) picture from the Internet. Also, ensure that your work history has useful details. It also pays to include recommendations and endorsements from several people.

The more complete your profile, the better the chance that your invitation will be accepted. People want to see a profile that reads well and communicates serious thoughtfulness. If you got an invite from a person with just a name, would you hit the “Accept” button?

2 – A Lack of Proper Grammar

Even though you are not writing a thesis or an essay, proper spelling and punctuation are still of the utmost importance. Try to also avoid writing in capital letters, which is often interpreted as screaming.

Trust me; no one wants to see this in their inbox. Unless you have good reason to shout, keep to the lower case. And if you must use capital letters, do so sparingly.

Also, use formal language if you are approaching people you don’t know. Casual, slang-filled invitations will only get you rejections. If you are not sure about grammar or typos, you can always check your spelling and grammar in Word or on Grammarly.

3 – Using a Generic Message

Many people are tired of seeing ubiquitous template LinkedIn messages. That’s why you need to create a “hook” in your invitation. Have you read the person’s post or article? Do you have a contrary opinion to a view or opinion that they expressed? Do you live in the same city as this person? Create a personalized hook to draw this person in.

Unless you have communicated with this person outside of LinkedIn, and they can clearly remember you, then the generic message might be just fine.

Here’s the LinkedIn Template Message (and these are the most boring 11 words in the English language):

LinkedIn gives you the opportunity to add your own notes to the LinkedIn invitation, so it really behooves you to do it.

4 – People are not Using LinkedIn Daily

LinkedIn has 500+ million users; from that number, only 106 millions are active users (Statista report, April 2017). From that 106 million:

  • 53 percent of active users spend between 0-2 hours weekly on LinkedIn;
  • 22 percent spend 3-4 hours weekly; and,
  • 10 percent spend 5-6 hours (survey from Statista March 2016).

As you can see from these statistics, the only people who spend a lot of time on LinkedIn are recruiters, because it’s their work tool. But candidates? Not so much.

Also consider this: One of the reasons why your invitation may not have been accepted just may be bad timing. You can send the invite out on a Monday, but if the person you’re sending it to is not logged in to LinkedIn until Friday, your LinkedIn invitation will not be seen until then. Given that, your invitation could be easily overlooked.

5 – Not Getting the Name Right

It’s bad enough that you are sending someone a template message, but misspelling their name is just not acceptable.

Of course, this can happen and people can overlook the error in the invite, but some take it seriously even if they don’t treat your obvious grammatical errors like they are a big deal. If you are going to get anything wrong, it should not be the name of a potential connection in a LinkedIn message.

6 – Offering a Job or Selling Something

If your main intention is to sell, do not make this known up front. It is better to connect first. Many people dislike opening their inboxes only to see a template sales pitch disguised as a LinkedIn invitation.

You should focus on connecting instead of trying to sell. And if you are planning to sell, don’t do it just a few minutes after your invitation has been accepted — wait at least one day.

If you are offering a job, don’t use a LinkedIn invitation. This is not the right venue, especially when you are not adding any info to the invite.

I was fooled once with this type of invite and got an offer for selling Herbalife.

Candidates are also getting template messages such as, “Hi, I have a job offer for you! Please add me to you network.” After they accept the invite, there is radio silence. And if you are using the same template as these spammers, don’t expect that candidates will treat you any differently, especially if they already have had that bad experience.

7 – You Are a Complete Stranger

If you are sending random invitations to people without speaking with them first, you will not get a lot of acceptances. We’ve all received connection requests from strangers, and we know that sometimes it’s better to steer clear and skip the connection.

Also, asking someone you are still trying to add to your connections to lunch or dinner will make the firewall stronger. So yes, your message was compelling and they will want you to be in their connections because they like your profile … but a lunch or similar request in the first invitation is just taking it too far.

Accepting your invitation may mean that they still have to come up with a polite way of declining your request, and that’s something that no one likes to deal with. Maybe they like the idea of lunch with you but you have to wait for them to check their calendar. Then you know the rest of the story — something happened along the line and they forgot about your invitation.

Remember: Do not make people commit to anything in your LinkedIn request other than accepting your initial invitation. Most people do not want to meet unless they have first developed a relationship with you.

8 – You are Too Impatient

Every month, I get at least one invitation that I consider a little bit pushy.

For example, I sometimes receive a LinkedIn invitation with a note asking me to add someone to my network. I don’t accept the invitation, but a few minutes later I get an email with a proposal for cooperation, and then another a few minutes later requesting a connection on Skype. Before I’m able to finish my answer on that email, my phone notifies me about a new Facebook friend request from that same person.

If you are impatient, just send the email — and nothing else. Sending so many requests to a stranger on so many social media sites is never a good approach. Don’t ruin your one and only personal brand.

9 – You Are Not From the Same Field/Location

LinkedIn was built on the idea that people will connect; however, after they implemented the connection limit (30,000 connections), people became more selective about who they add to their network.

If you are working in a Lesotho bank, and you would like to connect with a software engineer from Canada, there is a high probability that your invitation to a Canadian software engineer will never be accepted.

Networking is not playing Pokémon; you don’t have to catch them all and accept all the invites you receive. The same is true of the people you are getting invites from. You should always add a note stating why they should add you into their network.

10 – You Are Not Putting in Extra Effort

If you view the profile of the person you are trying to connect with, this will raise the possibility of your invitation being accepted. If you have never visited their profile and just sent an invitation, it could appear to the recipient as though you are just hitting the “Connect” button.

Have you actually tried to connect more than once? Maybe they didn’t get your first message. If they have not replied, give it some time and then try again. Some of your prospective contacts may assume that the first invitation was a scam, and a second invitation might change their perspective.

A follow-up message after they have accepted might also be helpful and shows that you are committed to building a relationship with them.

Final Thoughts

LinkedIn is still a great networking platform that you can leverage for your personal and business needs. Having the right connections is very important in getting the most out of that platform.

Always ensure that your LinkedIn message is personalized whether or not you know the recipient personally. Personification is a very important component when you reach out to somebody, plus, your message won’t look like a template.

If you have a mutual connection, mention the name of this person and keep your message short while providing them with a “hook” to bite on. Then, do your best to follow up.

Sometimes, the reason your invitation was not accepted could be because the person you are trying to connect with is not actually using LinkedIn. They may have created an account but have stopped using it. In this case, the message you sent may have nothing to do with why your invitation is pending.

Always remember: Not everyone checks their LinkedIn profile constantly. So, don’t take it personally if they don’t respond.

How To Use the People Search Chrome Extension by Workable

Workable is known for their recruiting and sourcing software. But did you know that they have a free Chrome extension as well? People Search – email and resume finder will help you find valid email addresses, phone numbers, and resumes.

What is great is it is free, and you do not have to be a Workable customer to use it. If you need more than the three free searches it gives you a day, you can purchase a Recruiter License.

 

 

 

Click below to see how I use People Search to find candidates. Tell us what you think!

 

About our Author:

Find COntact InformationDean Da Costa is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting.

Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter

Avoiding Hiring Mistakes? You Need a People-Driven Recruiting & Evaluation Process

For companies looking to bring on talent quickly, it’s easy to say “good enough” and just hire “someone.” Too easy. What’s not easy is finding (and potentially waiting) for the “right one” to take your business to the next level.

This is especially true for smaller companies, where the people in charge of hiring decisions are likely managers, whose expertise is in their jobs, not recruitment.

Recruiting novices often base their decisions on intuition and, perhaps, even the limited content found on a resume. That’s not enough to ensure you’re not making a potentially bad hire.

With that ever-present risk, it’s critical for hiring managers to factor additional components into the evaluation process to avoid disasters. To do that, employers need to leverage their own people across all stages of the process. A people-driven recruiting approach is a sure-fire way to better source, interview and evaluate candidates and, ultimately, find the best fit for the position at hand.

Sketching Out the Ideal Candidate

The first step to a successful hiring process is shaping the ideal candidate profile. Employers cannot hire blindly; they need to know what they’re looking for before building a candidate pipeline.

Oftentimes, the most ideal candidates mirror top performers already working within a company. Those top performers are the people employers should work with to define the ideal candidate.

For example, if the position already exists in the company, it’s a good idea to ask a top performer in that role to identify the hard and soft skills they believe are key to their success. If the position does not exist, perhaps a colleague who has either filled that position at another company or a colleague who will be working closely with the respective open position will share their experiences and preferences for top skills critical to success in that role.

Before ever interviewing, employers – and the hiring manager ultimately making the decision on who to extend the job to – need a strong vision of the characteristics and skills they’re looking for, and must know how to measure for them.

Filling the Candidate Pool

Generally, “A” players associate with other “A” players. That’s why referrals that come from top talent within a company are often the best source to build out a talented candidate pipeline.

Employers want to arm their companies with great people, so tapping into the great employee base they already have working for them is a great approach to filling out an impressive candidate set, making the hiring process more worth their time and their candidates’ time. However, it’s also important to note, while referrals are valuable, relying too heavily on them is one of the main reasons companies do not hire diverse workforces.

A successful hiring process factors in multiple people and tactics to ensure a diverse referral pool. This can even extend outside of the company as Boards, investors and other stakeholders may have talent to refer that you wouldn’t get from your current employee base.

Another people-driven recruitment approach is to actually hire recruiters. They can offer tremendous value to the recruitment process by keeping tabs on people who are in an active job search and cultivating a network of passive candidates (people who should never be cast-aside from the candidate pool).

Additionally, a two-person resume screening process can yield more diverse and interesting resume picks and prevent bad resumes from getting through, creating a more impactful pipeline. This process might include a member of HR doing an initial resume screen, and then, having an employee in a similar position as the open position to do a final check on resumes that are approved. That employee might be able to weed out any candidates who may not seem like a great fit with their team or highlight resumes that stand out to them and are a cut above the others.

Choosing the Right Person for the Job

If there is any stage of the hiring process where leveraging employees is most valuable, it is in the actual interview and decision-making process.

Interviewing should involve many different people across the company to ensure that feedback on a candidate is reflective of a more representative sample. Leverage multiple employee perceptions of a candidate and compare them to each other before making any kind of a decision. This comparison is easy to make if employees use the same assessment criteria across all candidates.

It’s also important, to get the most accurate candidate assessments, for employers to create a safe space for employees who did the interviewing to voice dissent. This not only limits pressure from employees to give positive assessments to candidates who’ve been referred by a colleague, but also prevents an “I told you so” attitude from employees who feel discouraged by a badly-performing new hire.

The “people-driven” recruiting approach relies on everything from employee attributes to employee insights to determine who the BEST candidates are in any respective pipeline. After all, “people” are the heart of every organization, and when employers take a pragmatic, employee-led approach to hiring, they ultimately have the pieces in place to build a great company.

VR in Recruiting is a Reality

Virtual RealityVirtual reality has been a thing of science fiction for most of our lives and has only recently come to hands of consumers with some extra cash to throw around. However – clearly there is a future (and one not too far off I would date say) that virtual reality is going to be part of our reality.

So why am I writing about virtual reality on a recruiting tech article? Think about it for a minute (dream if you will)… Could there be a day, not too far in the future, where you can bring a candidate in for an interview and test them in ‘real life’ scenarios for the job they are interviewing for?

How Will Virtual Reality fit into Recruiting?

Currently a recruiter will ask key questions to try and determine how well fit a candidate is for a specific job, candidates are asked to talk about a stressful situation they have been in and how the handled it or to explain how they managed a difficult customer etc. So – imagine, instead of just asking the questions, actually putting the candidate into that situation and watching how they actually work through a difficult customer or work through a specifically difficult task that could be part of their job.

Seem like science fiction, something far-fetched and so far in the future that it is not worth thinking about? Maybe not. In fact, Deutch Bahn, a German logistics provider is using it already. The company saw that it was going to need to hire 10,000 people per year. There was no way their current way of doing things was going to help them reach their goal. So they got creative and decided to give Virtual Reality a try.

By using virtual reality, prospective candidates can see exactly what a particular work environment is like. Kerstin Wagner, Deutch Bahn’s Head of Talent Acquisition said: “Whenever we use the VR glasses, you get immediately this very focused interest.” Prior to its use of VR technology, Wagner said about 10 people per job fair would express interest in a role. Now, with VR technology on hand, lines of prospects to try on the headsets typically produce anywhere from 50 to 100 interested applicants at a job fair. Furthermore, Wagner said her team gains higher-quality applications and more interested people who know what to expect from a job with the company. “It definitely is a good business case,” Wagner said.

Virtual RealityVR + Gamification = Better Hires

Google recently acquired Owlchemy Labs. Owlchemy Labs is the creator of the award-winning game Job Simulator. Yes – Job Simulator is currently a virtual reality game that immerses the player into different jobs for fun and entertainment but how far is that from being able to create a virtual reality simulation of specific job scenarios? I say it is not far at all, I say that it could be altered enough today that this type of simulation interviewing could actually happen today. Imagine, with 5-10 years more of work, how much more advanced the virtual reality realm will be.

A candidate can read a book and learn to answer your questions correctly, they can figure out ways to score big on the personality tests and other interview tools. However – could they fake their way through a simulation of reality? Isn’t that where it breaks down? When you get them into their job and then find out they really can not handle the situations they appeared on paper to be good for.

Imagine testing a candidate for a patient tech position and actually putting them through the stressful situation of dealing with that cranky old man that ‘grabs’ all the nurses… Ok – maybe that would be a bad way to use the technology… but you know what I am saying…

What do you think? Are we going to have simulated job situation interviews in the near future? Would you use this type of technology?

About our Author:

Dave Curtis has 30+ years experience in the workforce.  Of which 18 have been within HR/HR Information Systems. Given the nickname ‘The Wizard’ by his co-workers, Dave is a leader, innovator, HR tech professional and overall tech geek. Connect with him on LinkedIn and follow him on Twitter.

How You Can Find Anyone’s Contact Online

Posted with permission from Jan Tegze

If you want to succeed at sourcing, you need one important tool — your brain.

Luckily, your brain cannot be stopped by any LinkedIn Terms of Service. However, saving time in sourcing is also important, and if you want to save time and be more effective, you need to use the right tools.

There are hundreds of plugins and tools for recruiters; every month a new one appears, and many are also disappearing. My guess is that we will see a huge amount disappear this year.

It’s hard to follow or test every single one. There is probably only one person (Dean Da Costa) who knows them all.

I’m trying to test every new tool I discover or that I get tipped off about from others. And because I am also a geek who loves new technology, I like to test everything, and I did new test of 10 plugins that will help you to find anyone’s contact details.

This test was done during April 2017, and since that time a few things have happened. Many of these tools improve their databases, and Hiretual in particular did pretty good job in this area. However, the most important news was the update of the LinkedIn User Agreement.

Right now it’s hard to predict how sourcing tools will be affected by LinkedIn and new LinkedIn Terms of Service, but I don’t think many of these tools revealing contact information will be still with us.

How I Set Up My 10 Plugin Test

I tried to compare these tools and find out how effective they are, how effectively they can find email addresses, and, if the email address that is found is valid or not.

And the best way how to do that is a prepare test scenario and run a test case. Here’s what I did: 

  • I selected 50 random profiles on LinkedIn;
  • All the profiles were my 2nd or 3rd connections;
  • All profiles were checked to see if there is no email or phone;
  • The roles I targeted were: Finance Manager, IT Director, Senior Developer, Project Manager, UX Designer, Accountant;
  • The locations I targeted were: Hungary, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Brazil, Finland, Czech Republic, Spain, and the USA (the Greater Seattle Area);
  • The plugins I tested were: Prophet, Connectifier, Hiretual, Contactout, Hunter, Jobjet, Lusha, Rocketreach

The first thing I did was my own search, so I tried to find emails on all 50 profiles without these tools and I only used Google. After 4 hours and 57 minutes, I found 29 private emails. As you can see, I didn’t find all 50 emails, but I learned a lot about these candidates. I also learned about new sites to use to look for people like them, especially in countries that I usually do not target during my search.

With these plugins, I found email addresses within a few seconds or minutes. During this test, I also checked if the email address provided by the plugin was valid and connected with the right person. I also tested every single email I found to see if it was live and working.

Google Chrome Extensions

Because one plugin can show the company email and the second plugin a private email for the same profile, I decided to split that test results on the group “private email” and the “company email” section.

People often use their company email address for their LinkedIn accounts, but there is no way I can double check if the company emails I found through these plugins are also primary email addresses connected with their LinkedIn profiles. Alternatively, if they used private email, and these plugins showed me their company email addresses, it is because they tried to guess them based on their database.

These plugins offer various tools and options; I don’t want to write a long review about all of them, so here is a quick one-sentence review.

  • Connectifier – Was acquired by LinkedIn, and I’m not sure if it’s still working, but it was my first plugin that I used, which is why I added it here.
  • Hunter – Hunter is the great in guessing company emails with just one click.
  • Prophet – A great plugin, and if you use it with Hiring Solved Search and Rai, you will be amazed how powerful combo you can get. Note: The Prophet plugin is temporarily unavailable.
  • Hiretual – I like this plugin a lot. It’s very complex and you can see that they are adding new functionalities often.
  • Contactout – Simple and effective plugin with a simple option on how to save profiles on your Google Drive.
  • Jobjet – Great plugin and with their CRM system, you got a powerful tool.
  • Lusha – This plugin did not reveal more emails than others, but it showed me more phone numbers than other plugins.
  • Rocketreach – Interesting service also offering API so you can create your own tool.
  • Boolean assistant – An effective and simple plugin.
  • People Search – People Search is a Chrome extension for candidate sourcing from Workable (great ATS).

Results

All working emails

All functioning emails are all the private and company emails these plugins found. I tested these addresses, and if they worked, I added them into the graphic.

I’m using some of these plugins every day. Sometimes, the email address that the plugin shows you for one person belongs to somebody els. so it’s good not to blindly trust every email address they reveal, but it’s wise to double check to make sure that the email belongs to the right person you’re looking for.

Private emails

This graphic is only informative, because some people can use the company e-mail address as a primary email for their LinkedIn account.

Results: All Plugins

How is the future looking for these plugins?

The new LinkedIn Terms of Service could affect many of these plugins; if that happens, they will either end or stop working. However, I’m sure that more new plugins will appear in the future, and it will be interesting to see how they will coexist with LinkedIn.

Even if these plugins survive, one challenge for them could be how to prevent sharing a candidate’s contact details through these apps and plugins if they don’t want to share anything. Right now, there is no way to reach them all and tell them to hide or remove your email address from their databases (and if you are planning to use this idea for a new startup, you should give a big reward for it!) :).

It will also be interesting to see how they will follow all the privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and other similar regulations in the future. This will be one of the biggest challenges not only for these plugins, but also for applicant tracking systems (ATS) and technology companies.

Final Thoughts

These plugins are great but don’t rely solely on them. Contact details and emails are everywhere on the internet; you can use these plugins and try to learn how to create Custom Search Engine (CSE). You will also need some time to master CSE and get on the level of CSE experts, like Irina Shamaeva or Mark Tortorici.

You can also learn how to find the contact details on people on Stack Overflow through this lesson.

These Chrome plugins are used for sourcing, but they could also be used for sales or marketing activities. I tested 50 random LinkedIn profiles to get these results. If you want to get more relevant results, I recommend testing at least 500 profiles.

And, every plugin has its own pluses and minuses. During this test, there was one candidate profile when the email was found only through Hiretual and Prophet plugin. For one profile, the only Prophet located the work email, and the others showed nothing. Remember: Every plugin I mentioned here is worth a try.

I am running more of these tests, and some plugins are more successful for some areas and locations than others. Don’t take all the results from this test as final, but test all these plugins yourself. Try to test more of them and find the ones that are working for you. And if you are planning to do a similar test, please, share it with others.

These plugins offer free credits every month, but the Premium accounts give you not only more credits, but also more interesting analytics and tools. Moreover, the ROI from these plugins is also pretty good.

If you use these plugins and you are planning to contact the candidate or potential client, you should run (every time) this three step checklist before you hit the send button.

  1. The candidate you are planning to approach is matching the requirements; you spent some time to learn more about them, so will the role you are offering be to the benefit of that candidate?
  2. Are you sure?
  3. Are you really sure?

There are many tools out there you can use for finding contact details within few clicks, but it’s really essential to learn more about the person you will contact. We all should learn from people like Willem Wijnans, who is doing great work in this area and learning a lot about the candidates before reaching them.

Remember this too: Good research is the key if you would like to get a good answer from candidates.

The spray and pray sourcing method is not working anymore, so try not to spam others even if you have an email address.

Finally, remember that sourcing is not about quantity, but about quality! If your KPI is the number of emails, Inmails and Facebook messages you send per week, you should start thinking about whether you are working at the right place.

Don’t forget that you are not only representing your company, but you are representing yourself, and it’s your work that people will remember.

HR Tech World and The Final Countdown: How Europe’s Greatest Hit Played In the U.S.

Trust me on this: there are a whole lot of HR conferences out there. The most prominent among them generally tend to be shit shows, where the overwhelming crowds and ubiquitous vendors make getting substantial value difficult if not impossible.

The more niche events also have limited utility, given the fact that their narrowly defined scope limits both the content and conversations, creating something of an insular, often incestuous echo chamber of the same speakers, topics and attendees year in and year out.

For me, conferences in this industry always make me feel a bit like Goldilocks: they are either too big or too small, too esoteric or too mundane, but it’s exceedingly rare to find one that’s just right, particularly in an industry where there are a handful of dominant event organizers who haven’t moved the needle – or their business model – in the decade I’ve been in this business.

Most of the time, it’s same shit, different hashtag.

The Old World: Why Traditional HR and Recruiting Events Suck.

This is why this week’s SHRM Annual Conference – the most ubiquitous of all industry events – will have an agenda dominated by sessions on Millennials, social media, employee engagement and other topics that lost their relevance about the same time as the “competency based” credentials SHRM adopted in a blatant attempt to vertically monopolize an entire industry (or at least the Michael Kors clutching, Spanx wearing, risk averse masses, pun unintended).

Similarly, the HR Technology Conference – sans my very first ever speaking appearance this year, so there’s hope yet for that agenda – will, inevitably, feature the same staid enterprise software providers rolling out the same customer success stories and trying to build buzz and hype around stuff like product updates, which, let’s face it, is a Quixotic effort at best.

This has proved lucrative, with a pricing model designed to marginalize, or fully preclude, the most interesting emerging technologies or innovative, disruptive kinds of content that actually showcase what’s new and what’s next in the industry – and you can’t blame them, considering the Oracles and ADPs of the world are still willing to shell out big bucks to own the ecosystem and expo floor.

They throw lavish parties and feature elaborate giveaways, money that certainly would be better spent on R&D, or at least end user enablement, but instead goes to trying to keep up with their Tier One competition, to the detriment of any vendor trying to actually get heard above the white noise these companies inevitably create as a smokescreen to mask the fact that, well, their products kind of suck.

I’m looking at you, Workday Recruiting.

The United States of Stasis: Letting Go of The Status Quo.

There must be a happy medium between being all things to all people (or at least all those with enough budget to spend on inordinately priced systems and software) and being so hyper-focused on an industry, vertical or function that the conference ignores the bigger picture and ecosystem in favor of insularity and self-congratulatory validation.

For example, a sourcing conference will feature a bunch of content and conversations on how to build the best Boolean Strings, but without asking: why are we still wasting our time on this shit?

Similarly, user conferences are often circle jerks where current customers pay thousands of dollars for the privilege of getting some face time and product updates from their current vendor without ever learning what else is out there, or learning which point solutions, services or implementations might help those systems work even better – unless, of course, said third parties pony up enough cash to set up a booth that no one bothers stopping by in the first place. They’re there because work is paying them to take a vacation, and the booze is free.

Fair enough.

But when it comes to “just right,” your choices as a practitioner, or vendor, are few and far between, despite a packed calendar of events that tend to align with one of these two diametrically opposed philosophical polarities.

After last week’s HR Tech World  in San Francisco, however, I walked away encouraged that finally, someone infused the staid conference circuit with an event that added value to both vendors as well as buyers, whose content was both focused and forward looking, and whose expo hall conversations largely centered around collaboration instead of competition, partnerships instead of product roadmaps.

That it was the US debut for this formerly European centric event made the execution even more impressive, because I walked away intrinsically believing that the formula the Budapest based brains over at HRN have developed is exactly what the US market needs: actual innovation and disruption, rather than the commoditization of these terms within an existing and staid framework.

3 Reasons Why Every Talent Leader Should Attend HR Tech World.

From the pre-conference sessions, which featured the chance to listen to early stage startups pitch product for investors and attendees, to the keynotes with actual technology experts, not “HR Technology Thought Leaders” (there were a few of those, but fortunately, minimized and mostly kept off the main stage), to the carefully maintained vendor/buyer balance in attendance (not too many sleazy sales guys, not too many boondoggling business partners), HR Tech World consistently delivered real value to everyone involved, no matter what part of the world of work they happened to work in.

It was a refreshing change from the same old shit, and I think this has to do with three primary factors:

1. The Full Stack.

The show was more focused on tech than HR Tech, which, let’s face it, is way more interesting. This maybe why Oracle was conspicuously absent, although ADP did roll out their full trade show army featuring “ADP in Virtual Reality,” and the punchlines there kind of write themselves.

The companies that got the most buzz – and actually had lines of buyers there to learn about the product, instead of a smattering of attendees responding to some cheeseball promotion or Shanghaiing by a salesperson – were actually the smaller, less established players lining the walls.

These included companies like Textio (disclosure: I am an advisor for Textio, and they killed it), Expensify (one of my favorite business apps, and one that’s not a usual suspect at HR shows) and Culture Amp, who coincidentally announced a $20 million dollar Series C round during the show, and rightfully so.

Sure, there were the IBMs and Workdays of the world in attendance, but given the focus, their all sizzle, no substance activation just didn’t seem to work, particularly with emerging players like Lever, Ascendify and SmartRecruiters, among others, nearby.

The VC backed startup products spoke for themselves, without the carnival barkers and giveaways. And I know that many new and exciting entrants into what’s becoming a pretty crowded category finally got onto the radar of the kinds of decision makers they wouldn’t normally have direct access or visibility to.

One of the genius parts of the set up for HRN events, unlike, say, the 8.5 mile walk between sessions and the expo hall at the Venetian for a certain other HR Technology Conference, is that in order to go to the conference keynotes and sessions, attendees had to walk through the entire expo floor to get there.

Just like going into a grocery store to buy milk, the placement precipitated a few unexpected discretionary purchases or unplanned demos that might otherwise have never happened if, as is usually the case, vendors were treated as second class citizens or restricted to a designated area apart from the actual agenda.

This democratization of technologies, coupled with the carefully managed ratio of vendors and buyers, was refreshing, and likely forced more than a few major employers to rethink their RFP process.

It’s hard to see the forest through the trees sometimes, especially when those trees are 30×30 booths with flashing lights and huge LCDs playing product videos on repeat, but this was definitely a green field, by comparison – and one that I think everyone appreciated.

2. It’s A Small World, After All.

American companies seem to believe they have a certain hegemony over global business, thinking of, say, APAC and EMEA as the serfs to their centralized fiefdom, and thus approach HR – and HR Technology – with a certain jingoistic sense of insularity.

This ­­­is painfully evident at shows like SHRM, where half of the vendors and a ton of the content are geared around compliance with asinine US laws like OFCCP or GINA, where culture means “EB collateral” instead of regional and market variances, and where diversity is positioned as a regulatory and risk management issue instead of a business imperative and facilitator of actual innovation, instead of simple reiteration.

The exception to this, for some reason, is India, but despite SHRM’s presence in this market, the fact is that the back office looks more or less the same no matter what market you’re in, Bangalore looks a lot like Boston when you’re talking about payroll or benefits administration.

Of course, the major difference between the two markets is you cannot compete in India without a mobile first product, but there’s money to be made from this rapidly Westernizing market, and money to be saved from offshoring and outsourcing, which means that for SHRM, India seems like an arranged marriage made in heaven, down to the worship of cows (I’ll leave that there).

As much as our current administration and our limited exposure to other countries and cultures makes us forget that we’re not alone in business (the US has the lowest percentage of citizens with passports in the first world), globalization is a fact, and the global workforce has increasingly made even the most insular of companies into functional multinationals.

We must look outside our borders to the rest of the world, rather than living in our world where HR leaders largely mitigate the risk of compliance violations instead of collect the rewards of localization and decentralization.

That’s why HRN’s roots outside the United States may well prove to be one of its greatest assets – the global viewpoint of a company based in Hungary, whose previous conferences have been in the Netherlands, the UK and France, was clearly evident at HR Tech World Congress.

There was more talk about data privacy and SaaS security than OFCCP documentation and the theoretical construct of “the cloud,” and less talk about getting a seat at the table and more on how to eliminate the need for the table in the first place to best support and enable a multinational workforce.

Many major US HR Technology companies, like Glassdoor, have only recently started building a beachhead in Europe, with boots on the ground to challenge formerly insulated, niche market players like Job & Talent or Career.Ru.

These companies must learn about the other type of business culture to successfully compete – and win – across the pond, which makes the content and conversation at HR Tech World particularly valuable, given its international roots and representation from many vendors not normally seen on these shores (What the Hell is Harver?).

Conversely, many European companies are looking at the immense US market (we’re still the world’s biggest economy, despite our current and concerted efforts to cede that title). This trend is evidenced by such moves as Randstad’s acquisition of Monster, SmartRecruiters rapidly growing market share and acquisitions of EU startups explicitly for the purposes of brining them to US buyers, and the emergence of German player Kununu as a potentially viable contender/alternative to Glassdoor, which has been more or less an undisputed monolith within the employee review space for a decade now.

HR Tech World does a brilliant job of bridging these two worlds, and as “employee experience” becomes the newest buzzword in our industry, the experience of this event seems to be more “It’s a Small World After All” than Mainstreet, USA.

3. Keeping It Real, Not “Authentic.”

Maybe it was its location in Fort Mason, with its sweeping views of the San Francisco skyline, Alcatraz and the Golden Gate Bridge, the perfect weather or the presence/proximity of so many VC investors, startups and tech company buyers, but this conference felt a whole lot like it was built by and for a different generation, one that abhors the term “Millennial” even as we become a majority of the workforce.

Most of the time, if you’re under, say, 40, HR conferences have no chill, which is why you see so many coats and ties, people taking notes via pens and paper (WTF is that?) and heavy promotion on Facebook, the only social network those of a certain, er, “overqualified profile” generally pay attention to or use for their own purposes.

The social element is inevitably awkward, like going to a cocktail party at your grandparents’ house, ubiquitous white people wedding music and total lack of irony or self-awareness at stuff like posing for pictures so it looks like they’re on the cover of some shitty trade magazine, or taking time for photo ops with job boards’ anthropomorphic mascots. Not so at HR Tech World.

From the EDM music between the sessions (look it up, SHRM members – and thank God it wasn’t that damn Pharrell song over and over), to the vulgar, direct and demotivational opening keynote by none other than Gary Vaynerchuck, someone who is unlikely to ever get, say, an Oracle HCM World crowd jazzed about their jobs or able to ignore the profanity and learn what “transparent” and “authentic” really mean, the vibe at this conference, was, well, different.

It felt a whole lot like the future, instead of, say, the WorkHuman or SHRM events bookending HR Tech World Congress, who, if the hashtags were any indication, were sort of a blast from the past, apropos for a profession stuck in the status quo and unable to even iterate, much less innovate. No one takes you seriously when you’re morbidly obese and in charge of wellness programs, but apparently few HRBPs have gotten this memo to date.

In short, HR Tech World proved to be just as successful in its approach and philosophy as it has been in Europe, where in a few short years, it’s become the go-to show for everyone in the industry (and beyond), not to mention the fastest growing trade show in our space, while many others are actually declining in significance, scope and overall attendance. That’s because in a world of same shit, different hashtag, this conference was something altogether different.

And all I can say is, thank God for that – and I’m already looking forward to next year’s US edition of HR Tech World. In the meantime, we’ll always have Vegas.

Think the job board is dead? Don’t tell that to Google and Madgex.

Google and MadgexWhen doing an online search, where do you go when you are looking for a dentist? What search site do you use when looking for a new restaurant to try? Where do you go when you are looking for a new job?

In answering the first two questions, my guess is that you use Google for your search. When looking for a job, most people reply with one of the big three job boards – Indeed, CareerBuilder and Monster.

Well, today and for years to come, when looking for a job, Google wants you to Google it. “Just like when you ask for movie show times …when you look for jobs we … organize the information on the Web about jobs and show it to you directly,” says Google product manager Nick Zakrasek. And with their recent partnership with Madgex, searching for jobs just got easier.

Google and MadgexWhat is a Madgex?

You may have never heard of Madgex before, but you have heard of their customers — organizations like The Guardian, The Washington Post, and The New England Journal of Medicine. In fact, Madgex may be the largest job board technology company in the world. They’re the force behind the job boards for over 500 brands.

But of course, Google is a search engine and not a job site, so why the partnership?

Google really wants to get in the jobs business. This year, Google launched “Google for Jobs.”  Google scours the web, pulling from a broad cross-section of job listings, including from GlassdoorFacebook, LinkedIn, and ZipRecruiter. They are hoping to “increase the efficiency of job matching,” said Nick Zakrasek. All of this after announcing the Google Jobs Cloud API:

 

This move? Plain and simple, it’s all about the data.  Both Google and Madgex have been collecting the data. More specifically, Madgex has collected job seeker info from all of those job sites for over 15 years now. And these are huge numbers. Why would Google reinvent the wheel Madgex CEO Tom Ricca-McCarthy was quoted in 2015 saying, “Audiences may be changing, growing and shifting. The technology they use may be changing, growing and shifting. Job boards will therefore change, grow and shift. But they won’t be going away. We are excited about our future. We are busy; we have many, many ideas for our customers to change and grow over the next five years.”

Google and MadgexWIIFM?

With this new search feature on Google, people in the U.S. will see at-a-glance details about the posting, such as the job title, location, whether it’s full-time, part-time or an internship, as well as the opportunity to access detailed information about each job. They can even see the how long it would take to commute to the job from their home with the power of Google Maps. One search will now bring up multiple jobs from multiple sources. It’s only when the person clicks the “Apply” button that they will go to the appropriate job board.

The bottom line is this: Job seekers will be able to look for jobs in a way they are accustomed to. If candidates can find jobs that they are better suited for, they will apply more. And if more candidates apply, we can get people to work faster. Yes, this is a good thing.

For all of those job board owners out there, there’s no need for FOMO. Madgex is also finalizing a guide for job board owners on how to take advantage of Google’s new job feature. You can register to receive this free guide at info.madgex.com/googleforjobs .

 

Why It’s So Hard for Companies to Hold on to Millennials

Here’s something you know probably know: Millennials are the largest generation in our workforce.

But here’s something about Gen Y that you might not know: According to research by Gallup, Millennials are three times more likely to switch jobs than any other age group.

I know, I know; Millennials are known far and wide as being job hoppers. That’s not a big surprise, although the jury is still out on whether they change jobs more often than any other generation.

The trick, as Gallup notes, is figuring out how to get them to stay with your company. Despite all the sourcing and recruiting you are doing to find talented Millennials, all of that goes down the drain if you can’t find a way to keep them in your employ.

Why do Millennials change jobs more often?

To do that, you need to know just why Millennials change jobs more than other age groups, and Gallup’s research and analysis (from their How Millennials Want to Work and Live report) does a great job of zeroing in on that:

Compared with those from other generations, Millennials are as satisfied or more satisfied with nearly all aspects of their job. Gallup uncovered this trend in a recent analysis of three overarching job aspects:

  1. The tangible rewards a job brings;
  2. The demands a job imposes on a person; and,
  3. The opportunities a job offers.

So if Millennials are as satisfied as older generations, why are they so likely to switch jobs? Because “job satisfaction” (measured by the three aspects noted above) isn’t the same as engagement at work.”

Yes, Millennials change jobs because although they may be satisfied with their work, they just aren’t engaged — and that’s where the problem lies.

Gallup also makes the case that “engagement indicates a deeper emotional and behavioral connection to a job and company,” and it certainly does, but organizations have done a pretty terrible job giving Millennials a good reason to feel more connected to their work.

Disengaged by a lack of career development

Here’s another good question: Do you know what Millennials point to as THE major factor driving their lack of engagement? It’s pretty simple (and very distressing): It’s the poor job American companies do helping them with career development. As Gallup puts it:

One major contributor to Millennials’ low employee engagement may be poor or absent professional and career development. Nearly six in 10 Millennials (59 percent), compared with 44 percent of Gen Xers and 41 percent of Baby Boomers, say opportunities to learn and grow are “extremely important” to them when applying for a job.”

Although there has been an uptick in more training and development over the last couple of years, companies still don’t spend nearly enough on it. Brandon Hall Group’s 2016 Training Benchmarking study found that “organizations tend to use a ‘trickle-down’ approach when they leverage their training dollars… spending more money ($1,000-plus per learner) on senior leadership and generally spend less at the lower manager and employee levels.”

Last year, the Harvard Business Review zeroed in on this topic in an article titled, Why Top Young Managers Are in a Non-Stop Job Hunt.

Dissatisfaction with some employee-development efforts appears to fuel many early exits. We asked young managers what their employers do to help them grow in their jobs and what they’d like their employers to do, and found some large gaps.

Workers reported that companies generally satisfy their needs for on-the-job development and that they value these opportunities, which include high-visibility positions and significant increases in responsibility. But they’re not getting much in the way of formal development, such as training, mentoring, and coaching — things they also value highly.

Why the disconnect? We think it’s because formal training is costly and can take employees off the job for short periods of time. Employers are understandably reluctant to make big investments in workers who might not stay long.

But this creates a vicious circle: Companies won’t train workers because they might leave, and workers leave because they don’t get training. By offering promising young managers a more balanced menu of development opportunities, employers might boost their inclination to stick around.”

What recruiters need to be doing

Gallup’s research finds that only 29 percent of Millennials are engaged at work — and they estimate that Millennial turnover due to lack of engagement costs the U.S. economy a whopping $30.5 billion each year.

Jim Clifton, the Chairman and CEO of Gallup, wrote a commentary recently on The World’s Broken Workplace. In it, he addressed this very engagement problem, writing:

Only 15 percent of the world’s one (1) billion full-time workers are engaged at work. It is significantly better in the U.S., at around 30 percent engaged, but this still means that roughly 70 percent of American workers aren’t engaged. It would change the world if we did better. …

I sometimes wonder: What if, among all the good full-time jobs in the world — approximately 1.2 billion — we doubled the number of engaged workers from 180 million workers to 360 million? How hard could it be to triple it to more than 500 million engaged? What if we delivered a high-development experience to 50 percent of the billion full-time employees around the world? It is very doable.

It begins by changing what leaders believe. And then changing how they lead.”

Here’s my take: Recruiters and talent management professionals alone can’t fix the engagement problem. But, they are the “tip of the spear,” as they say, when it comes to knowing what potential employees are looking for and what they need to not only be satisfied but also engaged in their jobs.

Given the great insight they bring to the party, it behooves all TM professionals to keep senior management plugged in — to what they’re seeing, what they’re hearing, and what they think the Millennials they’re hiring need to be successful.

It’s not all about finding the right people and helping to get them hired. It’s also about making sure that more of the people you’re finding are ones you are able to retain and grow.

Although senior management sets the tone, TM pros play a big role too — and the Gallup study lays out a road map of what you need to do to get there.

The Five: Artificial Intelligence Recruiting Tools Everyone Should Watch

There is no doubt, the future of recruiting and sourcing will be embedded in artificial intelligence (AI). We are sure by now you have seen several of the new artificial intelligence recruiting tools out there. But, to be clear, we are not dealing with true AI as much as we are dealing with machine learning. Artificial intelligence occurs when computers can actually think and make decisions on their own. Machine learning is a way to try to achieve Artifical Intelligence.

Is it AI or Machine Learning?

Think of it like this. Machine learning is what allows Google to determine that you have spam in your Gmail inbox. Based on particular phrases and sentence structure, Gmail has ‘learned’ that you probably don’t know a Nigerian prince who has one million dollars that he wants to give you. That is machine learning. If Gmail used true artificial intelligence, it would recognize that there is a potential crime occurring, track who was sending out emails trying to extract money and report it to the police. But we are using the term AI because they call themselves an AI tool. (Whatever.)

The End of Bias.

That being said, there are companies reporting to have artificial intelligence recruiting tools that will make your life easier. Some help with scheduling interviews and booking meeting rooms. Others actually ‘interview’ candidates through the use of chatbots or find candidates in your applicant tracking system (ATS) that you may have missed. What freaks me out, is that many (if not all) claim to eliminate bias altogether. And we are calling bullshit. Computers can actually become biased. As detailed in The D!gitalist, an SAP publication in an article titled, “How AI Can End Bias:”

 

…the algorithms that drive AI don’t reveal pure, objective truth just because they’re mathematical. Humans must tell AI what they consider suitable, teach it which information is relevant, and indicate that the outcomes they consider best—ethically, legally, and, of course, financially—are those that are free from bias, conscious or otherwise. That’s the only way AI can help us create systems that are fair, more productive, and ultimately better for both business and the broader society.

 

Consequently, there are some new artificial intelligence recruiting tools that we are looking at. We think you should be looking at them too.

artificial intelligence recruiting tools Mya

Mya, which stands for “My Recruiting Assistant”  is a chatbot recruiting assistant. It communicates with candidates via email, Skype or text.  It isn’t going to go all rouge on you – it is a customizable product. If Mya doesn’t know the answer, it responds with an “I’ll find out and get back to you” message. Basically, it will do the initial candidate screen for you. It then looks at all the potential candidates and ranks them for you. If you decide to pass on a candidate, Mya will reject them for you. Currently, Mya is in private beta, but you can click here to join in the fun.

 

Arya

Arya uses proprietary A.I. technology that goes far beyond Boolean Search and applies multi-layered, deep learning algorithms to analyze recruiter behavior patterns, company DNA, and internal data. Over time, it will get smarter and use its own intelligence combined with her machine learning capabilities to learn detailed information about each candidate. Using a process and templates that you select, Arya will automatically communicate and engage with candidates and continue to move them through the various stages of the recruiting pipeline.

 

 

artificial intelligence recruiting tools Olivia

Made by Recruiting.Ai, Olivia is another  “Recruiting Assistant.” Similar to Mya, Olivia will start a conversation with those showing interest in a position. What makes it different is that the candidate doesn’t have to apply for the job.

“We’ve talked to thousands of job seekers, and they’re tired of long job applications, tedious forms, broken mobile experiences, and never hearing back from employers. Olivia is able to create a better candidate experience, and at the same time improve candidate capture and conversion,” said Stephen Ost, Head of Product for Recruiting.Ai. Click here to find out more about Olivia.

 

Pomato

Pomato (pronounced PO Mah -Toe) is a tool specifically to find IT talent. It has been built and trained by developers and technical hiring managers to perform over 200,000 computations on a candidate’s resume. Next, you will get a visual picture of your candidate to determine whether or not they will be a good fit. From there, you can create custom interview questions based on your job specs. Get a demo of Pomato by clicking here. You can also try it for free.

https://youtu.be/hevGlRePsFA

RAI by HiringSolved

Launching first to TalentFeed plus users, Rai, which stands for Recruiting Artificial Intelligence, is an AI interface to help search HiringSolved’s database as well as your current ATS. “We’re building Siri for recruiting and in effect, introducing the recruiting process of tomorrow,” said Shon Burton, founder, and CEO of HiringSolved. “RAI reduces the level of manual labor involved in recruiting by automating many of the steps required to find and initially contact candidates. Like a chatbot, RAI is conversational, possessing the ability to have similar discussions that a human recruiter has with a hiring manager. This technology The Rai AI technology eventually will be able to be used for all aspects of hiring from sourcing to onboarding. Click here to get early access to Rai.

 

A Tragic Tale: How to Get the Job Offer … and Then Completely Blow It

I would like to point out that I am a scary judge of talent.

I’m not bragging because it is why I have been very successful in my career. I read people, on the phone, for a living. So do many of us. We learn through the art of conversation and social engineering what is driving the candidate to either look for another role, or, the motivation that gets them to leave the position they are currently in.

The negotiation is a subtle dance of words swirling around like leaves in a windstorm until the air dies down and the leaves fall gently to the ground. We have a mutual understanding for both parties, or do we?

This #truestory is for all — the recruiters, the candidates, hell, even the managers out there — because we are all part of the process when it comes to recruiting,  And, we all realize that at the end of the day, you cannot fight stupid.

I once had a candidate referred to me that was, shall we say, simply good. She was smart — a Ph.D. in chemistry smart. She wanted to get into data analytics, her first love, and as intelligent people go, she had the chops, just not the experience.

When a Candidate Says Their Motivation Isn’t Money

She needed seasoning, and my team was more than willing to get her on board with us and add the special sauce to make her not only a star, but a superstar. That’s what we do. We had excellent preliminary conversations about what she was looking for, where she wanted to be, motivation, and of course, money.

As a sidebar, I take a copious amount of notes when I interview a candidate, and if there is a concern, I talk with them throughout the process to make sure that we are all on the same page both with the position itself, but also, to confirm that nothing has changed.

My Ph.D. in chemistry was not this way as her motivation was to get off the road, get out of Chicago, and get back home to San Francisco. Money, as she stated, was less of a motivation for her.

I never ask anyone what they are making. Instead, I ask more of a fishing question, “What is it that you want to make in your next role?” You see the world is changing, just like what Pete Radloff wrote here on Recruiting Daily about how the topic of salary is one hot mess.

At any rate, this woman told me that she would like to make $90k but was willing to take $85k to get back to the San Francisco Bay Area. I asked, as I always do, “if I can get you at least $85k, and you like the team, then we have a done deal, right?” Yes, absolutely, she said.

Now, this role dictates a salary in that range for a mid-level person in Silicon Valley with her skill set, and it was within our range as well, so it was sort of win-win for all parties. We had some people apply and some great referrals as well. I have to say as much as I love sourcing, just hitting the phone and calling curious willing leads is refreshing.

A Surprise When the Motivation Actually IS Money

After the preliminary interviews it came down to two candidates, and my Ph.D. in chemistry was one of them, and I was not shocked at this by any stretch of the imagination. The team called me and said she was the one so let’s make her an offer at $85k. I remember sitting back and smiling saying to myself, “done.” I mean, this was in the bag, I had pre-closed, and the motivation was not even money!

So, the offer letter went out, the mic dropped, and it was boom time for a steak dinner or some enchiladas — except that meal was not coming anytime soon.

I got an email from my Ph.D. in chemistry about her wanting to negotiate her salary. I was confused by this, because as I stated earlier, we had discussed money and I dismissed this as a secondary motivation since her primary goal was being getting back to the Bay Area. The money, she said, was secondary. Well, bad on me for believing a candidate to, you know, tell the truth.

This was not the first time I had a bait and switch candidate, so I knew what to do. I told her “no,” and that $85k was the offer that we were making, period. This was a good offer and I do not negotiate on the back end after we have already determined what the offer was going to be.

So, let me lay out some details about her that got us to where we were at.

On our first call, I asked what it was she was looking for, salary wise. The answer was $85-$90k; now however, when it came to offering time, she said she is currently making $90k with a whopping eight (8) months of experience. She demanded that she should get a raise from us to $108k. In other words, she wanted a 20 percent increase for eight months of experience.

Why It’s Always Good to Have Another Candidate

It ‘s nice to want things I suppose. Generally, I would try, begrudgingly, to discuss the fairness of the offer, how it was budgeted, etc. I was not inclined to do this with her for one solid reason: I had another candidate who was just as good, hungry for a role, and did not care about money as much as he wanted a career.

After speaking with the manager, we moved forward with an offer for him at the same level as the Ph.D. in chemistry — $85k. It was done, finished, and he was in before I could even finish my offering. Good times for all.

I received the signed offer letter from my second candidate about two (2) minutes after I sent it, and the dye was cast for a well-crafted email letting my first candidate know that since she had not said “yes” to the offer, it had now been rescinded. Instead of emailing me — up to this point her main point of contact — my Ph.D. in chemistry called three separate times until I was able to call her back.

She asked why I was not negotiating with her, and how that is what you are supposed to do after she told me what she wanted. She said she had thought about it and maybe we could give her $100k and that way everyone could win.

Well, sorry about that, but I already did win. As much as most candidates would like to think they have more leverage, they really don’t — not unless you are the only person in the world that can do that particular task, and if that’s not the case, then you are not all that special. In the end, we are all players on this stage we call life.

Remember — Everyone Is Replaceable

Just in case there are job candidates out there reading this, let me state for the record that everyone is replaceable. Yes, everyone. The world was made that way as we humans come and go on the whim of nature.

Remember: You are not entitled to a salary that you want, or a job that you want, or a mate that you want. These things involve attraction, need, and are based on the choices you make happen, or not. Simply stated, you simply need to make better decisions.

#zellerout

The Week That Was: Entelo, Erecruit, JazzHR, PrismHR, and Glassdoor.

Editors Note: In case you missed it, ‘The Week That Was’ is all you need to know about anything that matters. This is your source for insight to this week’s breaking news, current events, and money swapping in Recruiting. That and the stuff we like. This week we learned Entlo got bank, Erecruit merged with Bond International, JazzHR and PrismHR are coming together to share the love, Glassdoor is key to branding and while you watch, ICWATCH.

Overused Phrase of the Week:

Employee Engagement:  An “engaged employee” is defined as one who is fully absorbed by and enthusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organization’s reputation and interests.

Tweet of the Week:

Nothing better than extending an offer & hearing pure joy on the other end of the phone. #recruiterlife pic.twitter.com/d7NVmc93G5

— Zach Brown, MBA ☕️ (@HeadhunterZach) June 15, 2017

Entelo steps up its AI game with $20M Series C

The race to crown a winner in the AI-powered recruiting software space is on. With both Workey and Mya nabbing rounds in the last few weeks, the timing is prime for a few players to seek advantage in the form of growth capital. This seems to be exactly what Entelo, a six-year-old player in the space, is doing. The company is announcing a $20 million Series C round of financing today led by U.S. Venture Partners with Battery Ventures, Shasta Ventures and Correlation Ventures participating. Click here to read more.

 

erecruitErecruit Merges with Bond International Software

Erecruit™, the leading innovator in enterprise staffing software, VMS and onboarding solutions for large staffing firms, announced June 14th that it is merging with Bond International Software creating the industry’s most complete end-to-end staffing platform.

This merger will increase Erecruit‘s and Bond’s operational scale, extend geographical reach across the United States, Europe, and Asia, will more than double the size of the employee base, and expand the product portfolio. The companies will continue to invest in their core flagship products and lead the market in product innovation. David Perotti, the Chief Executive Officer of Erecruit, will assume the role of the Chief Executive Officer of the merged organization. Click here to read more.

 

JazzHR and PrismHR Partner to Deliver Best-in-Breed PEO Hiring Solution

JazzHR, the leading recruiting solutions provider for small and medium-sized businesses, today announced a strategic partnership with PrismHR, the largest technology provider to professional employer organizations (PEOs) and administrative service organizations (ASOs) in the United States. The partnership integrates JazzHR’s award-winning recruitment solutions with PrismHR’s payroll, benefits, and HR tools.

“PEOs and HR service providers are perfectly positioned to bring HR technology solutions to their SMB customers,” said Peter Lamson, CEO of JazzHR. “SMBs look to their service providers to provide powerful, user-friendly solutions that save time, money and produce better hiring results. JazzHR’s partnership with PrismHR fills this need in a way that it easy for PEOs to implement and share in the value we jointly create.” Click here to read more.

Glassdoor Pricing: How it Really Works

We all know Glassdoor, the review site where employees can anonymously comment on the pros and cons of working at a given company, as well as the salaries that they were/are paid.

Glassdoor has become a staple of job seekers’ candidate journeys and therefore has become an increasingly important consideration in a company’s employer branding strategy. Click here to read more.

 

Need Candidates? Try ICWATCH.

ICWATCH is a public database of LinkedIn profiles in the ‘Intelligence’ community. Watch Dean Da Costa as he uses ICWatch to find candidates.

Transboarding: It’s the Key to Building More Successful, Engaged Employees

With more organizations taking a people-centric approach to managing their business, there has been an intense focus as of late on how to best integrate new employees to a team, and more specifically, how organizations can ensure these same employees can quickly become fully productive and engaged.

What hasn’t received nearly as much attention, but is very similar to onboarding and just as important is transboarding – moving people into new roles within the organization, or “recruiting from within.”

The term transboarding may sound a little like sci-fi, but make no mistake, it is very much based on earthly reality and something organizations and employees the world over are experiencing every day, to the advantage of both employer and employee.

Why? Because transboarding is a great way for employers to keep good employees motivated and challenged by new opportunities and projects that are available at their current organization, rather than having to look elsewhere.

That said, not all organizations do transboarding well, and when they don’t, they run the risk of losing talented individuals to the competition. If we’re being really honest, most don’t do onboarding well, so how can we expect them to get transboarding right?

That begs the question: How does an organization help employees successfully navigate their new role and responsibilities, ensuring a successful transition? It starts with building the appropriate connections, facilitating clear communication, and developing a comprehensive yet flexible framework for workforce engagement.

5 Ways to Build a Better Transboarding Experience

If you’re thinking about transboarding, here are a five (5) things you should do:

  1. Gain leadership buy-in. Transboarding represents a leadership opportunity requiring both a commitment to people and a keen understanding of workplace culture. Make sure your leaders understand the significance of a good employee experience and the potential it represents.
  2. Give employees access to the right resources to succeed. By resources, I mean technology to help them do their job effectively. And, access to people — such as team members and mentors — who may have experience in the position and who can guide them on new processes, projects, and collaborate as needed.
  3. Provide clear communication. Set expectations about what success looks like from the very beginning. Make sure employees fully understand their new role and responsibilities, your expectations, the development plan, and so forth. They need to know what their short term and long term goals are and how their new position is different from the one they previously held.
  4. Make individuals feel welcome to the team. Here’s how to do it: Make introductions; invite them to meetings; add them to email distribution lists right away so they are in the loop from Day 1; and, plan engagements with team members to help them feel connected more quickly.
  5. For those who have moved into leadership roles, provide the education needed to effectively manage and lead a diverse workforce. This includes developing skills on how to manage a disparate workforce, and how to lead individuals with different strengths. Make sure you hold leaders accountable for the overall experience and engagement of employees.

How HCM Technology Can Help

The above suggestions are fundamental, however Human Capital Management Technology (HCM) should also be considered as a means to facilitate employee role transitions – mainly through connectivity, communication, and collaboration. For instance:

  • Understanding individual and team relatability can help individuals new to the team (if not the organization) figure out how best to work with others to drive higher levels of effective interaction between managers and employees. This will ultimately drive results.
  • HCM technology can also provide a channel of communication – informing employees of how their new job will impact the organization while helping formally reset goals and objectives in association with their new role, and, help to establish a performance development program.
  • Updated people, pay and other pertinent employee information can be automatically transferred into all HCM processes when using HCM technology. This type of automation can help ensure accuracy, efficiency, and productivity, making for a “seamless” employee experience.

Having said all this, companies need to seriously embrace good transboarding practices. With people switching jobs more often than in the past, growing employees internally through new roles, responsibilities, and functions is a fantastic way to retain talent and build new leaders.

Conversely, a poor transboarding experience can lead to low morale and a loss of top talent, so getting it right is essential. When the transboarding experience is successful, there is a strong likelihood the employee will be successful sooner in their new role.

This is what transboarding can do: Through the combination of people, technology and programs, employers can optimize their internal talent pipeline to fuel engagement, increase retention, and ultimately, improve their bottom line.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Lisa Sterling is the Chief People Officer at Ceridian, focused on executing the organization’s global people strategy combined with leading the vision on the Dayforce Talent Management offering. She joined Ceridian in June 2015 as Vice President of Dayforce Talent Management, responsible for global product strategy for Talent technologies. With over 17 years of experience in people, process and software design and execution, her broad range of expertise covers the entire people experience as well as talent management technology.

Chrome Extension Tips to Help Optimize Recruiting

How to use Chrome Extensions

I’m of the mindset that there’s no sense in hoarding knowledge in the workplace, and the recruitment/sourcing industry is no exception. Depending on the type of recruitment you work in (whether it be staffing, direct placement, or in my case, RPO), fellow colleagues can be outright selfish pricks when it comes to sharing experiences and information. I’ve never seen the logic in that approach, as I believe that the stronger and wiser my team is, the stronger and wiser I become. 

So, I try my best to share whatever I can, whenever I can, when I believe it will help those around me to better succeed. I do a fair amount of reading up on industry news and technology across many different sites across the web (including phenomenal sources such as recruitingtools.com, wink wink) on a weekly basis, so I basically filter out the fluff and buzzword-filled bullshit that I consume and pass along the gems worth knowing about to the rest of the group. Usually, this information is disseminated via an office-wide email, most likely to be “marked read” and either filed away and forgotten in a subfolder with my dumb name on it or sent directly to Deleted Items. I’ve got no beef with that, as I’m well aware of the barrage of emails we sift through day in and day out, and it’s hard at times to distinguish which are keepers and which ones can kiss the bottom of the recycling bin.

Sensing that was becoming the norm in my office, I thought it would be a good idea to switch up my approach and offer to lead a series of “Lunch & Learns” rooted in sourcing technology and things of the like. I’ve conducted a couple of similar courses in the past, but this would be the first with my current colleagues. I didn’t want to kick things off with a subject that sounded too lame or complex on the surface, so I opted to designate Chrome Extensions as the focal point of the first installment. I taped a sign-up sheet to the front desk, sent out the invite and hoped for the best. Once it was later announced that there would be free pizza, there was a sudden and miraculous surge in names added to the roster and we were all set for our first class!

Everyone in attendance stated that they learned a lot, many even confessed that they’d never used or even heard of a Chrome extension and that they were excited to start using them right away. If you’re relatively new to the industry, this webinar could be a great tool for you to get started with extensions. Based on the feedback I received, I plan on conducting a second installment sometime in the coming weeks, taking a look at a wider range of options that are available in the Chrome Web Store. I’ll be sure to share the recording of part two with you all once that takes place, but in the meantime check out part one and let me know your thoughts! 

 

About our Author:

Dan Louks has been working in RPO for about three years now, having spent time as both a Recruiter and a Sourcer. In a previous life, he has worked primarily in radio broadcasting and retail sales. Married with a four-year-old daughter, he is either hanging out with them or playing retro video games in my free time. Connect with him on  LinkedIn or connect with him on Twitter.