Blog

Happy Hour: A Recruiter’s Guide To Hooking Up.

2016-01-19_14-56-19I’d like to think I’ve learned a lot over my years as a recruiter, but I’d like to start with a piece of wisdom I once got back in the day, and one that has since served me well.

“Being an adult is not that hard: don’t smoke crack, pay your bills, keep a few close friends, remember to shower and always, always take care of your bartenders.”

That’s about it. You can quit reading now if you want. It’s not going to get more sage than that.

Even though I really hate the fact I had to say, “back in the day,” because it makes me feel old as shit. Guilty as charged.

But then again, all my best recruiting stories happened a long time ago, back before I figured out you could never really figure this shit out. That doesn’t stop me from continuing to try, though.

Competitive Intel.

That’s why I’d like to give a shout out to all my homies from back when I was first coming up in recruiting – and when I was making more of a killing in this business than I have before, or since.

Yeah, I might have been young and stupid. But turns out when you’re young, stupid and rich, the world gives you the benefit of the doubt, even when you’re a recruiter. Really.

OK. We’re going in the Wayback Machine now, Mr. Peabody, so cue the chimes and shit and cut to back when I was young, kind of sexy and didn’t carry the weight of a career in recruiting on my shoulders.

Man, those were the days, right?

Now, back then, I was working an account to try to find software and web developers for a client who desperately needed them. That same client, mind you, came right out and told me that desperation be damned: he wanted the best in the business. And for him, for some reason, that meant going after Intel employees.

No idea why – maybe it was a cultural fit thing, maybe he just had really weird standards – I have no idea what was inside his obsession with Intel employees, and frankly, I could give two shits as long as I was getting paid. My CPU worked on commission, and what the client wanted, the client got, even if it was a bunch of Intel insiders. Hey, told you this was a while back…

At the time, Intel was not a client of ours, which meant, in the agency world, that they were open season for employee poaching – er, “targeted recruiting,” if you’d like. Hey, when you’re working on draw, you’re either a client or the competition, and the competition is fair game in love and the war for talent.

Of course, going after Intel was no easy task at the time, even though today with all the tools at our disposal, it wouldn’t be hard to target tech talent who had some experience working at Intel at some prior point in their careers.

This is back before sourcing was nothing but InMails and mass e-mail blasts – when it actually required some skill, and by skill, I mean actually logging onto job boards and running searches in the only candidate databases any of us had access to.

HotJobs, Monster, CareerBuilder, the fact that these sites let you search for resumes by company was a pretty sweet improvement over dialing through voice mail directories and stealing hard copies of stuff like trade association membership lists.

Basically, that was as good as it got in the late 90s (like K-Ci and Jojo, Usher or Barenaked Ladies, we didn’t have many options). I mean, in hindsight, with those limitations in place I should have been screwed, just like every other sourcer out there. And I was, if I’m being honest.

That is, until I met Lilly. That was the thing that changed everything.

Pouring One Out.

oeLilly, by the way, is not some computer program nor software application. Nor is it some new social network or point solution – although honestly, if there was a way to productize Lilly, I’d have made a killing by now.

Nope. Lilly, you see, was a bartender. And not just any bartender – the one who not only mixed a mean ass drink, but also helped me learn more about recruiting than almost anyone. Lilly was the chick who helped me raid Intel – and it was totally badass, even all these years later.

Now, some might call this the dawn of “social recruiting.” God, I hope not. But it sure as hell worked. See, Intel’s main campus – the Death Star, for our purposes – was located in an upscale Phoenix suburb by the name of Chandler.

Based on the enormous influx of skilled workers and techies Intel’s mere presence brought to the Valley of the Sun, it changed the landscape of what was once a small town into the kind of bougie place with upscale retailers, organic grocery stores, golf courses and lots of really big douchebags in really nice cars.

They paved paradise and put up a parking lot, as we said in those days. Now, one of the first things that went in along with Intel’s headquarters was a brand new shopping mall to give Intel employees something to spend all that disposable income on now that they were living in the desert and had things to do other than stop by the Orange Julius and pick up some Sbarro right across the street from the HQ campus. Pretty convenient, particularly when it’s summer in Phoenix – which is why Intel employees used to hang out there like they were the kids in Fast Times at Ridgemont High, only somehow got laid less.

In this mall across the street from Intel, you had the normal anchor stores – back before they were all Macy’s, and some other standbys, like Claire’s, Spencer’s or Auntie Anne’s (all of which somehow exist to this day – take that, Circuit City!), but what was weird about this mall is it had not one, but two themed restaurants.

And this was back before that was standard fare in every exurb capable of producing enough bratty kids to sustain a Rainforest Cafe and a Chuck E. Cheese – it was nearly unheard of.

One of these restaurants was Jungle Book themed, which seems like a weird choice for a restaurant in a mall in Phoenix, where the last thing anyone wants is mystery meat and sweltering heat, but the much more bizarre of the two was easily the one that was supposed to make diners feel like they were eating in Alcatraz.

Because there’s nothing better than food in federal prison, you know?

The weird thing about this restaurant is that while it was probably the biggest shithole this side of a TGI Friday’s in Philly, they somehow managed to have a beautiful, personable and completely amazing bartender.

Her name was Lilly. And Lilly – God, Lilly. She was the sort of raven haired beauty that would have started a siege of Ancient Troy just for her hand, or that guys would tip twenties just so they’d have the chance at seeing that sweet smile. Hell, I paid a premium for that shitty draft beer, but every cent was worth it.

Now, a woman like Lilly was the kind who could have just sat there, looked f-ing gorgeous and cashed in on tips, big time. But instead, she chose to actually earn them by getting to know her customers, and letting them get to know her. This openness, of course, is a very unusual thing for preternaturally beautiful women, and even more rare for ones working in Alcatraz themed restaurants in Chandler, Arizona, of all places.

We met when I swung by for the occasional pint of Guinness, which they had on tap as a convenient excuse to get the great pleasure of sitting with a beer and hanging out with one of the biggest badasses I’d ever met.

Slowly, we got to know each other, and I got to know this random bar well enough to notice something unusual going on – which I wouldn’t have, had I not been transfixed by the bartender and transformed into a regular.

Where Everybody Knows Your Name.

norm-quotes-9See, I started to notice that pretty much every other dude in the bar had an Intel employee badge. Intel, like most large employers, had both permanent employees and contractors, a difference designated by the colors of their badges; this difference made not a single damn to a single person across the street.

Contractor or employee alike, the Intel crew descended on The Rock (the fake one) for the same reason I did: because there was decent beer on tap, and Lilly was behind the bar serving it.

No matter how bad your day was at work, that was enough to make it better. Even if you worked for Intel in Chandler.

Now, if you’re a good recruiter, you look outside the box when you’re looking for candidates. You have to differentiate yourself, to stand out from everyone else and do something no one has ever tried before, or else take a tactic that might seem implausible (or f-ing insane, even) but doing so because maybe, just maybe, we might get that perfect candidate to finally call you back.

We’ve all done it, after all. On the odd occasion you do beat the recruiting odds through an act of the recruiting Gods, you look like a freaking genius. And I love looking like a genius.

Shit never gets old.

Drinking Problems.

Alcohol-Quotes-28Now, I know many of you know me, and if you do, this might come as a shock to you, but back in the day, I didn’t think outside the box – I thrived keeping myself cooped up in the damn thing.

Now, in my defense, I’d only been recruiting for like two years by that point, so I was more focused on foundation than disruption.

You have to get the first, first.

But for some reason, I had a bright idea: a hypothesis that all I had to do to approach these Intel candidates was hit them up about roles I had open. In a bar.

I mean, who wouldn’t want to stop bitching about how bad their job sucked long enough to hear out some random dude telling them about another one that sounded equally painful in a social setting.

Spoiler alert: I totally failed.

Like, I got less candidates to talk to me by hitting them up in that bar than I would have sending them either carrier pigeons or InMails – we’re talking awkward silence, always.

I mean, at least they were polite, but all the free drinks in the world weren’t getting me anywhere, and no one ever called the number on the dozens and dozens of business cards I must have given out with every drink, like some little umbrella or curly straw, only not nearly as fun.

I mean, why would they call me back? I was trying to pick them up at a bar – and from personal experience, that never really worked out for me all that well with the ladies, either. Who wants to talk about work while out with work colleagues, anyways?

People are looking for a good buzz, not a new job. I wasn’t aware of it at first, but it soon became clear that not only had my attempts to prove my hypothesis been abject failures, they had also backfired: I had landed up on the persona non gratis list for most of the placeable IT folks in the Phoenix area.

I mean, to them, I was just some obnoxious asshole standing in the way of them getting to talk to Lilly, and maybe, just maybe, finally being the guy who convinced her to change her “no dating customers” rule for the first time. I mean, she was out of their league – hell, she was in a league of her own, particularly in a town like Chandler.

Watching her hold her own with all these horndogs was always great entertainment for me. I loved watching Lilly work the room, talking to the guys and watching as they opened up to her, no matter what, about everything and anything – and they did, like clockwork, once Lilly started asking them questions in that way that said, “you can trust me” without saying anything at all.

Then it hit me.

High Proof Spirits and Pick Up Lines.

2016-01-19_15-18-10After realizing what I had to do, I waited for a slower than usual night at the bar – and after around an hour, the happy hour crowd dwindled down to just Lilly and me. So, I took a deep breath – and I took my shot. No – I didn’t ask her out. I asked her a question that had intrigued and eaten away at me way more than simply about dating.

Simply, I asked her, “Do you ever hear from people here at the bar that they hate their jobs or wish they could just walk out and quit?” 

Not a hard question, but I don’t think I’ll ever forget the long look she shot me – her face was full of total confusion, like she didn’t understand what I was trying to ask.

Now that I’d broken the ice, I charged ahead and went through with my well practiced pitch for my idea to help us both make money – and help out her miserable customers in the process.

And because there were a ton of miserable employees at the unofficial Intel watering hole, if we could work together, we could make a ton of money, indeed. I was really, really excited.

Lilly? She shrugged her shoulders and said “sure, what the hell?” and asked what I had in mind.

I explained to her that I was a recruiter, and I offered a referral fee for everyone I knew who gave me a lead for a candidate who I ultimately placed. She smiled, and told me she didn’t realize you could make a job out of getting people jobs like that. I loved Lilly for stuff like that. And because I felt like I could get away with it, I asked her how much she made, all in, on what she’d consider a good night.

A good night, Lilly told me, a good night was when she had $300 to take home, no matter how out of control her sales or total bar tabs happened to be – that was about as high as it got, even when they were slammed. Now, as an aside, let me tell you that if you can afford to go out to a bar and order drinks at said bar, you should be able to freaking tip your bartenders, people. They put up with a lot of shit, and slinging shots for douchebags reeking of Axe for $2.75 an hour and a couple quarters is total bullshit.

Of course, that’s another post entirely.

I explained to Lilly that anyone she referred to me, if I could get them a new job, would earn her a referral bonus of $500. I repeated it for emphasis – one hire, five hundred bucks. She raised an eyebrow, looked at me quizzically, like I were some sort of creep, and asked me what the catch was.

No catch, I told her – I just handed her a stack of business cards and told her to make sure that anyone who was bitching to her about their jobs – especially the ones in Intel badges – should get a copy of my card. If they called me and it worked out, we’d both get paid.

I gave Lilly those cards, a number she could call so her referrals would be credited to her (this was before tracking codes and IP addresses) and then over a nightcap, gave Lilly a rundown on recruiting and a list, on a cocktail napkin, of the kinds of buzzwords to listen for and the types of technologies she could make money finding among her regular clientele.

I could tell after maybe a half hour that Lilly not only had a reference of who I was looking for, but was figuring it out on the fly (she was as brainy as she was beautiful). Recruiting isn’t rocket science, of course, and by the time I left the bar that night I swear she knew more about tech than most of the “senior recruiters” who I get InMails from on a regular basis. Looking at you, TekSystems.

But what the hell did I have to lose, right?

Closing Time: Answering The Last Call.

image001-Well, after about two weeks, I still hadn’t seen any referrals come in from Lilly, although I still went in enough to know that she was trying – or said she was – and had already handed my card out to quite a few guys.

Then, suddenly, one morning I logged into my inbox and there were four – four! – resumes. From Lilly.

All were engineers from Intel – three of them candidates I couldn’t get a hold of even though I had already tried targeting them in my sourcing and outreach.

Suddenly, this odd request was starting to look totally do-able – and extremely lucrative.

They kept rolling in; after the first month, Lilly had referred me nine placeable candidates; seven were from Intel, and while the other two were not, they were still really viable for other clients I was working with.

Now, this was awesome, but put me in something of an awkward situation – I had to pay Lilly out of pocket, which I was happy to do if I landed one or two placements. But 9? This girl was such a natural even this contingency recruiter didn’t have a contingency plan to cover the costs before getting my commission in a couple months.

I didn’t complain, though – it was a drop in the bucket compared to my take – and future business from a very happy customer, who started funneling us even more job orders; of course, not everyone at his organization was as gung-ho on Intel folks, although each had some sort of unspecified, really specific thing they wanted me to look for when sourcing candidates, like the one who wanted to talk to only Arizona State grads and refused any candidate unlucky enough to be a U of A alum. Bear down, indeed.

But it was a coup, as far as business is concerned – this client had become one of our biggest accounts, thanks almost exclusively to Lilly. Goes to show you never know, right?

One morning, my boss started our weekly team meeting by recounting the story of how I’d generated all those referrals from Lilly, one I’d told him and thought he’d forgotten about if he’d even been listening to begin with. Nope, turns out that he wanted to turn this into a companywide program for every recruiter in the agency.

Now, the company was condoning – in fact, imploring us – to implement the same sort of payout I’d worked out on good faith with Lilly to bartenders, servers, or really anyone who needed cash and knew enough people to know when they were looking and where to send them.

Busboys, bell cooks, hell – anyone can get you hires, my manager told the meeting, and I had proven it. Let me tell you, I walked out of that meeting feeling like a badass.

The feeling, of course, was fleeting. After the dust settled and the offer letter ink had dried, after we’d built a pretty solid business case for referrals thanks to my unintentional pilot with Lilly, it finally came time for me to settle my tab at the bar.

Funny enough, my boss had just happened to ask if he could come along, and before being introduced to Lilly, handed me a plain white envelope. “Open it,” he told ne, and when I did, I pulled out a bunch of crisp $100 bills I later worked out to the $3500 I owed Lilly for the Intel hires (the other client hadn’t paid up yet).

I gave him a look, wondering what he was up to, and he just shrugged and explained: “I have to see if this bartender of yours was real or just another recruiter story, Zeller,” he told me, and I just smiled. “If you’re buying, I’m driving,” I told him, and we went to the petty cash drawer to pull some company cash for a night in Alcatraz. It was apropos, really.

It was a Thursday night, so by the time we got to the bar from the office, it was crowded. Lilly was chatting up everyone at the bar as usual, her infectious smile belying just how damn busy she was and making even first timers feel totally welcome and at ease. That’s one of those skills more people in this world should have.

And one that made her so special.

Tipping Works Both Ways.

8163fd5487004b60f068d098f446a296It had been a few weeks since I’d stopped in, and Lilly’s eyes lit up like a pinball machine as she ran over to embrace me the minute I caught her eye, even before I had gotten fully into the bar.

I remember my boss looking on in total disbelief and amazement that this woman not only existed, but she was as perfect – maybe more so – than I made her out to be. He wasn’t the only guy she had that effect on.

Lilly went back to work, and I waited a while, throwing them down with my manager, before Lilly stepped away for a break.

Sensing my opportunity, I followed her, pulling out the envelope with the $3500 my manager had handed me earlier. I handed it to her and said, simply, “thanks. You deserve more.”

She tentatively pulled at the envelope, and I told her to go on. I’ll never forget her face when she opened it all the way and saw what was in there.

Then, the tears began to flow as she tried to convince herself that this was really happening, that some guy just handed her $3500 just for giving out some cards once in awhile. She later told me it was more money than she’d ever held before in her life – and that she couldn’t believe there weren’t any strings attached. After finally pulling herself together and drying her eyes, she returned to the bar and announced she was buying the next round for everyone.

The evening after that was a blur. My boss, of course, made the rookie mistake of going into recruiting mode, trying to hire her on the spot. “Your talents are being wasted behind a bar,” he said, “and you could make a lot more money working with me than here.”

She smiled her Bette Davis smile, and then broke my heart. She was moving to San Diego, she said, and in fact, this was her final shift at Alcatraz – it was only coincidence that we had come that night in the first place. That was the last time I ever saw Lilly, and while I have no idea what happened to her, what she taught me about recruiting is something that will always stay with me.

We’re in the business of people, and we’re all dealing with difficult emotions, feelings and situations every day – and have to make some tough choices in who we trust. For many of us, that’s not a boss or a co-worker – it’s a bartender, or a babysitter, or someone you might not think is capable of being a great recruiting resource, but is capable of helping you land more hires than every other type of social recruiting combined.

Trust me, while I’ve never had a referral generator as effective as Lilly, this strategy is still effective, and even now there are bartenders across the DC area with my business cards in their pockets, even though it’s been years since I last worked the desk at an agency.

I’m corporate now, so I’m in no position to hand out $500 a hire, but somehow, I still find a way to take care of my bartenders. Because, you know, tipping can work both ways. #TrueStory

Derek ZellerAbout the Author: Derek Zeller draws from over 16 years in the recruiting industry. The last 11 years he has been involved with federal government recruiting specializing within the cleared Intel space under OFCCP compliance. Currently, he is a Technical Recruiter for Oracle.

He has experience with both third party agency and in-house recruiting for multiple disciplines and technologies. Using out-of-the-box tactics and strategies to identify and engage talent, he has had significant experience in building referral and social media programs, the implementation of Applicant Tracking Systems, technology evaluation, and the development of sourcing, employment branding, military and college recruiting strategies.

You can read his thoughts on RecruitingDaily.com or Recruitingblogs.com or his own site Derdiver.com.  Derek currently lives in the DC area.

 

Bigger In Texas: Top 5 Coolest Tech Companies in Texas.

reconverseAs a little country girl from Waco, Texas, I may be a bit biased, but some of the best things in life come from Texas. We do things big in Texas – real big.

You need to look no further than Texas job openings, and not just the energy companies. With Texas having added 26,500 private sector jobs in December, 24,100 in November and 17,200 in October, finding solid candidates is number one on most company’s to-do lists.

With all this hiring going on, it is no wonder that some of the top recruiting minds in the industry are based right here in Texas.

William Tincup, Bryan Chaney, Craig Fisher, Matt Charney, Shannon Pritchett, Jim Durbin, Carrie Corbin, and Jeremy Roberts all call Texas their home.

Why are the cool people here?

Because in Texas, we are doing some cool stuff and we have cool companies in Texas.

Lone Stars: The Top 5 Coolest Tech Companies in Texas:

The Coolest: Pristine.io: EyeSight

The Department of Homeland Security is working with 10 – 15 startup companies in Texas and Illinois to find ways to integrate wearable technologies for first responders. Mark my words, Pristine.io, based in Austin, Texas,  will set the benchmark for wearable technology. What they have created is a tool to bring video communication to “deskless” workers and gives them the opportunity to collaborate with remote colleagues in real time. Partnered with Google Glass, they have done this with a tool called EyeSight.

Imagine, you are in surgery, and the surgeon needs a second opinion. They can contact one of their colleagues and show them exactly what they are doing and get some advice. Did I mention it is HIPAA compliant?

So, healthcare is where the tool is growing, but for now (based on what I have read) they are targeting the field service and inspection industries.

So what does this have to do with recruiting? Could you imagine if your candidates could wear one of these while they were being interviewed, and you were watching live? How many times have you wanted to be a fly on the wall when one of your candidates was being interviewed? Now could be your chance.

Another possibility from a recruiting perspective would be to have members of the IT staff film what they do all day. Sure, it might not be the most exciting thing that you would have seen all day, but it could totally disrupt the recruiting world. This is the only startup on my list, but Texas is the best place for startups right now.

Bonus: They are in walking distance of the Iron Cactus Mexican Restaurant, Grill and Margarita Bar.

The First: Jobs2Careers

At first glance, JobsCareers looks like every other job board out there. But there is a twist. Jobs2Career was the first job board that allowed “pay-per-application.” You only pay Jobs2Careers when someone actually applies for your job, not when you post the job.

They claim that companies no longer need to “post-and-pray,” which I think is quite a stretch, but it does save money. Here is how pay-per-applicant works. You post your open positions. Post as many as you want – for free and then the rest of the work is up to the job board.

Their job is to find you, qualified applicants. More importantly, they are prescreening the candidates for you saving you time and money. You will no longer have to sort through crappy resumes that usually clog your email, only the ones that match what you are looking for. Why pay per month when you can pay per completed qualified application?

Even cooler is their Pay-Per-Call feature. When you post your job, candidates will have the option to “click to call” the employer. You only pay when the candidate calls you. This is mobile optimization at its best.

Bonus: The office is a short drive from a great view of Lake Austin.

Check them out.

 

The Free-est: Spiceworks

When I was with ScriptLogic (now owned by Dell), Spiceworks was a company that we always competed with. Was it a better product, I don’t think so. (Again, I am a bit biased.) But why did we lose to Spiceworks? Because it is free. FREE. Not kidding.

I am sure the 111 mil. in VC helps them offer it for free, but we are talking about inventory management, help desk management, IT asset management, network monitoring, and mobile device management for free. So how does this relate to recruiting? They have an IT Community that you can join, and the cost is, you guessed it, FREE.

They offer free webinars, free training and free to attend meet-ups. What does this say to me? It means I can find some free IT candidates, that’s what. Bring IT on, y’all…

They also have cool IT pro shows online called CTRL+ALT+TECH.

Bonus: In town on a Wednesday, make sure you go to Texas Roadhouse for a 10.99 steak dinner.

The Smartest: GradLeaders (Formerly CSO Research)

OK, the smartest could be a stretch. I called it that because this is a company that helps connect companies with college students both grads and undergrads. I like this tool because they don’t only have a recruiting tool. They actually take the time to train you on how to connect with students, which as a 42-year-old I definitely could use some help on. Need a candidate with a bit more experience? Don’t worry, GradLeaders can also help you get in contact with Alumni groups, and faculty as well. If you are having trouble recruiting students and recent grads, GradLeaders has figured it out for you. And you can make friends on their CSO Employer community. (Don’t get too excited about it, though. It is hosted on LinkedIn so odds are no one uses it, but it is available.)

Bonus: Since they are doing the recruiting for you – try some indoor skydiving at iFLY Austin.

 

The Biggest: Indeed

Are they disruptive? No. Are they doing something cutting edge in the market? Not really. But they are the biggest Job Board of all time, and they are based here in Texas. I feel like I would be rude not to include them on my list. Especially since so many of my friends work there.

Indeed has something many other job boards can’t emulate; the power of one. Unless you have been in solitary confinement for the last ten years, you should already know that Indeed aggregates open positions from across the web, yet somehow manages not to duplicate jobs and posts them in one place and saves job seekers and recruiters a ton of time.

Bonus: When you are in town, schedule a tour of the Circuit of the Americas. Two words. Formula One.

https://youtu.be/0Ua3G0x-ATs

So you can see, there is more than oil and cattle in Texas, we have some cool companies in Texas too. See for yourself. In February, RecruitingDaily, and a few of our friends are tripping around Texas connecting in-house recruiters to the vendors they need to know.

Texas is big so don’t waste time trying to cover the whole state looking for the best recruiting vendors. We will bring them to you at our Reconverse event.

reconverse

 

We have handpicked the best suppliers and are bringing them together in-house recruiting leaders for exclusive networking and peer-to-peer roundtable discussions. We have done the heavy lifting for you. Register today and come down to Texas, we’ll leave the light on for y’all. Follow us on Facebook to check out the fun.

Stranger Than Fiction: Recruiters and The Myth of Generational Marketing.

back+in+my+day+blue+plateThere’s always at least one recruiter in every room who still reminisces fondly about the days of when candidates used to mail in resumes to ads they found in print newspapers.

This, let’s face it, is a way bigger pain in the ass than any ATS will ever be, but that was just how things were done (and not too terribly long ago, too).

Then came fax, e-mail, mobile, social and who the hell knows what’s next. But no matter how far we’ve come in terms of better living through consumer technology, the fact is that going through a job search or company application process is still really, really painful.

Even if, as many recruiters seem to perceive it, it might not be as excruciating as it used to be. I can only imagine how shitty that must have been – seriously.

But even if you’re one of those recruiters still nostalgic for the “goold old days” of cold calling and Boolean search, you have to concede that you’re badly behind the curve, even though you’re adopting best practices that have a proven track record, shit that’s always worked – like picking up the phone, for instance.

You’ll take the proven methodology over a passing fad, any day of the week. All that stuff is really just a speed bump for recruiters, anyways. It all comes down to making placements, and you’ve made enough to make a stand on the impact of new technologies on old school recruiting.

Generational Marketing: Recruiting Best Practice or Bullshit?

marketoonistIn all fairness, we’ve all made our predictions. I’ve made mine.

I’ve been right more than I’ve been wrong, and with that, I wanted to go ahead and address what’s becoming an increasingly prevalent trend among practitioners and pundits in the weird little world of talent attraction these days. I’ve been watching and waiting for a little while now, and I feel I can stand before you now, and say to you with great authority:

Generational marketing is bullshit. And don’t let the snake oil salesmen selling this shit convince you otherwise.

So, let’s talk about what I mean by generational marketing.

Just to be clear, I am not bashing the utility of persona based marketing, or developing specific messaging or campaigns based on personality profiles. This is actually something recruiting needs to do more of.

When you open any requisition and look at the kinds of candidates that are going to be successful, you’ve got to know what their most likely professional aspirations and personal drivers will be in order to better target your talent focused communications and have more relevant, effective recruiting conversations.

This is why, whether you’re trying to engage with targeted talent through any channel, from blogs to direct e-mails to job ads, you have to talk to their interests and aspirations, not yours or the employer you happen to be representing on that particular req.

Personas work. Period.

But let’s be clear: persona marketing is not the same thing as generational marketing. Because in persona based marketing, you have a precedent for what success looks like, and can make some generalized assumptions on shared characteristics of high performing, high potential workers within any job group, function or project team. Once identified, targeting and marketing to  candidates whose personalities or performance potential aligns with previously defined personas isn’t only smart, it just makes sense.

What makes no sense, though, is building these personas explicitly around when those candidates were born or what arbitrary age range they happen to fall into – which is more or less the entire point of “generational marketing,” missing the point that candidates, as consumers of work, are unilaterally going to perceive job opportunities or recruiting communications through the lens of experience, not age.

These are two completely different concepts that should never be confused. Since one’s, you know, really a thing. The other is BS.

Old News: Why Generational Marketing Doesn’t Matter in Recruiting.

iconI’ve considered that the widespread adoption and seemingly sudden shift of “generational marketing” from the recruiting margins to the mainstream, recently, can be attributed mostly to misperceptions or misunderstandings by recruiters about what persona marketing truly entails.

I thought somewhere, most recruiters had mistakenly mixing this marketing concept with the ubiquitous conversation around generations in the workplace.

But as much as I want to at least give the benefit of the doubt, the fact is that every week seemingly brings on a new brocade of all those “silver tsunami sweeping the workplace” or “millennials say the darndest things” headlines, and with it, the reassertion that recruiters really believe this stuff.

Which is ridiculous, really.

The biggest problem (and my biggest issue) with “generational marketing” is that we ignore fundamentals so that we can cater to smaller groups when we haven’t got the fundamentals right.

For example, recruiters have no way of knowing how to write a job description that specifically speaks to what a millennial really needs, but then again, recruiters don’t know how to write job descriptions that speak to anyone about anything, really.

And on the other hand, the fact that we’re writing job descriptions or creating campaigns targeting certain demographics defined exclusively by age is actually a compliance violation at best, discriminatory hiring at worst. Hell, you’d think recruiters would know better than to approach protected classes differently than any other job seeker – there are whole government agencies devoted to cracking down on that kind of shit.

Sure, there are certain scenarios where you are targeting a very specific mentality, one that happens to fit into the millennial, Gen-X definition or whatever generation you want to write for, but in reality if your fundamentals aren’t right and you haven’t met the most basic criteria for someone to be able to apply to a job, it doesn’t fucking matter.

There’s a reason why technology companies have huge development teams and they take a ton of time to do quality assurance testing before they roll anything out or let marketing see it (at least outside of HR Technology, that is).

Because you can’t build a customized message to a customer if you don’t know the fundamentals of how something works. Especially if it doesn’t work at all.

5 Recruiting Fundamentals That Matter More Than Generational Marketing.

gen zMy other problem with targeting generations with recruitment marketing is that we make a ton of assumptions about what that group is or isn’t, what that group likes and dislikes, and what type of job that person wants to do.

In reality, we’re supposed to be learning how NOT to make assumptions.

It’s how we lose star candidates before they even walk in the door, assuming that because they didn’t finish college they can’t do the job, or because they make a certain amount of money, they would never consider going to your smaller company.

Those types of assumptions burn placements and make it harder for job seekers to find the right job and for recruiters to put those people into the right jobs. We’re wasting our breath focusing on generational marketing. Period.

And if you really want to talk generations, I challenge you to this.

If you can’t check the box for these 5 things, it’s time you checked out of the “generational marketing” conversation for good:

  • Referrals make up the majority of my applicants.
  • I know exactly how long it takes candidates to apply for jobs.
  • I’ve reevaluated my entire recruiting tech stack within the last 3 years.
  • My job descriptions are more interesting than reading the dictionary or the phone book.
  • I can accurately measure my source and cost per hire and monitor my conversion rates.

If you couldn’t answer “yes” to these recruitment marketing fundamentals, you’ve got way more pressing issues to worry about – and if you don’t get these right, you’re going to get recruiting wrong – no matter what age of candidate you happen to be hiring.

So shut up about “generational marketing,” already – it’s getting really old by now.

Just like those of us in Gen Y, really.

Flawless: Becoming The Beyoncé of Recruiting

Recruiters areRecently, Katrina Kibben, Derek Zeller and I did a blab.im to talk about all the reasons why people hate recruiters and share our advice to help recruiters be better. If you didn’t catch our blab or live in a world where you think recruiters are perceived as nice people, do a quick Google search. Mine is on the right.

Evil. Idiots. Liars. Not exactly a good reputation.

Unfortunately, in some cases – those words apply. We all know there are bad recruiters out there. You know them from your recruiting days or maybe your own job searches. They’re the ones that don’t reply, don’t know what you do and ask all the wrong questions. They make everyone look bad and frankly, it irritates me.

In my recruiting days, I thought of myself as a dream maker – and that’s not some metaphor to boost my ego. I did not hunt for resumes and submit any candidate I found. I took my role really seriously, knowing that the impact I would have on both my candidates and the companies I recruited for had serious life consequences. As you likely know from your own recruiting experience, an appreciation for doing things right doesn’t always produce the fastest results. Regardless, I maintained my preference for quality over quantity. I stayed focused.

In pop culture, we might call these recruiters – and I surely call myself –  the Beyoncés of recruiting. Being the Beyoncé of recruiting is no simple task. Beyoncé is known for a level of perfection – from her music to her look. In recruiting, that translates to being respected for your work, pursuing a flawless reputation and being bootylicious. I’m only kind of kidding about the bootylicious part. It surely doesn’t hurt anything.

Being the Beyoncé of Recruiting takes more than focus, though. It takes skill. it takes practice. It takes work. It takes these 6 things, and maybe a dash of being bootylicious, too.

hate recruiters1) You Must Not Know ‘Bout Me: Ask Questions.

I cringe when I get a call or e-mail from a recruiter saying they have the perfect position for me… when we’ve never spoken before. Half the time, they haven’t even Googled me. How can you know what the perfect job for me is if you have no idea what’s important to me or what I even like to do? If you can have good communication with your candidates, they will give you all the answers you need  to help you decide if what you’re offering is a good fit. Get to know your candidate by asking things like:

  • Have you considered looking at a new position?
  • How would you describe your dream job?
  • Have you ever heard of (company name)?
  • What could you add to your current job that would make it the best?

Believe it or not, there are some recruiting software platforms that can help you ask better questions. Take a look at:

hate recruiters2) Crazy In Love: Listen.

Recruiters call with an agenda – to get the job filled. But we are not dealing in widgets. Our product is people. Because of that simple fact, you have to earn trust and respect. When a candidate feels like you’re listening, you have the building blocks for a solid relationship. If they say they aren’t looking for a job, respect that. Don’t try to weasel them into allowing you to submit their resume.  Not only will you build a rapport with the candidate, but you’re impacting turnover as well by not putting people in the wrong jobs.

Not such a great listener? Try video interviewing. You can go back time and time again to listen to what the candidate is trying to tell you, instead of trying to get everything into the first conversation. It also helps you see what they aren’t saying, with their body language and facial expressions. But there are also a ton of video tools on the market. Here are the ones I recommend:

  • InterviewStream They have a role-play tool that you can use to train new recruiters.
  • SparkHire –  Video Interviewing made easy. Video interviewing is basically all the same, until it comes down to the services and SparkHire has the best customer service ever.

3) Who Runs The World: Connect With me.

Once you find a good candidate, whether you’re going to be able to place them in a job or not, connect with them on social media. Add them to a Twitter list. Ask them to connect on LinkedIn. From there, be a connector. Check out these tools to help you better connect with candidates on a more one-to-one level:

4) All My Single Ladies: Engage With Your Candidates hate recruiters

If you have candidates or potential hires in your social networks, share information that is relevant to them. Let them know what is going on in the industry. Give tips on how to find new jobs or negotiate salary. Be valuable to them and eventually, they’ll be valuable to you. Recruiting is a never-ending cycle of good karma and helping people is just that. You want to be the first person on their list of calls if they ever need a job or want to refer a recruiter. Need technical support staying engaged? Here’s where to start:

  • Herefish – This is a service as well as an automation tool to allow you to reach out to candidates that you haven’t seen for a while.  Best part – Herefish does it for you.
  • HRS –  The cool thing HRS offers is their “Social Sourcer” that allows you to push content to candidates through their HootSuite integration.
  • Talemetry – I like Talemetry because of their built in engagement reporting. See what engagement does for you.
  • Sparc (Formally Match-Click) – A video based job description service leveraging real employees to share critical information about the career opportunity and could just influence the job seeker throughout their job search.

hate recruiters5) Best Thing I Never Had: Following Up.

Be reliable. Be punctual. Do what you say you are going to do no matter how small the task is. If you can’t keep up with the little things, why would someone trust that you can help them in one of the biggest decisions in their life? These tools can help:

  • iCIMS Recruit – With iCIMS Recruit you can schedule out what you want to say to your candidates, among other things...
  • Visibility – They offer an ATS that allows you to schedule and document all of your communication in one place making it easier to remember to give your candidates a call.
  • Akken Cloud – Akken Cloud leaves you no excuse for not managing your candidates. They have an efficiency improvement platform and it works (if you work it…)

6) If I Were A Boy: Empathize.Hate Recruiters

Not being chosen for a job sucks. Candidates want feedback on whether or not they are getting the position, but they also want to know if they interviewed well. Be honest. If you were in their shoes, what would you want? Do that.  “You just weren’t a good fit” is not a good enough answer. Especially after you have told them how perfect they would be for the role. Of course, you may not have any additional information. Be tactful but be considerate and empathetic to the fact that they may feel rejected. Not a good feeling.

And if you’re looking for a tool to help with this one, go get a new job. Recruiting is a series of letdowns (for candidates and recruiters alike) and without empathy, you can’t be the Beyoncé of Recruiting.

ICYMI: Here is our Blab!

 

Diversity & Exclusion: A Realistic Look at the Question of Progress in HR and Recruiting.

diversity-cartoonAs a white male, there are few conversation topics more taboo than talking about (much less writing about) the issue of race. It’s one of those things, like politics, sex or religion, that’s just not considered apropos for the workplace.

This is why we only speak of ‘race’ in terms of “diversity” and “inclusion.”

While these precepts are predicated on overt prejudice, frankly, for some reason the not so subtle institutionalized quota system that equal opportunity employment and affirmative action represent have become firmly entrenched as a dedicated HR discipline.

Loving Your Enemies.

This has become another egregious example of HR hypocrisy; a recent survey by executive search firm Witt/Kiefer found that 84% of active Chief Diversity Officers at enterprise employers were themselves visible minorities (with African American males predominating within this professional demographic).

This, of course, mirrors the larger trend that HR has become, in fact, a little too effective at diversity within its own function; according to Forbes, 69% of all HR professionals and fully 74% of HR Managers are female, which, in fact, is the very same type of disproportionate representation that diversity initiatives were designed explicitly to address (by comparison, about 55% of the US workforce, according to the Department of Labor, was female).

HR is essentially the home economics of professional functions, demographically speaking; statistically, preschool and elementary education is the only other category where women are more prevalent than men, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Additionally, the same organization suggests around 52% of practicing HR professionals are “visible minorities,” which far surpasses the 37% rate of the overall US workforce.

That HR maintains such an overrepresentation of women and minorities should mean, theoretically, that inclusion efforts within the function should shift towards targeting white males, at least according to the stated purposes of corporate diversity efforts. Of course, that’s not the case.

In fact, HR professionals with less than 3 years of experience, according to SHRM, were somehow more predominantly female or persons of color than their more experienced counterparts, meaning the growing gender and diversity divide in the profession will only continue to grow.

This mirrors the larger trend within the US workforce, where minority representation is expected to rise to 57% by 2060, with the US Department of Commerce projecting nonwhite ethnic groups will represent fully 85% of U.S. employee population growth through 2050.

Such demographic changes will inevitably transform the workplace; how they will transform diversity hiring initiatives, of course, remains to be seen.

Rediscovering Lost Values.

groupthinkOne fact, however, is becoming crystal clear: in order to prepare for the workforce of tomorrow, we need to rethink our approach to diversity and inclusion – furthermore, that change needs to start in HR if HR will continue to be the primary arbiter of diversity and inclusion programs, initiatives and organizational compliance.

Because these efforts today are not only completely extraneous (as evidenced above), but largely ineffective,

In fact, a recent longitudinal study of over 700 companies demonstrated that implementing formalized diversity programs has little positive effect in addressing underrepresentation, and may in fact decrease participation of women of color.

This is only one of a litany of studies producing data to suggest that diversity programs actually exacerbate the same problems they purport to address.

A recent Harvard Business Review article’s title really says it all when it comes to our current approach to diversity: “Diversity Programs Don’t Help Women or Minorities, and They Make White Men Feel Threatened.”

This central thesis was reinforced by an experiment conducted to measure white male attitudes towards workplace diversity conducted by the authors of the aforementioned article. In this experiment, college aged white men were subjected to a hiring simulation for an entry-level job at a startup technology company.

For half these young, white and male “applicants,” the recruitment marketing materials and company culture collateral for this fictional firm incorporated references to their “pro-diversity” values; for the other half, diversity was not mentioned during the application process. Besides this slight difference in positioning, the company career copy was identical.

Each “applicant” was then subjected to a simulated, standardized “interview” to gauge their attitudes towards their fit at each firm. During these simulated interviews, each participant also had their cardiovascular activity monitored to determine stressors.

The study found that compared to the control group, to which diversity was never mentioned, the group of white men interviewing at the company who explicitly highlighted diversity was much more likely to enter the interview with expectations that such a firm would evidence more unfair treatment and reverse discrimination towards them than their counterparts.

Additionally, the ‘applicants’ for the “pro-diversity” employer performed much more poorly in the standardized job interview, during which their cardiovascular responses evidenced far more stress than the control group. These stressors spiked when topics related to “diversity” and “inclusion” were mentioned – far more than any subject tested.

According to the study’s authors:

“Pro-diversity messages signaled to these white men that they might be undervalued and discriminated against. These concerns interfered with their interview performance and caused their bodies to respond as if they were under threat.

Importantly, diversity messages led to these effects regardless of these men’s political ideology, attitudes toward minority groups, beliefs about the prevalence of discrimination against whites, or beliefs about the fairness of the world.

This suggests just how widespread negative responses to diversity may be among white men: the responses exist even among those who endorse the tenets of diversity and inclusion.”

Yeah, diversity kind of sucks  – at least from where I’m sitting.

How Long? Not Long!

ted_20120216I am, personally, part of this aforementioned group of white guys who actually believe in the principals behind diversity and inclusion, and applaud organizations committed to making these efforts.

The fact of the matter is, though, I do believe that the existence of diversity and inclusion initiatives have more or less led to diminishing returns.

It’s time we address the fact that such efforts fail what’s largely becoming a minority group overall, but even more so, within the same HR profession tasked with diversity and inclusion in the first place.

In addition to threatening white men, as the study suggests, diversity initiatives also seem to do little to convince minorities that companies will treat them more fairly.  After doing the same experiment with visible minorities, it turns out that even the company who aggressively advertised their pro-diversity position and initiative was seen as “no more inclusive, no better to work for, and no less likely to discriminate against minorities than a company without a pro-diversity stance.”

The study’s authors, reviewing their results, suggested that the only success corporate diversity initiatives really have achieved is in compliance with diversity and EOE/AA/OFCCP legislation. In conclusion, however, they caution that “when people feel threatened, they may resist efforts to make the workplace more inclusive.”

Extending this logic, then, the realization becomes readily apparent that the only true way to achieve diversity and inclusion, and have these efforts pay off, is through eliminating – or at least completely changing the context – of current diversity and inclusion efforts.

The same study showed over 80% of white males agreed with the fact that race and gender shouldn’t inhibit employment or advancement opportunities, meaning that white men are actually more active advocates of diversity (at the moment) than racial minorities (at around 65%), and about equal to women across all races (81% of whom agreed, in theory, with diversity recruiting).

I See the Promised Land.

white-guys-suck-and-they-can-lauWhile I’m unsure what the future of diversity hiring looks like, one thing is clear: if it continues to mirror present practices, it’s not only going to threaten the very same historical gains these programs have made, but are likely going to increase discriminatory hiring practices, decrease employee perceptions of inclusion and make race, that “elephant in the conference room,” as it were, a point of contention instead of consensus.

I know even writing a post questioning the conventional wisdom behind diversity, as a white guy, is pretty much asking for controversy, or else suggestions of complicit racism or explicit discrimination, but in fact, the exact opposite is true.

I’m just sick and tired of reading about the importance of diversity while being marginalized – and knowing as much as I agree with conventional wisdom (like the fact McKinsey found organizations in the top quartile of racial diversity performed 35% better in terms of financial returns), the fact is that these programs don’t work as intended.

Of course, I’m just following the advice of Dr. Kira Hudson-Banks, who studies hiring bias and diversity programs at Saint Louis University, who writes that the most important way to address this issue is by bringing it up in the open. She writes:

“Be prepared for some harsh truths. Racial discrimination, tokenism, and the sense of isolation are common concerns. But if you don’t hear, acknowledge, and understand them, you can’t do anything about them.”

Which more or less seems to be the direction diversity initiatives seem headed unless we change the course – and conversation – around inclusion. Because no matter what terrible societal and historical problems white dudes were responsible for in the past, the fact of the matter is, that we are the diversity candidates of the future – and the exclusion has to stop.

Or at least, on MLK Day, a guy can dream, right?

The Fit Bit: Does Hiring For Culture Fit Matter More Than Recruiting For Skills?

culture fitUnlike many HR centered constructs, there is actually a clearly established business case for creating a strong organizational culture, and that hiring for culture fit has a direct impact on a company’s performance and bottom line results.

According to a study conducted by the International Review for Business Management and Research of over 60 peer reviewed research studies focused on the human capital performance outcomes of over 6,000 businesses, the case use of culture is clear:

“The competitive advantage of an organization is attained through strong association and establishment of culture. The organization culture helps in measuring limitation to overcome performance measurement. The limitations shows that culture and employee performance shows negative correlation as employee performance is badly affected by it.”

Need further proof that culture, recruiting retention are all inexorably intertwined?

A 2015 Gallup poll showed that fully half the American workforce reported having quit at least one previous job exclusively because of a bad manager, echoing the conventional wisdom that “people leave people, not companies” as well as the outcomes of dozens of previous studies showing similar results.

This rationale, however, is only one facet of culture fit (or lack thereof) and its impact on voluntary turnover. For instance, another 2015 study by TinyPulse found that a worker’s peers “can make or break a job,” with employees who don’t feel recognized by their peers 11 times more likely to leave their job than those who feel appreciated and respected by their team.2016-01-15_09-22-44

That same study found employees who gave their overall company low marks for culture were 15 times more likely to look for a job than those who gave their current employer flying colors.

Add in the fact that employees who feel comfortable with their workload were around 31% less likely to be actively looking than someone who reported feeling overworked or overstressed at work, and you’ve got a pretty obvious reason why recruiters tend to emphasize culture as a primary consideration – and selling point – to job seekers.

Much fewer, however, turn these culture branding efforts towards targeting their current employees, too.

Mission Statement, Impossible?

culture fit recruitingGiven the extreme costs associated with turnover due to poor culture fit (50-60% of that person’s annual salary, on average, according to SHRM), the fact that internal mobility remains the number one source of hire overall and referrals the top source for external hiring and given the recognition that culture, as a dynamic construct, is largely shaped by existing employees, this seems like a grievous strategic oversight – and a huge miss by HR.

The fact is that if someone doesn’t fit with your company culture in the first place, even a successful candidate is doomed to the inevitability of failure, fatigue or frustration associated with this misalignment in mission, vision or values.

That’s why it’s more or less a Sisyphean task to try to address current employees who don’t fit your culture; by the time they accept that offer, it’s already too late.

With the average employee tenure hovering right above two years for managerial and professional level positions, according to the BLS – of whom, data suggests around half will leave within a year of accepting an offer – they’re also not statistically worth proactively saving post facto, even if it means incurring the cost of backfilling them.

Instead, it’s essential to refocus your efforts on hiring for cultural fit by reexamining what your culture is really all about – not as some 30,000 foot mission statement, but how it looks at the line level –  and, if necessary, redefining how you articulate that culture and how you screen candidates for fit during the hiring process.

Of course, defining what, exactly, your organizational culture consists of is easier said than done. Companies have been known to employ a wide range of strategies, from behavioral assessment tools and screening solutions to external consultants, internal focus groups or, in many cases, executive edict.

No matter what the means might be, the common end goal of this exercise should be to create a list of standard cultural norms that impact the overall operations of your business and accepted practices (formal or informal) for how employees should interact with their managers, executive leadership and each other.

These SOPs should have enough fluidity to reflect the dynamic element of culture as well as the fact that, done right, great cultures are largely organic and not created.

While employee driven and focused on individual workers, however, they also must not only gain management buy in, but be largely seen as an executive edict instead of an HR initiative.

If the CEO isn’t able to clearly articulate your culture, there’s misalignment between their vision and worker reality or any other disconnect between leadership and the line exists, however, such efforts are doomed to failure.

The Value of Values.

hiring for cultureMake sure before rolling out any changes to hiring for culture fit, branding for culture or even considering anything related to this concept that you have consensus among senior leaders, hiring managers, peer interviewers, recruiters and everyone else in your employee population that you’ve accurately identified the most important characteristics or traits to look for when looking for organizational culture fit.

Let’s say, for purposes of illustration, you’re at a high growth startup that values autonomy and encourages a sense of employee entrepreneurship.

In that case, you’ll want to source candidates who have a track record of success in similar roles or companies and include questions related to this specific culture fit signal throughout the interview process.

For example, highly entrepreneurial candidates are more likely to be able to “sell themselves” and what they’d bring to the table than someone who’s only able to talk to their resume and the job description.

No matter what those key components of organizational culture might be at your organization, you’ll need to figure out, as in the above example, which behaviors to look for and which questions to ask to find fit reliably. If you’re unsure, the answer is as simple as asking your hiring team or existing employees for help.

Their stakes in finding a candidate who’s the right culture fit are higher than anyone else’s, since they have to live with (and work with) whatever hiring decision you end up making, and whether or not that person stays put.

Better to ask for their feedback up front than deal with the repercussions of bringing onboard a shitty hire or a toxic teammate. Trust me on this one.

Cultural Bias?

culture_fit-2While there’s been a pretty consistent consensus that a strong culture creates both competitive advantage and positively impacts productivity, output and bottom line results, actually putting tangible programs or initiatives in place to codify culture fit as an integral component of organization’s hiring processes is a different story.

The importance of recruiting for culture, again, is nothing new; companies like Bell Labs, Intel, GE and P&G were built through an intense focus on internal mobility such as rotational and leadership development programs, and have structured their hiring practices around looking for potential for future success instead of past accomplishments. Hire for fit, train for skills has built some of the biggest bellwethers in business. In theory, this should be as integral a part of the people function as payroll.

Of course, these companies happened well before “personnel” morphed into “human resources,” which, invariably, presented an obstacle to something both sensical and simple. Surprise, surprise. The biggest reason why hiring for fit remains more on the talent margins than the recruiting mainstream has more to do with the legacy misconception that for some reason, looking for culture fit can lead to both discriminatory hiring practices and erode organizational diversity.

The myth that hiring for culture acts as a “smokescreen” for discriminatory hiring practices has no statistical validation beyond pop psychology and anecdotal evidence, but that hasn’t stopped this misconception for persevering as a widely held belief among both the academic and mainstream press.

Articles on “Why Culture Fit Is Really Discrimination” appeared as recently as a few months back in publications like Fortune, Inc. and the Harvard Business Review.

This is akin to reading about why vaccinations cause autism, or how global warming is a myth – and every bit as accurate in terms of the overwhelming body of evidence to the contrary.

Culture Fit Isn’t Supposed To Be About Inclusion.

culture biasExplaining the justification behind this leap in logic and vacuous vacuum deduction, Lauren Rivera, who researches hiring bias at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern and cautions organizations against hiring for fit, explains:

“Interviewers look for a sense of connection, often seeking potential friends and “playmates” rather than those with the best work experience or job-relevant skills.”

I’d say that the ability to interact with teammates and colleagues, share a common vision and perspective with your coworkers and the potential to work across business units and teams is about the most job relevant skill there is.

Every recruiter already knows there’s little to no connection between prior work history and future potential. If there was, hiring wouldn’t be so damned hard – and we wouldn’t still be talking about the importance of culture fit.

It’s important to also understand that hiring for culture fit doesn’t necessarily mean hiring people who all look the same; the most important thing is that they share the same values and similar attitudes or expectations around work as their coworkers, teammates and direct supervisors. Diversity isn’t a human capital issue; it’s an intellectual capital issue.

And anyone who would suggest that you can tell someone’s values, work ethic or intrinsic abilities based off the fact that they’re part of a protected class would more or less be the definition of discrimination, frankly. Just like you can’t tell culture fit from a resume, you sure as hell can’t judge the quality of a man’s character by the color of his skin, to paraphrase something a wise man once said.

Of course, what the hell do I know? If I knew how to fit into any corporate culture, I’d have already gotten a real job by now.

 

What Venture Capital Means for The Future of Recruiting.

cinco_de_mayo_squirrelSourcers and recruiters have long chased after proverbial “purple squirrels,” those elusive, highly skilled candidates that represent the type of “top talent” that actually lives up to that moniker.

Their rarity, of course, has led many organizations and recruiting agencies to invest an inordinate amount of their time and energy chasing a quarry that’s nearly impossible to catch, statistically speaking.

The rich rewards, however, of overcoming these odds, much like Powerball or pyramid schemes, prove so enticingly lucrative that the promised payout can lead to even the most data driven recruiters opting for the power of possibility over probability.

Even the most blue chip retained firm or the most connected recruiter out there, however, knows the potential peril of investing a finite amount of resources into an infinitely improbable search.

This is why almost no recruiter works on only a single req at one time, effectively hedging their hiring in order to distribute risk and increase the odds of generating a successful placement (and payday).

VC: Where Myths Meet Money.

Much like recruiters and “purple squirrels,” venture capitalist firms spend their days in a similarly single minded hunt for what are commonly called “unicorns” – defined as a VC backed company with a total valuation over a billion dollars. In 2014 alone (the most recent year for which complete stats are available), venture capitalists sunk an estimated $52 billion into the technology and life sciences category alone, representing investments in nearly 50,000 early or mid-stage startups, the highest total reported since the height of the dot com bubble in 2000.

That same year, exactly nine achieved a liquidity event worth more than a billion dollars, led by the staggering $21 billion that Facebook (a former unicorn in its own right) paid for WhatsApp. This small number was actually a historical high, beating the 7 Unicorn exit events of the previous year; in the entire decade since 2005.

In fact, only 44 VC backed companies out of the literally hundreds of thousands of firms with some sort of VC funding who emerged (and mostly disappeared) achieved true “unicorn” status during these 10 years.

As of this writing, only 138 privately held companies in the world were worth a billion dollars or more, led by Uber’s $51 billion valuation.

Number-of-Private-Unicorns3That you’ve even heard of Uber actually makes it something of an outlier – most unicorns, such as Chinese smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi (the second most valuable VC backed company after Uber at $46 billion) or Palantir Technologies, the biggest of big data companies with an estimated $20 billion valuation, remain as obscure to the average consumer as the funds investing beaucoup bucks into driving these staggeringly high valuations.

Few have ever heard of entities such as New Enterprise Associates or Institutional Venture Partners, two of the top 5 VC funds in the world in 2015, whose generic and mundane names undermine the fact that they’re not only responsible for investing in some of the most exciting technologies in the world, but if they were publically traded corporations would easily rank among the Fortune 200.

New Enterprise Associates, for instance, saw an $18 billion increase in portfolio value in 2014; that same year, The Walt Disney Company, by contrast, ‘only’ generated around $14 billion in total revenue, for a basis of comparison.

You don’t need a PhD in quantitative finance (which many investors actually do) to realize that the odds of finding a unicorn are pretty piss poor, to say the very least – but the potential profits prove an even less effective deterrent in the chase to find the next Facebook, Google or Genentech.

And, increasingly, more and more firms are putting their bets on the HR Technology sector, turning this vertical from a business backwater to something of the belle of the VC ball these days.

All in the Timing: When To Get Capital for Your Capital Idea.

gomezIn my most recent post, Making It Rain: A Recruiter’s Guide to Venture Capital, I discussed exactly what talent pros need to know about how venture capital firms traditionally allocate their investments, what drives their decision making and what types of risks and rewards are generally associated with raising VC money.

You can click here to read the whole post, but the moral of the story for anyone trying to transform purple squirrels into unicorns?

Only raise venture capital if you’re OK with selling your company; even if the price tag is less than you expected, it’s only a failure if you and your investors lose money. The greatest success you can have is to generate a positive return.

Hell, even WhatsApp lost $128 million the year before Facebook acquired them, proving that even for the ultimate unicorn, the formula for successfully generating a return from your investors might necessitate getting out while the getting’s good.

And while many would-be entrepreneurs have no problem stepping up to the VC plate, it’s stepping back that often proves problematic for so many founders.

Profit beats passion any day of the week. If you’re not in this to get out, then get out now.

To VC or Not to VC? 5 Questions Every HR Tech Company Should Seed.

8XxJMNNSo, let’s say you’ve read the above and aren’t phased in your quest to raise enough capital to transform your latest product or idea into the next big thing.

Or, perhaps you own or have a stake in a pretty nice HR Technology business that has seen steady revenue growth and a developed into a pretty solid business with a decent customer base after years of bootstrapping and belt-tightening.

Everything was going according to plan until some analyst at a VC Fund unexpectedly calls up one day with an invitation to meet with one of their partners on their upcoming trip to your neck of the woods.

Whatever the case, when you’re thinking about raising venture dollars for your HR or recruiting technology company, here’s how I would recommend determining whether or not it’s the right time to take on VC money – and if so, how you can make sure to make the most of any initial or early stage funding that you’re lucky (or unlucky) enough to raise.

 1. Do You Have A Reason?

cleese-gif-1What’s motivating you to turn to outside investors? Is it because your competitors are gaining speed and market traction?

Is it because there’s a network effect, virality or other significant barrier to entry that any of these competitors could potentially erect to erode your business and its long term viability?

Do you have a “go bit or go home” mentality? Are you ready to be rich (without also being king)?

Whatever your rationale is, make sure it’s compelling enough to not only attract investors, but not to scare away the people who have helped your company grow to the point of even having to make this critical decision in the first place. Because without the human capital in place, there wouldn’t be a viable product in the first place.

Don’t make this decision for yourself (or by yourself). Make it for your people, for your business or for your customers. If you’re doing it just for the money, then there’s no need to ever take someone else’s.

2. Are You Ready?

4746120-are-you-readyEveryone has a great idea; quite few have the confidence that idea can scale into a sustainable, successful business.

This can only be done by getting past the due diligence of figuring out whether there’s a market opportunity that’s not only viable, but monetizable (the latter being far more difficult than the former, frankly).

Realistically, unless you’ve got like three degrees from Stanford, a Harvard MBA with McKinsey or Goldman on their resume or were one of the first hires over at PayPal, pedigree alone isn’t enough to attract investment.

The only background or experience that really has any equity with equity investors is that you’ve successfully exited from somewhere else in the past for somewhere north of, let’s say, fifty million bucks.

If that doesn’t describe you – and if it does, chances are you’ve got no desire to go through the associated growing pains of growing another company – then you’ll actually need some sort of proof of concept of the fact that the market you’re so confident of in fact exists.

The only way to do this is by proving traction through paid customers and a fairly robust future pipeline; the purpose of VC is to augment, rather than initiate, those efforts at gaining momentum and finding a foothold in the market.

If you’re not already booking customers, winning deals and booking revenue (the more recurring, the better) then you should go back to the drawing board, not out to VC investors.

If your company isn’t pointed in the right direction, and the infrastructure isn’t there to support hockey stick style growth in the future, then it’s going to be damned near impossible to change the course of your rocket once you hit the light speed of scaling a startup.

Make sure you’re aiming in the right direction before you fire away.

3. Are You Really Ready? 

tumblr_ndq3kahyY91stxegwo1_500VC firms generally back up their investments with deep insights and expertise on how to build companies, but what they’re really looking for when making those decisions is whether or not there’s some sort of pre-defined, proven formula to which they can add capital. This is where the concept of what’s known as “unit economics” comes into play.

Here’s what that means. Let’s say you have a SaaS company who is buying qualified leads at $100 a pop, but your average deal size is only $100 per converted lead.

That means while you can pay for your customer base upfront and break even, but let’s say that those initial $100 customers subscribe to an additional service or product tier, which commits them to paying $50 a month, every month, ad infinitum.

Sweet, right? You’re totally kicking ass, and should have no time raking in the VC cash with that type of business model.

Of course, there are obviously a lot of subtleties and uncertainties in every sure thing – even looking at the above example – from the view of those potential investors. What’s the gross margin involved, for instance? If you sell a product for $100, but it costs $75 to bring that product to market and keep it there, this might not be as interesting.

Is your lead generation strategy scaleable? If you’re buying AdWords for $100 a month and suddenly that same word’s price spikes for some reason, then there won’t be enough cash to keep the sales funnel and deal pipeline growing…as you can see, there are a ton of complexities, and they add up quickly.

The bottom line here is your bottom line.

4. How Good Do These “Unit Economics” Have To Be?

giphy (15)A VC will try to grow their invested capital at a rate of 30% return every year; that’s more or less the standard success benchmark every fund measures itself by, and it’s an aggressive target. Of course, many of the companies in their portfolio will return 0%; the key is having enough that will return at 1000% to offset those losses and hit that 30% for the year, every year.

As a rule of thumb, if you’re a founder, you’ll want to double your enterprise value each year; this is especially true of earlier stage companies. The closer you are to zero, after all, the easier this is to do.

If you can’t double your revenues in the first three years, then good luck when you’re expected to start generating that sort of cash every quarter. At a later stage company – one with a cash flow of $10 million or more – then the risk profile is decreased, as is the required return for the investor.

It’s kind of like if you gave your buddy who just got out of jail some cash until he got on his feet – you’d expect the money back, of course, but since you’re obviously taking a high risk that you’ll ever see it again, you want an extra 15 or 20 bucks if he does come through as promised. On the other hand, if you gave your other buddy a bridge loan so he could relocate to a job in Silicon Valley he accepted after graduating from MIT, you’d probably only want a couple bucks thrown your way as a ‘thank you.’

An early stage company is your buddy, the parolee. For startups, you need to have demonstrative proof to credibly convince investors you’ll return 100% per year, with the ability to return a few hundred percent if a few things go your way. Once they do, you’ll start looking a little less like an ex-con and a little more like your other blue chip buddy.

 5. What Does This VC Investment Mean for My HR or Recruiting Business?

giphy (16)If you’re in HR or Talent Technology, there are a few specific implications to consider when considering venturing after venture capital, as should be fairly obvious after going through the above.

You have to have a business that can be really big.

Huge, even. I mean, you’ve got to kick serious ass.

If a great business typically captures even 20% of a market, but that market’s only worth $10 million, then the most money I’ll ever be worth is $2 million a year in revenues, max.

At a 15% cash flow margin and an 8x exit multiple, I can only be worth 2.4 million in enterprise value ($2 million * 15 * 8) in that scenario. That’s chump change. Typically, the defined market (think: ATS, payroll, performance management) has to be worth a billion dollars or more, at a minimum.

You have to have a business that can be really scaleable.

If you’re in a SaaS business where you can support an unlimited number of subscribers, you’re going to have far more success at scaling and far fewer growing pains than if you’re doing one off consulting or ad-hoc projects.

Now, if you can combine that product with the kinds of services people are willing to pay extra for, that’s even better. The key here is finding enough reasonably smart people to sell it, which is more easily done at scale than finding enough consultants to scale a services offering (although anything but easy).

You have to have a business that has really attractive gross margins. 

I’m talking, really sexy. Because VCs, as a rule, are used to investing in software companies with 85% gross margins. Go tell that to a retailer and see what they say – it’s a pretty ridiculous threshold to try to meet.

These companies, based on these margins, are able to eventually generate large bottom line profits as their base of recurring revenue increases, while their fixed costs are able to be spread across even more customers, who ideally cost almost nothing to acquire and support. Gross margin is also a great litmus test for finding barriers to entry.

If something has a 90% gross margin but is super easy to replicate, that means others will inevitably enter the market and compete with you directly until your margins are significantly decreased. If, on the other hand, that 90% margin can be maintained, you’ll have VCs lining up at the door waiting to write you a check. Doesn’t happen very often, though.

The Exit Event: What Happens Next.

math_is_hard_poster-r63bddbd6f6084dc18c6568434c482a37_w72_8byvr_324Wow. You really made it through all that? All those numbers, and all those boring finance terms and math and stuff?

You, my friend, just might have what it takes to be a VC backed entrepreneur, after all. You clearly have a high enough threshold for self-inflicted pain to create a killer product.

To you, then, the biggest piece of advice I can offer to anyone out there with a great product is to find a great mentor – someone who’s been there before, and can help you navigate through the inevitable unexpected bullshit, market turbulence and cyclical stressors you’re going to have to deal with.

There’s no better way to follow a roadmap than to have someone who’s already been there helping show you the way. There’s just too much to learn and too little time to learn it well, much less execute.

But if you’re really smart, have a good business and a great mentor, then you’ll succeed – with or without VC investment.

phil strazzullaAbout The Author: Phil Strazzulla is the founder/CEO of LifeGuides, a recruiting and HR technology startup which builds software to help make it easy for employers to create the content that explains why their company is a compelling place to work – and effectively attract top talent.

Before LifeGuides, he was a venture capital investor at Bessemer Venture Partners, the oldest VC in the world which has made investments in companies such as LinkedIn, Cornerstone On Demand, Skype, Yelp, Pinterest and many others.

Phil started investing at the age of 11 when he opened his first brokerage account and hasn’t stopped since.

Follow Phil on Twitter @PhilStrazzulla or connect with him on LinkedIn.

 

 

No Time for Losers: Why We Love To Hate Recruiters.

queenPick any trending topic that’s top of mind in recruiting right now, from the candidate experience to onboarding.

Chances are that once you strip away all the unnecessary layers of BS, buzzwords and bureaucracy, and once you get rid of the ubiquitous consultants and unnecessary complexity, all recruiting is just variations on the same theme, really.

Step back and take a really good look. Fact is, every problem plaguing our profession shares both a common cause and a stunningly simple solution.

Turns out, overcoming even the most pressing or pervasive talent challenge really comes down to what seems, superficially at least, to be a pretty obvious silver bullet: adding a little humanity to the hiring process.

No matter how many machines we have, no matter how much data we generate nor how many processes we can automate, the simple fact is that every recruiting process revolves around people. Hiring managers, not algorithms, still have the final say in who gets an offer.

The most advanced matching engine or sophisticated software can’t build scaleable, sustainable relationships with candidates, no matter what the product marketing material may say.

And as much as the talking heads and “thought leaders” would like us to think otherwise, the fact is that for many of us, working directly with candidates represents a significant part of the way we spend the days we spend at work.

Under Pressure.

giphy (14)Now, if you’re a recruiter who doesn’t happen to be dedicated to backend research or sourcing, and you aren’t already spending pretty much all of your time directly interacting with candidates, do us all a favor.

Stop reading this right now, pack up your things and find yourself a new career.

Real interactions between real people is what real recruiting is really all about, and if you think otherwise, you’re not really a real recruiter, as far as I’m concerned.

Of course, you wouldn’t know that interpersonal interactions are intrinsic to our industry, at least not judging from the way that so many recruiters fail so miserably at what should come pretty naturally to anyone who’s not a sociopath or an SPHR.

Even if you’re not the most extroverted or outgoing person, if you’re in recruiting, you either fake it until you make it or you get the hell out. A little practice makes perfect, and a little persistence makes placements.

Too bad there seems to be such an endemic shortage of shits given to perfecting what’s arguably recruiting’s most critical core competency, and too many shitty recruiters out there incapable of actually sounding like people, even when they actually do pick up the phone.

That’s the weird thing about a lot of recruiters – they manage to tick off candidates by acting and sounding like robots even when they’re at their most human. The tech sector is perhaps the best proof of this phenomenon.

Seriously. I know not a ton of people in tech necessarily had a ton of friends growing up, or really vibrant social lives as adults outside their World of Warcraft Guilds and occasional LARPing excursion, but still. That doesn’t make them any more likely to want to talk with you if you spit out your selling points and job requirements with the speed of a Hadoop stack and the feeling and fervor of an automaton.

I’m not sure if this strategy is deliberate, but it’s a miserable failure either way – and that’s putting it nicely, to say the least. So if a recruiter’s system isn’t hardwired for humanity, what can we do to update their software or reprogram their skills? How do we solve for this unplanned obsolescence?

Too Much Love Can Kill You.

tumblr_n8qd8gslp91tcw7cko1_500OK. I’m not one to beg, but in this case, I’m willing to suck it up and implore you to please, for every other recruiter out there, to change your approach to this particular worst practice TODAY.

By sending out mass email blasts responsible for generating more spam than your average online Russian pharmacy, you’re not only destroying your credibility, but the credibility of OUR entire profession.

Look, I get it. I really do. You’re being forced to do more work with less resources and more pressure than ever before. Your candidates are driving you crazy, your hiring managers won’t make up their minds, and every one of your open reqs was supposed to be filled yesterday.

Hey, I’ve been there, too. Hell, we all have.

In both agency and corporate environments, it’s easy to sacrifice for the sake of speed, particularly when you get all of the blame when good reqs go wrong. No one notices a recruiter until they screw up. And we all do, on occasion. But there’s no greater screw up screwing up all of us than the weapons of mass communication that recruiters use to blast out email sends.

If you stop and really think about it, no matter how many names you source, and no matter how rich your research may be, if you don’t have time to do anything more with these potential candidates than blasting every profile you find some shitty, generic e-mail, then do you really have time to deal with the off chance that some of them are actually going to respond?

I Want To Break Free.

tumblr_m8mfveK9Ok1rd524so1_500Here’s a good rule of thumb: if you want a person to take time to respond to a recruiting message, recruiters have to take the time to actually write that message to a person, personally.

Top talent is finite, but automation isn’t, and at some point, something’s got to give.

My guess is it’s going to be all of our asses when we finally reach the that inevitable tipping point where we’ve effectively turned away every candidate we’d actually want to hire.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at some of the data I’ve discovered in looking at my own performance over the course of a couple of years.

Yeah, I know – nerd alert, right? And yes, while I do crunch the numbers on my response rates from LinkedIn, I can’t get the whole picture simply by looking at this single platform, which I primarily use as a last resort if for some reason I can’t develop someone’s contact information on my own.

Even so, I’m using LinkedIn because it offers the most consistent and standardized way to monitor and measure my personal performance over the past few years.

Here’s what the numbers say:

Year 2009 – LinkedIn Response Rate: 18%
Year 2015 -LinkedIn Response Rate: 31%

You don’t need big data to tell that this represents a pretty big difference, statistically speaking. It’s also anomalous to the aggregate industry wide data that shows recruiting response rates dipping drastically. This downward trend, judging from the data, seems perhaps more pronounced on LinkedIn than any other potential source of hire out there.

So how the hell did I manage to more or less double my response rates, defying both logic and conventional wisdom in the process?  Not coincidentally, it was around 2009 (2010 at the absolute latest) when I really woke up to the reality that the disparaging responses (or lack thereof) from candidates was entirely my fault. I kept getting the same shit results, I realized, simply because I was treating all candidates the same.

I’d have been insane to expect different results, which is why I would have been crazy not to start taking the time to customize my e-mails to candidates – I mean, really personalizing them – and it wasn’t long before those response rates began rising, and dramatically so.

Now, while I admit I still start with a template, I genuinely shape it to that person, using it as a departure point for developing messaging and calls to action specifically tailored for their specific skills, experience and expertise.

While I did a pretty kick butt job turning my candidate response rate around, what was even more telling was that I soon began getting a new type of response that I hadn’t really seen before. Suddenly, but not surprisingly, I began getting replies from people who ultimately weren’t interested in the opportunity I had offered, but who still wanted to connect anyway. Mind. Blown.

Let me reiterate: I’m not for the total abolition or abandonment of email templates. They serve as an effective time saving device, ensuring that recruiters have a framework for creating compelling messages without having to continually reinvent the wheel every single time we send a candidate an e-mail.

What really matters is that there’s some element of humanity in them that shows top talent that they’re responding to someone who at least cares about them enough to take the time to at least try to make recruiting emails meaningful; I’m not sure why anyone would trust their careers to a recruiter who doesn’t even care enough to make sure they get their macros right.

When we fail to stay human, we’re not just failing the candidates we want to hire; we’re also failing other recruiters, particularly when we so frequently perpetuate the automation arms race on other recruiters, too. If we can’t even create a decent experience for our professional colleagues and industry counterparts, how can we hope to do any better for our candidates?

Another One Bites The Dust.

tumblr_lv38bboe2F1qdslbvo1_500To spend such an inordinate amount of time identifying and trying simply to talk to top talent seems like an egregious waste of time when so many recruiters do little more than simply rip through some script.

Consequently, recruiters often squander those rare chances for direct candidate contact by racing through some checklist of qualifications, focusing on “processing” candidates instead prescreening or, more importantly pre-closing them.

It’s not enough for a recruiter to find the right talent, after all – they’ve got to get them to accept an offer, too.

Of course, the fact is that not every candidate you’ll have a conversation with will be someone you’re able to place directly, but even if you don’t have any immediate opportunities. A little personalized outreach today will go a long way towards winning hearts, minds and top talent tomorrow.

The goal of engaging a candidate isn’t necessarily to place them into a position, but instead, to make them aware of who you are, the kinds of roles you’re hiring for and what they can do to help. That’s why instead of going for the direct sale, it’s a good idea to use that initial candidate conversation as a chance not to talk business, but instead, simply to get to know each other a little bit better.

This serves two purposes: it makes candidates more comfortable (and trusting) while talking to you, and it allows recruiters some sort of insight into whether or not they might be a fit for your company culture (and if not, to screen them out as early in the process as possible).

And no, you don’t need some sort of bullshit, peer reviewed, PhD proctored “personality assessment” to gauge this culture fit; if you know your company, and you know what it takes to succeed in the business unit or teams you’re hiring for, then you’ve got all you really need to know to go with your gut. This, of course, remains the best tool in any recruiting arsenal, big data, social and mobile be damned.

During this initial recruiting conversation, it’s always a good idea to review their background and experience for some sort of mutual affinity, whether that’s both having graduated from the same college or having a common connection from a previous company. Or, instead of trying to do that dance around how much comp they’re looking for, instead talk about that unusual pastime or extracurricular activity that’s often the most interesting part of a candidate’s resume.

In my experience, I’ve found this a fertile source for finding shared interests or hobbies outside of the office. You know, the kind of stuff candidates actually want to talk about. Hell, I just spoke with a candidate a few days ago who actually stuck something at the bottom of his resume about his love for Lego.

When I called him, we instantly connected after spending the first 15 minutes of our conversation talking about all the new Lego stuff we were getting our our kids for the holidays (read: cool new toys for Dad to play with). Turns out, once we started talking about the real reason I was calling, dude wasn’t a fit, but we developed a good rapport that lead to a great referral before we finally hung up the phone.

While talking about toys with a candidate before even bringing up potential opportunities may seem silly, or even a waste of time for recruiters trying to fill reqs as quickly as possible, but I’m willing to bet he’d never have connected me directly with a former co-worker (and current friend) if I was just dialing for dollars and treated these calls like some sort of “Robo-Cruiter.”

Nope, I was calling as Pete. And Pete is a far better person than the perception pretty much any candidate currently ascribes to recruiting professionals writ large. That’s why I’ve found it always pays to be yourself with candidates – unless, that is, you suck. If that’s the case, you won’t get very far with top talent in the first place.

Friends Will Be Friends.

tmAnother tactic that I employ on almost all of my calls is that when discussing their potential future team or manager, I’m careful to use only first names with candidates to convey the kind of open, collaborative culture candidates are almost always looking for in a potential new employer.

It seems like a small detail, but in my experience, it’s made a big difference, particularly in tech recruiting.

So when I’m talking about our Hadoop Engineering team, which as a collective is every bit as boring as it sounds, I instead refer to Eric (the manager).

I also refer by name to every member of Eric’s team (and call them that, collectively), how the group is structured and how success is measured, both subconsciously creating a sense of familiarity with the group while also opening the door for the candidate to ask any questions they have related to Eric’s management style, professional history or interviewing style.

Whatever they want to know, I want them to know that they can do so on a first name basis. This seemingly superficial, often subconscious strategy can go a long way in developing a sense of trust and transparency with the candidate in question. You’re not only being candid and open with information, you’re also giving them the insights they need to know in order to have the best chance at getting through your hiring process and, ultimately, getting an offer.

Of course, the earlier you’re able to establish this candid candor, the easier getting that offer accepted becomes. It’s hard to refuse someone you trust. Trust me.

The Show Must Go On.

tumblr_m6xq7cjjWX1qaef0yo1_500I know it probably sounds crazy to most recruiters out there, but as much as an emphasis as we should be placing on humanizing the recruiting process, it’s also imperative for us humans to intervene when that process doesn’t go exactly according to plan.

That means actually taking the time not only to offer the candidate good or bad news, but updating them on their status even when there’s no news at all.

Look, things get stuck in recruiting all the time, and when this happens, recruiters more or less have one of two choices to make.

You can either entirely freeze out a hot candidate (or, more likely, keep them treading water), or you can take three minutes and make a call to give them the peace of mind that they’re still top of mind. In recruiting, common courtesies are anything but – and this is the type of tactic that stands out the most to active and passive job seekers alike.

I know what you’re thinking: “calling a candidate with an update that there’s no update. Who does that?”

The answer is almost no one. Which is why they’ll always remember you’re the one who took the time to let them know you were looking out, which, come closing time, has a funny way of working out almost all of the time. These three minutes, in fact, can be the most valuable time any recruiter spends connecting with candidates.

Even if the entire point of the call is that the recruiter has nothing to say, it’s a gesture that truly speaks volumes.

Don’t Stop Me Now.

giphy (4)Ultimately, that old aphorism that recruiting isn’t rocket science is true. We’re in the people business, and we need to always remember that, no matter what tools, tech or trends the HR Technology industry happens to be making noise about this week, these vendors will never be able to automate what makes real recruiters really dangerous.

This business is all about basic human communication, common courtesy and emotional empathy. Good luck getting that across in some shitty e-mail template or catch-all communication.

All the tech in the world will never help build rapport with a candidate or trust with a hiring manager. Only recruiters can do that.

And that, after all, is why they pay us the big bucks.

unnamed (11)About the Author: Pete Radloff has 15 years of recruiting experience in both agency and corporate environments, and has worked with such companies as Comscore, exaqueo, National Public Radio and Living Social.

With experience and expertise in using technology and social media to enhance the candidate experience and promote strong employer brands, Pete also serves as lead consultant for exaqueo, a workforce consulting firm.

An active member of the Washington area recruiting community, Pete is currently a VP and sits on the Board of Directors of RecruitDC.

Follow Pete on Twitter @PJRadloff or connect with him on LinkedIn, or at his blog, RecruitingIn3D.

 

Conference Champions: How To Win At Recruiting Events.

career fairDuring the deepest depths of the recession, nightly news footage was full of seemingly stock footage of resume clutching job seekers standing in line at career fairs.

The formula for these recurring stories was always the same – some gloomy unemployment statistics cut in with shots of career fairs and interviews with long ago laid off white collar workers presently reduced to professional punery.

While such stories seemed to underscore the microeconomic misery of the masses of unemployed, what they glossed over was the fact that, even with unemployment well over 8%, CNN reported in March 2009 an estimated spike of 25-35% in career fair attendance, with an 60% of those attendees having more than a decade of professional experience.

Of a local career fair with over 50 employers in attendance, a spokesperson reported, “if they’re attending, they want to fill positions.”

Even with the economy at its worst, then, and hiring at its slowest, that the few employers who were actually adding jobs evidently chose to invest their recruiting bucks in career fairs underscores a trend that continues even in today’s torrid talent market.

According to one recent survey, employers reported attending an average of 31 career fairs in 2014-15, with 100% reporting to having allocated at least some spend to in person recruiting events or career fairs during the same year.

This rare consensus among recruiters job fairs as a reliable source of hire, regardless of economic conditions or the bigger job market, would seem to suggest that employers were seeing substantial recruiting ROI from such events.

With universal adoption of career fairs, meanwhile, only 78% of employers in the same survey report on planning on using social media for recruiting and only 71% planning on dedicated diversity spend in 2014-15.

But if you really think that real recruiters are seeing real results from these hiring events and career fairs, you’d be dead wrong.

Not Fair: Why Employers Should Shift Their Event Spend.

goes-to-job-fair-not-just-for-free-stuffThe thing is, with the average employer spending around half a million dollars on these inordinately expensive efforts, only 37.5% of employers reported to actually making a hire despite the unilateral investment in this channel.

According to the 2014 Career XRoads Source of Hire Survey, across the board, career fair hires accounted for a putrid 1.4% of all external hires last year, an outcome only slightly better than the .9% who reported making a hire from print advertising.

That’s not to say that professional events, industry conferences or trade shows aren’t still a great source of qualified candidates.

It’s just that most employers’ event activation strategy seems singularly focused on active job seekers, from college career fairs to candidate open houses or “employer brand” focused event presence.

It’s just that making events pay off for recruiting and hiring means shifting spend (and focus) to proactively targeting top passive talent. With career fairs more or less the in-person equivalent of “post and pray,” building a pipeline of potential hires for today – and tomorrow – means shifting sourcing strategy to fish where the proverbial fish are. And increasingly, there are few waters more fertile – yet for some reason, largely untapped – than professional conferences or seminars.

According to the Center for Exhibition Industry Research (CEIR), B2B event spending in the US spiked to an estimated $70 billion in 2014, with 71% of professionals reporting to having attended at least one industry conference or trade show in the past year; 48% report having gone to three or more, four times as many as in 2010.

With the ubiquity of these events only expected to increase in 2016, it’s time recruiters realize that connecting with top talent doesn’t only have to happen online – and in fact, professional events might be one of the most desirable destinations for reaching the most desireable talent on the market today.

Buy Show, Sell High: 7 Keys For Successful Conference Sourcing and Recruiting.

Of course, this sort of recruiting event strategy requires way more than just setting up a table and taking resumes.

While industry conferences and networking events represent a powerful potential source of hire, making sure you’re getting the most out of the money and time your recruiters invest in attending these events requires a little strategy, a little sweat equity and a whole lot of hustle.

Here are seven strategies recruiters can use before, during and after events to make sure they’re making the biggest bang for their recruiting buck – and the biggest ROI when it comes to real hiring results.

What to Know Before You Go.

1stalking. Identify Potential Candidates.

Even if  you only need to make a single hire, it’s pretty rare that any single req or role is going to be worth the expenses associated with conference attendance. That’s why when planning which professional events to target, recruiters should always remember to research and identify events which align with their most frequently recurring roles or forecasted future openings.

Looking at lists of confirmed attendees or past registration lists to ensure that their current titles or current responsibilities reflect the type of talent you’re targeting; if these lists don’t exist, try obtaining a copy of a sponsorship prospectus or exhibitor’s guide. These are easy to find and almost always include at least an overview or high level look at the professional focus, experience or expertise of event attendees.

While often imperfect, this generally represents at least enough information for recruiters to decide whether or not a respective conference is worth the price of admission.

2. Do Your Homework.

Make sure to do everything in your sourcing power to obtain access to the confirmed attendee list and try to fill in any gaps in public registration information that might help you target your recruiting efforts, such as job title or current company. If there are current employees with experience or expertise similar to the background you’re targeting, ask them not only which events they’d recommend, but also, any attendees in their network worth targeting.

Even at recruiting events, referrals are where every smart sourcing strategy should start.

Once you’ve identified specific candidates you’ll be targeting, make sure to research their professional history or personal interests. That should include any profile information you can find through search or social media, previous presentations they’ve given or articles they’ve published, or any other online insights that might help turn a passive conference attendee into an actual connection (and, hopefully, a candidate).

3. Write It Down.

This is simple: if you’re taking the time to do the prep before an event, make sure you’re able to put all that hard work to work by writing it down. It’s cool if you bring your notes with you – in fact, if you’re compiling enough information on your targeted contacts or candidates, there’s no way that you’re going to be able remember it all.

Make sure these notes are organized so that if you need to hunt down a candidate’s dossier in a hurry, and don’t be afraid to refer to them as necessary (as long as you don’t go overboard and remember to actually make eye contact – and connections).

If anyone else from your company is planning on attending the event, make sure to share these notes with them, too; you never know who’s going to have the best chance to make that first candidate impression for your company.

Game Day: A Playbook for Kickass Recruiting Events.

work conferenceIf you’re properly preparing for an event, a good rule of thumb is you’ll spend about twice as long preparing for the big day ahead of time as you actually will at the conference or seminar.

That’s why if you’ve put in the work to do the proper amount of prep work before the event kicks off, then the hard part’s behind you.

Here’s what to do with all that pre-game planning once the show finally gets underway.

4. Be Smart About Sessions.

Obviously, you’ll want to look at a copy of the event agenda ahead of time and plan to attend the sessions or talks that are most likely to interest the candidates you’re targeting, particularly if they happen to be presenting or exhibiting as part of the conference’s planned itinerary.

That way, you’ll know when and where you’ll have the best chance of meeting qualified leads, and spend your time on site the smart way – converting candidates, not hunting down potential prospects.

Of course, you’ll want to leave a little flexibility in your schedule, and leave a little wiggle room so that you’ll leave yourself some time to spend introducing yourself and networking with other attendees at these sessions. It’s also a good idea for recruiters who want to stand out to ask relevant questions during any Q&A or following up with the attendees you meet by exchanging business cards or relevant information whenever (and with whomever) possible.

Because if that person sitting next to you in that next session might just be your next hire, you’ve got to know what’s next.

5. Stand Out On Social.

Most events have associated hashtags or some form of dedicated social media presence designed to encourage attendees to share ideas, insights and observations with each other, and with their wider network of professional colleagues or connections who might not have been able to make it to the event. This back channel should be front of mind for every recruiter at every event.

Even if you don’t share anything, social is another great way to develop qualified candidates or potential leads from an event; seeing who’s interacting around a conference related hashtag can be invaluable for determining who’s actually worth talking to – and what they’re talking about, too.

Of course, sharing relevant information or insights from your own social account can make top talent want to find you, too.

6. The Only Way To Sell Is By Not Selling.

If you want to actually convert the connections you make at conferences, it’s important that potential candidates consider you a professional colleague, not just another recruiter. This makes subtlety a blatant imperative for successful conference recruiting.

What makes these events so valuable is the fact that you’re able to find and connect with attendees who probably aren’t actively looking for a job, which means that most are there, first and foremost as representatives of their current employers. Too much glad handing or being too overt with your recruiting overtures can permanently alienate potential candidates – or at least put them in an awkward professional position.

Use that first face time at an event to make that first impression, and make sure the contacts  you make at a conference are going to be meaningful enough to translate to deeper conversations or connections long after the event itself has ended.

The Post Game Report.

sorryNo matter what you do, no matter how perfect the match might be, at least wait until after the event to present any concrete job opportunities. That way, at least, they have to give you a way to follow up, even if it turns out they’re not interested, chances are they’ll know someone who might be a good fit.

For recruiters, it’s just a good idea to wait until after the fact to stop shmoozing and start selling. First things, first.

When the event is finally over and it’s an appropriate time to follow up, make sure that you not only include those on your initial target list but include any new connections or candidates in your initial outreach.

Also, it’s important to ensure that you’ve captured their information in a centralized database, like an ATS or CRM, along with any relevant notes or additional information  about a candidate you’ve captured that’s worth remembering (or sharing) for future reference.

During this first round of post-event outreach, be prepared to introduce specific openings or opportunities to candidates who might actually be qualified or interested in available opportunities; if the potential candidate isn’t interested in pursuing an immediate career change, it might not be that they’re not right – it’s just they’re not right for right now.

Make sure to put these warm leads into your active pipeline or recruiting network so that you can follow up with them for future openings, referrals or even, if you’re smart, recommendations for who you should target at the next event they’re planning on attending. If it’s not already on your list, make sure to start again – and repeat steps 1-7 as necessary.

It’s all in the execution – and following these 7 keys for event and conference based recruiting should give every employer the leg up on the competition for top talent.

Remember: there’s no such thing as “fair” when it comes to careers, so skip the career fairs and rethink your recruiting strategy at events and conferences.

 

Don’t be an (ID)IoT: 11 Programming Terms for Recruiting the Internet of Things.

internet-of-thingsThe future of STEM careers can be found within the Internet of Things (IoT). So maybe you’re thinking “what the IoT is IoT?” If so, you’re not alone.

To explain, for those who who don’t geek out on tech recruiting and are not yet familiar with IoT, it’s the ability to connect any device to the cloud and control it online.

The bottom line is, everyday devices are collecting more data points and getting “smarter.”

The catch is, as our devices are getting smarter, we need smarter people to create and develop them.

So why should recruiters care?

Because an entire new industry of hard-to-find developers is rapidly growing and any smart recruiter knows, that’s a business opportunity waiting to happen.

“The Industrial Internet (of Things), this latest wave of technological change, will bring unprecedented opportunities, along with new risks, to business and society. It will combine the global reach of the Internet with a new ability to directly control the physical world, including the machines, factories and infrastructure that define the modern landscape. However, like the Internet was in the late 1990s, the Industrial Internet is currently in its early stages.”

 Accenture, ‘Winning the Industrial Internet of Things’

Think about this: half of you don’t even know what the Internet of Things even is and I found over 2,000 open positions.

Why The Internet of Things Matters for Recruiting.

Still not sure what all this means? Well, good thing for you – Mashable created this mini-introduction course .


Right. It’s time we started adding IoT specialities to our repertoire. Our first stop in beginning to recruiter for IoT developers is to understand their code. Here is a list of the most common programming languages used in “Things Speak” you should familiarize yourself with.

1. C

Developed in the 1970’s, C is the oldest and most popular programming language. The C language supports the other popular programming languages like C#, Java, JavaScript, and Python. C is almost always used to build operating systems and embedded applications.

2. C++

C++ is used to build system software, application software and client-server applications model requiring high processing capabilities like video games.

3. Objective-C

Utilized by the Apple operating system, Objective-C is a object oriented versatile programming language. It is the power behind  Apple OS X and iOS, as well as the application programming interface (APIs). There is a huge recruiting gap for the demand of this language.

4. Java

One the most wanted programming languages, Java is the standard for businesses’ software, websites, games, mobile applications, and Android operating system. Java is created to work for applications written on Mac and Windows.

5.    JavaScript

Spoiler alert – Java and JavaScript are not the same thing.  The two languages speak to each other, for example, some libraries can be used by both, but they were developed separately and share no syntax or semantics. JavaScript is a scripting language that runs on the client.

6. Python

Python is a high-level scripting language primarily for webapps. It’s considered as a clear and easy language to learn for beginners because of the short, easy understanding syntax.

7. Ruby

Ruby is an object-oriented, dynamic scripting language for mobile web pages and apps. Web sites including Scribd, Github, Groupon and Shopify all run on Ruby.

 8. Go

 

Looked at as an alternative to Java, Go was developed at Google. “Go combines the development speed of working in a dynamic language like Python with the performance and safety of a compiled language like C or C++.”

9. Rust

Rust developed at Mozilla,  is an open source project that is evolving quickly. The primary use of  Rust is to make it harder to write the kind of security-compromising bugs that are abundant in C and C++

10. Parasail

Parasail is a compiled, object-oriented language that has evolved so that it can be programmed with syntax that looks like Java, Python, and C#.

11. B#

B# looks a bit like C#, but it allows for real-time control functions relevant for IoT development.

You’re welcome. Now don’t go out there sounding like an Id(IoT.)

Has Recruiting Content Jumped The Shark?

Henry-Winkler-The-FonzFor many of us who work in the content marketing space, one of the biggest trending topics is the question of whether or not there might not just be too much content out there, sparking an ongoing conversation about how we are living in a “content glut,” or even “peak content,” if you like.

Supporting these statements are a litany of facts, specious statistics like, “there are 2 million blog posts published every day.” “Every day, we publish a million more minutes of footage online than anyone could consume in a day,” which, on the surface, at least, suggest a pretty compelling case.

And when it comes to recruiting, the perpetual source of so much crappy copy and cliche career advice, how could you even make a case that this industry actually needs to keep cranking out content?Here’s the thing: I’d go so far as to suggest that, in fact, there isn’t nearly enough recruiting content out there. Not by a long shot.

Sit On It: 57 Channels and Nothing To Do.

1196162003_1There was a time when there were only three television networks. Even when you added in a local UHF station and a PBS affiliate, there were rarely more than seven stations to chose from. Each channel tried to gain the most audience by broadcasting things they felt the most people would watch.

Shows became simple, shallow and repetitive. How many sitcoms use “let’s switch jobs to show how hard we have it” as a premise? And aren’t we still seeing “surprise twin” and “amnesia” storylines on soap operas, themselves pablum content disguised as content, to draw housewives in so they could be sold soap?

When cable became the de facto at most suburban homes, Bruce Springsteen complained that we had 57 channels and nothin’ on.Because, as the number of channels split, they couldn’t all show the same pablum to their audiences (the TV audience, split 3–6 ways, could support these shows, but when you couldn’t realistically expect more than one-sixtieth of the viewing audience, you can compete in a different way.

That’s why MTV and ESPN and CNN (and the like) were created, to focus on specific markets. Sure, housewives might like drama, but maybe some like news more than soap operas. Or game shows.

As the channels continued to fragment from 57 to more than 300, they could get more narrow in their focus. How many different news channels are live right now? Enough to appeal to almost every flavor of political interest.

Recruiting Content: ‘Aaaaaay’ for Effort.

2016-01-11_12-37-09And then the internet came, and 300 channels became three million. If you can’t get enough of Fox or MSNBC, certainly there is an online publication tailored to your very specific interest. Many of them have just enough of a viewership or readership to maintain some version of profitability despite splitting the audiences into ever-shrinking slices.

The content that drives an entry-level nurse isn’t the same story that motivates an experienced one.

The same is true for recruiting content. In the beginning, there was marketing and corporate brand content. Why you should do business with them was just as good a reason as to why you should work for them. There was one channel, and marketing owned it.

It was fine, but it had to appeal to everyone, be they consumers, investors or prospects. And the content reflected it. There were rarely specifics, and when there were, it was geared toward the consumer, marketing’s client.

Then we realized we needed separate channels to talk to those interests, and the career site was born – the one that was more than a list of jobs. But still, this channel had to speak to all prospects the same, be they intern or executive, working in Atlanta or Austin, technical, medical or administrative. And so channels got more specific again, one to each region or each job type.

What differentiates recruiting from marketing is that recruiting doesn’t need the largest possible audience, they need the right audience. And often that right audience is only a handful of people.

Happy Days?

Jumping-the-sharkWhich is why we find ourselves in “peak content.” The goal of recruiting content is to tell the right story to the right prospect in order to get them to apply (though a better goal might be to provide the right story—one that so engages the prospect that they feel compelled to apply and engage themselves with the entire process).

This means more and more specificity. It might not be enough to talk to IT prospects in general, when the facilities and departments staffing them in Austin and Atlanta are so different. Or that the content that drives an entry-level nurse isn’t the same story that motivates an experienced one.

Building more content that connects those dots, so that the prospect feels like the content is talking to just them, requires more stories told. Lots more.

Peak content comes from the marketers who worry that they can no longer command a huge audience just by telling a pablum story. They are the networks complaining that they can’t compete with what HBO and AMC are putting out there, because those networks learned how to leverage smaller but passionate audiences.

What differentiates recruiting from marketing is that recruiting doesn’t need the largest possible audience, they need the right audience. And often that right audience is only a handful of people. After all, if you have a mid-level IT job opening in Omaha, would you rather have a dozen qualified candidates or a thousand? Because marketing wants thousands, and you really only need a few.

This is a world where our Netflix queues are straining from the number of great stories being told in the form of TV and movies. We have amazing podcasts and Twitter feeds that we follow. Do you complain that you have too much good stuff to watch? Of course not.

There can’t be too many stories, just too many bad stories.

Read more at Meshworking from TMP Worldwide.

james_ellis_tmp
About the Author: James Ellis is a Digital Strategist for TMP Worldwide, the world’s largest recruitment advertising agency.
For more than 15 years, James has focused on connecting cutting-edge technology to marketing objectives. As a digital strategist for TMP Worldwide, he helps some of the largest companies in America answer their most pressing digital questions.
Follow James on Twitter at @TheWarForTalent or connect with him on LinkedIn.Learn more about TMP Worldwide at www.tmp.com.

 

 

The Science of Talent Attraction: Understanding What Makes People Click

The Science of Talent Attraction: Understanding What Makes People Click

We’re in the tightest labor market in almost seven years, and competition for great talent is fierce. So when you know what candidates are looking for – and how and why they’re looking – you’re one step ahead of the game. We surveyed more than 8,000 adults, 1,000 talent professionals, studied our own data and uncovered some compelling insights about why and how people search for jobs today.

While employer-driven messaging of results-driven work resonate more meaningfully with more experienced workers, this doesn’t mean that those stories shouldn’t also be shared with the emerging workforce as well -after all, there’s wisdom in experience, and wisdom in showcasing what that experience looks like at an employer.

It’s essential to demonstrate what success looks like from a development and career path perspective.  Infusing that focus on work-based activities with glimpses of the off-the-clock or after hours elements.  Those, in tandem, create a holistic talent attraction strategy.

We’ll share the research and dig into the science behind job search and how candidates make career decisions today. You’ll learn:

  • The top five factors that inspire people to make a career change
  • Actions employed people take to find their next job
  • Five ways to future-proof your talent attraction strategy

How-To Hack the Candidate Experience

How-To Hack the Candidate Experience

By now, you’ve probably heard a lot about candidate experience. After all, this perpetual “trending topic” represents one of the biggest challenges in recruitment today.  Beyond the and buzzwords it’s hard to know what real recruiters are supposed to do.

That’s why you should watch our exclusive RecruitingDaily webinar presented in partnership with our friends over at Lever. We go beyond theory to look at what candidate experience is really all about.  While we look at why it matters for recruiting.  In addition, you will learn what you can do to leverage candidate experience for maximum results.

In this webinar, you’ll learn:

  • The Candidate Journey: We’ll break down the psychology of job seekers and candidates.  Also learn what recruiters can do at each step of the hiring cycle to ensure the best possible experience for passive and active seekers alike.
  • 5 Hiring Hacks for Success: Learn what front line recruiters can do to transform the candidate experience process. See how to monitor and measure success and how to hack your hiring process.  This ensures a world class experience for every candidate and every applicant, every time.
  • Building A Business Case: We’ll hear from real talent leaders at some of the world’s biggest brands about specific strategies and tactics they’ve leveraged to transform their candidate experience throughout each stage of the hiring process.

Learn how to build a business case, implement a  strategy and what success looks like from some of the recruiting and talent leaders already getting candidate experience right.

 We all know that it sucks. But fixing it takes more than talking theory; join us to learn how to actually make a measurable, meaningful impact with actionable takeaways and hiring hacks you can use today to ensure a world class experience for the top talent of tomorrow.

Chrome Extension: LinkedIn Search Tool @DeanDaCosta

On Monday, you are reading the news and you see the name of person that could be a good candidate for you. So you copy the name paste into LinkedIn and begin your search.  Sure it is easy, but now there is a tool to make it even easier.  Dean DaCosta found “LinkedIn Search Tool.” LinkedIn Search Tool is a very easy to use Chrome extension that allows you to discover LinkedIn profiles from anywhere on the web, simply by highlighting and right clicking their name.

In this video, Dean will take us through the steps to find a potential candidate’s LinkedIn Profile.

To download LinkedIn Search Tool for yourself, click here.

 

dean_dacostaAbout the Author: Dean Da Costa is a highly experienced and decorated recruiter, sourcer and manager with deep skills and experience in HR, project management, training & process improvement.

Dean is best known for his work in the highly specialized secured clearance and mobile arenas, where he has been a top performing recruiter and sourcer.  Dean’s keen insight and creation of innovative tools and processes for enhancing and changing staffing has established Dean as one of the top authorities in sourcing and recruiting. Connect with Dean at LinkedIn or follow @DeanDaCosta on Twitter.

Why Social Recruiting Is Everyone’s Job.

magicIf you’re like most employers, you’ve probably already set up some sort of social media presence dedicated to careers and hiring.

A recent study showed fully 94% of recruiters reported using at least one social network for sourcing or talent attraction in 2015, evidence that this emerging technology has already moved from the recruitment margins to the mainstream.

Similarly, 59% of workers surveyed say social media either influenced or impacted their last job search, more evidence that for recruiters, social isn’t a question of “why,” but “how.”

With more or less every employer on social media, however, standing out from the crowd – and connecting with (or converting) top talent is more challenging than ever before.

With so much noise, getting heard requires going beyond the basics; when candidates see your social recruiting sites, it’s important that they don’t just see another boring business page at another boring company.

They need to see what makes your company so special, and why you’re an employer of choice worth choosing. And the only way to do that, of course, is by representing the biggest competitive differentiator any employer really has: its people.

That’s why it’s so imperative for employers to provide every candidate – current or potential – with real insights into what your company culture is really all about and what working there is really like. Of course, while curating this kind of content is recruiting’s job, actually creating that content – and sharing it – is every employee’s responsibility.

Historically, HR has had a somewhat strained relationship with social, with many companies setting specific policies prohibiting workers from accessing social networks.

Today, however, with social becoming an integral component of successful recruiting strategies, the tables have turned. Companies now realize that on social media, building a compelling employer brand requires providing those same employees with tools and training instead of more red tape.

Scoring Net Promoters: 3 Keys for Social Recruiting Success.

social cartoonIf you’re not leveraging your current employees as brand ambassadors, or emphasize your postings over your people, then, simply put, you’re doing it wrong.

Here are three things every HR and talent pro should know about transforming your current workers into employer brand evangelists on social media – and maximizing your social recruiting ROI.

Candidates have a choice. Here’s what you can do to make sure they choose you over the competition.

1. Lead With Culture.

Employees are great ambassadors of your company, but it all starts with having a culture where employees are proud to work. If they enjoy going to work every day, you can trust that they will represent your company in a positive way.

Look at the culture and values of your company from your employee’s perspective. Find a way to make the intangible tangible – and showcase the best parts of what it’s like to work at your company on your social media channels. From a candidate’s perspective, there’s immediate context around what the work environment will be like.

Since it is coming right from the eyes of your employees, candidates will often consider it a reliable source, painting an accurate picture of your organization.

2. Follow Procedure.

socialGetting employees to post about their company isn’t always an easy task, but having a proper procedure in place lays the foundation for success. Create a handbook policy and social guidelines that are as simple and universally applicable as possible. This will remove any doubt as to whether or not the content your employees post is appropriate.

Using social media at work, or referencing it online, has to be safe – for employees, supervisors, managers and the brand itself. If your workforce doesn’t feel safe, or if employees feel there will be consequences for using it, engagement will be minimal at best.

To ensure employees are comfortable speaking about your company on social media, consider a training program. Y

our employees should receive base level social media training. Company-wide initiatives should be shared during this time, such as a company-specific hashtag.


At Paychex, for example, where I help manage our HR function, we ask employees to add #PaychexProud to their social media posts that illustrate the unique and positive culture at Paychex. In my experience, it’s easy to get started – and easy to see a big impact for a relatively minimal investment.

Simply create a hashtag that represents your company’s culture and encourage people to share pictures, ending the post with the hashtag. Is your company participating in a community service activity, or attending a tradeshow? Even something small, such as having cake for someone’s birthday, is an opportunity to showcase your organization’s culture.

When everyone understands how to use social media, the execution strengthens the company’s brand – internally and externally – and becomes more appealing to candidates researching future employers.

3. Keep Up With Content.

pot goldSocial media programs can yield powerful results. By engaging your employees, there’s great potential to generate content in a variety of ways to attract potential new hires.

One way to do this is to create a hashtag campaign for employees to share what they love about working at your company.

Proper usage can be outlined via the training mentioned above, however it must feel organic, conversational and casual. If not, you run the risk of seeming insincere, which can cause harm to your brand and your culture. A successful campaign is one in which employees share their stories and moments, without thinking about participating in a marketing or recruiting initiative for the company.

Share posts that demonstrate the quality or tone that you’re looking for, on the company’s official social media channels.

While you may want to share all content, only share employee content when it’s a good fit for the culture or values of the company, in real time.

Another option is to curate the best content that your employees share and make it available to recruiters and hiring managers. Listening for hashtag posts with the same vigor and intent as you listen for client concerns and brand mentions can help inspire additional content, such as a blog post or an employee testimonial.

There’s no doubt that social media now plays an integral role in recruiting strategy, and has become one of the major drivers influencing top talent throughout the hiring process.

That’s why it’s essential to make sure you’re keeping it real, and letting your own workers tell their own stories – because in employer branding. transparency and authenticity are more than just buzzwords. When it comes to finding fit, they just might be social recruiting’s silver bullet.

laurie zauchaAbout the Author: Laurie Zaucha currently serves as the Vice President, Human Resources and Organizational Development at Paychex, Inc., a leading provider of integrated human capital management solutions.

In her role, Laurie  is responsible for all aspects of human resources, organizational development, and the company’s training department.

Laurie has more than 20 years experience as a human resources executive; before joining Paychex, Zaucha was senior vice president of human resources for PAETEC Holding Corporation, a vice president for Bausch & Lomb and has held senior management positions in human resources for Footstar, Inc., a retail footwear company, Starbucks, and Pizza Hut.

Zaucha has a master’s degree in management from Purdue University in Lafayette, Ind. and a Bachelor of Science degree in computer information technology from Bentley University in Waltham, Mass.

Follow Laurie on Twitter @LZaucha or connect with her on LinkedIn.